UNITED KINGDOM
 HALL OF SHAME


If you find our website useful, please consider sending us a contribution!!!

PCWG, 1114 Brandt Drive, Tallahassee FL 32308

 


A4e

May 14, 2008 Politics.co.uk
A private company that took charge of education and training in eight Kent prisons has terminated its contract a year early in the face of a hefty financial loss. The company, A4e, described on its website as a "market leader in global public service reform" won the three-year contract to run Offenders' Learning and Skills Services (OLASS) in Kent, starting from 2006. The company was to work in partnership with the eight prisons to develop tailored education and training for offenders. But it has now made a shock announcement that it will be unable to run the service for the third year of its contract (August 2008 to July 2009) because it stands to make a loss of £892,000. The company has asked the Learning and Skills Council, which oversees the OLASS programme, for a financial lifeline but is awaiting a response. A4e has contracts to run offender learning and training at 24 other prisons in the South West, North West and East of England. Sally Hunt, UCU General Secretary, said: "Running high-quality prison education and training with professional staff does not come cheap as A4e has found out. "This sends a strong message to government: bringing in private providers is not the solution to providing good quality public services. "Our members are delighted to see the back of this company although the future for their own employment is not clear. UCU will do its utmost to protect jobs and terms and conditions for staff."

Altcourse Prison
Group 4 (formerly run by Global Solutions)

November 9, 2010 BBC
A dentist who tricked the NHS out of more than £300,000 by claiming twice for working in a private jail has been jailed for two and a half years. John Hudson, 58, admitted two counts of dishonestly retaining wrongful credit from the NHS, and was sentenced at Liverpool Crown Court on Tuesday. Hudson was paid by HMP Altcourse but also claimed £307,000 over two years. Patients from his practice at Whitworth near Rochdale, wrote letters of support for him to the court. 'Blatant dishonesty' -- Judge Graham Morrow QC said Hudson had been a pillar of the community in Whitworth, but was guilty of "calculated, blatant and persistent dishonesty" in taking money which should have gone for patient care. The court heard that dental services at the privately-run jail near Liverpool were also privately run. But Hudson exploited a weakness in the NHS system. When the NHS changed the way it ran prison dental contracts in 2006 Hudson should have ticked a box which stated he was already being paid privately at Altcourse. Box ticking -- The prosecution said that when he did not tick the box he was fully aware of what he was doing - effectively getting paid twice for the same work. The dentist approached Liverpool Primary Care Trust about a contract at the jail demanding £247,000 a year but accepting half that figure. Despite lengthy negotiations Hudson never revealed his private payments. The court heard he spent some of the money on holidays and education fees for his three children, but he is also more than £40,000 in debt and the NHS is suing him for £500,000.

October 5, 2010 Liverpool Echo
A PRISON dentist defrauded the NHS of more than £300,000 – and could now face jail himself. John Hudson treated inmates at HMP Altcourse, in Fazakerley, for more than two years. But the 58-year-old, who was paid £130,000 a year by the private jail, wrongfully billed the NHS for the work. Between May 2006 and July 2008, £306,961 flowed into his NatWest bank account. At Liverpool crown court yesterday, Hudson pleaded guilty to 27 counts of dishonestly retaining wrongful credit. Judge Graham Morrow QC granted the dentist unconditional bail, but warned him he could receive a custodial sentence when he returned to court on November 9. It was also alleged Hudson cheated East Lancashire primary care trust out of £32,000 at his private practice in his home town of Whitworth, Rochdale. Hudson denied those two offences and five further charges of dishonestly retaining wrongful credit of £65,385 from the NHS over four months between August and December 2008. Kevin Slack, prosecuting, told the court he did not think it would be in the public interest to pursue those charges.

December 17, 2009 Liverpool Daily Post
A LIVERPOOL prison is among five in the country allowing its inmates to watch satellite television. More than 4,000 prisoners enjoy the privilege in private jails nationwide. Altcourse Prison, in Fazakerley, is among the contractor-run prisons allowing access to a “limited number” of satellite channels. The number of prisoners allowed to watch satellite varies according to behaviour. But Justice minister and city MP Maria Eagle revealed the number was currently around 4,070. The Garston MP was responding to a written question from Tory MP Philip Davies. She said no inmates in public sector jails have access to satellite in their quarters. But they do at Altcourse and other GS4-run prisons in South Wales and Warwickshire. The other private prisons offering satellite television are run by Serco in Staffordshire and Nottingham. Ms Eagle said: “In these establishments, satellite television in cells is generally only available to prisoners on the enhanced or standard level of the incentives and earned privileges scheme.” There are 84,500 prisoners in England and Wales, meaning around one in 20 has access to satellite TV.

November 5, 2009 Liverpool Echo
PRISONERS in a Liverpool jail are commanding their organised crime empires using mobile phones. A damning report into HMP Altcourse slams the authorities for not investing in jamming technology that would make mobiles obsolete. Independent inspectors say prison officers at the jail have to conduct laborious yard searches and intelligence gathering exercises in vain attempts to crack down on the phones. The Independent Monitoring Board (IMB) – a national body which inspects prisons for the Government – says buying a signal deviator is an “urgent requirement”. Its report adds: “This Board is tired of being fobbed off with excuses from the prison service and ministers alike concerning the progress as to installation of mobile phone deviators.” An IMB spokesman also said: “The current situation is having profound implications, particularly in terms of allowing prisoners the opportunity to organise both the availability of drugs within the prison and to control criminal activity outside the prison.” The situation is becoming more critical as inmates are better connected than ever as handsets get more high-tech. Altcourse inmates could use web-enabled smartphones to transfer money, the IMB warns. The category B jail, which has a maximum capacity of more than 1,320, is run by private outfit G4S. Some of the prison officers there are represented by the Prison Officers Association (POA). POA spokesman Glynn Travis told the ECHO: “I believe deviators should be used. There would be no need for mobile phones within the establishment at all. “It would stop the drug trafficking, the bullying and the violence that goes with the mobile phones.” He said they are also used to taunt victims and their families. Mr Travis said mobiles are hot property inside and are worth up to £200 and can be rented out for £150. But they are contraband and if a rented mobile is confiscated owners often dish out harsh punishments and fines – on top of those handed out by the prison authorities. Mr Travis added: “It’s a real problem. On average there’s one mobile for every 10 prisoners. “If every cell was fitted with a phone, would prisoners use it? No – because they want to use them for illicit activity.” The IMB report also expressed concerns about the transfer of inmates to Altcourse from the West Midlands. There has been an influx from HMP Hewell, in Redditch, to ease overcrowding. Around half have been near the end of their sentence, which the IMB says shows little regard for their “human care”. Altcourse also houses around 120 foreign criminals. But some of them are being kept there well over the end of their sentence as immigration papers are processed. The IMB say they deserve a more “humanitarian service”. A Prison Service spokesman said: “We thank the IMB at HMP Altcourse for their report which is being fully considered by ministers. We will be responding in due course.” A spokeswoman for G4S added: “It’s up to the Ministry of Justice whether they give deviators to prisons. We just do the best we can to try to stop mobile phones coming in with searches and the like.”

April 28, 2008 BBC
A man accused of raping an 18-year-old woman has died after apparently hanging himself in his cell. Mathew Le Cras, 21, of Newborough on Anglesey, was taken to hospital on Thursday from Liverpool's Altcourse jail where he was being held on remand. Doctors are thought to have switched off his life-support machine. He had been charged with the rape of the woman near Gaerwen and had been due at Mold Crown Court for a preliminary hearing on Friday. A spokesman for GSL, which runs the private jail, confirmed Mr Le Cras had died. He had been held at Altcourse prison for a week He is thought to have been found by a prison officer.

April 27, 2008 Daily Post
A 21-YEAR-OLD man accused of raping an 18-year-old woman on Anglesey has died. Matthew James Lecras, of Church Street, Newborough, was rushed to hospital early on Thursday, hours before he was due in court. A spokeswoman for Global Solutions Ltd, the private company which runs Altcourse Prison, Liverpool, where he was being held, said that Lecras had been found in his cell by a member of staff during a routine check. Lecras was being held on remand accused of raping a woman at Gaerwen on April 14. The hearing at Mold Crown court continued in his absence on Friday after the judge heard he was seriously ill in hospital.

April 26, 2008 Daily Post
A 21-YEAR-OLD man accused of raping an 18-year-old woman on Anglesey was in a critical condition last night in hospital. Matthew James Lecras, of Church Street, Newborough, was rushed to hospital early on Thursday, hours before he was due in court. A spokeswoman for Global Solutions Ltd, the private company which runs Altcourse Prison, Liverpool, where he was being held, said that Lecras had been found in his cell by a member of staff during a routine check. It is unclear why he had to be taken to hospital. The spokeswoman said: “He is in a life threatening condition in hospital and an investigation into the circumstances is underway.”

March 26, 2006 Wales on Sunday
A WOMAN whose husband threatened to kill her then committed suicide in jail, is fighting his corner for the sake of their young daughter. Vowing to sue the private prison where her mentally ill ex hanged himself in the days following their divorce, Karen Crabtree wants justice for their four-year-old girl "who has lost her daddy". The Llandudno mum-of-one was devastated last summer when Altcourse Prison in Liverpool told her Lee was dead. The troubled 32-year-old - who believed Karen was the devil - was found hanging from a bunk bed by a fellow inmate's shoelaces in July.

March 23, 2006 BBC
An inquest has heard of concerns of a prison officer and a cellmate for the mental health of a remand prisoner, who was later found hanged in his cell. Lee Crabtree, 32, from Llandudno, had been placed on suicide watch at Altcourse Prison, Liverpool, last July. He was seen several times by medical staff during his time in prison. His cellmate said that he was "depressed to death". The inquest in Liverpool continues on Thursday. Mr Crabtree was discovered in a cell on "Beachers Block", the unit which normally holds remand prisoners and young offenders. The inquest heard how prisoners on suicide watch are supposed to be placed with cellmates, but Mr Crabtree was alone on the day he died because his cellmate was in court. In a statement, his cellmate Raymond Smith said Mr Crabtree was "depressed to death," and "sick in the head". He added: "He had said the devil was playing games with him and that he was being tested."

September 23, 2005 BBC
Ten prisoners who rioted after they claimed guards tried to lock them up early on New Year's Eve have been sentenced by a court. The men caused damage costing £17,500 after barricading themselves inside a wing at Altcourse prison in Liverpool. They staged a sit-in protest after guards attempted to lock them up for the night on 31 December 2004. Mr Davies said the prisoners took over the wing for more than four hours before a team of 50 officers, known as the Tornado Team, took back control. The prison wing had descended into chaos with inmates smashing windows, destroying pool tables and lighting fires.

September 2, 2005 BBC
An investigation is under way following the death of a remand prisoner in a hospital, the Prison Service has said. Robin Spavold, 44, from Llandudno, North Wales, was held at HMP Altcourse in Liverpool on 18 August after being charged with criminal damage. He was taken to the prison's health centre because he was suffering from severe bruising. Mr Spavold was transferred to the nearby Fazakerley Hospital, and died on Thursday. He suffered a cardiac arrest.

August 16, 2005 Daily Post
PRIVATELY-RUN Altcourse Prison has been named the most overcrowded in the country with figures showing that last month it held 50% more inmates than it was designed to hold. According to Home Office statistics, more than 933 prisoners were crammed into the Fazakerley jail, which was built to accommodate 614. The figures show that Altcourse was full beyond even its safe over-crowding limit of 903. Anything above that limit is considered a serious risk to "good order and security" Last night Walton MP Peter Kilfoyle, who has both Altcourse and Walton prisons in his constituency, said: "There has to be a suspicion that in a private prison such as Altcourse, the more prisoners they take in, the more money they get.

July 13, 2005 BBC
An inquiry has been launched after two men were found hanged in their cells at a prison in Liverpool. Lee Jason Crabtree, 32, from Llandudno, Conwy, was found dead on Monday at HM Prison Altcourse. David Oakes, 25, from Warrington, Cheshire, was found on Tuesday. The two deaths are not thought to be linked. The privately-run jail has recently been praised by prison inspectors for its good environment and work with mentally ill inmates. But the report, by the Chief Inspector of Prisons Anne Owers, also highlighted bullying among prisoners and criticised procedures for inmates' first night in jail.  

Ashfield Prison
Serco (formerly known as Premier)
February 16, 2012 The Guardian
A huge increase in the use of force to restrain teenage boys at a privately run young offender institution has been sharply criticised by the chief inspector of prisons. Nick Hardwick says the nine-fold rise in the use of force in the past year at the Serco-run Ashfield young offender institution from an average of 17 times a month to 150 times a month is "extremely high". The chief inspector has warned the private prison managers at Ashfield, near Bristol, that force must only be used as a last resort where there is an immediate risk to life or limb and not simply to obtain compliance with staff instructions. But when the prison inspectors went into Ashfield last October they found that more than 40% of the teenage inmates had been restrained and the most frequent reason given in five out of the six preceding months was "failure to obey staff instructions". Penal reformers said the disclosure has "chilling echoes" of the death of 15-year-old Gareth Myatt, who died while being restrained at a Northamptonshire young offender institution in 2004. The inspection report on Ashfield published on Friday also says there are serious problems with the late delivery of offenders from court despite a new private escort company, GeoAmey, with inmates delivered from court to Ashfield on one recent occasion between 11pm and 3am. All new arrivals were also strip-searched even though few items of contraband were ever found. The inspectors say this practice should stop.

August 10, 2011 Gazette
Police were also called to Ashfield Young Offenders’ Institution in Pucklechurch following reports of disturbances there. Prison officers dealt with a "small scale incident of disobedience" involving several inmates according to a statement from Serco, the company which runs the unit. A spokesman said: "Some minor damage has been caused, but the situation has been contained and the centre is secure," a Serco spokesman said. Avon Fire and Rescue Service were called out at 7.49pm but were stood down as they were not required to attend the scene.

August 20, 2009 Public Finance
Children detained in prisons and young offenders institutions are exposed to such ‘dire conditions’ that they are living in ‘modern day dungeons’, according to a hard-hitting report by the Howard League for Penal Reform. The report, published on August 17, paints a picture of ‘extraordinary squalor and institutional brutality’, with children regularly denied access to showers, toilets and outside exercise areas. Detained children are also often subject to strip searches by adult staff and many institutions fail properly to undertake required assessments, plans and reviews. Frances Crook, director of the Howard League, said: ‘We keep children smelly and dirty, idle and frightened, bored with education and cooped up in modern-day dungeons. And we expect them miraculously to pupate into responsible citizens. In reality, these young people leave prison more damaged and more dangerous than when they first went in. It is frankly shocking that we treat children in this way in the twenty-first century.’ At Ashfield prison in Gloucestershire, which is run by Serco, children were routinely given bags to urinate in instead of being allowed toilets on their journey to the prison, the report found. At Castington jail in Northumberland, children were allowed showers only twice a week and seven young people suffered broken wrists after being handcuffed. A Ministry of Justice spokesman said: ‘Work is continuing on raising the quality of the services provided and developing new initiatives that will help further ensure positive outcomes for all the young people.’

April 13, 2009 This Is Bristol
The privately-run Ashfield Young Offenders Institution has more attacks than any other prison in the country, according to latest figures. The institution, near Pucklechurch, recorded more than 600 attacks on inmates in one year – the highest number of all the UK's 142 jails. Ashfield also had 126 assaults on prison officers, latest figures released by the National Offender Management Service show. But Serco, the firm which runs Ashfield, said the figures to July 2008 were high because it recorded every incident, including minor skirmishes, while other prisons only recorded the most serious attacks.

March 19, 2003
Premier's Ashfield "worst" prison in England and Wales. (News).  Plans to extend the role of private providers in prison services suffered a setback this month when a PFI jail for young offenders was described as the worst in the country.  An inspection found that conditions at Ashfield, near Bristol, were so bad that many inmates were frightened to leave their cells. Under pressure staff relied on inmates to act as "mini-officers" in the reception wing, and escort van drivers were used as officers on other wings.  Staff delegated responsibility to inmate orderlies to a worrying extent that went as far as "role reversal". Martin Narey, the director-general of the Prison Service, described privately run Ashfield as the worst prison in England and Wales "by some measure".  But he added: "The introduction of the private sector into the running of prisons has brought immense benefits. My best prison is probably a private-sector prison."  Ashfield is a 44m [pounds sterling] prison holding up to 400 sentenced young offenders aged between 15 and 21. It is run by Premier Custodial Services, a joint venture company owned 50% by Serco Ltd and 50% by Wackenhut Corrections (UK) Ltd, under a 25-year PFI contract.  The criticism came only days after the chancellor, Gordon Brown, said there should be "no principled objection" to further extending the private sector's role in prison management. The failings in Premier's operation of Ashfield were exposed in an inspection report by Anne Owers, the chief inspector of prisons. Describing her report as "depressing" she found that bullying was rife and that many inmates were "afraid to leave their cells".  A spot-check revealed that nearly half of the inmates remained in their cells during the day, and less than a quarter were in education. Owers said a central problem was the poor quality and low morale of staff because of the inadequate salaries paid by the company.  She also criticised the company for its unwillingness to do anything not in the contract. Speaking on BBC Radio 4's Today programme on 5 February, Narey said that Premier has lost around 2m [pounds sterling] in revenues so far.  It is the second time that Premier has been warned over its performance at Ashfield in recent years. In December 2001, the company was issued with an improvement notice for noncompliance with the PFI contract. At the time it had the most reported incidents of self-harm in the 15-17-year age group of any young offenders establishment in the UK.  Under the terms of Premier's contract--and normal under PFI deals in the prison sector--the banks that financed the prison's construction decide whether they choose another private operator or allow the public sector to take over.  Local Northavon MP Steve Webb (Liberal Democrat) said the private sector had failed to deliver on even the most basic aspects of the contract. "It is time that the Prison Service took the management of Ashfield back under its control," he said.

February 5, 2003
The reputation of the private sector as a manager of prisons suffered a blow yesterday when the government's Youth Justice Board announced it was withdrawing all sentenced juveniles from the first privately run young offenders' institution.  The board announced its phased withdrawal of 172 young offenders after the chief inspector of prisons published a scathing report on conditions at the Ashfield young offenders' institution near Bristol .  Anne Owers said Premier Prison Services, Ashfield's operator, failed to provide "the minimum requirements of a safe environment".  Describing her report as "probably the most depressing" she has issued in the 18 months she has been in post, Ms Owers found that bullying was not addressed and that many young people were "afraid to leave their cells". A spot-check during her inspection revealed that nearly half of the young inmates remained in their cells during the core day, and less than a quarter were in education.  There was no effective resettlement strategy.  Ms Owers said one of the main underlying problems at Ashfield was the poor quality and low morale of staff because of inadequate salaries paid by the operator.  Some officers at Ashfield had not undergone an enhanced Criminal Records Bureau check, which is meant to provide better protection against pedophiles.  The Prison Officers' Association, which has always been opposed to privatisation, called for Ashfield to be taken immediately into public ownership.  Brian Caton, the union's general secretary, said Ashfield provided evidence of the "immorality of running private prisons with the emphasis on making profit rather than running a good service on behalf of society".  Juliet Lyon, director of the Prison Reform Trust, said the "utterly damning report" raised questions as to why the Prison Service had allowed such a situation to develop in the first place.  (Social Affairs Correspondent)

BBC
Aramark, Serco

August 22, 2011 Daily Mail
ALL the old jokes about the BBC canteen are true – and it’s no laughing matter. For years the grub provided cheeky material for stars including Ronnie Corbett, Peter Sellers, Terry Wogan and Les Dawson. Sellers quipped on the Goon show in 1954: “Lunch is now being served in the BBC canteen. Doctors are standing by.” And Wogan regularly refers to his Beeb tea as “the evil brew”. Now, following a Freedom of Information request, the Mirror can reveal things seems to be as bad as ever. More than 130 staff have moaned about catering at TV Centre in the last two years. One claimed to have found animal droppings in a sandwich. He wrote: “I could have been poisoned.” A colleague said he saw a mouse run across the serving counter at breakfast. He said: “It fair put me off the scones.” Another wrote: “Fingers crossed that this time I’d find some meat in the lamb stew. Alas it was not to be.” Gripes about the canteen and other cafes in the West London centre included “dust-dry” toast, “undrinkable” coffee and “shameful” service. And there was an outcry when the Beeb announced it was closing a popular “greasy spoon” van used by workers at nearby Shepherd’s Bush. Catering firm Aramark, which serves 4,500 meals a day, said the complaints represented a tiny percentage. Chief executive Andrew Main insisted: “Most of the feedback we get is entirely positive.”

May 23, 2010  The Daily Telegraph
Under the scheme, the publicly-funded broadcaster handed over footage to inmates who earn just £30 a week rather than members of its own 23,000 staff. Convicts at a privately run Category B jail, the second-highest security level, transferred tapes of old television shows to computer to save them for posterity. Senior staff in the BBC’s archives department visited the jail to watch the work in progress while meetings were held to discuss a landmark deal for the prisoners to digitise all 1million hours of programmes in its vaults. Fearful about the controversy the scheme could cause, the BBC never discussed it publicly and even the broadcasting union, Bectu, was unaware of it. Details were obtained by this newspaper through a Freedom of Information request that took more than four months rather than the usual 20 working days. The BBC insists that it has not given any money to Serco, the private jail operator, for the secret scheme nor signed any contracts, following the pilot project last year. However emails disclosed by the corporation show that it had shown considerable interest in the innovative project proposed by Serco, which runs four prisons in England. The BBC owns more than 1m hours of historic content, some of it decades old and at risk of being lost. It employs 66 people to look after it, at a cost of £5m a year, in its Information and Archives department. The corporation estimates it would take 10 years to safely copy all 100m items in its collection into longer-lasting digital formats. In December 2008 it was approached by Serco to become involved in Artemis – Achieving Rehabilitation Through Establishing a Media Ingest Service – a new project for prisoners to transfer archive documents to computers. Serco said it would provide “high-quality employment” and the chance of an NVQ qualification for inmates and HMP Lowdham Grange, a 628-capacity jail near Nottingham all of whose inmates are serving at least four years. The firm said this would mean it could provide a “stable work force”. The BBC was told it would prove a “very cost-effective” way of digitising its archive, and several meetings were organised to discuss plans. Managers agreed to hand over 20 hours of old videos, including episodes of Horizon and Earth Story, so prisoners could transfer them to computer and also add “meta-data” – typed detailed descriptions of the footage to help producers search through it more easily. The British Library and National Archives also provided material for the pilot project. In September last year, five members of BBC staff visited the jail, where a production workshop had been built, and were reported to be “pleased” with what they saw of the prisoners’ work and enthusiasm. However David Crocker, the driving force behind the scheme at Serco, admitted: “The major concern was around the potential negative newspaper headlines that the BBC may attract.” The company did discuss the scheme with one newspaper and one trade magazine but made no reference to the BBC’s involvement. In November, Mr Crocker told the BBC: “I can’t thank you enough for finding a project for us to kick-start Artemis.” He said his staff were drawing up “terms of reference” and would then “cost the project” of a full-scale digitisation of the BBC’s archive. However no deals have yet been signed. The BBC said: “The BBC did hold discussions with Serco about their planned project to digitise archives. As part of this the BBC, alongside other organisations, provided some material for Serco to use as part of its feasibility study for the project. “No payment was made to Serco as part of this, nor was any guarantee or promise of work entered into. “The BBC has no plans to work with Serco to digitise its programme archive and has not come to any agreements nor signed any contracts with any firms about utilising the prison workforce on any project.”

Bicester Detention Center
Oxford, UK
Group 4

June 11, 2008 Mail on Sunday
The Home Office squandered £29million of taxpayers' money on a flagship giant asylum centre which was never built - including hiring in a 'financial advisor' who charged almost £16,000 a month. A scathing report from MPs exposes a catalogue of costly blunders and lambasts the failing department for a 'startling absence of common sense' in one of its most embarrassing fiascos of recent years. Seven years after officials started working on the ambitious plans to house thousands of asylum seekers on a former RAF station at Bicester, Oxfordshire, the site remains empty and derelict with 'no benefit' to the taxpayer. Vast sums were paid to consultants, private advisors and contractors and when ministers pulled the plug on the entire project in 2005 they were forced to hand over millions more in cancellation fees. Officials failed to understand how fierce local opposition and legal challenges would drag out the process, and made no attempt to plan for future uses of the site or the risk that other immigration policy changes would scupper the scheme. Last night the Home Office claimed the disaster had led to an 'overall positive impact for the public' because officials had learned important lessons. Former Home Secretary David Blunkett announced the scheme in 2001, as part of a strategy to speed up and streamline the creaking asylum system by housing applicants in a series of huge accommodation centres across the country. Thousands were to be placed in the first centre at an isolated site outside Bicester, but crucially it would not be secure and the immigrants would be free to come and go as they pleased. The plans brought a storm of protests, not only from local residents but also from refugee support groups who claimed leaving so many asylum seekers to languish at a remote site, far from any local community, was a disastrous plan. Planning inspectors rejected the plans, but John Prescott used his powers to overturn their decision, further infuriating locals. Finally ministers realised in 2005 that the centre was unnecessary and unworkable, but not before almost £30million of public money had been wasted. The PAC report reveals how the Home Office hired a Financial advisor at a cost of £15,743 per month, and a procurement advisor who was paid £15,559 per month, because no civil servants were judged to have the right expertise. The pair, who have not been named, were paid more than £1.1million for less than three years work, on top of £6.3million paid out to consultants. MPs complained that the Home Office was unable to show whether the highly paid consultants 'added value'. Private contractors Global Solutions Limited were paid £7.6 for design work, but claimed almost £8million in termination fees when the Bicester scheme was axed. PAC chairman Edward Leigh said the project 'embodied lack of foresight, poor business planning and a startling absence of common sense.' He said the scheme was 'always going to provoke opposition in the local community' but the Home Office took no account of that, or of objections from refugee groups, and made no effort to make contact with local interest groups or MPs to discuss objections. Nor did the department realise - until it was too late - that a decline in the number of asylum seekers and some success in speeding up the system meant the centre was increasingly pointless. Last month the Home Office announced plans to build a secure immigration detention centre on the Bicester site, although it will not be open until 2012 at the earliest and will require planning permission. Shadow Immigration Minister, Damian Green, attacked the Bicester debacle as 'a symptom of long-term incompetence by immigration ministers, who failed to notice that asylum numbers were dropping just when they were planning this new centre. 'Their latest plan is to turn the derelict site into a detention centre. I hope they have done their homework better this time.' A Home Office spokesperson said: 'At the time, we believed accommodation centres to be the right decision but as circumstances changed and the project was delayed, we reviewed that decision. 'Our experience with this project has taught us some important lessons, and this, along with the other improvements put in place, has led to an overall positive impact for the public.'

November 8, 2007 The Guardian
A Home Office decision to abandon plans for an asylum accommodation centre near Oxford because of local opposition cost it £28m, including "termination payments" of £7.9m to the private contractor, Whitehall's spending watchdog reveals today. The National Audit Office says that some of the problems faced in trying to open Bicester accommodation centre could have been foreseen - and money saved - if the Home Office had worked in a "more coordinated and joined-up way". The report also discloses that despite a four-year battle by local residents against the project, it is still being considered whether the site can be used as a detention centre for failed asylum seekers who face deportation. The plan to set up a 10-strong network of purpose-built accommodation centres holding 3,000 asylum seekers was announced by the then home secretary, David Blunkett, at a time when asylum applications were at a record high, as part of a plan to disperse them from London and the south-east of England. Bicester was earmarked as one of the first but it met fierce local opposition and planning permission was not secured until November 2004. By then, the number of asylum seekers coming to Britain had halved. The Home Office accounting officer advised that it was no longer economically viable and the project was cancelled in June 2005. The NAO inquiry found that £33m had been spent in total on the accommodation centres, including £28m on Bicester alone. The report reveals that the successful bid by GSL, formerly Group 4, for the contract to build the 750-bed centre for £59.9m was nearly £25m cheaper than the bid from rival private security company UKDS. After the project was cancelled GSL was handed "termination payments" of £7.9m. It had already been paid £7.6m for design work. Edward Leigh, the chairman of the Commons public accounts committee, said that £28m had been spent on "the asylum centre that never was". Mr Leigh said: "The Home Office drove ahead with a project to build a network of asylum accommodation centres without an eye on what was happening to the numbers of those seeking asylum in the UK.

Birmingham Prison
Birmingham, UK
Group 4

Jan 9 2013 Birmingham Post
A new report into Birmingham Prison says staff morale has plunged since privatisation – with guards also struggling to deal with rising numbers of sex offenders. The Independent Monitoring Board released its first full annual report since the 1,450 capacity HMP BIrmingham, in Winson Green, was taken over by security firm G4S in October 2011. Major recommendations include the need for extra capacity to deal with a ‘big increase’ in sex offenders, the need to replace hospital beds first promised in 2008 and the reduction of category D prisoners at the category B prison. The report, which covers the period between July 2011 and June 2012, says: “The changes (privatisation) have proved part of a difficult adjustment in culture, and it is undoubtedly the case that some staff have not yet fully accepted them. “The effect on staff morale across the prison has been severe.” The report goes on to say that staffing problems have been exacerbated by time owed and long and short-term sickness, which has averaged at 40 and 24 days respectively. The Board said the Secretary of State needed to “give urgent consideration to extra places in the system to accommodate the growing number of sex offenders that are coming into the establishment through the resolution of historical sex offence cases, growth of internet pornography and more cases of rape being prosecuted. “Suitable numbers of prison places need to be provided at establishments which can offer appropriate rehabilitatory programmes for these offenders.” The report also said the number of Category D prisoners is too high for the Category B prison, which is an ‘inappropriate’ place to hold them. In June 2012 the prison had 40 Category D prisoners. Other findings included poor use of the library because of a lack of available staff to escort prisoners. The report also highlighted problems with vermin, including rats, mice and cockroaches, most noticeably in the kitchen, offices and on the wings. Yet the Board did highlight some positive areas, including the conversion of J Wing to use as the older prisoner and social care unit, a move which could be seen as a ‘model’ for other prisons. Pete Small, G4S, Director of HMP Birmingham, said: “As the first prison to transfer from public to private management, HMP Birmingham has faced many challenges and we are pleased that the Board has recognised the efforts we have made to make the transition as smooth as possible. “The Board’s report covers a 12-month period up to last summer, and since that time action has taken to address many of the issues raised in the report. ‘‘We have introduced effective and robust pest control measures; ageing catering and kitchen equipment that we inherited has been replaced and repaired; and with the provision of new all-weather pitches we have improved the sporting facilities available to prisoners. “There are undoubtedly challenges to overcome at Birmingham. “We continue to work closely with our staff and their representatives to work through issues.”

January 23, 2012 BBC
A prison officer has been arrested by police investigating missing keys at the privatised HMP Birmingham. Inmates were locked in their cells for almost 24 hours after a master set of keys went missing in October. West Midlands Police confirmed that a man in his 30s was arrested in December and has been released on bail while investigations continue. G4S, which runs the privatised prison, said it was aware a member of staff was helping police with their enquiries. The company said it would not comment further while the matter was subject to an investigation. HMP Birmingham, in Winson Green, is the first jail in the country to be transferred to the private sector.

October 21, 2011 BBC
Birmingham Prison inmates were locked in their cells for almost a full day after a set of keys fitting every cell door went missing. Keys to the jail, which was taken over earlier this month by private security firm G4S, disappeared on Tuesday. The firm said all prisons had established contingency plans for incidents of this nature and there was no risk to public safety. The jail is the first in the UK to be transferred to the private sector. It is not known if the keys have since been found or what action is now being taken at the prison.

Bronzefield Women's Prison
Ashford, West London
Kalyx (Sodexho)

September 22, 2009 The Sun
STAFF at a jail blasted for lax security were sent on a training day to learn how to lock cells and gates. Bronzefield, Britain's largest private female prison, was fined an estimated £250,000 in the last two years for more than 100 security breaches. The latest saw blueprints for an extension at the Category A jail in Ashford, Middlesex, floating in the wind after a bin bag burst. The crisis got so bad, employees were sent on a training course in the nick - as some of the 465 cons chanted: "You don't know what you're doing." Internal documents seen by The Sun revealed blunders, including leaving cells and gates unlocked and escorting the wrong prisoner to court. Prison director Helga Swidenbank called the level of security breaches "unacceptably high" in one memo to staff. In another, deputy director Charlotte Pattison-Rideout told officers: "Failing to secure gates and doors increases the possibility of staff assaults, hostage incidents and escapes." Shadow justice secretary Dominic Grieve said: "It is an utter shambles." Kalyx, which runs Bronzefield, said: "We have strict procedures and training in place to ensure security measures are followed."

March 6, 2009 Staines News
The 'underhand' expansion of Bronzefield prison in Ashford has angered neighbours who say they were promised it would never grow any bigger. Cranes are towering over the women's jail in Woodthorpe Road and prefabricated cells are being brought in daily as a new block is built to house 77 extra inmates. But residents who live close to the high-security prison - which has been home to serial killer Rose West - claim they were told it would never house more than the 450 prisoners it was built for in 2004. John Hitchins, of Woodthorpe Road, said: "All we need is another 70-odd Rose Wests across the road. It was bad enough when they built it in the first place but to be fed this rubbish that they weren't going to make it any bigger and then see the prefabricated cells carted past my front door is just a joke. They have been so sneaky and underhanded." The two-storey block is being built within the existing perimeter wall, along with a new all weather sports pitch. Permission for the development was granted in 2007 but residents say they have no recollection of being told about the proposals. Penny Vincent, who has lived opposite the prison for more than 15 years, said: "I don't remember hearing anything about it. It wasn't advertised in the newspapers and I think we should have had some sort of notification. "I am sure it's growing faster than ever anticipated. It's not an expansion of their land but it's still far bigger then they ever said it would be." A spokesman for Kalyx, the private company that runs Bronzefield, said: "Additional prisoner accommodation is being built at HMP Bronzefield which will be within the current prison boundaries.

March 2, 2006 The Sun
A LIVE bullet has been found in the jail holding House of Horrors killer Rose West. It was the second security scare at all-women Bronzefield Prison in Ashford, West London, which earlier freed a jailbird by mistake. The jail was locked down for eight hours after the bullet discovery and all 450 prisoners were confined to their cells. Explosives experts and sniffer dogs helped to scour the £200million private prison from top to bottom, but nothing more was found.

February 27, 2006 The Sun
THE private jail holding serial killer Rose West freed a prisoner by mistake, it was revealed yesterday. The woman, who was facing drugs charges, was on the loose for four days after the blunder. Livid Home Office chiefs have ordered a major probe into the first “escape” from state-of-the-art Bronzefield women’s prison in Ashford, West London. The £200million jail run by UKDS opened two years ago. West, 52, moved there from Durham jail last year. She is locked up forever for the Gloucestershire murders of ten girls, including her daughter Heather, 16. The freed lag was released after being told to gather her belongings. A source yesterday said: “This is the first time a con has escaped from Bronzefield and it was all the prison’s fault. “It wasn’t a case of mistaken identity. It was either rank incompetence or a paperwork error. “It would be catastrophic if Rose West was released by mistake. “She has changed her appearance dramatically by shedding three stone and ditching her thick specs for contact lenses.” The freed 40-year-old lag, being held on remand, was returned to Bronzefield earlier this month. UKDS last night declined to comment.

Brook House
Sussex, UK
Group 4
July 12, 2010 The Guardian
Conditions at the privately run immigration deportation centre at Gatwick airport are fundamentally unsafe, according to a damning report by the chief inspector of prisons published today. Dame Anne Owers says that a year after the opening of G4S-run Brook House immigration removal centre she and her inspection team were disturbed to find one of the least safe immigration detention facilities that had been inspected. Her report says bullying and violence were serious problems at the time of their inspection in March and – unusually for immigration detention centres – drugs were also a serious problem. Those who were about to be deported or had been recalcitrant were placed in two oppressive holding rooms, which are windowless and seatless. Owers says they should be decommissioned immediately. Many of the 400 male detainees held at Brook House are ex-prisoners facing deportation. A number of them told the inspectors their experience at the removal centre was worse than their time in prison. "Our surveys, interviews and observations all evidenced a degree of despair amongst detainees about safety at Brook House which we have rarely encountered. At the time of the inspection, Brook House was an unsafe place," says Owers's report. Although the centre – which is built to the same standards as a category B prison – is designed to hold detainees for no more than 72 hours, the report says the average time spent in Brook House is three months, with one man having been there for 10 months. Its design as a short-term holding centre meant there was insufficient activity or education facilities. A significant number of staff left after an outbreak of serious disorder in June last year when detainees started fires and damaged one wing. "While many staff tried hard to maintain order and control, many felt embattled and some lacked the confidence to manage bad behaviour," says the report. "A number of staff reported feeling unsupported by managers, detainees claimed that some staff were bullied by more difficult detainees." The result was a confrontational approach in the treatment of detainees with a high use of force, separation often used as punishment, – which is against detention centre rules – and restrictions on freedom of movement in an attempt to combat violence. The report says force had been used to restrain detainees by staff 78 times in the previous six months. The chief inspector said force was generally used in line with approved techniques. However on one recent occasion a detainee was moved to temporary confinement after urinating through his door. The report says: "The officer's own record read: 'I entered first with the shield. A was standing up by the table and I hit him with the shield.' Another officer in the team had recorded that (officer N) used the shield to hold the detainee against the table in the room. Detainee folded his arms behind the shield." In a later incident in the same the same officer N is recorded having used his shield to pin a detainee to his bed. The chief inspector also details the use of the separation unit and cites the case of a detainee who was taken to a psychiatric institution after more than 80 days in separation for disturbed and disruptive behaviour. "The challenges of opening a new immigration removal centre should not be underestimated, particularly with inexperienced staff and challenging detainees, many of them ex-prisoners," said Owers. "But none of this can excuse the fundamentally unsafe state of Brook House, which must be urgently addressed by G4S and United Kingdom border agency."

June 13, 2009 BBC
A fire was started and "disorder" broke out at a wing of an immigration removal centre near Gatwick Airport, Sussex police said. Officers said there were reports of minor damage and a blaze in the exercise yard at Brook House, which houses 312 people awaiting deportation. No-one is believed to be hurt and the fire is said to have burnt itself out. The force said "disorder" involving 30 detainees started at about 2250 BST and was confined to one wing. Officers were called in to support security firm G4S. 'No risk' -- G4S, with the help of HM Prison Service, currently manages the welfare of detainees inside the centre, the police said. Ch Insp Ed Henriet, of Gatwick Police, said: "Sussex Police is supporting the security arrangements. All detainees are accounted for and there is no risk to the wider community." A second fire, that was unrelated to the first, according to a spokesperson for G4S, was also started by "one of the detainees setting fire to his bedding" on Saturday afternoon. It was extinguished using sprinklers and fire extinguishers. The spokesperson added that a detainee who assisted in putting out the fire was "slightly injured" and the fire had delayed some detainees being fed. The then Home Secretary Jacqui Smith opened Brook House, which can house up to 426 people, in March. It is situated next to Tinsley House, a 136-bed detention centre.


Brixton Prison
Securicor
June 11, 2003
Companies like Securicor and Group 4 were first awarded contracts to carry prisoners between jails and courts 10 years ago.  Since then, several of their charges have escaped either from courts or from vans en route.  (BBC News)

June 10, 2003
Three prisoners are on the run after escaping from a security van during an armed hijack in south London.  Armed men reportedly disguised as postmen stopped the Securicor van, shooting the driver in the knee and hitting a guard with a gun.  A Prison Service spokesman said: "The driver was threatened by a man with a shotgun who proceeded to shoot the driver in the knee through the door of the van.  "The other security staff on board, the passenger, was pistol-whipped.  (BBC News)

Castle Crown Court
Global Solutions Limited
August 5, 2004
A WORKINGTON man who admitted a series of sex offences against a teenage girl slashed his forearm moments later in the cells at Carlisle Crown Court, it has emerged.  But just minutes after the judge presiding over the case warned the 35-year-old that a prison sentence was inevitable, Carruthers used a prison razor blade to cut his arm.  (News and Star)

Campsfield Immigration Removal Centre
Oxford, England
GEO Group (formerly run by Group 4, Global Solutions)
October 5, 2011 Oxford Mail
EFFORTS to improve conditions for detainees at Campsfield House immigration removal centre have stalled, according to inspectors. Chief Inspector of Prisons Nick Hardwick said not enough had been done to deal with problems – particularly in healthcare and education – raised by his predecessor Dame Anne Owers after an inspection of the UK Borders Agency centre in Kidlington two years ago. His officials made an unannounced three-day inspection in May, shortly before operation of the centre – which houses about 200 people – passed from Geo Group to Mitie on May 30. The inspectors praised the way newly-arrived detainees were supported, said detainees felt safe and there was little bullying or use of force, noted relationships between staff and detainees were satisfactory, work placement arrangements had improved and access to phones and email was good. But they said there were “significant weaknesses in healthcare services”, education provision had not improved, decisions to place detainees in the separation unit were not always properly authorised and better interpreting services were needed, along with more notices in foreign languages.

August 5, 2011 The Guardian
Separate investigations into three deaths in immigration removal centres (IRC) in the past month have been launched by the police, amid growing concern about the treatment of detainees. The spate of deaths has caused alarm among critics of the government's detention policy, who warn that the system is at "breaking point" with poor healthcare putting people's lives at risk. Two men died from suspected heart attacks at Colnbrook near Heathrow airport and the third killed himself at the Campsfield House detention centre in Oxfordshire on Tuesday. John McDonnell, Labour MP for Hayes and Harlington, who has two detention centres including Colnbrook in his constituency, said he feared there would be more deaths as the system struggled to cope with the number of people being detained. "The government is now detaining people on such a scale that the existing services are swamped," he said. "It is inevitable if we put the services under such relentless strain that there will be more deaths as a result … we are dealing with people who are extremely stressed and extremely vulnerable and the services are not able to cope and not able to guarantee their safety." The first man who died was Muhammad Shukat, 47, a Pakistani immigration detainee who collapsed at around 6am on 2 July. His roommate Abdul Khan says that in the hours before he died Shukat was groaning in agony, had very bad chest pains and was sweating profusely. Khan, 19, from Afghanistan, said he began raising the alarm around 6am and pressed the emergency button in the room 10 times in a frantic effort to get help. Khan claimed that on three occasions members of the centre's nursing team entered the room and found Shukat on the floor where he had collapsed. Khan said they put him back into bed, took his temperature and some medicine was administered, but did not call emergency assistance immediately. According to Khan, the nurses initially said that Shukat could go to see the centre's doctor at 8am. According to the London Ambulance Service, Colnbrook staff called an ambulance just before 7.20am. Attempts were made to resuscitate Shukat, but he was pronounced dead on arrival at Hillingdon Hospital. A postmortem found the provisional cause of death to be coronary heart disease. Shukat's body has been returned to Pakistan and his family are understood to have no concerns about the medical treatment he received. The second man to die at Colnbrook has not yet been named. According to the Metropolitan police he was 35 and was found dead in his cell at 10.30am last Sunday. London Ambulance Service officials pronounced him dead at the scene. "A postmortem held on 1 August found the cause of death to be a ruptured aorta. The death is being treated as unexplained," said a police spokesman. Colnbrook IRC is managed by Serco. In a statement to detainees about Shukat's death, deputy director at Colnbrook, Jenni Halliday, described her "deep regret" and extended her condolences. In a statement to detainees about the second Colnbrook death, Serco's contract manager, Michael Guy, informed detainees that a resident in the short-term holding facility had died and that the death was thought to be from natural causes. On Tuesday, a 35-year-old man hanged himself in the toilet block at Campsfield House detention centre in Oxfordshire. A fellow detainee, who refused to give his name, said the man had been hours away from being deported and had become very anxious. "He was normally a very quiet person … but the pressure is too much for people in here." It is understood the man had only been at the centre for a few days before he died. The Home Office refused to give any more details saying his extended family had yet to be informed. Emma Ginn, from the campaign group Medical Justice, said the deaths had heightened concern about the poor healthcare on offer to those being kept in UK detention centres. "Based on medical evidence from many hundreds of detainees, Medical Justice has documented the disturbingly inadequate healthcare provision that often vulnerable immigration detainees are subjected to in Colnbrook and other immigration removal centres... [this] combined with the perilous and frightening conditions of detention, is a lethal cocktail, a disaster waiting to happen." The UK Border Agency declined to comment on the specific circumstances of each case. It said the police and the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman always investigated deaths in immigration detention centres and it would be inappropriate to comment until these were complete. David Wood, director of criminality and detention at the UK Border Agency, said all detainees at immigration removal centres have access to health services seven days a week. "All detainees are seen by a nurse within two hours of arrival and are given an opportunity to see a GP within 24 hours," he added. "The health of all detainees is monitored closely, and the healthcare professionals are required to report cases where it is considered that a person's health is being affected by continued detention. "The UK takes its responsibilities seriously, which is why we consider every case on its individual merits and will continue to offer protection to those who need it. However, detention is an essential part of our controls on immigration in the UK." A groundbreaking ruling -- A man with severe mental illness was unlawfully locked up in a UK detention centre for five months and subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment, according to a high court ruling. The man, a 34-year-old Indian national, was detained in Harmondsworth immigration removal centre between April and September last year. On Friday a judge ruled that his treatment amounted to a breach of article 3 of the European convention human rights. The man's lawyer said the ruling – thought to be the first of its kind – raised wider questions about how the government treats people with mental illnesses in the immigration and detention system. "The court's decision that my client suffered inhuman or degrading treatment at a UK detention facility sends a very loud and clear message to the authorities," said. "We would urge the minister to conduct a fundamental review into how people suffering from mental illness are treated in the immigration detention estate." The man, referred to as "S" in the ruling, had a history of serious ill treatment and abuse before arriving in the UK. He served time in prison for wounding and assault before being transferred to a secure psychiatric hospital until his discharge in April 2010. Following his release the UK Border Agency said there was "no evidence" he was mentally ill and he was detained in Harmondsworth where his health deteriorated and he began to have psychotic episodes and self harm. The high court intervened and he was released on bail. His lawyers said he had been living with his family since then and had fully complied with the conditions of bail set by the court. In the ruling judge David Elvin said: "S's pre-existing mental condition was both triggered and exacerbated by detention and that involved both a debasement and humiliation of S since it showed a serious lack of respect for his human dignity. It created a state in S's mind of real anguish and fear, through his hallucinations, which led him to self-harm frequently and to behave in a manner which was humiliating…" A UK Border Agency spokesperson said: "We regularly review our detention policies and will look at the findings in this case to ensure lessons are learned. Detention is an essential part of our immigration control but we recognise the importance of ensuring it remains appropriate on a case by case basis."

August 3, 2011 BBC
A man has died whilst being held at the Campsfield House Immigration Removal Centre in Oxfordshire. The BBC received a call from a fellow detainee claiming an Asian man had hanged himself in the showers on 2 August. A spokesperson from the UK Border Agency confirmed a man had died at the privately run centre and was in the process of contacting his family. The Police and Prisons and Probation Ombudsman are investigating the death.

August 3, 2010 Daily Mail Reporter
More than 100 men being held at an immigration centre are on hunger strike today. The detainees last night refused their evening meal at the Campsfield House immigration removal centre in Kidlington, Oxfordshire. Officials at the UK Border Agency confirmed they were 'monitoring' the situation. Jonathan Sedgwick, UKBA deputy chief executive, said: 'We can confirm 108 detainees have refused prepared meals from staff yesterday evening. 'However they still have access to food from the on-site shop and vending machines. 'Staff are monitoring the situation closely and listening to the detainees' concerns. 'All detainees have access to legal representation and 24-hour medical care.' Earlier this year a report by HM Chief Inspector of Prisons Anne Owers found that the average lengths of stay for detainees at Campsfield appeared to be increasing. It also found that some detainees were effectively being held indefinitely because there was little prospect of removal, while education provision was poor, particularly for the significant numbers of long-stay detainees and those with little English. Campsfield is 'a long-term centre where detainees are accommodated, pending their case resolutions and subsequent removal from the United Kingdom.' The site has 216 beds for male detainees and is run by contractor The GEO Group Ltd.

March 10, 2010 BBC
Some detainees held at Campsfield House immigration centre in Oxfordshire are being detained for "excessive periods", according to an inspector's report. Dame Anne Owers, HM Chief Inspector of Prisons (HMCIP), said the centre near Kidlington was making progress. But the inspector expressed concern that average lengths of stay appeared to be increasing and a lack of data obscured the scale of the problem. The UK Borders Agency (UKBA) said it reviewed detention frequently. Campsfield House, run by GEO Group Ltd, has had an unsettled recent history, with a number of high-profile incidents and escapes.

May 18, 2009 Oxford Mail
DISTURBANCES at Campsfield House Immigration Removal Centre could be reduced if detainees were given more to do, an independent body has claimed. Campsfield’s Independent Monitoring Board (IMB) has just published its 2008 annual report on the controversial Kidlington centre, which has a history of escape attempts and violent incidents. IMB chairman Lieutenant Colonel Freddie Cantrell said: “We believe that activities and education should be increased to fully occupy the detainees. “There is nothing worse than boredom with a detainee who really doesn’t know what his future is going to be. “This can cause stress, and stress can lead to trouble and disturbances.” Lt Col Cantrell — one of 10 IMB volunteers who check on treatment of inmates at the centre — said detainees currently had 30 hours of formal education a week, including lessons in English, art and computing, which was insufficient.] He recommended the UK Border Agency review its contract for education provision at the centre, which holds up to 216 detainees. The 61-page report also shed new light on two major incidents which occured within days of each other in June last year. On June 16, friends of a Jamaican man who was due to be deported started fires in an education block, detainees’ rooms and in a fitness suite. The education block was destroyed and a shop was looted. Three days later, seven detainees escaped through a ground-floor window. Three of those who went on the run are still at large. Referring to the escape, Lt Col Cantrell said: “Of course it shouldn’t happen. “It means there is a weakness in the security. Of course that has been rectified.” But he added: I don’t think any establishment in the world is completely secure.” Other findings included a plan to put televisions in each detainee’s room within months, and the fact that paid work for inmates had doubled since the 2007 report was published. The report said force was used by staff 34 times in 2008, up from 31 in 2007, but the occupancy was higher and as such there was a reduction in the proportion of incidents where force was used. Handcuffs were used 11 times in 2008, the lowest level at the centre since 2005. The IMB also recommended ensuring detainees’ property travelled with them when they were transferred from police custody to the centre, and reviewing the way racial complaints were investigated. A UK Border Agency spokesman said detainees had access to a range of activities, and added the agency awaited recommendations from a review of education provision. No-one at GEO Group UK Ltd, which runs the centre, was available for comment.

December 3, 2008 Oxford Mail
Failed asylum seekers at Campsfield House Immigration Removal Centre used the Internet to access “inappropriate content” on the web, it has emerged. A report by Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Prisons (HMIP) revealed the centre’s 200 plus detainees were accessing the worldwide web for up to an hour a day, but “despite controls, arrangements to block access to inappropriate content were not always effective”. Last night, a spokesman for HMIP could not detail the nature of the inappropriate content, and chief inspector of prisons Anne Owers was unavailable for interview. However, Ms Owers released a statement which read: “Email and Internet access is an important, and cheap, way for detainees to keep in contact with the outside world and relatives overseas. It is, however, important to ensure that access is controlled. “The point of the comment in the report is that there was a system of visual and spot checks at Campsfield, but the most effective way of ensuring that access is consistently controlled, which we have observed in other centres, is either to have a filtering system, or for staff to have a monitoring screen on which they can see exactly what all detainees are accessing.” Detainees first began surfing the web in December last year and there were plans to create an Internet cafe, HMIP revealed. Inspectors compiled the report after an unannounced four-day inspection of Campsfield House, near Kidlington, in May this year. The centre had “returned to normal” following a series of “major disturbances” in 2007, which included two riots and a breakout by 26 detainees, the report said. However, the inspection took place a month before another outbreak of violence and the escape of seven more detainees, and those incidents were not mentioned. Inspectors also found detainees were given pay-as-you go mobile phones on arrival at the centre, which the Home Office said were returned whenever a detainee was removed. The report found there was little evidence of bullying. The report also showed that the average length of detention had more than tripled, from 14 days in December 2006 to 46 days. Bill McKeith, of the Campaign to Close Campsfield, said: “The overall flavour of the report is quite critical. The Government claim it is a removal centre. A removal centre is a place where people are placed briefly before they are removed — and 46 days is not a brief stay.” A spokesman for the UK Border Agency would not be drawn on Mr McKeith’s claims, and did not issue a reaction to the report. Nobody was available for comment at GEO Group UK Ltd, which runs the centre. The inspectors also recommended an investigation as to why there had been a 37 per cent turnover of custody officers in 12 months. The report also gave a detailed breakdown of the nationalities and ages of the 202 detainees.

August 14, 2008 BBC
Thirteen Iraqi Kurds began fasting on Saturday in protest against deportation and reports an Iraqi man killed himself after being deported from the UK. The Home Office said the situation was "under control" and no-one had collapsed from lack of food. The BBC has learned about 46 people refused their evening meal on Wednesday. Some of the hunger-strikers are also protesting against conditions at the centre. Earlier, Algerian detainee and Aston University student, Redouane Messaoudi, 32, told BBC News he would starve for as long as it took. He said he came to the UK nearly 10 years ago and is married to a British woman, and lives with her and two young children in Birmingham. "I am at university, I've paid so much money, I have been working so hard to manage my life between the family and studies," he said. Dashty Jamal, general secretary of the International Federation of Iraqi Refugees, said the detainees were "victims of war and violence" in Iraq. "They are not a criminal, they are civilians," he said. "They arrived in this country because they didn't have any other choice." Campsfield House, which holds some 200 asylum seekers and foreign prisoners, has been the subject of a campaign to close it. The Campaign to Close Campsfield group said other detainees joined the strike in protest over conditions at the centre, where they said they were being "treated like animals". The GEO Group, which runs the site for the government, declined to comment.

June 19, 2008 Telegraph
Four detainees are on the run after escaping from a controversial immigration centre that has been the scene of much unrest. Seven people initially broke out of the facility although three were recaptured by police shortly after the alarm was raised at 4 am. The break-out happened just five days after a fire at the Campsfield immigration detention centre in Oxfordshire. The blaze was in a communal room at the centre on Saturday afternoon and around 20 detainees staged a rooftop protest. At the time, detainees said tensions began simmering among Jamaican inmates at the 215-man detention centre when staff brought dogs into their accommodation. In August last year 26 detainees escaped from the centre in a mass break-out. A Thames Valley police spokesman said that officers remained on the scene supporting the Home Office in their efforts to bring the situation under control. Superintendent Howard Stone said police were also working with the GEO Group UK Ltd, which controls the privately run centre on behalf of the Immigration and Nationality Directorate. "We are working with GEO as well as the UK Border Agency to ensure everything is done to locate the missing detainees as quickly as possible," he said. "However, I would ask that if members of the public see anyone acting suspiciously and believes they may have been involved in this incident to contact the police immediately." GEO signed a three year contract with the Home Office to run the centre in March 2006 with an option to extend it until 2011. A GEO spokesman said: "Yes, it is correct there has been another outbreak at the detention centre. We know who the escaped detainees are and the police are now working to recapture them."

June 14, 2008 Daily Mail
A special prison service riot unit known as the Tornado Team was sent into a controversial detention centre yesterday to quell a violent stand-off between staff and illegal immigrants awaiting deportation. The 50 elite officers – dressed in Robocop-style black boiler suits and helmets and carrying batons and shields – marched into the Campsfield centre near Kidlington, Oxfordshire, after an initial disturbance when several fires were started. Crews from 15 fire engines tackled the blazes which caused thick black smoke to billow from one of the detention buildings. The Tornado Team was supported by about 50 police officers – some, equipped with riot gear and dogs, entered the camp while others secured the perimeter as a police helicopter hovered overhead. All the 200 inmates were herded into the camp’s exercise yard while fire crews took two hours to put out the blazes and make the area safe. But the detainees, all men, then refused to return to their buildings – creating another stand-off. At one point the illegal immigrants could be heard violently hammering on the 25ft high steel fence that surrounds the yard. A senior prison officer said outside: ‘No one in there is going anywhere.’ The Home Office said last night: ‘The UK Border Agency asked police for assistance and officers have secured the perimeter, which has not been breached. 'Specially trained prison officers known as a Tornado Team have been sent to the site in riot gear.’ Last August, 26 detainees escaped from Campsfield after a fire was started. But last night all the men were believed to have been accounted for. Tornado Team members are picked from serving prison officers and undergo four months of specialist training. Their boiler suits are fire-resistant, as are their padded gloves and steel-capped Army-style boots. Extra protection comes from plastic protectors on their forearms and shins. Every officer carries an American-style PR-24 sidearms baton. It can be used for defence, held along the forearm, or to attack by using a protruding metal attachment which can be spun round in confined spaces such as cells or corridors to keep assailants at bay. As an additional precaution, squad members wear face protectors to stop flames spreading under their protective suit. They use personal radios to contact their head at the scene, who is known as Silver Commander. He in turn takes orders from a Gold Commander, in charge of the overall operation and based at the Prison Service headquarters in London. Campsfield has been dogged with controversy since it was converted from a youth detention centre to handle illegal immigrants in 1993. Last year alone, there were two other disturbances not including the breakout. It is run by the UK subsidiary of American company the GEO Group, which signed a five-year contract in March, 2006. The Home Office said all the detainees were being escorted back to their accommodation blocks by 7.30pm. A spokesman added: ‘The situation has calmed down. There has been no resistance from the detainees to going back to their rooms. The operation is being wound down at the site.’ A GEO spokesman was unavailable for comment last night.

June 14, 2008 The Times
Inmate disturbances and fires broke out this afternoon at a troubled immigrant detention centre that has previously suffered riots, blazes and escapes. Two plumes of smoke rose from the centre in Kidlington, Oxfordshire. The problems at Campsfield House detention centre, which holds more than 200 foreign criminals and illegal immigrants, have prompted calls for its closure. Thames Valley police were called in this afternoon to help the security teams at the privately-run centre. A police helicopter hovered above the centre, and the riot squad was put on standby. More than a dozen fire engines have been attending the fire, and one detainee is said to have been hospitalised with smoke inhalation. There have been no other injuries reported at this stage. Campsfield House is managed by the Reading-based GEO Group UK Ltd, on behalf of the Immigration and Nationality Directorate. It has been beset with problems since it opened, and detainees rioted twice last year. In March, fires were started and CCTV cameras smashed, after a detainee was removed for deportation. Seven staff and two inmates were injured. A fire in August allowed 26 inmates to escape - eight of them were still at large at last report. All the escapees were foreign criminals, awaiting deportation. In December, staff were forced to evacuate a block, again after a detainee was removed. Other inmates wrongly believed that the man, Davis Osagie from Benin in West Africa, had been murdered by prison officers. Authorities moved 128 inmates to other detention centres after December’s riot. David Pitman, who lives down the street from Campsfield, said he saw smoke coming from the detention centre and heard the inmates shouting. “This seems to happen more and more often,” he said. “Last time there was trouble and the police hadn’t arrived on the scene so I had to chase one of the escapees with a torch. “I have a young daughter and I worry for her safety with these criminals running around free. Something needs to be done about the security in there.” The centre’s independent monitoring board criticised GEO for failing to prevent the rioting, despite being warned after the first clash that the rioting could happen again. An audit report this year, commissioned by the Border and Immigration Agency, disclosed racism and tension in some of the country’s 10 immigration detention centres. It found that officers at several centres had taunted detainees - describing them as “black bastards” in one case - and found “turbulent” atmosphere in some units. At Campsfield, it said, there was a “tense” environment atmosphere where staff were afraid of detainees. One member of staff said: “If this was white British people in here we would be a lot stricter, it is because they are black people that we are afraid.”

November 26, 2007 Oxford Mail
Detainees at an immigration detention centre near Oxford have warned the atmosphere is on a knife-edge as campaigners marked its 14th anniversary. While protesters rallied outside Campsfield House, detainees spoke of a tense atmosphere and warned of a new riot. Speaking to the Oxford Mail from inside the centre in Kidlington, detainee Michael Sinclair said: "People are not getting any justice in here. They have been talking about a riot. "People have been plotting. I am frightened because you never know what will happen - it is very dangerous." Father-of-five Mr Sinclair, whose mother lives in Blackbird Leys, came to Oxford from Jamaica in 1999. He met his wife, who lives in East Oxford with three of his children, in 2003 but was unsuccessful in securing a spouse's visa and returned to Jamaica to re-apply. His visa was refused again, and desperate to see his wife and children, he returned to Britain on a false passport but was caught and jailed in March. The 41-year-old has been detained in Campsfield House since October and is currently facing deportation. Fellow detainee Rohan Walker, 27, said: "People are not getting any justice." When asked if he thought another riot was likely, he said: "People have been talking about that. You never know when it could happen." Around 50 demonstrators from the Campaign to Close Campsfield staged a two hour protest outside the centre on Saturday afternoon. The group chanted and listened to speeches. Member Bob Hughes, 60, said the centre was on the verge of serious unrest. The university lecturer, from St Clements, Oxford, said: "It is continuously on the boil. As far as we know the conditions are dreadful." Mr Hughes said the anniversary of the centre, which opened on November 23, 1993, made the current situation particularly troubling. Neither The GEO Group UK, which runs the centre, or the Home Office, were available for comment.

August 7, 2007 The Times
Ministers were warned less than two weeks ago that an immigration centre from which 14 men are on the run was unsuitable for holding them. They were also told that the policy of putting foreign prisoners in immigration centres “bursting at the seams” presented a high risk that could trigger disorder. Fourteen foreign prisoners are on the run after fleeing from Campsfield House immigration removal centre during the second outbreak of rioting on the premises in five months. The convicted prisoners, who were among 26 who escaped from the centre run by GEO Group UK, had served sentences in jails but were being held in the centre near Oxford while awaiting deportation. It emerged yesterday that officials from the Home Office had met detainees at the centre last Wednesday and Friday to discuss their grievances, including overcrowded and squalid conditions, a high rejection rate for bail applications and delays in repatriating migrants who wish to go home. But at 10.30pm on Saturday a fire broke out in a portable building at the centre where food is prepared. The detainees took advantage of the disorder to break out of the centre but 12 were recaptured soon afterwards, including a Bangladeshi who approached the home of a prison officer and asked to be hidden. Explaining that the search for the missing men has been scaled down, a Thames Valley Police spokesman said: “We have not got large numbers of officers on the ground searching for them any more. [But] we are still looking for them and their identities have been circulated to all forces.” A report into the earlier disturbance at the centre highlighted the risk that the Home Office was running by placing prisoners in immigration centres, which have much lower security than prisons. “The impact of foreign national prisoners is the biggest external issue affecting Campsfield House. It is putting the centre under great strain,” the report by Bob Whalley, a former Home Office senior civil servant, said. At the end of May more than 50 per cent of the 198 detainees in the centre were foreign prisoners. The inquiry report cautioned: “The fabric is not suitable for foreign national prisoners. It has none of the strength of a prison, nor does it offer any flexibility for dealing with difficult incidents or detainees.” Staff had complained of the large influx of foreign prisoners, “many with serious criminal backgrounds and ‘streetwise’ in their experience of prison”, the report said. It added that little was known about many foreign prisoners who arrived at immigration centres. After serving time in jail many of the prisoners found the more relaxed regime at Campsfield House disorientating. The report said that some became manipulative or bullying. It cautioned: “Some will find the dual pressure of further time in custody and uncertain date of release frustrating, to the extent that, ‘with nothing to lose’, the temptation to join in gratuitous disorder may prove too much. A concentration of discontented detainees may prove so volatile that an otherwise innocuous event may prove a trigger point for concerted disturbance.” The report said: “There are several groups of foreign national prisoners presenting high risk in terms of potential for disorder. There is little to inhibit them if an opportunity to engage in wanton disorder presents itself. The greater their frustration at the position, the greater the risk of disorder.” Damian Green, the Tory immigration spokesman, attacked the Government for putting foreign prisoners who were awaiting deportation into immigration removal centres. “We need immigration detention centres as part of the process of removing people who have no right to be here, but what we shouldn’t be doing is mixing up immigration offenders with other criminals, and that’s where the big failure lies.” Lin Homer, chief executive of the Border and Immigration Agency, said: “We have recently looked at the regime in Campsfield and we are putting in place a number of improvements with the centre operator.” Troublespot -- 1993 Campsfield centre opens


 1997 50 detainees take part in disturbance 

 2001 90 go on hunger strike 

 2002 David Blunkett, then Home Secretary, announces its closure 

 2003 Decision reversed after riot at another detention centre 

 2004 Local council rejects plans to expand Campsfield to hold 300 

 2006 GEO Group wins five-year contract to run Campsfield 

 March 2007 Disturbance as staff try to remove Algerian for deportation. Sixty detainees transferred out because of the damage 

 August 2007 Disturbances and 26 detainees flee. Twelve recaptured and 14 still on the run Source: Times database

August 3, 2007 BBC
Detainees at an Oxfordshire detention centre are suspending their ongoing hunger strike while they wait for a response from the Home Office. More than 150 detainees at Campsfield House Immigration Centre near Kidlington in Oxford have been refusing to eat since Tuesday night. They have complained to officials about the overcrowded conditions and claimed they are being held illegally. The Home Office said it would respond to concerns by Friday afternoon. Campsfield was rife with scabies, but only staff were issued with gloves. Campaign to Close Campsfield -- In a statement, the Campaign to Close Campsfield also said the centre "is a health hazard with 70% of people infected with flu". "Paracetamol is the only medicine made available and two weeks ago even this ran out. "Campsfield was rife with scabies, but only staff were issued with gloves. "Although detainees are held as civil detainees, not convicted prisoners or prisoners on remand, food, toilets and showers are a lot worse than in prisons." It said some detainees were being held even though they had won appeals against deportation or had agreed to go back to their countries of origin. Troubled history -- On Wednesday, the Home Office promised it would respond to the concerns within 48 hours. Formerly a Young Offenders Institute, Campsfield was converted into an immigration detention centre in 1993 amid a storm of protest from local residents. Run by the American company GEO, which specialises in operating detention facilities, Campsfield holds up to 200 male asylum seekers at a time. Within six months of opening the centre experienced a major problem when six asylum seekers escaped following a rooftop protest. A number of low-level disturbances inside the centre and regular public protests outside its gates has since occurred at Campsfield.

April 3, 2007 The Guardian
A private prison was criticised by its staff and a judge yesterday following the collapse of a manslaughter trial over the death of a prisoner on suicide watch. Four officers from Rye Hill prison, near Rugby, run by Global Solutions Ltd, were cleared of all charges in connection with the death of Michael Bailey, from Birmingham, who was serving a four year sentence for cocaine dealing. He was found in March 2005 hanged by his shoelace from the door to his cell in the segregation block. Daniel Daymond, 23, of Rugby, Paul Smith, 39, of Warrington, and Samantha Prime, 29, also of Rugby, were acquitted at Northampton crown court of charges of manslaughter by gross negligence in connection with Bailey's death. Ben King, 21, of Southbrook, Daventry, along with Mr Daymond, was cleared of perverting the course of justice by doctoring log books for suicide watches. All were cleared on the direction of the judge, Mr Justice Grigson. He said: "No one who has heard the evidence in this court can have any doubt that the death of Michael Bailey was a tragedy, not least because it was avoidable." Outside the court Bailey's mother, Caroline, said: "This case clearly shows there were failures in Rye Hill prison and GSL ... I hope the outcome of this case brings changes." Paul Smith, manager of the segregation unit where Mr Bailey killed himself, resigned from GSL before the court case. He said after his acquittal. "Straight from the start I had expressed concern about the level of support and training. I told senior management about it and they didn't do anything." In a statement released through his solicitor, Mr Daymond said: "[Michael Bailey's] death was a tragedy that was wholly avoidable. I hope that today's decision will focus attention on the way in which Rye Hill Prison is run." A spokesman for GSL said: "This whole matter will be looked at very carefully. Self-harm is an issue that prisons work very hard to avoid." The jail was the subject of criticism by the chief inspector of prisons, Anne Owers, who found the staff were inexperienced.

March 16, 2007 Oxford Mail
Staff are counting up the costs at Campsfield House immigration detention centre after detainees ran riot and started a fire. About 60 detainees were moved to other detention centres, including Yarl's Wood in Bedfordshire, on Wednesday night. Anti-Campsfield campaigners claim the revolt at the centre, in Kidlington, was sparked when an Algerian detainee was removed from his room for deportation. Police are investigating the fire as suspected arson. A former member of staff, in his 20s, who asked not to be named, praised former colleagues who he said tried to tackle the fire at the centre at 6.30am on Wednesday, before firefighters arrived. He said: "They kicked windows out and tried to tackle the fire themselves. "I spoke to one of the seven members of staff who needed hospital treatment and he told me that there has been serious damage to blue block and yellow block and the library has been destroyed. "Only about 30 detainees kicked off, but it will cost hundreds of thousands of pounds to put the damage right. "The ironic thing is that the GEO group that runs the site has been getting detainees to paint internal areas and blue block has only just been painted." The former worker claimed that more than 190 detainees were housed in an area which mean for 130 and that it was not 'fit for purpose'. Oxford West and Abingdon MP Evan Harris said: "There will need to be an investigation of why there has been yet another serious disturbance at Campsfield House, which has been a subject of a number of critical reports by successive chief inspectors of prisons." Dr Harris, a member of the House of Commons select committee on human rights, added: "My select committee is already conducting an inquiry into detention of failed asylum seekers, following concerns about physical abuse during removals. "The Home Secretary himself a few years ago declared that Campsfield House was not appropriate for the 21st century, but then of course the Government decided to keep it open anyway. They will need to look at that question again."

March 14, 2007 BBC
Seven staff and two inmates have been injured in a fire after a riot broke out at an immigration removal centre. Emergency services were called to deal with the incident at Campsfield removal centre near Kidlington, in Oxfordshire, early on Wednesday. A BBC reporter saw a dozen riot officers carrying shields enter the centre to join about 35 police officers who were dealing with the incident. The nine injured people are thought to be suffering from smoke inhalation. The seven immigration staff at the centre and two detainees have been taken to hospital. A Home Office spokesman said the riot teams were working to get the centre completely under control as soon as possible. "The perimeter of Campsfield has not been breached and all detainees have been accounted for," he added. They used force to drag the person from the bed and after that everything kicked off. Campsfield detainee: In a statement Thames Valley Police said: "The detainees were evacuated and nine people have been taken to hospital suffering from smoke inhalation. No serious injuries have been reported. "The fire has now been extinguished. Five fire engines and 30 firefighters attended the incident. The fire was relatively small and mainly generated a lot of smoke." 'Fighting stopped': A detainee, who did not want to be named, told BBC News 24: "This place is falling apart - computers are getting smashed. "They've stopped fighting now but they're destroying every bit of equipment they can find - computers getting smashed, shops are getting broken into, they're stealing everything." "They used force to drag the person from the bed and after that everything kicked off," he said. Sarah Cutler from Bail for Immigration Detainees, which provides workshops at Campsfield offering legal advice to detainees, said she was not surprised by the disturbance. "There are big problems at the moment," she said, adding that many people were being held for months. Riot gear: Those included "people who want to go back to their country of origin, have told the Home Office they want to go back, but are still detained because they can't get it together to remove them". A Home Office spokeswoman said the continuing incident began at 0630 GMT. BBC reporter Rajesh Mirchandani, speaking outside the centre, said he had seen members of a prison service fast response team enter the site. "They're riot trained and they went in carrying riot gear." He said he could see a helicopter hovering overhead and police dog units and mounted police were now patrolling the perimeter of the centre. The Home Office spokeswoman said: "Police, fire and ambulance teams are on the scene and a number of Tornado units from the Prison Service have been deployed to the centre." Campsfield can hold 196 adult male detainees, but it is not known how many are currently being held there.

July 22, 2006 The Independent
A Kurdish teenager killed himself after spending more than four months in an immigration detention centre, an inquest has heard. Ramazan Kumluca, 18, is the youngest asylum-seeker to have committed suicide while facing deportation from Britain. Campaign groups yesterday called for the closure of all detention centres, comparing them to Victorian workhouses. Mr Kumluca is one of more than 30 asylum-seekers who have killed themselves in the past five years after being told their applications had failed. He had travelled from his home in Turkey to Italy and then on to Britain where he claimed asylum last year, saying that his life was in danger over a £20,000 debt owed by his father. He also claimed that if he was sent back to Italy (under rules that asylum must be claimed in the first safe country reached) he was at risk of exploitation. Mr Kumluca was refused asylum and denied bail because there were fears he would not report back for deportation. He was sent to Campsfield House in Oxfordshire, an immigration removal centre that holds around 100 men at any time. The average stay for detainees at the centre is 14 days, but because the teenager was fighting his deportation order he was held for four and a half months. An inquest at Oxford Old Assizes heard he had been plunged into despair during his incarceration and had complained of insomnia, headaches and anxiety. A fellow inmate, Abdulwase Kamali, told the court Mr Kumluca had appeared "sad" the day before he killed himself. He said: "Ramazan said he had been told by immigration he would be sent back to Italy, and he said if he was sent back to Italy he would be used in sex films. He said he would slash himself or hang himself." On 27 June last year, Mr Kamali and other Muslim detainees alerted warders after calling Mr Kumluca for morning prayers and finding his door would not open. He was found hanging from the door closing mechanism. After investigating his death, a Prison and Probation ombudsman cleared staff of any wrongdoing. The jury returned a verdict of suicide. Outside the court, Bob Hughes, of the pressure group Campaign to Close Campsfield, said: "Here we have an institution full of people being driven deliberately to despair by government policy." "He added: "We believe these people should be allowed to get on with their own lives. Centres like Campsfield are a huge national scandal and shame. Campsfield House has been a removal centre since 1993 and is privately run by the company Global Solutions Limited. In 2002, the then Home Secretary David Blunkett pledged that the centre would be closed, but a year later it was decided to keep it open and expand the number of places. Since 2000, at least 25 asylum-seekers have killed themselves while living in the community after being told they would be deported. Mr Kumluca was the seventh to have committed suicide in a detention centre. More than 2,600 adults and children are being held in detention centres prior to deportation. In January this year another asylum-seeker Bereket Yohannes, from Eritrea, was found hanging at Harmondsworth Removal Centre. An inquest will be held into his death.

June 17, 2006 Indy Media
On Monday 12th of this week a Somalian man went onto a roof at Campsfield; he had been detained for four months (probably illegally, since the government cannot deport people to Somalia) and took a rope and a plastic bag with him. GEO, the new management at Campsfield, asked the police to leave and said they would deal with the matter themselves; we do not know whether they used violence against the Somalian detainee; he has been removed from Campsfield, no doubt to somewhere even worse as is usual in these cases. There have been 12 suicides in immigration detention, and several hundred attempted suicides and cases of self harm requiring medical treatment. GSL lost the contract to run Campsfield to GEO (Global Expertise on Outsourcing), presumably on cost grounds. GEO took over at the beginning of the month. They have changed their name from Wackenhut, and have a discreditable history of running penal institutions in the USA and Australia. GSL's manager, Andy Clark, who had been more willing than his predecessors to allow volunteers and education classes in Campsfield, decided he could not work with GEO; at least two of the people who ran education classes and workshops have been sacked or left, and GEO apparently intends to provide much reduced hours of education (as required under the contract), run by its own officers. But of course the most serious problem is not the conditions inside the centre, but the fact that people are detained there who have committed no crime, been charged or suspected of no crime, with no judicial process and no time limit, often with no access to lawyers, and always with great uncertainty about what is happening to them or about to happen to them.

May 23, 2001
The global private security firm Group 4, is an "Investor in People."  This may come as a surprise.  For since Campsfield opened, almost unnoticed, in the bleary period just before Christmas in 1993, this improvised brick compound has become to many the unacceptable face of the British government's asylum system.  Within weeks, the country's first specialized facility for confining them while their cases were decided was provoking hunger strikes.  Within months, detainees were climbing on to its roofs to protest at the conditions.  Still in its first year of operation, there was a mass escape over its 20ft perimeter fence, and a "disturbance" - involving fires and smashed furniture - which resulted in the deployment of riot police and injuries to detainees, who needed several ambulances and hospital treatment.  Official reports on Campsfield in 1995 and 1998 by two different chief inspectors of prisons found fear, boredom and stress among inmates.  Among the Group 4 staff, the inspections found inexperience, poor pay and exhausting shift work.  This cycle of protest and disorder and repressive countermeasures continued unabated during the late 1990s.  (Guardian Newspapers)

May 14, 2002
As many as 15 asylum seeker accomadation centres could be built across the UK despite an angry response from residents in the locations chosen for the three pilot "villages".  The government plans to build the centres at Throckmorton, near Pershore on Worcestershire, RAF Newton, in Nottinghamshire, and at Bicester, Oxfordshire.  More than 3,000 villagers have signed a petition objecting to a development in their area.  Some local people are anxious about plans to house large numbers of asylum seekers near them, particularly following the riot and fire which destroyed the $100m Yari's Wood centre.  Steve Mitchell, chairman of Pinvin Parish Council, promised to fight the plans "every step of the way".  (BBC News)

Colnbrook Immigration Removal Center
Colnbrook, UK
Serco

August 5, 2011 The Guardian
Separate investigations into three deaths in immigration removal centres (IRC) in the past month have been launched by the police, amid growing concern about the treatment of detainees. The spate of deaths has caused alarm among critics of the government's detention policy, who warn that the system is at "breaking point" with poor healthcare putting people's lives at risk. Two men died from suspected heart attacks at Colnbrook near Heathrow airport and the third killed himself at the Campsfield House detention centre in Oxfordshire on Tuesday. John McDonnell, Labour MP for Hayes and Harlington, who has two detention centres including Colnbrook in his constituency, said he feared there would be more deaths as the system struggled to cope with the number of people being detained. "The government is now detaining people on such a scale that the existing services are swamped," he said. "It is inevitable if we put the services under such relentless strain that there will be more deaths as a result … we are dealing with people who are extremely stressed and extremely vulnerable and the services are not able to cope and not able to guarantee their safety." The first man who died was Muhammad Shukat, 47, a Pakistani immigration detainee who collapsed at around 6am on 2 July. His roommate Abdul Khan says that in the hours before he died Shukat was groaning in agony, had very bad chest pains and was sweating profusely. Khan, 19, from Afghanistan, said he began raising the alarm around 6am and pressed the emergency button in the room 10 times in a frantic effort to get help. Khan claimed that on three occasions members of the centre's nursing team entered the room and found Shukat on the floor where he had collapsed. Khan said they put him back into bed, took his temperature and some medicine was administered, but did not call emergency assistance immediately. According to Khan, the nurses initially said that Shukat could go to see the centre's doctor at 8am. According to the London Ambulance Service, Colnbrook staff called an ambulance just before 7.20am. Attempts were made to resuscitate Shukat, but he was pronounced dead on arrival at Hillingdon Hospital. A postmortem found the provisional cause of death to be coronary heart disease. Shukat's body has been returned to Pakistan and his family are understood to have no concerns about the medical treatment he received. The second man to die at Colnbrook has not yet been named. According to the Metropolitan police he was 35 and was found dead in his cell at 10.30am last Sunday. London Ambulance Service officials pronounced him dead at the scene. "A postmortem held on 1 August found the cause of death to be a ruptured aorta. The death is being treated as unexplained," said a police spokesman. Colnbrook IRC is managed by Serco. In a statement to detainees about Shukat's death, deputy director at Colnbrook, Jenni Halliday, described her "deep regret" and extended her condolences. In a statement to detainees about the second Colnbrook death, Serco's contract manager, Michael Guy, informed detainees that a resident in the short-term holding facility had died and that the death was thought to be from natural causes. On Tuesday, a 35-year-old man hanged himself in the toilet block at Campsfield House detention centre in Oxfordshire. A fellow detainee, who refused to give his name, said the man had been hours away from being deported and had become very anxious. "He was normally a very quiet person … but the pressure is too much for people in here." It is understood the man had only been at the centre for a few days before he died. The Home Office refused to give any more details saying his extended family had yet to be informed. Emma Ginn, from the campaign group Medical Justice, said the deaths had heightened concern about the poor healthcare on offer to those being kept in UK detention centres. "Based on medical evidence from many hundreds of detainees, Medical Justice has documented the disturbingly inadequate healthcare provision that often vulnerable immigration detainees are subjected to in Colnbrook and other immigration removal centres... [this] combined with the perilous and frightening conditions of detention, is a lethal cocktail, a disaster waiting to happen." The UK Border Agency declined to comment on the specific circumstances of each case. It said the police and the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman always investigated deaths in immigration detention centres and it would be inappropriate to comment until these were complete. David Wood, director of criminality and detention at the UK Border Agency, said all detainees at immigration removal centres have access to health services seven days a week. "All detainees are seen by a nurse within two hours of arrival and are given an opportunity to see a GP within 24 hours," he added. "The health of all detainees is monitored closely, and the healthcare professionals are required to report cases where it is considered that a person's health is being affected by continued detention. "The UK takes its responsibilities seriously, which is why we consider every case on its individual merits and will continue to offer protection to those who need it. However, detention is an essential part of our controls on immigration in the UK." A groundbreaking ruling -- A man with severe mental illness was unlawfully locked up in a UK detention centre for five months and subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment, according to a high court ruling. The man, a 34-year-old Indian national, was detained in Harmondsworth immigration removal centre between April and September last year. On Friday a judge ruled that his treatment amounted to a breach of article 3 of the European convention human rights. The man's lawyer said the ruling – thought to be the first of its kind – raised wider questions about how the government treats people with mental illnesses in the immigration and detention system. "The court's decision that my client suffered inhuman or degrading treatment at a UK detention facility sends a very loud and clear message to the authorities," said. "We would urge the minister to conduct a fundamental review into how people suffering from mental illness are treated in the immigration detention estate." The man, referred to as "S" in the ruling, had a history of serious ill treatment and abuse before arriving in the UK. He served time in prison for wounding and assault before being transferred to a secure psychiatric hospital until his discharge in April 2010. Following his release the UK Border Agency said there was "no evidence" he was mentally ill and he was detained in Harmondsworth where his health deteriorated and he began to have psychotic episodes and self harm. The high court intervened and he was released on bail. His lawyers said he had been living with his family since then and had fully complied with the conditions of bail set by the court. In the ruling judge David Elvin said: "S's pre-existing mental condition was both triggered and exacerbated by detention and that involved both a debasement and humiliation of S since it showed a serious lack of respect for his human dignity. It created a state in S's mind of real anguish and fear, through his hallucinations, which led him to self-harm frequently and to behave in a manner which was humiliating…" A UK Border Agency spokesperson said: "We regularly review our detention policies and will look at the findings in this case to ensure lessons are learned. Detention is an essential part of our immigration control but we recognise the importance of ensuring it remains appropriate on a case by case basis."

June 22, 2009 Thaindian
The news that foreign criminals, including rapists and terrorists, are being treated to lavish cuisine as they wait to be deported, has not gone down with the taxpayers in Britain. There is an outrage among residents over money being spent on the preparation of mouthwatering dishes for 383 inmates, who are currently staying at a luxurious 47 million pounds Colnbrook Immigration Removal Centre in Berkshire. The menu that these detainees are being offered includes oriental poached fish parcels, beef goulash and mint lamb stew. Each detainee is offered four choices for lunch and dinner, plus three vegetable options and a dessert. “The idea that these people should enjoy hotel-style standards of service and food is preposterous. Given the recession we’re living in, most people will think this type of arrangement is outrageous,” the Sun quoted Matthew Elliott, a local resident, as saying. Other delicacies offered to them include chicken chasseur, fish gumbo and beef and onion pie. They are handed a menu at the start of the week and asked to mark their choices for the next seven days - with food cooked to order. “Some of the dishes are so exotic they put Gordon Ramsay to shame. The grub’s certainly better than the local hotels. Now every foreign con wants to come here because the food is so good,” an official said. The scandal is the latest to hit the Colnbrook Immigration Removal Centre in Berkshire, which is run by a private firm ‘Serco’. Earlier it was reported how the detainees had access to Nintendo Wiis and plasma TVs.

June 2, 2009 The Independent
Allegations that asylum seekers are being bullied by immigration staff are not being properly investigated, a report into Britain's flagship immigration removal centre has found. The use of reasonable force to control detainees at Colnbrook Immigration Removal Centre, near Heathrow Airport, had increased and was not always well managed, Anne Owers, the Chief Inspector of Prisons also found in a report published today. In the three months before the inspection, there had been 179 complaints ranging from bullying to poor food. Dame Anne said: "...we found little improvement at Colnbrook since our last visit... there was evidence of the centre taking inappropriate steps to manage some of the challenges; there were examples of separation being misused and the vulnerable persons unit was not fit for purpose." The centre, run by Serco, holds male detainees in the most secure facility in the detention estate. Dame Anne said: "A significant number of complaints, including allegations of staff bullying, were not adequately investigated and replies lacked detail." Dave Woods, head of criminality and detention at the UK Border Agency, said: "In the six months since HMCIP visited, safety, security and purposeful activity for detainees have improved significantly."

January 16, 2007 IC Coventry
Conditions in holding centres for immigration offenders awaiting deportation still need to be improved, the jails watchdog has said. Chief Inspector of Prisons Anne Owers published reports on four immigration short-term holding facilities at Colnbrook near Heathrow Airport, Sandford House in Solihull, and Liverpool's Reliance House and John Lennon Airport. Inspectors found that detainees at Colnbrook spent unacceptably long periods locked in single rooms, and there was a lack of information and independent advice for people facing removal. But it had avoided some of the problems seen in other facilities because it was managed by the Immigration Removal Centre, offering access to healthcare facilities, welfare and race relations support, Ms Owers said. Staff at the three centres in Liverpool and Solihull - all run by Group 4 Securicor - needed more training in the care and protection of children, her report found. The facilities also required reorganising for a mixed population, it added. Ms Owers said: "Accommodation still remains inadequate in many centres and the needs of detainees in relation to healthcare, information and advice, and preparations for release are not yet sufficiently met." Home Office Minister Liam Byrne said: "I take very seriously the recommendations, and action plans responding in detail are currently being drawn up to ensure further improvements are made. "It is important to remember that non-residential short-term holding facilities are intended to accommodate people for very brief periods of time." Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman Nick Clegg said: "The inspector's report confirms what has been apparent for some time: that, for the Government, these people are out of sight and out of mind. "Any society should be ashamed when people are treated like this just because they are to be deported."

Docklands Light Railway
London, England
Serco
May 13, 2010 London Evening Standard
Docklands Light Railway operator Serco has been fined £450,000 after it failed to stop a train which hit and killed a man who had fallen off a platform. Robert Carter, 34, stumbled on to the lines at All Saints station following a late-night argument with another passenger, Paul Green. Mr Green telephoned police to say Mr Carter had a knife and had fallen on to the track. Officers asked the DLR control room to check if someone was on the lines, but this was treated as an “informal request” rather than an actual report, Southwark Crown Court was told. A control room operator failed to see Mr Carter on the track and did not halt the trains, which are automatic and do not have an actual driver. Shortly afterwards another member of the control room staff saw a police officer on All Saints station's CCTV waving his arms above his head. This operator immediately pressed an emergency plunger to halt an oncoming train but it was too late. The wheels struck Mr Carter, who suffered serious injuries and died in hospital. Serco was also ordered to pay £43,773 costs. It was found guilty last month, under health and safety regulations, of failing to ensure its automatic trains did not hit people who were on the tracks. Judge Deborah Taylor, passing sentence yesterday, said: “Serco fell considerably below what was required of it.” Procedures were “not robust or comprehensive enough” in dealing with incidents of human error. But the judge said it was clear that Serco “took safety seriously “ and there was “no suggestion profit was put before safety”. David Travers, QC, prosecuting for the Office of Rail Regulation, said Mr Carter was involved in an altercation with another passenger at All Saints. “After he fell, it would appear that Mr Carter was unable or unwilling to move — whether through injuries from the fall, intoxication or for some other reason is unknown,” said Mr Travers. “DLR staff looked at the station on their CCTV monitors, which are not suitable for seeing if anyone is on the track, and failed to see Mr Carter. The train which killed Mr Carter could have been stopped before reaching the station.” Jurors were played a recording of the British Transport Police call to the DLR control centre, in which line controller Paul Day was heard to say: “There's certainly no one on the track.” Stephen Moody, for Serco, said it had made several changes since the incident and improved safety procedures. It denied one count of failing to comply with its health and safety duties.

Doncaster Prison
South Yorkshire, UK
Serco (formerly known as Premier)

November 3, 2010 The Star
A DISGRACED prison officer who was handed a suicide note by an inmate put it in his manager's 'in tray' to be dealt with the next morning. By that time Shaun Flanagan, aged 26, was dead - just three days after being locked-up on a charge of driving while disqualified. An inquest at Doncaster Coroner's Court was told prison officer Russell Calladine admitted he was too frightened to enter the cell where Mr Flanagan hanged himself in June 2006. Instead, he waited until colleagues at HMP Doncaster arrived a few minutes later before helping to cut the prisoner's noose. It has taken more than four years for evidence about Mr Flanagan's last hours to be heard in public, by a jury of four women and three men. Mr Flanagan, of South Street, Highfields, was supposed to be checked in his cell every 30 minutes because he was detoxifying from drug addiction. But questions have been raised about the checks carried out by Mr Calladine, who has since been sacked.

July 23, 2010 The Star
PRISONER-on-prisoner violence has more than doubled in Doncaster Prison last year after bosses put all the young offenders together. The figures for assaults reported at the Marshgate jail soared to 412 in 2009, compared to 192 in 2008. The figure was more than three time the 2007 figure of 127. The revelation comes as figures obtained by The Star under the Freedom of Information Act revealed there were 1,149 attacks on prisoners by other inmates over the last three years. Lindholme Prison saw the fewest, with 156 over three years, with 47 in 2009, 57 in 2008 and 52 in 2007. Moorland recorded 262, with 85 last year, 86 in 2008 and 91 in 2007. A Ministry of Justice Spokesman said: "The rise on prisoner-on-prisoner assaults recorded at HMP Doncaster in 2009 was due to restructuring in the prison whereby its young offender population was relocated to a single block, rather than dispersed among the adult population. This resulted in a temporary spike in assaults and particularly fights among young offenders.

April 23, 2006 24 DASH
Prison officers are calling for all jail wardens to be better armed claiming they should be given metal batons in order to defend themselves from assault. The Prison Officers Association (POA) conference next month will vote on whether the extendable baton should be allowed in many more prisons. The union's national general secretary Brian Caton said he supported the proposals and predicted the motions would be passed. Currently, staff at private prisons such as Doncaster do not carry batons. "We would say that's wrong," Mr Caton said. "Prisoners in private prisons are no less violent, they're no less difficult. "You are twice as likely to be attacked in a private prison as in a public prison." Last July the Chief Inspector of Prisons warned that staff at a privately-run prison were being bullied by inmates. Anne Owers demanded urgent action after discovering unsafe conditions at Rye Hill jail, near Rugby in Warwickshire, which is run by GSL UK Ltd. Inexperienced officers were ignoring misbehaviour and evidence of contraband in order to "survive" on the wings, the report said.

April 12, 2006 Politics.Co.UK
The government has been forced to defend its use of private contractors to run Britain's prisons in the wake of a critical report from the chief inspector. Anne Owers says that while Doncaster is "by no means a bad local prison", where relationships with staff and inmates are generally good, physical conditions are "sometimes squalid". Many prisoners lack basics such as pillows, toilet seats and working televisions, some cells are dirty and covered in graffiti, and she highlights "institutional meanness" in making prisoners pay to change their account number which allows them to call home. In her report, Ms Owers notes the prison has good points, in particular in its resettlement of offenders and community re-entry facilities, but warns the problems were all in areas "not specifically mandated by the contract under which the prison is run". "There remains a concern that, in focusing on meeting their contractual obligations, prison managers had allowed important areas to slip below what was safe and decent; and indeed may have sought savings in precisely those areas," she said. Frances Crook, director of the Howard League for Penal Reform, seized upon today's report as an example of the "manifest failings of private prisons". "It exposes the fallacy promulgated by the Home Office that private prisons have helped to improve prison conditions, raised standards or fostered advances in the decent treatment of prisoners and staff. Doncaster shows that this is not the case," she said. "Unsurprisingly, the chief inspector draws attention to the fact that those areas in which the prison is failing are those in which it was not contractually obliged by the Home Office to meet particular standards."

April 12, 2006 The Mirror
DONCASTER prison has been described as "squalid" and showing signs of "institutional meanness" in a damning report by the jails' watchdog. Chief Inspector of Prisons Anne Owers expressed concern that prison chiefs had let standards slip at the 800-inmate jail and made savings to meet Home Office contract targets. She claims the medium security jail, which is run by private company Serco - formerly known as Premier Prison Services - had deteriorated since it was last inspected in 2003. Her report said one example of "meanness" was charging inmates 50 pence to change family telephone numbers on the automated phone system, which was branded "particularly unfair" because of the shortage of paying jobs in the jail. The chief inspector said: "Respect was seriously undermined by the physical conditions in which many prisoners lived, which in some cases were squalid. Many prisoners lacked pillows, adequate mattresses, toilet seats, working televisions, notice-boards and places to store belongings. "Some cells, especially on the young prisoners' wing, were dirty and festooned with graffiti." First night cells were "squalid" with no hot water, "lumps of foam" as mattresses and "dirty" bedding, said the report. In other areas, bedding was "heavily soiled". Ms Owers also pointed out bullying problems were not properly addressed at the prison and only 29 per cent of young ethnic minority prisoners reported that staff treated them well. In 2003, Ms Owers said Doncaster was a good jail which needed to increase the amount of purposeful activities available - such as work or education - and improve first night facilities. On her return last November, she found it had not tackled these problems and had slipped back in a number of other areas. But, overall, she said Doncaster was "by no means a bad prison". Making 156 recommendations for improvement, Ms Owers said: "Our main concern was not only that managers had failed to tackle problems we pointed out in our last inspection, but that the prison had deteriorated in some important respects - all in areas not mandated in the prison's contract. Yorkshire and Humberside regional offender manager, Paul Wilson, said: "I am satisfied that Serco has responded quickly and appropriately to the inspectorate's recommendations and that the director and his staff are committed to continuous improvement of standards of offender management."

May 6, 2005 The Mirror
VALENTINE'S Day killer Paul Dyson slit his wrists and scrawled "Sorry" on his jail cell wall before admitting responsibility for his girlfriend Joanne Nelson's death. The former bouncer, charged earlier this week, smuggled a small blade into his prison. A guard found him slumped on the floor of his cell in the early hours. Doncaster Prison, where Dyson is being held, opened nine years ago and was Britain's first private jail. It is run by Premier Prisons, which is partly American owned. The jail has been hit by controversy in the past, with allegations of bullying and high numbers of suicides.

Dovegate Prison
Staffordshire, United Kingdom
Serco (formerly Premier)
August 14, 2010 The Sun
ONE of Damilola Taylor's killers is claiming £100,000 from prison bosses for failing to stop a lag from slicing off one of his ears. Evil Ricky Preddie, 23, was lured into his attacker's cell and hacked with a home-made knife after a row over a game of pool. Doctors could not sew the lug back on. Preddie is suing private firm Serco, which runs Dovecote Prison, Staffs. Last night Damilola's dad called the claim "outrageous". Richard, 62, said: "He doesn't deserve a penny. Ricky was attacked in prison because he remains as arrogant as ever. "If he had been sentenced properly - and by that I mean the death penalty - then he could only launch his claim in hell." A Serco spokesman said: "Mr Preddie made a complaint that we believe has no substance and have refuted."

January 26, 2010 Derby Telegraph
A FORMER prison officer has appeared in court accused of helping an inmate to escape from a Derbyshire jail. Andrea Clarke is also charged with harbouring an escaped prisoner and leaving a prohibited article for importation into prison. Clarke had been employed at the privately-run Dovegate Prison. But the charges relate to the escape of an inmate from Sudbury Prison, three miles away. The 36-year-old, of Burton, appeared at Southern Derbyshire Magistrates' Court yesterday but entered no plea. The case was committed to Derby Crown Court. Dovegate Prison, in Marchington, near Uttoxeter, is a category B prison run by Serco. A spokesman for HMP Dovegate said: "The individual concerned no longer works for Serco. We continue to fully co-operate with the police."

December 17, 2009 Liverpool Daily Post
A LIVERPOOL prison is among five in the country allowing its inmates to watch satellite television. More than 4,000 prisoners enjoy the privilege in private jails nationwide. Altcourse Prison, in Fazakerley, is among the contractor-run prisons allowing access to a “limited number” of satellite channels. The number of prisoners allowed to watch satellite varies according to behaviour. But Justice minister and city MP Maria Eagle revealed the number was currently around 4,070. The Garston MP was responding to a written question from Tory MP Philip Davies. She said no inmates in public sector jails have access to satellite in their quarters. But they do at Altcourse and other GS4-run prisons in South Wales and Warwickshire. The other private prisons offering satellite television are run by Serco in Staffordshire and Nottingham. Ms Eagle said: “In these establishments, satellite television in cells is generally only available to prisoners on the enhanced or standard level of the incentives and earned privileges scheme.” There are 84,500 prisoners in England and Wales, meaning around one in 20 has access to satellite TV.

December 8, 2009 Yorkshire Post
A JUDGE has urged a thorough investigation into how a dangerous criminal was able to use a mobile phone in prison to organise the punishment shooting of another man who might now lose a leg. Leyon Randall was in Dovegate Prison, Staffordshire, serving an indeterminate jail sentence for robbery, kidnap and firearms offences, at the time he arranged the shooting of Geovannie Meade in Leeds in May this year. Yesterday Randall and his brother Lloyd were both jailed for life at Leeds Crown Court after being convicted by a jury of conspiracy to cause grievous bodily harm with intent to Mr Meade. Judge Scott Wolstenholme said: "It is a very serious situation." It appeared Leyon Randall was able not only to communicate regularly via a mobile phone but to organise the "ruthless shooting from the comfort of his jail cell using a mobile phone he had had for weeks if not months". It was also suggested during the case that had been done with the connivance of officers at the jail. "That may be an outrageous lie but it is something I would have thought needs thoroughly investigating," the judge added. He said the shooting was carried out by Lloyd Randall because his brother believed Mr Meade was spending too much time with his girlfriend Amy Farnhill. The fact he was prepared to arrange such lethal violence to settle "petty scores" confirmed the view he was dangerous. It also showed a mobile phone in the wrong hands in prison could be a very dangerous weapon. Sentencing both to life, the judge ordered Leyon Randall, 29, to serve a minimum of eight years and Lloyd Randall, 29 of Recreation Street, Holbeck, Leeds to a minimum of seven years in jail. Both denied any involvement in the shooting. Susanna Holdsworth, 26, a care assistant, found guilty by the jury of perverting the course of justice, was jailed for two years. She gave Lloyd Randall an alibi for the time of the shooting. Farnhill, 18, was cleared of conspiracy to pervert the course of justice. The jury heard from David Dixon, prosecuting, that on May 9 Mr Meade was invited to Farnhill's address in Lingfield Gate, Moortown, Leeds, but as he arrived in the early hours he was approached by Lloyd Randall and another man, and was shot in the leg by Randall. He had surgery in hospital and further operations since but may still lose his leg. A spokesman for Serco which operates HMP Dovegate said they had worked with West Yorkshire Police in the case: "HMP Dovegate has a leading reputation for reducing and preventing the use of illicit mobile phones. This year alone we have confiscated 46 illegal phones from prisoners or visitors."

September 11, 2009 Burton Mail
A PRIVATE prison near Burton says it has taken action on failings surrounding the death of a prisoner last year. The inquest of Simon Coutts, who was found hanged in his cell at HMP Dovegate, in Marchington, in June last year, concluded yesterday at Stafford Coroner’s Court. The 29-year-old, originally from Manchester, was discovered by prison officers with a ligature around his neck, days after receiving a ‘dear John’ letter from his wife ending their relationship. Details of Coutts’ conviction or how long he was serving were not disclosed at the hearing. The inquest heard from DC Dave Johnstone, the investigating officer from Burton police, that Coutts used a sheet and a towel, wrapped together using electric cable as a ligature. This was fixed to a ligature point — consisting of a hook attached to a small wooden block stuck to the wall using a powerful adhesive glue — with shoe laces. DC Johnstone told the hearing that as well as the hook on the cell wall, there were also makeshift shelves attached, and a bird cage holding a budgerigar, which was permitted in the ‘therapeutic community’ (TC) which houses 200 of the prison’s 700 inmates. Eric Pearson, the investigating officer for prison owner Serco, had told the hearing the previous day that there had been ‘failings’ by prison staff, whom he believed had not carried out cell checks on the night of Coutts’ death. He said both the ligature point and toilet roll used to block the cell door’s glass window should have been spotted and removed if correct checks had been performed.

September 4, 2003
Staff at a private jail were so inexperienced they were unwilling or unable to confront inmates, the chief inspector of prisons said today.  Faults at Dovegate prison in Staffordshire included a "cumbersome" system to deal with insubordination, which allowed prisoners to "exploit the situation" and avoid punishment, Anne Owers said.  Operator Premier Custodial Group was also accused of maintaining a "policy facade" disguising a lack of effective systems.  The report, though praising the jail for its facilities and innovations, was seized on by prison reformers and trades unionists who have long claimed privatised jails were inadequately staffed.  The 800-inmate category B jail near Uttoxeter held sophisticated offenders who were "capable of exploiting any weaknesses or naivety in the staff who supervise them," said Ms Owers.  "There was a worrying lack of experience and confidence among a young, locally recruited staff, few of whom had any previous prison experience and who were operating with low staffing levels and high staff turnover," the report said.  "We observed an inability or unwillingness to confront prisoners appropriately." Few prisoners had privileges taken away even if they misbehaved, leading to the whole system being "seriously undermined".  Inspectors said in their report: "Drug use appeared prevalent, yet drug reduction measures were given low priority."  They also found that a so-called "personal officer" scheme designed to build a personal relationship between staff and inmates existed "in name only".  A survey by Ms Owers' team found that 17 per cent of inmates reported being kicked, punched or assaulted by another prisoner.  But there was reluctance to stop bullying even though an anti-bullying strategy had supposedly been put in place.  Premier has a 15-year contract with the Home Office to run Dovegate, which opened in July 2001, although how much it is paid remains secret.  (Birmingham Post)

September 3, 2003
Homemade weapons and illicit hooch have been found at a privately run prison where staff were so inexperienced that they were unable to confront the inmates, according to a report by the chief inspector of prisons.  The inspection at the 800-inmate Dovegate prison, near Uttoxeter, Staffordshire, was carried out in April and found that in contrast to the staff, the prisoners were so sophisticated that they were able to exploit any weakness among the staff.  Anne Owers, the chief inspector of prisons, said Dovegate, with its young staff recruited locally, provided further evidence for the critics of the private prison sector. The company, Premier Custodial Group, operated the prison with low staffing levels and a high turnover.  But she said the prison, which opened in July 2001, also provided evidence of good relations between staff and prisoners. The prison was praised for its cleanliness and the time spent out of cell by inmates in useful activities.  It was to the credit of the prison that the potentially dangerous mix of sophisticated inmates and inexperienced staff had resulted in a mostly safe prison based on mutual respect, Ms Owers said. But she criticised the "cumbersome" system for dealing with insubordination which allowed prisoners to avoid punishment.  A search carried out the week before the inspection uncovered the weapons and alcohol, suggesting that regular cell searches were not thorough.  Kevin Rogers, Dovegate's director, defended the prison's staffing policies and said it managed with fewer staff than most state-run prisons because of the "open minds of the new recruits" and union agreements which allowed it to run a more flexible working system.  (The Guardian)

Dover Asylum Screening Centre
London City Airport
Group 4 (formerly run by Global Solutions)

September 12, 2005 BBC
Immigration detainees have been forced to sleep on tables or plastic chairs because of sub-standard provisions, the prisons watchdog has revealed. Facilities at Gatwick Airport, London City Airport and Dover Asylum Centre were inappropriate for overnight stays, the chief inspector of prisons said. City Airport was "unsuitable" for holding children, the report said. The government said it takes detainees' welfare seriously but that facilities may need independent monitoring. Holding centres at ports and airports hold foreign travellers whose permission to be in the country needs to be examined by immigration officers. But none of the centres inspected, all run by private company GSL UK Limited, had adequate child protection arrangements, according to the report. Inspectors found detainees were sleeping in inadequate conditions, there were no regular healthcare visits and suicide-prevention measures were not good enough.

August 16, 2005 BBC
Facilities at four short-term immigrant holding centres have been condemned as "inadequate" by the prisons watchdog. Dover Asylum Screening Centre, a centre at London City Airport and two at Gatwick Airport are not suitable for overnight stays, its report says.
Detainees were found to have slept on tables or plastic chairs, it adds. Immigrants are only supposed to be detained for a few hours, but Chief Inspector of Prisons Anne Owers said people were sometimes held overnight, and occasionally for up to 36 hours. Ms Owers said none of the centres had adequate child protection arrangements. A spokesman for GSL UK Limited, which was in charge of the centres at the time of the inspections, said it was inappropriate to comment as the company no longer ran them. The centres have since been taken over by Group 4 Securicor.

Downview Women's Prison
Banstead, UK
Aramark
March 27, 2007 IC Surrey
REPLACING prison food with over-priced outside catering fare is a recipe for disaster in a women's jail. This is the opinion of prison visitors whose latest report says inmates much preferred 'porridge' the way it is. Aramark, the company which has taken over the canteen at Downview Women's Prison, is typical of the caterers who have taken over the food at many jails. And the report by the Independent Monitoring Board claims the new system is not being welcomed anywhere. The report says: "We were warned in advance by other independent monitoring boards who had experienced a similar change to expect a disastrous transfer - and it has been. "The decision to privatise the canteen may bring cash benefit to the Treasury but the introduction of Aramark to run the prison canteen has so far been a disaster. "For prisoners the canteen is one of the most important facets of their lives but prices have risen sharply,the inventory has shrunk, revisions take ages to implement and the administration is poor. "In contrast the old prison-run canteen at least understood the needs of the prisoners and charged prices that matched their wages. "It worked and this seems to be the same story repeated throughout as prison after prison has lost control of its canteens." In a report which praises "committed and dedicated" staff, the board said all the faults it found with Downview were beyond their control.

Dungavel Detention Centre
Lanarkshire, Britain
Wackenhut
September 21, 2003
Campaigners have reacted angrily to reports that the Dungavel asylum centre's capacity is to be increased . The Home Office has confirmed that it is looking at a £3m project to increase capacity by a quarter to 194. This would involve new pre-fabricated buildings with bars on the windows being built at the centre in south Lanarkshire. The Scottish National Party accused the Scottish Executive of "dishonesty" and of hiding the plans. This is one of a number of plans to increase the size of detention of state Home Office spokesman MSPs have clashed over who is responsible for Dungavel as the UK Government is currently in charge of immigration and asylum, but education in Scotland is a devolved matter. An executive spokesman said again on Sunday that immigration and the operation of Dungavel is reserved to Westminster and the Home Office. Collusion claim A Home Office spokesman said: "This is one of a number of plans to increase the size of detention of state. "If it goes ahead the capacity will increase to 194. But the extra space will not be used for families and instead will house single males." Linda Fabiani, SNP MSP for Central Scotland, accused the executive of colluding with the Home Office. She said: "Ministers are being very dishonest about this. They should be deeply ashamed at what they are allowing the Home Office to do. "They're going to have to take notice of the people in Scotland who know that they are breaching human rights." The MSP claimed the plans were prove that Dungavel was being used like a prison. She said: "They (the executive) have chosen to make this place a prison and are actually building prison facilities with bars on the windows. "They are locking children up in that environment." Labour MSP Elaine Smith, the member for Coatbridge and Chryston, said the plans should have been revealed months ago. Labour MP Michael Connarty, a campaigner against the detention of children at the centre, said he was concerned. He said: "We need to move away from this type of facility. "I'm concerned we seem to be consolidating Dungavel's role. It is a prison establishment and unsuitable for children." (BBC News)

September 11, 2003
Westminster has effectively ruled out educating children held at the Dungavel asylum centre in local schools.  Immigration Minister Beverley Hughes said she wanted the "best possible education" provided for children inside the centre.  In a special debate in the Scottish Parliament, Scottish National Party leader John Swinney appealed to MSPs to follow their consciences and end the policy of detaining children.  The privately-run centre in South Lanarkshire, which can hold up to 150 asylum seekers, has caused controversy by holding children in the former prison for long periods with their parents.  An SNP motion in parliament called for "an end to the detention of children" at the Dungavel Immigration and Removal centre.  It also sought an end to "a system of detention of children at Dungavel which denies them access to social contact and to educational and other services in the local community".  In an impassioned speech, Scottish Socialist MSP Rosie Kane made clear her opposition to Dungavel.  She said: "Detention of innocent people is wrong. Dungavel and other detention centres all over the UK are wrong.  (BBC News)

September 6, 2003
About a thousand people have joined a human rights demonstration outside the controversial Dungavel Detention Centre in Lanarkshire.  The event was planned to coincide with the second anniversary of the centre's opening.  Organisers the Scottish Trades Unions Congress (STUC) said the protest reflected growing public concern over the treatment of asylum seekers there.  A spokesman said it was outrageous that asylum seekers and their families had been detained in Scotland over the past two years, having committed no crime and with no charges against them.  (BBC News)

August 15, 2003
The long-term detention of children in immigration removal centres should stop, the chief inspector of prisons has said.  Anne Owers' call is made in a report on the Dungavel detention centre in Lanarkshire, the only such centre in Britain where children are regularly held for long periods.  Opposition politicians and churches in Scotland have demanded the closure of the 62-bed family unit at Dungavel.  The privately-run centre holds up to 148 failed asylum seekers and other immigration detainees.  (BBC News)

Elmley Prison
Kent, UK
Serco

May 24, 2010  Kent News
Four people, including a prison guard, have been sentenced for conspiracy to supply drugs and mobile phones to convicts. The drugs had a prison ‘street value’ of around £17,000 in HMP Elmley prison, and the judge described the crimes as "very serious offences, as drugs and mobile phones are a form of currency within prisons which can destroy prison life". Prisoner Darren Byrne, 30, of HMP Elmley, received eight years imprisonment for his role as ringleader in the conspiracy. At Maidstone Crown Court Judge Gold said: "You were at the hub of this conspiracy, orchestrating it all from within the prison walls". The court heard how officers had found a mobile phone and Sim card in Byrne's cell and the phone revealed a series of text messages between him and Carly Morris revealing key information about the smuggling operation. Morris, 25, from Dover, formerly a Serco court security employee working at Canterbury Crown Court, was given a total of five years imprisonment for her role in the conspiracy. Judge Gold said Morris "had a responsibility to transport and guard prisoners and that she had abused her position of trust" by passing over drugs and mobile phones to prisoners to smuggle back into HMP Elmley.

June 3, 2009 Little Hampton Gazette
A former prison worker has been remanded on bail after appearing in court charged with trying to smuggle drugs into a Kent prison. Carly Joanne Morris, 24, who has left her post at Serco, was charged with conspiracy to supply drugs into Elmley Prison on the Isle of Sheppey in Kent, along with three other people. Prison inmate Darren Paul Byrne, 29, Dino Lewis Gillet, 37, unemployed, of Canterbury Road, Westgate-on-Sea, and his wife, Sahra Naomi Gillet, 35, also unemployed and of the same address, also appeared at Medway Magistrates' Court for a preliminary hearing. All four are also charged with conveying prohibited articles into the prison. Morris, from Dover, and Mrs Gillet were remanded on bail. Mr Gillet and Byrne were remanded in custody until their next appearance at Maidstone Crown Court on June 15. Officers from the serious and organised crime unit within Kent Police's specialist operations directorate made the arrests following a joint investigation between Kent Police and HMP Elmley security department. More than 18 police officers were involved in the investigation and arrests and properties in Grange Road, Ramsgate, and Canterbury Road, Westgate-on-Sea, were searched. The arrests come after another former Serco worker was charged with trying to smuggle drugs into the jail last month.

May 14, 2009 BBC
A former prison worker has been charged with trying to smuggle drugs into a Kent jail. Kent Police charged Zoe Spenser-Campbell, 25, with conspiracy to supply controlled drugs into Elmley Prison on the Isle of Sheppey. The former Serco employee was charged alongside labourer Jason Howsam, 26, who lives at the same address in High Street, Herne Bay. A second man who was also arrested on Tuesday was released without charge. The arrests followed a joint investigation between the serious and organised crime unit within Kent Police's specialist operations directorate and HMP Elmley security department.

Forest Bank Prison
Agecroft, UK
Sodexho (Kalyx)
September 30, 2011 Manchester Evening News
A prison manager demoted over the dramatic escape of a gangster has been found hanged at his home. Tony Purslow was part of an escort taking criminal Michael O'Donnell to hospital in an ambulance when it was subjected to a 'terrifying' attack by a gang of bat-wielding masked men in Salford. O'Donnell, who had been awaiting sentence for conspiracy to rob and commit burglary, was sprung by the gang and spent nearly a month at large. Mr Purslow – who worked at Forest Bank in Salford - was hauled before a disciplinary committee and demoted to the rank of senior custody officer, cutting his salary by £10,000 a year. Three other prison officers who were in the ambulance at the time of the escape were sacked. Mr Purslow, 50, was found dead at his home in Leigh last Thursday. He was immaculately dressed in a suit and had a picture of his family in his top pocket.

February 11, 2011 BBC
A former prison nurse who smuggled a mobile phone into a Salford jail could have put people's lives at risk, police have said. Leanne Cartledge, 23, of Miles Platting, hid the mobile phone in her clothing and gave it to a prisoner she was in a relationship with. She admitted taking a prohibited article into the privately-run HMP Forest Bank prison last year. On Thursday, she was jailed for four months at Minshull Street Crown Court. Det Con Phil Marsh, of Greater Manchester Police, said: "Cartledge was employed in a position of a trust - a position she abused when she smuggled a prohibited item into the prison and our investigations revealed her actions had serious and far-reaching implications. "Any time a mobile phone is illegally handed to someone who is in prison, it can give that offender a lifeline to continue their criminality in the outside world which has a knock-on effect for many people, potentially putting them at risk. "It can also lead to fights between other inmates, bullying and witness intimidation so clearly her actions were both foolish and dangerous." A spokeswoman for Kalyx, which runs HMP Forest Bank, said they were not able to comment on individual cases.

November 9, 2010 Manchester Evening News
Young prisoners are being tied up in bed linen and beaten by other inmates, a report said today. The practice, known as "sheeting", is seen as horseplay by some staff at Forest Bank prison, in Salford, Greater Manchester, but the Chief Inspector of Prisons, Nick Hardwick, condemned it as "serious bullying" which needs to be stopped. "A very vulnerable young man who spoke to us described it as him being tied up inside a duvet cover and 'battered' every night," he said. "A number of prisoners talked to us about 'sheeting' and these were incidents that the prison had recorded on a number of occasions. "A prison officer on a wing described it to us as horseplay. Prison management had limited knowledge of it. We are satisfied this does occur and needs to be stopped." Forest Bank, a category B local prison for adult and young adult men, was operating under its full operational capacity of 1,424 prisoners at the time of the inspection between June 29 and July 9, the report said. The report found that the prison is making improvements in cutting out drug abuse - with only one in ten prisoners failing a random drugs test in 2009 compared with four in ten in 2005. About half of the prison's 110 young adults were held on the A1 landing, where most of the incidents of sheeting took place and inmates there identified "serious concerns about their safety", the inspectors said. "A prisoner was forcibly put inside a duvet cover and the opening knotted so that he could not release himself while perpetrators carried out random acts of violence," Mr Hardwick said. "Prisoners told us that it was common and we met a number of young people who had clearly been victimised in this way." He added: "We were concerned that for a small minority of prisoners, it was not at all safe and in some cases, prison officers on the wings had a passive attitude to bullying and unexplained injuries - however good the policies."

May 28, 2010 BBC
A prisoner who cut off part of his ear so he could escape from an ambulance in Greater Manchester has been arrested. Michael O'Donnell, 29, was on remand at HMP Forest Bank in Salford when he took a razor to his ear while in his cell. He was taken to hospital on 2 May, but on the way the ambulance was held up by masked men and O'Donnell escaped. He was arrested at Pontin's in Southport, Merseyside, on Friday on suspicion of escaping from lawful custody. Two other men, aged 24 and 52, were also arrested on suspicion of conspiracy in assisting an offender to escape from lawful custody. O'Donnell was sharing a cell with his brother when the incident happened. He was being taken to Hope Hospital when a stolen BMW pulled in front of it, forcing it to stop on Agecroft Road. Four masked men then attacked the vehicle with baseball bats and bolt cutters and O'Donnell, who was escorted by three prison guards, escaped. The BMW, which had been stolen in a burglary on 30 April in Levenshulme, was later found abandoned near to Lumbs Lane. O'Donnell was due to be sentenced at Manchester Minshull Street Crown Court on Friday for conspiracy to convert criminal property, in relation to a car cloning crime ring.

May 4, 2010 Manchester Evening News
A prison has launched an inquiry after a dangerous robber was sprung by a masked gang as he was taken to hospital. Michael O’Donnell is believed to have used a razor blade to slice off part of his own ear to set up his escape. The gang stopped the ambulance taking him to hospital from Forest Bank prison in Salford early on Sunday before forcing guards to free him. They then fled in a stolen BMW. His escape was the third in five years from the privately-run jail. In 2006, robber Michael Halligan, then 26, from Salford, gave two Forest Bank guards the slip as he waited for a minor operation in hospital. The year before, car-jacker Neil Brennan was sprung. He deliberately injured his hand and made a phone call from inside the prison to tip-off his hijackers. Forest Bank opened in 2000 at a cost of £46m and is run by Kalyx, which runs four prisons in England and Scotland. The prison will consider how the gang appeared to know precisely when the ambulance was due out of the prison and whether mobile phones may have played a part in the operation. Colin Moses, chairman of the Prison Officers’ Association, said: “Prisons should not be for profit. “It lowers standards and lowers wages. As a result, you get incidents like this. We are in an election when there’s a lot of talk about getting rid of the public sector. If this is how the private sector runs a prison, it’s not very good. “Here we have a prison given over to a group of profiteers and they cannot even keep people in custody.” A spokesman for Kalyx said: “We refute any allegations that our security measures would be compromised for any reason. “We have strict security procedures in place and security training for prison officers is in accordance with MOJ standards.” Detectives from the Major Incident Team of Greater Manchester Police have searched addresses in Stockport and south Manchester for O’Donnell, who has links to the travelling community and had been awaiting sentence for conspiracy to rob. Assistant Chief Constable Ian Hopkins said: “Given the timing and the nature of the attack, there’s clearly a degree of planning gone into it.”

April 29, 2008 Manchester.com
The inquiry into why a man wrongly released from Forest Bank jail in Salford was able to murder a man on a double-decker bus has criticised the criminal justice system. Anthony Joseph was released from the private prison in Agecroft despite an outstanding warrant for his immediate arrest from Liverpool crown court over a burglary offence. Anthony Joseph, 23, stabbed Richard Whelan several times on the top deck of a bus in London in July 2005 only hours after he was released. The report, which was commissioned by the Home Office last December, criticises the "lackadaisical" and "nonchalant approach" of the criminal justice system when it comes to some offenders. Officials at Forest Bank jail in Manchester have said they were not aware there was an outstanding arrest warrant for Mr Joseph. The report also criticises the lack of communication between law enforcement bodies. Earlier this month, government figures revealed that a tenth of the prison drug finds in England and Wales during 2007 were in Forest Bank. But the prison governor claims this reflects the jail's high detection rate.

August 14, 2006 BBC
A prison officer from a private jail has been arrested over claims he made nuisance calls to inmates' relatives. The 41-year-old man, who works at Forest Bank Prison, in Salford, Greater Manchester, was arrested after prisoners and families complained. The officer was held on 2 August and later bailed until 30 August. A Greater Manchester Police spokeswoman said a man had been arrested on suspicion of misuse of telecommunications systems. Forest Bank, which opened in 2000, is run by United Kingdom Detention Services (UKDS). A spokesman for UKDS said it had nothing to add to the police statement.

December 21, 2005 The Guardian
Inmates threw a bucket of excrement over prison staff as government inspectors toured a privately-run jail, it emerged today. The chief inspector of prisons, Anne Owers, revealed the incident - known in jail lingo as "potting" - as she raised concerns about falling safety standards at Forest Bank jail, Greater Manchester. The 800-inmate men's jail, which is run by UK Detention Services, suffered 25 prisoner assaults a month and there had been 2,500 disciplinary hearings in just six months, she said. Drugs were "rife" with four out of 10 compulsory drug tests coming back positive, her inspection team found. The director of the Prison Reform Trust charity, Juliet Lyon said: "This damning report reveals a prison that has become all too comfortable with violence, drugs and bullying. When a bucket of excrement is thrown at staff, during the inspection itself, you have to ask whether anyone is in control at Forest Bank. "This is the latest in a series of worrying reports suggesting that high staff turnover and lack of control in some private prisons is creating a 'Lord of the Flies' environment that is dangerous for prisoners and staff, and almost guaranteed to increase the chances of re-offending on release."

December 21, 2005 The Times
A PRIVATELY run jail is out of control, with high levels of assaults and a culture on the wings of drug abuse, according to a highly critical report published today. Prison officers were covered with a bucket of excrement by inmates at Forest Bank jail as inspectors toured the building. The incident known in prison slang as "potting" was the latest in a number of similar attacks on prison staff. Anne Owers, the Chief Inspector of Prisons, criticised the culture at the jail which was "steeped in serious drug abuse". In one month alone, more than 2kg of cannabis, 60g of heroin and 4.6g of cocaine were found at the jail, run by United Kingdom Detention Services. Ms Owers was so alarmed by the prison in Salford, Greater Manchester, that she immediately alerted senior Prison Service officials to the extent of the failings. "There had been a significant deterioration in safety so that urgent management attention and remedial action was required to rebuild staff confidence and properly regain control of the prison," the inspection report said. A surprise inspection in July at the jail, run by UKDS, a subsidiary of Sodexho Alliance which runs three prisons, found routine intimidation of staff, prisoner assaults on other prisoners running at 25 a month and staff turnover of 25 per cent a year. There had been 2,500 prisoner discipline hearings in six months and 40 per cent of compulsory drug tests were positive. Ms Owers said: "There were a series of assaults against staff, including one unsavoury incident when a bucket of excrement was thrown into an office and over two staff who were there, while we were at the prison. This was by no means the first such 'potting' incident in the prison's recent history. We were told there were two or three others in the previous couple of months." The report depicts a prison where drugs are rife and that a high level of staff turnover meant custody officers were unable to tackle problems. It is the second report in less than six months in which Ms Owers has found serious problems of control at a privately run jail. In July she found that staff at Rye Hill jail near Rugby had little confidence in controlling prisoners and the premises were "almost out of control". Staff turnover at the prison, operated by GSL, formerly part of the Group 4, was running at 40 per cent a year. Private sector involvement in the prison system has helped to spur the public sector to improve its performance and introduced innovation into the jail system. But staff turnover at private jails is higher than State-run jails - reflecting lower pay for officers compared with those in State prisons. It is also difficult to get information about what goes on in private jails with "commercial confidentiality" used as a reason not to disclose details. One prison watchdog said: "The private sector do not like anyone knowing too much about what goes on in their prisons. If they could get away with giving out no information at all, they would."

March 3, 2005 BBC
Police are searching for a "dangerous" prisoner who escaped while he was being taken to hospital in a taxi. Convicted robber Neil Brennan, 21, was handcuffed to two prison officers as they travelled from HMP Forest Bank to Hope Hospital, Salford, on Wednesday. The taxi was stopped by two men who threatened the guards with a gun, forcing them to unlock the handcuffs. Brennan escaped with the men. Greater Manchester Police said Brennan "may pose a danger to the public". Det Ch Insp Sam Hawarth said the hijacking had been well-planned and that he believed Brennan may have injured himself deliberately as part of the plot. He said he expected the Prison Service to review its means of transporting prisoners in the wake of the escape. "It would appear that using taxis in this manner is a regular practice, but it is not one we were aware of," he said. The prison guards who were taking Brennan from the privately-run HMP Forest Bank were not injured but were left "shocked".

August 18, 2004
A GREATER Manchester prison is at breaking point - according to an officer who has admitted trying to smuggle drugs into it. Norman Edgerton, 40, appeared at Manchester Crown Court last week after pleading guilty to possession of heroin with intent to supply. Now the contents of a letter the former prison officer wrote to the judge, Recorder Cross, have been revealed. In it, Edgerton criticises management at the prison, which is privately run by UK Detention Services (UKDS). The company has rejected the allegations. "It's not good enough to give officers keys, a badge and no radio, and expect two of them to unlock 86 inmates, run the wing, and hope all goes well. "If officers are to have any chance of doing their job effectively and within company regulations, they need and deserve the support and back-up systems that are there on paper only." He claims that officers ring in sick and quit their jobs because they feel "helpless, stressed and can no longer cope". He also alleges that inmates are becoming stressed at the lack of organisation on the wings. In February, up to seven prison staff suffered memory blackouts after their drinks were spiked during a night out. Last year, there was a security alert after allegations that an officer supplied mobile phones to inmates; and in 2002, an early Christmas party for prison officers ended in a brawl with police being called. (Manchester)

Glasgow Royal Infirmary
Glasgow, England
Sodexho
January 25, 2002
THESE were the shocking scenes inside Glasgow's largest hospital this week. A joint management and union inspection team found filthy conditions throughout Glasgow Royal Infirmary in areas used by patients and staff.   Now unions at the hospital are demanding Health Minister Malcolm Chisholm sack the private cleaning contractor Sodexho for failing to deliver decent services.   Bloody surgical "scrubs" from an operating theatre are dumped in a lift used to carry patients' meals. Staff say the area is infested with cockroaches.   DANGER MOVE: A porter moves bags of contaminated material, but is wearing no protective clothing.  Workers say tunnels below the Victorian-built hospital have been turned into firetraps by piles of waste.   And staff have to wash themselves in a stinking bathroom among damaged brickwork that could harbour germs. There are more piles of filth on the floor.   Despite this chief executive Maggie Boyle slammed our investigation and promised: "The cleaning contract for the hospital is routinely monitored and any problems identified are addressed."   However, North Glasgow Unison secretary Carolyn Leckie today called for Sodexho's contract to be terminated.   She said: "What we found is the result of years of under-funding. This is made worse by private firms milking profits and potentially putting patients at risk."   Staff shortages are so severe two men have to shift 10tonnes of linen a day, a job previously done by eight people.   Ms Leckie said: "We want to an end to privatisation.   The Trust can't solve this problem on its own. We desperately need extra resources from the Scottish Executive."  (John McCann)

Global Solutions Limited (now Group 4)
January 30, 2008 Oldham-Chronicle
SECURITY guards were left red-faced after their prison van got stuck in a town centre car park. Global Solutions Limited (GSL) is employed by the Prison Service to transfer prisoners safely between court and jail. But the driver caused a bit of a stir when the van became jammed in the former Co-op car park at the back of Mecca Bingo on King Street. Police went to investigate but found the prisoners had already been dropped off at Oldham Magistrates’ Court. A police spokesman said: “The driver said he had read the height restriction notice but thought the van would be able to clear it.” The driver and his colleague then freed the van by letting air out of the tyres.

December 18, 2007 Yahoo Business Wire
Cognetas, an independent mid-market pan-European private equity firm specialising in complex deals, today announces the sale of Global Solutions (GSL) for £355 million to G4S. The sale, subject to EU merger clearance and South African competition commission clearance, is expected to complete in 2008. GSL is a leading provider of outsourced support services to public authorities and corporate organisations worldwide. Services are typically provided under long-term contracts (5 to 30 years) either directly to the end customer or through joint ventures and Public Private Partnerships with government and corporates. GSL has operations in the UK, South Africa and Australia. Its service offering covers three areas: Custodial services, including prison management, escorting, immigration, custody and training; Public Services, for example healthcare, education and Local Authority services; and Business services, comprising utilities, office accommodation and other managed services. Cognetas backed the original MBO of GSL in 2004 in a £207 million (€309 million) transaction. At the time, Cognetas underwrote equity and debt to facilitate certainty for the vendor with an initial commitment of £105 million (€158 million) on behalf of Cognetas Fund I. This was reduced within two months to £54 million (€81 million) by introducing senior debt. The balance of the funding was provided by Englefield Capital on behalf of the Englefield Funds. Since then Cognetas has supported management in the implementation of a growth plan that has seen revenues increase from £291 million in 2004 to over £400 million in 2007 through organic growth, in fill acquisition and expansion of services in its sectors over three continents with the number of staff employed increasing by over 25% to more than 9,500. Nigel McConnell, Managing Partner of Cognetas commented: “We are delighted to be associated with the success of GSL over the past three years and we are pleased to see that the dynamic management team has built the business into a worldwide quality provider of outsourced services. We leave the business on extremely sound and robust grounds which will help sustain its continued growth. I am confident that being part of a larger global business like G4S will take this business forward to a new level and I wish them well”.

November 29, 2007 The Telegraph
Group4Securicor is in talks to buy Global Solutions, a company it used to own, for around £350m. Earlier this year, private equity firm Cognetas appointed investment bank UBS to carry out a strategic review of Global Solutions, which runs a number of Britain's prisons and detention centres. However, the credit crunch forced Cognetas to put the review of Global Solutions on hold. Since then, the company has received a number of approaches, including one from Group4Securicor. Cognetas bought Global Solutions, which also manages hospitals, schools and tourist offices, from Danish security firm Group 4 Falk for about £200m three years ago. Group4Securicor is now understood to be carrying out due diligence on the business. However, it is not the only company bidding. Sources said US group GEO and several private equity firms have also made approaches for the company. Global Solutions has previously come under the spotlight for the way it runs its prisons and detention centres, following the Government's privatisation of the sector. Earlier this year, there was a Panorama investigation by an undercover BBC reporter, who worked as a custody officer, in one of Global Solutions' prisons at Rye Hill. None of the parties involved would comment.

August 26, 2007 The Observer
A possible sale or flotation of Global Solutions, which runs a number of Britain's prisons and detention centres, has been shelved by private equity owner Cognetas, according to City sources. UBS, the investment bank that was appointed last month to undertake a strategic review of the prisons group, is understood to have advised Cognetas against a move while global credit and stock markets are still on tenterhooks. Cognetas bought Global Solutions, which also manages hospitals, schools and tourist offices, from Danish security firm Group 4 Falk for about £200m three years ago. The company has stoked occasional controversy, most recently after the BBC's Panorama programme looked into the way Global Solutions ran Rye Hill prison, near Rugby, Warwickshire. The jail was the subject of a report by the chief inspector of prisons, Anne Owers, who found the staff were inexperienced. There has also been criticism of the way it runs asylum centres - last year, a prisons inspectorate inquiry was ordered into Yarl's Wood, an immigration removal centre in Bedfordshire that was formerly run by Global.

June 14, 2007 The Telegraph
Global Solutions, a company that runs some of Britain's prisons and detention centres, may be about to change hands for around £400m. Private equity firm Cognetas, which owns Global Solutions, has appointed investment bank UBS to carry out a strategic review of the business, according to sources familiar with the matter. It is understood that the review is likely to examine a float, sale, refinancing and possible future acquisition for the business. Sources stressed that the strategic review might not necessarily lead to an imminent sale of Global Solutions, which Cognetas bought in 2004 from Danish security firm Group 4 Falck for around £207m. The move comes as Global Solutions - which also builds and manages hospitals, schools and tourist offices for several public organisations around the world - has come under the public spotlight for the way it runs its prisons and detention centres, following the Government's privatisation of the sector. Earlier this year, there was a Panorama investigation by an undercover BBC reporter, who worked as a custody officer, in one of Global Solutions' prisons at Rye Hill. Global Solutions' detention centres for asylum seekers have also been criticised. Last year, a prison inspectorate inquiry was ordered after two refugees had to go to hospital following prolonged detention in Yarl's Wood, an immigration removal centre formerly run by Global Solutions. Cognetas declined to comment.

February 16, 2006 BBC
A councillor has called for an urgent review of security after two prisoners escaped from Derby Crown Court in the space of a week. Derby city councillor Richard Smalley said one of the prisoners was on remand for allegedly being involved in a post-office robbery in his ward. Kabbar Kamara, 25, from Liverpool made his escape after being refused bail. He appeared in a court on the top floor before getting away in a manner likened to the fictional character Spiderman. Unsuccessful search. He punched his way through the dock, ran from the court and into a toilet. He squeezed through a window, climbed onto a roof, jumped down to another level and dropped 12 feet to the ground. Police used a helicopter and dogs to search for him but without success. Previously Fabian Wilson, 23, from Derby absconded after appearing in court charged with breaching a community service order. Mr Smalley, deputy Conservative leader on the city council, said: "I think it's of paramount importance that the way offenders or alleged offenders are handled within the court is looked at and tightened up." Security at the court is handled by GLS, formerly Group 4. A spokesman said a review would be conducted to identify any lessons that could be learned from the escapes.

Group 4/Securicor (AKA Wackenhut, G4S, ArmorGroup)
G4S teaches UK Border Agency how to care for children: openDemocracy, July 9, 2012, Clare Sambrook. It’s no joke — the world’s biggest security company is training immigration staff in “Keeping Children Safe”.
Who should investigate murder — the police, or a private security company?: openDemocracy, April 13, 2012, Clare Sambrook. Private rent-a-cops to investigate murder?
Police, magistrates and prisons by . Is this what the British people want?: openDemocracy, March 6, 2012, Mel Kelly. Scary story about G4S taking over everything. This is dangerous folks. A must read.
Companies Use Immigration Crackdown to Turn a Profit: Expose on immigration by Nina Bernstein at the New York Times, September 28, 2011
Duty of Care: Expose by Clare Sambrook on G4S and the death of Aboriginal elder Mr. Ward. June 8, 2011

March 08, 2013 getsurrey.co.uk

A DOUBLE amputee from Woking died from head injuries when his unsecured wheelchair tipped over in a G4S ambulance that the driver had not been properly trained to use, an inquest jury has found. Palaniappan Thevarayan, 47, of Hawthorn Road, Barnsbury, was being transferred to St Helier Hospital in Sutton on May 4 last year when his wheelchair came free from the built-in clamps and he fatally hit his head. The jury at Westminster Coroner’s Court ruled on Thursday (March 7) that Mr Thevarayan had not been securely clamped into the back of the ambulance. Driver John Garner and fellow G4S staff were insufficiently trained to transport hundreds of patients from their homes to clinics and hospitals across London and the south east, the inquest heard. The court was told drivers were aware of problems with the clamps prior to the incident, and were then told to stop using them immediately after Mr Thevarayan’s death. New vehicles were introduced in November 2011. The former newsagent was being moved from a dialysis treatment centre in Epsom to St Helier’s when he had to be diverted because his catheter had become blocked, the inquest heard. After hearing that Mr Garner’s manual handling training had not been refreshed since 2009, jurors decided: “Patient transport service staff were not sufficiently trained in the safe transportation of patients by ambulance.” Mr Thevarayan, who was born in India, had been undergoing dialysis three times a week for nearly three years when he died and was only using the Epsom centre because his usual facility in West Byfleet had been temporarily shut down in April 2011 due to storm damage. Mr Thevarayan’s wife and full-time carer Nirmala told the inquest she wanted answers about his treatment by G4S and why it took so long to get him into surgery. She said her husband was given a 50:50 chance of survival if operated on immediately after the injury but nearly six hours passed before he went for surgery. “I want to know why they didn’t look after him properly,” she told the court on Monday. “And in hospital, why did they take so long to treat him?” Mrs Thevarayan said her husband had called to say he would receive antibiotics and be back home that night. But he was given a bleak outlook when assessed by doctors on arrival at St Helier’s, the inquest heard. Despite his condition, it was not until 10pm that he was transferred to St George’s in Tooting for surgery and a further four hours until he went into the operating theatre. The inquest heard Mr Thevarayan, a devoted family man, was diagnosed as diabetic when he was 23 and developed kidney problems later on in life. He was forced to retire when both his legs were amputated after he developed circulation difficulties, and had a heart bypass in 2009. But Mrs Thevarayan said her husband remained fiercely independent, despite his health problems. “He was a very capable man, and what he could do, he would do,” she told the inquest. “He never asked anyone for any help.” She added he was nearing the top of the kidney transplant list when he died and was also due to be fitted with a prosthetic leg. “The next day he had an appointment with the transplant surgeon and he was so looking forward to that,” his wife said. Mr Thevarayan died of an acute chronic subdural haematoma and head injury contributed to by chronic renal failure and diabetes. Assistant deputy coroner Kevin McLoughlin said to Mrs Thevarayan and her son and daughter, who sat through the four-day inquest: “I pay tribute to the calm dignity which you and your family have conducted yourself through what must have been heartbreaking evidence.”


22 Feb 2013 itv.com

Two employees who stole thousands from a cash collection depot in Maidstone have been jailed for four years each. Barry Jackman from Ashford and Mark Knight from Maidstone, were charged after an internal investigation by G4S, who contacted police when they noticed money going missing. The pair were employed as depot manager and deputy of the Maidstone depot, which conveys money to banks and financial institutions. Jackman and Knight came under suspicion after they were allegedly seen in a car park exchanging what appeared to be a bag of money. Police officers searched Knight’s home and found eight cash bags, each containing £500 in £2 coins. At Jackman’s house, £100 in £2 was found in a box in the garage. Mark Knight was also sentenced to four years in prison Credit: Kent Police  -- The two had come up with techniques to remove money from the depot, bypassing the searches that they were subjected to when leaving the premises. It's estimated that between January 2010 and September 2011 that £90,000 went missing from the depot. **Knight blamed temptation as the main factor. One of the methods involved moving a loose ceiling tile, allowing access to the roof space, and leaving the bags in the space. Once through the security checks, Jackman or Knight accessed the roof space via the ladies toilets to collect the cash. The pair also took real money, but balanced the books by sending counterfeit cash that the depot had sorted back out to financial institutions to ensure that there were no anomalies.


February 13, 2013 express.co.uk

The group said the final settlement with the London Organising Committee of the Olympic Games (LOCOG), would cover its failure to provide all the 10,400 security guards needed to protect the event last summer. Military personnel had to be drafted in to cover the shortfall with G4S boss Nick Buckles hauled before Parliament to explain why it had not met its targets. G4S had previously forecast a £50million loss from the £284million contract but said its decision to waive a larger chunk of its management fee had sent the bill higher. It is also taking a further £18million hit including the cost of Games marketing and a £2.5million goodwill donation to a military charity. However the overall loss was less than the £150million speculated by some in the City leaving G4S shares flat at 280½p. Buckles said: "Whilst we are extremely disappointed to find ourselves in this position we are pleased to have concluded these negotiations. "The Government is an important customer and it was in our interests to bring this matter to a close in a professional manner without the need for lengthy legal proceedings." A G4S spokesman said the settlement had drawn a line under the affair and it was now keen to "restore its reputation" with the Government, which accounts for about half of its UK revenues.

12 October 2012 Scotsman.com
Police had to cover “thousands” of extra shifts at the London 2012 Games after private security firm G4S failed to recruit and train enough guards. Officers working overtime covered around 500 shifts, earmarked for G4S staff, in London alone. Regional events such as the football competitions meant this figure jumped “significantly” outside London during the Games, the national Olympic security co-ordinator, Assistant Commissioner Chris Allison said. He told London Assembly’s Police and Crime Committee: “It was significantly more than that [500 shifts in London]. I think it was in the thousands that we had to do nationally.” G4S confirmed the shortage just weeks before the Games began. All the forces, such as Strathclyde Police who took over ­responsibility for security at the Olympic venue in Glasgow, are being reimbursed by G4S, Mr ­Allison said.

October 1, 2012 AP
The security contractor at the Y-12 nuclear weapons plant in Tennessee was fired Monday after authorities said three protesters cut through fences and vandalized a building in an unprecedented break-in. Security contractor WSI Oak Ridge said it has started winding down operations and will transfer its protective force functions to B&W Y-12, the managing contractor at the plant, over the next several weeks. The Department of Energy had earlier recommended that WSI's contract be terminated. The security contractor was criticized for its poor response when the protesters, including an 82-year-old Roman Catholic nun, cut through fences on July 28 and defaced a building that stores the plant's weapons grade uranium. Peter Stockton, a Department of Energy adviser on nuclear security during the Clinton administration, called the firing long overdue. "This the most egregious thing we've ever run into," said Stockton, a senior investigator with the Project On Government Oversight. "It's the worst of the worst."

September 28, 2012 The Upcoming
Two senior executives from G4S (Group 4 Securicor) have resigned after a report blamed management failings for the Olympics’ security fiasco. G4S, the world’s largest security firm, failed to provide the contracted and adequate number of security personnel to cover the Olympics in a public blunder that nearly overshadowed the successful Games. Nick Buckles survives the G4S management cull in the wake of the Olympics scandal. G4S chief operating officer, David Taylor-Smith, and the managing director for G4S Global Events, Ian Horseman-Sewell, are stepping down in wake of the scandal.

September 22, 2012 Reuters
G4S's bill for its embarrassing London Olympic staffing failure could rise after a government committee demanded the embattled security firm waive its management fee and compensate Games staff neglected in its chaotic recruitment drive. The world's biggest security firm has been under fire since admitting just two weeks before the Games began that it could not provide a promised 10,400 venue guards, embarrassing the government - a key customer - and forcing British troops to cancel holidays and fill the shortfall. G4S has already estimated a 50 million pound loss on the Olympic contract relating to the cost of deploying additional police and military personnel and the likely penalties the London Organising Committee of the Olympic and Paralympic Games will impose, but that may prove conservative. In a report published on Friday, the Home Affairs Committee, which twice hauled in G4S chief Nick Buckles to explain the Olympic debacle, said responsibility for the failure was with G4S and that its most senior personnel should be held accountable for making misleading staffing assurances to security officials so close to the start of the Games. "Far from being able to stage two Games on two continents at the same time, as they recklessly boasted, G4S could not even stage one," said Keith Vaz, Chairman of the influential Home Affairs Committee, referring to an interview managing director of G4S Global Events, Ian Horseman Sewell, gave to Reuters in July. "G4S should waive its 57 million pound management fee and also compensate its staff and prospective staff who it treated in a cavalier fashion." LOCOG has so far parted with only 90 million pounds of the 237 million pound contract and earlier this month insisted the remainder would have to be negotiated.

September 10, 2012 POGO
Shortly after the security breach at Y-12 National Security Complex on July 28, the Independent Oversight Program at the Department of Energy (DOE) headquarters sent a team to Y-12 to conduct performance tests on the effectiveness of the Wackenhut Services Inc Oak Ridge guard force, according to a POGO source at the DOE. Two days ago, The Nuclear Weapons & Materials Monitor reported that a federal inspector discovered copies of questions and answers from the written portion of the performance test in a guard force vehicle. The newest security director of Y-12, John Garrity, who took over the position after the break-in a month ago, has now been administratively re-assigned. This incident of cheating on a performance test at Y-12 is nothing new for Wackenhut. Prior to the break in at Y-12, POGO had received an anonymous tip voicing concerns about cheating on security tests that sounded credible. We could not verify the allegation so were not able to release it at the time. But after another source contacted POGO and the latest revelation about guards with test questions and answers, there is certainly justification to do so now. The source stated that “Wackenhut has a history of cheating on performance tests at Y12 and other locations. All of the in house testing that is scheduled to occur is relayed in advance to the security personnel so they always do a great job. All drills and tests done for the occasional outside agency are relayed ahead of time as to what they will be. There is no honest testing taking place. The security force cannot do any response without practicing and rehearsing ahead of time as they almost always do. Even though Wackenhut was caught cheating during an IG investigation in 2004, they were allowed to not only keep their contract, they were allowed to continue testing themselves. This is clearly a conflict on [sic] interest as it has been and it continiues [sic] to go on.” And in June 2003, a test using four different force-on-force scenarios was conducted at Y-12 to determine the effectiveness of the guard force. It turned out that the guard force performed too well on all four scenarios. An Inspector General (IG) investigation of the 2003 incident found that the tests had been compromised when leaders of the guard force gained access to the attackers’ plans: Several individuals told us, for example, that controlled (test-sensitive) information was shared with SPOs [Security Police Officers] prior to their participation in a given performance test. These concerns paralleled our findings regarding the June 2003 performance test. When queried as to the nature of the information that had been shared with SPOs in prior years, they provided a number of examples, including the following: •The specific building and wall to be attacked by the test adversary; •The specific target of the test adversary; and •Whether or not a diversionary tactic would be employed by the test adversary. In a memorandum attached to the IG report, Inspector General Gregory Friedman said, “We found that shortly before the test, two protective force personnel were inappropriately permitted to view the computer simulations of the four scenarios. This action compromised controlled (test-sensitive) information. As a consequence, the test results were, in our judgment, tainted and unreliable.” Additionally, the 2003 IG review stated that inspectors were provided with information that inappropriate actions had occurred going back to the mid-1980s in connection with performance tests at the department’s Oak Ridge Complex. In the last month, dozens of officials at Y-12 have either been transferred or allowed to retire as a result of both the break-in and the cheating debacle. This is nothing short of rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. Merely firing a single low-level guard, Kirk Garland, is hardly enough to address the larger issue of Wackenhut cutting corners on security. Garland was like a canary in a coal mine—in a real attack he would have been the first victim. His bravery was rewarded with a termination letter while those truly responsible for the break-in and cheating remain gainfully employed. Each performance test costs the better part of $100,000. Wackenhut has now been caught cheating twice and there are additional reports of cheating from sources like our anonymous whistleblower. How many more times will DOE allow Wackenhut to waste taxpayer money on tainted and unreliable tests before it terminates the security contract and provides adequate security that is tried-and-true?

September 9, 2012 The Guardian
Home Office ministers have ordered weekly reports on the progress of two new contracts with the private security companies G4S and Serco to house and provide support services for thousands of asylum seekers and their families. The chief executive of the UK Border Agency (UKBA), Rob Whiteman, has confirmed that serious concerns about the ability of the two companies to find housing for thousands of asylum seekers across the north of England by November has led to closer monitoring at the most senior levels of the Home Office. The £883m a year Compass contract to provide support services for dispersed asylum seekers is the largest project run by the Home Office. The two private security companies took over the five-year asylum housing contracts in four of the six UKBA regions across Britain from social landlords, including councils, in March. The companies were expected to start moving people in June. But after a contractual dispute G4S dropped its housing subcontractor for the Yorkshire and Humberside region, United Property Management, in June and its new subcontractors have yet to find enough homes. Two councils, Sheffield and Kirklees, have raised concerns about their ability to deliver the housing contract within the expected timetable. Kirklees council said that a fortnight ago, only one family out of 240 asylum seekers had been moved as part of the transition from the council to the new providers. "There are 240 asylum seekers being assisted. We understand the subcontractors are finding it difficult to procure accommodation and the council has been asked to continue to provide assistance until the end of October. There is no suggestion however that the council's contract will be renewed after this time," Whiteman has told the Commons public accounts committee there were also concerns about the two Serco contracts, one covering north-west England and the other Scotland and Northern Ireland, including the "speed at which properties are being acquired". He said the issue had been "escalated" to directly involve himself and Jeremy Oppenheim, the UKBA director of immigration and settlement. Weekly reports are also being sent to ministers. "It is not at this stage anywhere near penalties because they are acting within the contract in terms of how the work is handed over to them," Whiteman told MPs. "We do have concerns about mobilisation. We are escalating this and I have been involved in meetings on that but it is at a relatively early stage." He added there were other remedies available under the contracts but he hoped the difficulties would be resolved.

September 7, 2012 Reuters
Embattled security firm G4S will be forced to relive its embarrassing London Olympics staffing failure on Tuesday when its boss returns for a second showdown with British lawmakers demanding to know how the debacle was allowed to happen. Group Chief Executive Nick Buckles and David Taylor-Smith, who is the group's UK and Africa CEO, w ill be pressed for further explanation of the recruitment failure which has hit shares and raised questions about its prospects on future deals. "Everyone now accepts that G4S let the country down before the Olympics began. We need to ascertain the reasons why this happened and who else was responsible for the pre-Olympics shambles," Keith Vaz, chairman of the Home Affairs Committee and a member of Parliament for the opposition Labour party, told Reuters. Vaz said the committee had quizzed Home Secretary Theresa May, who is in charge of domestic security, on Thursday, and had received a detailed letter outlining the department's oversight of the contract and the minister's meetings with Buckle and the Olympics organizers during the run-up to the Games. G4S, the world's largest security firm, which in Britain runs services for airports, prisons, immigration and the police, admitted just 16 days before the Games began that it could not supply a promised 10,400 venue guards. It eventually raised 7,800 at peak times, leaving the military to make up the shortfall. The failure embarrassed the government, one of G4S's core clients which accounts for more than half of its 1.8 billion pounds British revenue. More than 20 percent of its pipeline of potential UK work also stems from that market. Those numbers mean the UK public sector is one of the biggest global clients for the group, whose revenue for 2012 is forecast at just over 8 billion pounds according to a Reuters poll of 21 analysts. G4S has said it expects to take a 50 million pound ($79.7 million) loss over the contract failure, but the potential for a longer-lasting reputational blow goes beyond the UK market. A week before it conceded recruitment problems, the company told Reuters it expected its work at the 2012 Games would help it win a bigger share of a four-year cycle of global events whose safety and security budget has been estimated at more than $10 billion.

August 20, 2012 Reuters
G4S is set to pull out of Pakistan amid an increasingly hostile environment for foreign security companies, the Financial Times reported on Monday. The company, which trades under the name Wackenhut Pakistan Ltd, has agreed to sell the business to its chairman in the region for about $10 million. Ikram Sehgal, chairman of G4S's Pakistani operation, who already owns a 50 percent stake in the company, is expected to buy the company's Pakistan interest. "The Pakistani government has decided it doesn't want foreign security companies in the region, which makes it tough for outsiders to operate," Sehgal is quoted as saying. G4S, the world's largest security firm, employs 10,000 staff in Pakistan, where it provides security for the UN and multinational corporations. G4S is under fire over its failure to provide enough guards at the London Olympics.

August 19, 2012 The Independent
G4S boss Nick Buckles once said that he "never had any ambition of working for anyone else". Early retirement it is, then, for the 51-year-old with the odd mullet haircut, because there is no way he should be allowed to continue at the world's second biggest private-sector employer. This is not because of the security fiasco at the Olympics, when G4S failed to stump up enough security guards so that the army had to step in to protect the event. Don't get me wrong, the epic failure at a global event that means the company has ruled itself out of bidding for contracts at the 2014 World Cup and the 2016 Olympics in Brazil was certainly deserving of his head. Nor is this about the disastrous failure to buy ISS for £5.2bn last year, when shareholders effectively vetoed his plans and were proven right last week when the Danish cleaner was valued some 20 per cent below that level in a stake sale. And, obviously it's a bit odd how corporate advisers, brokers and a chairman lost their jobs with G4S when Buckles goes around boasting that his role nowadays is "reputation and pricing bids". Of course he should have gone over the Olympics. Of course he should have gone over the ISS fiasco. But, to go for those reasons alone means that all the other shambles and controversies during his eight-year leadership then would be forgotten. Buckles should go for the many, many awful mistakes the company has made during his reign. It's difficult to know where to start, so I'll trot out the rebuttal that many shareholders will make against my argument: G4S has gown hugely under Buckles, the share price hovered below 120p in mid-2004 and since 2009 has traded at well over double that. Yes, the financial performance is impressive, with consistently strong turnover, profit and dividend pay-out figures. But, the operational performance has been shameful and when the industry is something as crucial as security, it is not enough to use accounts as a defence. Buckles is not personally responsible for any of the following, but the list is long enough to suggest that he has failed to impose the right culture on G4S's employees: In 2007, staff at US subsidiary Wackenhut were found asleep while "securing" a nuclear power plant, resulting in the loss of its contract with the US's biggest energy provider; In 2008, Aboriginal elder "Mr Ward" died of severe heat stroke in the back of a G4S prison van in Australia. G4S was fined after pleading guilty to charges of failing to protect the 46-year-old's health and safety; In 2010, father-of-five Jimmy Mubenga, who was being deported from the UK to Angola, was restrained by three G4S security guards and died of cardiac arrest. Last month, the Crown Prosecution Service did not bring charges to the guards over insufficient evidence, a decision that a former chief inspector of prisons branded "perverse"; In 2011, G4S lost a major government contract after a record 773 complaints by immigration centre detainees, including nearly 50 of assault. Current chief inspector of prisons Nick Hardwick found that G4S guards used "highly offensive and sometime racist language". Individually, these are hardly the fault of the boss of one of the world's most sprawling empires. It is also hard to say when enough emerged that Buckles should have taken a hard look at himself and admit that he hadn't corrected what appears to be cultural deficiencies. But the list has gone well beyond whatever that point is and he should go.

August 18, 2012 The Sun
A ROBBER dressed as a G4S guard walked out of a store with £14,000 takings — while the real security man was sat outside reading a paper. Duped staff at Poundland became suspicious after handing over the cash. They went outside to the waiting G4S van and told the driver: “We’ve just given the money to your mate.” But the stunned security guard put down his newspaper and replied: “What mate?” Cops reckon the robber had watched the G4S staff’s regular routine before “mocking up” a uniform — complete with crash helmet and body armour. A source said: “The real G4S guys often take a quick break when arriving in their security wagon. On this occasion the guy was reading a paper in the cab. “The robber has been caught on CCTV appearing from the back of the van, as if he’d got out of the passenger seat. “Staff had no reason to think he wasn’t a G4S man. He handed them two cash containers which they filled up. “He then calmly walked out and disappeared. He must have been laughing his head off under his helmet.” Police are appealing for witnesses to Thursday’s heist in Stratford-upon-Avon, Warks. It is the latest embarrassment for gaffe-prone G4S after its failure to provide 10,400 Olympic security staff. A spokeswoman said: “We’ll be working closely with Poundland and Warwickshire Police.”

July 31, 2012 Manchester Evening News
Embattled security firm G4S was booted out of Old Trafford before the first Olympics football match there, the M.E.N. can reveal. Hundreds of G4S staff workers were supposed to patrol United’s home ground while it hosted matches at the 2012 Games. The arrangement was part of a £284m contract between Games organisers Locog and the crisis-hit company. But a string of problems led to the decision to drop G4S at Old Trafford and bring in security firm Controlled Event Solutions, (CES) which looks after the stadium for Reds’ matches. A United source said the final straw for Olympic bosses had come when G4S sub-contractors walked out, claiming they had not been paid. The source added: “Someone has looked at it and said enough is enough and they have sent them packing and brought in CES.”

July 25, 2012 Aiken Standard
A civil lawsuit against Wackenhut Services Inc. at the Savannah River Site claiming discrimination should proceed to trial, a U.S. magistrate judge recommended in federal court documents last week. Judge Paige Gossett recommended granting in part and denying in part motions for summary judgement in the case of Marvin Timothy Oerman, who filed a lawsuit in 2010 claiming he was demoted by former employer Wackenhut because he is white. The judge's July 17 recommendation said the lawsuit should proceed on a race discrimination claim, but not on a sex discrimination claim. "It is our understanding that the magistrate issued recommendations partly in our favor and partly against us," said WSI spokesperson Rob Davis. "If the recommendations are upheld, the case will proceed to trial on one of Mr. Oerman's claims." Davis said that Wackenhut continues to deny any discriminatory actions against Oerman. Oerman, who is no longer employed with Wackenhut, worked for the contractor for more than 25 years, and claims that he was demoted while a less experienced black male was selected for the position of manager of Wackenhut's training operations department. The complaint states Oerman later learned that another manager planned to leave the department, and that Randy Garver, general manager of WSI-SRS, did not post the position before choosing another black male with less experience. Oerman filed a second lawsuit in 2011 against Wackenhut claiming retaliation once it became known that he had filed the initial lawsuit. He claimed Wackenhut Services Inc. selected individuals on the basis of race and gender and has "instituted an ad hoc racial and gender quota system," according to the complaint. Court documents state that, according to Garver, "there were continuing performance failures at the barricades for which [Oerman] was responsible," and as a result, he selected a new manager to oversee perimeter protection and transferred Oerman elsewhere. "Unfortunately, there were a significant number of employees who lost jobs through downsizing at SRS over the last several years, and this is our only lawsuit related to that downsizing," Davis said.

July 23, 2012 Ekklesia
The Howard League for Penal Reform has revealed new findings from polling firm Populus showing that half the public oppose privately run prisons. While just 37 per cent describe themselves as comfortable with private prisons, 49 per cent are uncomfortable, including 23 per cent very uncomfortable. The gap is even wider amongst women (32 per cent comfortable, 50 per cent uncomfortable) and the electorally crucial over-65 age group (32 per cent comfortable, 59 per cent uncomfortable). When the specific example of G4S running a local prison is presented, just one in four (26 per cent) describe themselves as comfortable with the idea and even fewer (23 per cent) view the service as suitable for a payment by results approach. Frances Crook, Chief Executive of the Howard League for Penal Reform, which campaigns for less crime, safer communities and fewer people in prison, said: “It’s clear that the public understands the dangers of putting such a key service as the prison system into the hands of unaccountable companies, who are driven by cutting costs rather than cutting crime. "The scandal of the Army having to step in to provide security at the Olympics after private firm G4S failed to do its job proves yet again that when private firms underperform, the public pays through the nose and safety is compromised. We shouldn’t be allowing the same thing in our prison system.”

July 16, 2012 The Guardian
The slide in the G4S share price on Monday reflected the Olympic-sized blow to the private security company's reputation, not only in Britain but throughout its global operations. The company has been here before. In its former incarnation as Group 4 in the early 1990s it became a national joke in Britain, as its first contracts to escort prisoners from courts to jail were hit by one high-profile escape after another. Since those dark days – helped by the fact that it was not then a publicly quoted company with a share price to protect – Group 4 not only recovered but has gone on to become a global success story, with 657,000 employees in 125 countries. G4S is now the largest player in global security, with 8% of the market and contracts that include protecting ships from pirates in the Indian Ocean and supplying security systems to the Pentagon. But its proud boast to be "securing your world, in more ways than you might realise" has been dealt a massive blow by overstretching itself on such a high-profile contract. While Olympic tier-one sponsors such as British Airways and Adidas have paid more than £700m to ensure they harvest a positive boost to their profiles, G4S is experiencing a turbocharged PR meltdown. Will this prove fatal to the company's UK reputation as the go-to contractor for everything in the criminal justice system from running police stations to managing prisons? Replacing its chief executive, Nick Buckles, 51, may not prove sufficient to repair the damage, especially if he pockets, as he will be entitled to, £20m in pay and benefits if he goes. The company will already have written off its hopes of winning the security contracts at the 2014 football World Cup and the 2016 Olympics, both in Brazil.

May 30, 2012 Our Kingdom
On Tuesday 8 May a Bradford asylum seeker and her twelve week old baby were given barely a week’s notice by private landlord UPM to quit their home. On Thursday 17th they were transported forty miles to a tiny flat in Doncaster with no cooker, table or chair, and only a tiny sink to wash dishes and clothes. Campaigners in Bradford and Doncaster supported the mother and engaged with local medical services and the Red Cross, and protested to the UK Border Agency and local authorities. The protests prompted a Border Agency inspector to visit the Doncaster flat. On Monday the Border Agency declared the flat “contractually non-compliant” and “not suitable in its present state for mothers and babies”. The Border Agency claimed it had instructed UPM to relocate the mother and baby as a matter of urgency. But they remain in the Doncaster flat, marooned 40 miles from anybody they know. This is the new world of asylum seeker housing controlled by G4S, the world’s biggest security company. In March G4S won a massive £30 million UK Border Agency contract to house asylum-seekers in the Midlands, the East of England, the North East, Yorkshire and Humberside. Using the “prime contractor model”, which G4S tells investors is “attractive”, the company granted subcontracts to UPM and the charity Migrant Help. UPM, or United Property Management (slogan “Serve like a charity. Perform like a business”), describes itself as “a market leading provider of accommodation and support services to people from all walks of life.” They’re based just up the road from Manchester’s Victoria Station. Beatrice Botomani, a worker at Bradford Refugee Action Forum who has coordinated protests and emergency help for the Bradford women and children, said: “We met UPM at the end of April and they gave a long list of pledges about not taking children out of Bradford and away from social and medical services and schools, and giving adequate notice on removals. Only a few days later they started evictions and removals with less than a week’s notice. Some of these women and children have been in Bradford for two years or more awaiting decisions on asylum claims. UPM has not told us where people are going and we cannot alert local support services to contact them – many of these people are already traumatised and have fled from terrible conditions in their home lands, UPM is adding to their stresses.”

March 30, 2012 Journal-Sentinel
Milwaukee County Sheriff David A. Clarke Jr.'s plan to privatize courtroom bailiffs won't fly - at least not for now. Judge Dominic D'Amato ruled that Clarke could not place private security guards in courtrooms, a move the sheriff had already started by issuing a $1.4 million contract with G4S Secure Solutions. The firm, formerly known as Wackenhut, is an international company that provides personnel and technology services. D'Amato issued a temporary injunction halting the deployment of 25 part-time G4S guards, siding with the county Deputy Sheriffs' Association. Clarke argued that he had the power to hire the G4S guards as an emergency stopgap and wanted that to avoid paying full-time bailiffs overtime. Clarke issued the G4S contract on an emergency basis after his 2012 budget was cut and eliminated 48 deputy jobs. The budget also called for creating a new category of part-time hourly bailiffs, who would be county employees but not deputies. Until now, the county has used only full-time deputies for courtroom security. The deputies' union has resisted opening the door to part-time bailiffs or private security for the courtroom. Under current staffing, felony courts have two bailiffs each, while misdemeanor and civil courts have one. Roy Felber, president of the Deputy Sheriffs' Association, said Friday the ruling was "a big win for us. I'm very disgusted that we are trying to privatize law enforcement." Private security guards would be loyal to their company, not to the county, Felber said.

January 13, 2012 The Guardian
The chairman of the company tasked with protecting athletes and visitors at the London Olympics has paid the price for a failed deal to take over a cleaning company and fallen on his sword. Alf Duch-Pedersen, who has headed the world's largest security firm G4S for the past five years, said he was "sad" to be stepping down this year but accepted the time was right to find a successor. Chief executive, Nick Buckles, is still in a job but Duch-Pedersen is to go after shareholders rebelled against a rights issue for a planned £5.3bn takeover of Danish cleaning firm ISS. Investors would not support a £2bn money-raising exercise unveiled last October – which would have allowed a merger to create a group with more than 1.2 million staff worldwide – at a time of deep economic uncertainty. Many analysts argued at the time that G4S – the result of an earlier merger between Group 4 and Securicor – should concentrate on its core protection work where it had won a groundbreaking contract to deliver back office functions for Lincolnshire police – the first of its kind by a British Police Authority.

November 22, 2011 The Guardian
Serious injuries or other life-threatening warning signs have been detected on 285 occasions when children have been physically restrained in privately run jails over the past five years, according to Ministry of Justice figures. The figure reflects the number of "exception reports" submitted by the four privately run secure training centres to the youth justice board since 2006. The warning signs triggering an exception report include struggling to breathe, nausea, vomiting, limpness and abnormal redness to the face. Serious injuries are classified as those requiring hospitalisation and include serious cuts, fractures, concussion, loss of consciousness and damage to internal organs. The MoJ figures, which have been disclosed for the first time, show that there were 61 such exception reports made last year. There have been 29 so far in the first 10 months of this year. Their disclosure comes as a two-day High Court challenge is due to get underway over the MoJ's refusal to identify and trace hundreds of children who have been unlawfully restrained in the privately run child jails using techniques that have since been banned. Children's rights campaigners believe they should be entitled to compensation. The Children's Rights Alliance for England (Crae) has brought the case challenging the justice secretary, Ken Clarke's, refusal to contact former detainees dating back to 1998, when the first secure training centre opened. The legal challenge follows a second inquest earlier this year into the death of 14-year-old Adam Rickwood, who was found hanging in his room at Hassockfield Secure Training Centre, where he was on remand in 2006. It concluded there was a serious system failure which gave rise to an unlawful regime at the child jail. The use of several "distraction" restraint techniques, that involved inflicting pain with a severe blow to the nose or ribs, or by pulling back a child's thumb, were banned in 2008. The use of physical restraint techniques to control teenagers simply for the purposes of "good order and discipline" was also ruled unlawful by the court of appeal. Carolyne Willow, Crae's national co-ordinator, said their lawyers will argue there had been a chronic failure by the authorities to protect vulnerable children over many years. "It was not children's responsibility to know about, challenge and stop unlawful and abusive treatment," said Willow, adding there were potentially thousands of former detainees who should now be contacted. "Children in custody are among the most disadvantaged in society and they were held in closed institutions where unlawful restraint was routine and ordinary. It was the state, and the private contractors, who were duty-bound to protect the welfare and rights of vulnerable children." She said that government officials now had a duty to notify potential victims that their rights had been infringed. The abuses should no longer remain hidden and unchallenged. The security company, G4S, which operates three of the four child jails is also joining the case as an 'interested party'.

October 21, 2011 BBC
Birmingham Prison inmates were locked in their cells for almost a full day after a set of keys fitting every cell door went missing. Keys to the jail, which was taken over earlier this month by private security firm G4S, disappeared on Tuesday. The firm said all prisons had established contingency plans for incidents of this nature and there was no risk to public safety. The jail is the first in the UK to be transferred to the private sector. It is not known if the keys have since been found or what action is now being taken at the prison.

October 17, 2011 BBC
Shares in G4S, the world's largest security group, fell almost 20% after it announced a £5.2bn ($8.2bn) takeover of Denmark's ISS. G4S will pay ISS's private equity owners cash and shares, and will raise £2bn from existing shareholders to help fund the deal. ISS operations range from catering to cleaning, while G4S services include running prisons and army training. The takeover will double the size of G4S, giving it revenues of about £16bn. G4S said the deal would create an estimated £100m of annual savings for the combined business by 2014.

October 11, 2011 Canberra Times
The Commonwealth Government is suing its former immigration detention operators for failing to protect it against lawsuits lodged by people kept in detention facilities. The case will be heard in the South Australian Supreme Court on November 21. It is part of a long-running case launched by former asylum-seeker Abdul Amir Hamidi, who won a confidential settlement against the Federal Government after almost five years in detention. As The Canberra Times revealed on Saturday, Mr Hamidi's lawyers predict that the confidential settlement will spark dozens more claims for damages. In a case to be heard on November 21, the Commonwealth will claim its former detention centre operators - GSL and Australasian Correctional Services - breached their contracts by exposing the Government to the legal action. The Commonwealth will argue both companies agreed to indemnify it against damages based on their running of Australian detention centres. Australasian Correctional Services operated Australia's mainland immigration detention facilities until early 2004. Group 4 Falck Global Solutions Pty Ltd (which later changed its name to Global Solutions Limited, or GSL) commenced management of the centres in late 2003. Both companies will fight the claim, with ACS arguing it had insufficient time to respond to the allegations and the terms of its agreement included dispute resolution measures. GSL says it is not responsible for indemnifying the Commonwealth for any ''negligent, wilful, reckless or unlawful acts or omissions of the Commonwealth, its employees, officers or agents''. Between 2000 and March 2010, detainees in Australian immigration detention centres were paid more than $12.3million in compensation for personal injury or unlawful detention.

September 11, 2011 Scotland on Sunday
HUNDREDS of thousands of pounds of taxpayers' money is being spent holding asylum-seekers at Dungavel detention centre for months at a time. Scotland on Sunday has learned that almost £500,000 has been spent housing 13 long-term detainees, several of whom have been at the former prison in South Lanarkshire for more than a year. Asylum-seekers are supposed to stay at so-called pre-departure centres for no more than a week. But in a number of cases, delays in the deportation system mean the UK Border Agency is holding people for an unspecified period. For the duration of detention, the Home Office pays security firm G4S £110 a day for each asylum-seeker. At Dungavel, two men have been held for two years and four months, while others have been held for more than a year, at a cost to taxpayers of about £480,000. Detaining Christian Likenge, 27, a former law student from the Democratic Republic of Congo, who has been held for 28 months, has cost £100,000 to date. Likenge, a Christian preacher, is being held after the UK rejected his application for asylum but officials in his native country refused to give him the necessary identification to return home. "It's very difficult and frustrating being here this long," he said. "It's mental torture. I feel depressed. You miss your people, you miss your friends. You feel half-dead."

September 7, 2011 The Age
Specialist security guards at a mental health hospital that houses some of Victoria's most disturbed patients have been locked out over a pay push for an extra $2 an hour. The union representing the guards now fears there could be security breaches at the Thomas Embling Hospital, in Fairfield in Melbourne's north-east, which houses psychiatric patients from the prison system, some of them killers found not guilty on the grounds of mental impairment. The Health and Community Services Union said about 10 guards found themselves denied access to the hospital this morning and replaced by guards sent there by security contractor G4S. The hospital's guards have been campaigning for nine months to be paid the same as security officers who worked at public hospitals. They were about to put in place bans on working overtime and filling out paperwork, the union said. Union state secretary Lloyd Williams said the guards were paid about $18 an hour, despite requiring specialist qualifications in dealing with patients in a mental health hospital. The rate is about 10 per cent lower than they received by guards who patrol public hospitals. He said his members wanted pay parity with colleagues at public hospitals. Mr Williams doubted whether the replacement guards had the appropriate skills to work at the hospital, and lacked the detailed knowledge of patients and daily running of the centre. He warned of a risk to the safety of patients, hospital staff and even the public if security was breached. "That's our concern, that when - and not if - there is a security problem, these people who are there now will not be able to respond appropriately," he said. The hospital experienced one security breach yesterday, when a man considered by police to be dangerous failed to return after being sent out on day release. Dwayne Lee Spintal, 37, was apprehended peacefully by detectives in South Yarra this morning. Mr Williams said the standing down of the hospital's guards had been felt already, as one patient who was scheduled to be taken to another hospital for medical treatment had to have his treatment cancelled. "They clearly don't know how to run the facility because senior management are shadowing them as we speak, making sure that something doesn't go wrong," he said. "We know already because of the situation that a patient who needed to go out of the hospital for [medical] treatment had to have that treatment cancelled. "Clearly [G4S] are putting their profits ahead of patient treatment." G4S said in a statement it replaced the guards under provisions of the Fair Work Act.

August 29, 2011 UKPA
Two members of staff at a private security firm have been sacked after an electronic tag was put on an offender's false leg, the company said. Christopher Lowcock, 29, wrapped his prosthetic limb in a bandage and fooled G4S staff who failed to carry out the proper tests when they set up the tag and monitoring equipment at his Rochdale home. Lowcock could then simply remove his leg - and the tag - whenever he wanted to breach his court-imposed curfew for driving and drug offences, as well as possession of an offensive weapon. A second G4S officer who went to check the monitoring equipment also failed to carry out the proper test. Managers became suspicious last month, but when they returned to the address a third time Lowcock had already been arrested and was back in custody accused of driving while banned and without insurance. A G4S spokeswoman said: "G4S tags 70,000 subjects a year on behalf of the Ministry of Justice. Given the critical nature of this service we have very strict procedures in place which all of our staff must follow. "In this individual's case two employees failed to adhere to the correct procedures when installing the tag. Had they done so, they would have identified his prosthetic leg. Failure to follow procedure is a serious disciplinary offence, and the two employees responsible for the installation of the tag have now been dismissed." A Ministry of Justice spokesman added: "We expect the highest level of professionalism from all our contractors, and there are strict guidelines which must be followed when tagging offenders. "Procedures were clearly not followed in this case and G4S have taken action against the staff involved. Two thousand offenders are tagged every week and incidents like this are very rare."

July 8, 2011 POGO
Private security contractor ArmorGroup North America Inc. (AGNA) agreed to pay $7.5 million to settle whistleblower allegations that it violated procurement rules that put the security of the U.S. Embassy in Kabul, Afghanistan at risk. AGNA's parent company said the settlement was made solely "to avoid costly and disruptive litigation—and that there has been no finding or admission of liability." This is the same company whose employees are depicted in lewd pictures POGO made available in fall 2009—which demonstrated a serious breakdown in discipline among the security personnel defending the U.S. Embassy in Afghanistan. POGO Executive Director Danielle Brian called it a 'Lord of the Flies' environment. Former AGNA director of operations James Gordon was the whistleblower who filed the lawsuit—he will receive $1.35 million from the $7.5 million AGNA has agreed to pay. According to a Department of Justice (DOJ) press release, these are the whistleblower allegations that were resolved by the settlement: •"AGNA submitted false claims for payment on a State Department contract to provide armed guard services at the U.S. Embassy in Kabul, Afghanistan"; •"[I]n 2007 and 2008, AGNA guards violated the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) by visiting brothels in Kabul, and that AGNA’s management knew about the guards’ activities"; •"AGNA misrepresented the prior work experience of 38 third country national guards it had hired to guard the Embassy"; and •"AGNA failed to comply with certain Foreign Ownership, Control and Influence mitigation requirements on the embassy contract, and on a separate contract to provide guard services at a Naval Support Facility in Bahrain." Gordon’s lawsuit was filed in September 2009. Nearly a year and a half later, DOJ joined Gordon’s whistleblower lawsuit on April 29, 2011. Slightly more than two months later, AGNA settled. According to DOJ statistics, whistleblower lawsuits (or qui tam lawsuits) that allow insiders to sue on behalf of the federal government have a much higher success rate when the government intervenes and joins the whistleblower, known as a relator, in their lawsuit (or parts of their lawsuit). In 2009, Gordon stated that he filed his lawsuit “to hold ArmorGroup accountable for the blatant disregard of its obligations to ensure the safety and security of the U.S. Embassy in Kabul. In an industry where good people are required to face extreme risk on a daily basis it is essential that those companies who disregard the rules be removed as they not only endanger their own staff but also endanger the mission, all in order to increase profit.” On September 14, 2009, POGO’s Executive Director Danielle Brian provided testimony on the breakdown of discipline among many of AGNA’s employees in Kabul before the Commission on Wartime Contracting in Iraq and Afghanistan. Shortly after the Commission hearing, Brian was contacted by Samuel Brinkley, Wackenhut Services, Inc. (WSI)’s Vice President of Homeland and International Security Services, who offered to work with POGO on behalf of WSI and AGNA to identify and remedy mistreatment of victims of this hazing, retaliation against some of the whistleblowers who had come to POGO, and other matters raised in POGO’s disclosures. WSI is AGNA’s parent company. During the intervening months, Brinkley and Brian had many discussions regarding the fair and appropriate treatment for POGO’s whistleblowers and others not involved in the wrongdoing. As a result, POGO was pleased that WSI/AGNA resolved the employment concerns of those five personnel at issue. WSI issued a statement yesterday as well in response to the DOJ press release announcing the settlement. WSI disputed the DOJ’s assertion that there was a violation of the False Claims Act, that it did not have an anti-trafficking policy in place, and that it violated rules regarding third country nationals, and foreign mitigation requirements. It also said “the sole individual confirmed to have frequented prostitutes was fired by AGNA in normal course when his conduct became known.” WSI noted that the period of AGNA’s alleged behavior predated WSI’s acquisition of AGNA. Regarding the violation of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act, Gordon’s allegations are more serious than they sound in the DOJ press release. Last year, the Washington Post/Center for Public Integrity wrote about Gordon’s case in the context of a perceived lack of U.S. enforcement regarding alleged sex trafficking by U.S. contractors and subcontractors: In Afghanistan, evidence of trafficking came to light when 90 Chinese women were freed after brothel raids in 2006 and 2007. The women told the International Organization on Migration that they had been taken to Afghanistan for sexual exploitation, according to a 2008 report. Nigina Mamadjonova, head of IOM's counter-human trafficking unit in Afghanistan, said the women alleged in interviews that their clients were mostly Western men. In late 2007, officials at ArmorGroup, which provides U.S. Embassy security in Kabul, learned that some employees frequented brothels that were disguised as Chinese restaurants and that the employees might be engaged in sex trafficking. A company whistleblower has alleged in an ongoing lawsuit that the firm withheld the information from the U.S. government. James Gordon, then an ArmorGroup supervisor, alleged that a manager "boasted openly about owning prostitutes in Kabul" and that a company trainee boasted that he hoped to make some "real money" in brothels and planned to buy a woman for $20,000. The settlement is a victory for accountability, but ultimately may be unsatisfying for critics of the government's less-than-robust oversight of contractors. Can we really expect other contractors to see this settlement as a wake-up call? The State Department fell asleep at the switch with AGNA and still has yet to prove that it's serious about contract oversight and enforcement of trafficking in persons regulations.

July 6, 2011 WA Today
The family of Aboriginal elder Mr Ward, who died in custody, is calling for any court fines due to be issued today against those responsible for the death to be invested in a community Environmental Science Centre. Warburton man Mr Ward, whose first name is not used for cultural reasons, died from heat stroke in the back of a prison van, with no working cooling system, after being driven 360 kilometres from Laverton to Kalgoorlie in 42-degree heat in 2008. State Coroner Alastair Hope conducted an inquest into the death in 2009, concluding the department, private prison security firm G4S and the two drivers had contributed to Mr Ward's death. The state government and G4S have since pleaded guilty to failing to prevent the death of Mr Ward, after charges were sought by WorkSafe WA earlier this year. Both parties are due to be sentenced in the Kalgoorlie Magistrate's Court today and are expected to face heavy fines of up to $400,000 each. In anticipation of the decision, Ward family spokesperson Daisy Ward has written to Attorney-General Christian Porter asking for the fines to be reinvested in the development of a beneficial science centre in the remote community of Patjarr in the Gibson Desert rather than being put back into government revenue. Ms Ward wrote: "I believe that when the magistrate brings down his sentence, the penalty put on your government will come from consolidated revenue and then be paid back into consolidated revenue. "This is both hurtful and painful to us. This pain does not go away from us. Where is the penalty? ... Any penalty that the company, G4S, has to pay will also go back to your government. "... If the government is getting the money, could you think about giving us the penalty monies because then it really is a penalty." An environmental science centre would reflect the work carried out by Mr Ward to educate environmental science students about indigenous land management, according to his family. "We believe that this will give our families and communities some justice for what happened, and will act as a living legacy of his work," Ms Ward said. "If the fines imposed are paid to the government, this will not bring any justice for what happened to my cousin."

July 5, 2011 The Advertiser
A PRIVATE security firm responsible for prisoner transport has been fined $50,000. This comes after a review into the March escape from custody of Drew Claude Griffiths. The review found private security firm G4S had failed to secure a controlled entry point and van door on March 22 in the prisoner hold area of the Parole Board's Adelaide premises, allowing Griffiths to escape. He was recaptured on March 25 by STAR Group officers. Correctional Services Minister Tom Koutsantonis said the fine sent a strong message to G4S. "This is a message for G4S that any escape is unacceptable," Mr Koutsantonis said. "I am getting sick and tired of prisoners escaping secure custody."

May 20, 2011 Palm Beach Daily News
A limited liability company associated with Richard R. Wackenhut of the security-services fortune has paid a recorded $11.5 million for a landmarked oceanfront home at 930 S. Ocean Blvd. The Palm Beach County Clerk’s office on Friday recorded the warranty deed of sale for the house, which was built in 1929 by noted society architect Maurice Fatio for his own use. Broker Lawrence Moens of Lawrence A. Moens Associates acted on behalf of the buyer, listed on the deed as 1111 Partners LLC, whose sole managing member is Richard Wackenhut, according to state records. He is the son of the late George Wackenhut, the Miami founder of the Wackenhut security-services company. Richard Wackenhut served as CEO and president of the company that went through ownership changes beginning in 2002. Today it is part of G4S Secure Solutions, which last year changed its name to drop a reference to Wackenhut. G4S Secure Solutions-North America is based in Jupiter. The house was not on the market at the time of the sale, said Moens, who arranged the deal privately. Moens said he had no comment about the buyer or details of the sale. The house was sold by Steve and Linda Horn Inc., an entity affiliated with Steve and Linda Horn of New York. The company had bought the house for $9.45 million in 2005. Linda Horn, who owns an antiques and decorative accessories shop in New York, said Friday she had no comment on the sale. Fatio and his wife, Eleanor Chase Fatio, lived in the house at the intersection of South Ocean Boulevard and Via Bellaria. Fatio designed the home in the Florentine Renaissance style with an exterior featuring coral key stone, one of his favorite building materials. The two-story, L-shaped home has a poolside covered loggia featuring an arched colonnade and a pecky-cypress ceiling. The house also has a 500-square-foot basement. Architectural features include French doors — with sidelights and fanlights — that open onto the pool area and side gardens. The Fatios lived in the house until 1930, when Fatio sold it to Franklin Simon, a New York City department store owner. County property records show that the limited liability company that purchased the house this week bought other property owned by Richard Wackenhut. He and a land trust paid $3.95 million for a home at 338 Eagle Drive in Jupiter’s Admirals Cove in 2001. Wackenhut took full ownership of the property a year later. Last November, Wackenhut, acting with his wife, Marie, transferred ownership of the Jupiter home to the same LLC that bought the South Ocean Boulevard house.

April 15, 2011 All Africa
The Mozambican judicial authorities on Thursday ordered the release of the 24 workers from the firm Group Four Securicor (G4S) who were jailed in Maputo awaiting trial on charges relating to demonstrations outside the G4S offices on 6 April. The decision was made by Judge Ana Felisberto Cunha of the Maputo Judicial Court, on presentation of declarations of identity and residence by the strikers. The release of the workers comes after the company withdrew the criminal complaints it had made against the group. According to G4S managing director, Pedro Baltazar, the decision to withdraw the charges was taken during a meeting of the Board of Directors held in Maputo on Monday as part of efforts to find a peaceful solution to the labour dispute at the company. The workers' lawyer, Salvador Nkamati, said that the 24 will have to wait for new developments, and must comply with certain obligations imposed by the law. "They will have to appear before the Court whenever requested, as well as other relevant authorities such as the police and prosecutors" he explained. Riot police used excessive force to disperse workers who were protesting outside the human resources department of the Maputo branch of G4S. A riot police unit was ordered to the scene after protestors broke windows and tore up fencing. According to the newspaper "O Pais", despite having been beaten and arrested, the security guards are still loyal to the company and are all set on returning to work. However, the General Secretary of the National Union of Private Security Workers (SINTESP), Julio Sitoe, argued that they should be entitled to compensation from the company for injuries sustained when members of the riot police violently attacked the demonstration.

February 16, 2011 The Street
After fiery closing arguments in the Smith v. Walmart trial, a jury found Wackenhut, but not Wal-Mart(WMT), liable for inadequate security in a store parking lot where a customer was murdered. The jury awarded over $1M in damages. Michael Born was murdered in a Wal-Mart parking lot while replacing his car's headlight. The plaintiffs claimed that Wal-Mart knew the store was located in a high-crime area, and that police were repeatedly called to the site. However, neither Wal-Mart nor its hired security service, Wackenhut, took adequate measures to protect Wal-Mart customers. Plaintiff attorney Mont Tanner reminded the jury that there had been more than a hundred similar incidents of serious crimes at the store, such as battery and robbery, most within the two years prior to the murder. However, said Tanner, there was no annual security assessment at this "crime magnet" by either Wal-Mart or Wackenhut, and the Wackenhut patrol officer was not trained to identify or deal with suspicious persons. Wal-Mart also allegedly failed to comply with its own security guidelines.

February 8, 2011 The Guardian
The Guardian has obtained a training video used by Securicor - now G4S - to instruct guards deporting asylum seekers on flights. The footage forms part of a dossier of evidence produced by G4S whistleblowers. The inaugural flight to Afghanistan should have been a showcase for a multinational company vying for the lucrative contract to deport foreign nationals on behalf of the British government. The plane heading to Kabul on 26 January 2004 had been chartered by a company that would go on to become part of the world's largest private security firm – G4S. Its cargo included refused asylum seekers in handcuffs. A number had their legs bound with tape and had been placed in the first-class cabin. But according to new evidence some of the guards on that flight, recruited to supervise the deportation, had not completed a full training course, and they included a number of inexperienced prison staff. Some had not even received Home Office accreditation. Shocking details about that flight and dozens more are contained in previously unseen evidence to parliament obtained by the Guardian. The documents reveal how G4S employees spent several years raising concerns about the potentially lethal methods being used on refused asylum seekers. The most disturbing technique involved bending deportees over in their seats and placing their head between their legs. The procedure became known within the company as "carpet karaoke" because it would force detainees, struggling for breath, to shout downwards toward the floor. Although an apparently successful method of keeping disruptive detainees quiet, it can lead to a form of suffocation known as positional asphyxia. Its alleged use is documented in written testimony by four G4S whistleblowers, submitted to the home affairs select committee in the aftermath of the death of Jimmy Mubenga, an Angolan who died on a British Airways flight from Heathrow in October last year. The cause of Mubenga's death remains unknown. Passengers on BA flight 77 reported seeing three guards heavily restraining the 46-year-old, who they said had been bent over and complained of breathing difficulties before his collapse. Police later arrested the guards in connection with the death and recently extended their bail until next month. Grievances -- All four whistleblowers have registered personal grievances against G4S, including some that have been settled out of court. Some are understood to have been themselves accused of inappropriate behaviour or later barred from conveying their concerns to the press. However, they now accuse G4S managers of presiding over a "macho" corporate culture that ostracised staff who showed compassion towards detainees or questioned the safety of their treatment. One of the whistleblowers, the company's serving charter operations manager, concedes that his detailed dossier to parliament is likely to result in his dismissal. The dossier records how he repeatedly wrote to his seniors expressing concerns, including one letter in which he stated that some G4S employees were playing "Russian roulette with detainees' lives".

December 26, 2010 The Guardian
A security company has recruited two former senior civil servants, sparking an outcry about the "revolving door" between Whitehall and the company. G4S, formerly Group 4 Securicor, hired Dr Peter Collecott, the one time director of corporate affairs at the Foreign Office, and David Gould, the Ministry of Defence's former chief operating officer in charge of defence equipment, according to a government report. The company, whose guards are under investigation over the death of deportee Jimmy Mubenga, supplies armed guards for embassy staff around the world. It has recruited former ministers including Lord Reid as well as senior figures in offender management. The disclosure comes two weeks after Sir George Young, the leader of the Commons, said he would examine the "revolving door" between Whitehall and defence companies. Denis MacShane, the Labour MP for Rotherham, called for a closer examination of civil servants before they are allowed to take private sector roles that may overlap with their former public duties. "There is great excitement over politicians and outside interests but the real issue is the gilded path from Whitehall where billions of pounds worth of public spending decisions are made into employment with companies that gained from such contracts and contacts," he said. "We need new rules so that anyone in public service cannot go straight into employment with companies to which they previously awarded contracts." Harry Fletcher, the assistant general secretary of the probation union Napo, who has been critical of the way G4S has recruited senior civil servants from the Home Office, said: "Appointments such as these give G4S a commercial advantage over their rivals and will encourage others to go down the same route." The appointments are listed in the latest report from the Advisory Committee of Business Appointments, released earlier this month. Collecott, 60, was the ambassador in Brazil from 2004 to 2008. He was a member of the Foreign Office's senior leadership forum that brought together the most senior heads of mission overseas. G4S said he has worked for their company on two separate domestic projects – once in 2009 and again this year, a contract which ended in September. The company has declined to explain the nature of the project. Gould, the MoD's former chief operating officer of defence equipment and support – which put him in charge of billions of pounds worth of procurement contracts – took up a consultant post with G4S last year. He left the MoD in 2008, and has also had roles at Selex Sensors and Airborne Systems Ltd. A spokesman for G4S said he worked on a specific project with G4S in 2009. Last month, G4S prompted an outcry by hiring Philip Wheatley, the former director general of the National Offender Management Service. Wheatley's G4S role, which he takes up just as Ken Clarke launches a plan to privatise much of the probation service he managed until June, has been criticised by probation unions. Wheatley's appointment is part of a pattern of G4S lobbying over probation privatisation. The company paid for a meeting at the last Conservative conference, where G4S "offender management" executive Jerry Petherick, spoke alongside the prisons minister, Crispin Blunt.

October 29, 2010 Financial Times
G4S, the security group, is to be replaced on a £30m-a-year ($48m) contract to deport detainees from the UK, the Home Office said. The loss comes after three security guards employed by G4S were arrested over the death of an Angolan man last week. However, the UK Border Agency said its decision to award a new four-year “escort services” contract to Reliance Security rather than G4S, which had done the job for the past five years, had no connection with the incident. Jimmy Mubenga, a 46-year-old deportee, died after he collapsed onboard a British Airways flight that was preparing to depart to his homeland from London’s Heathrow airport. The Home Office declined to disclose the sums involved in the G4S or Reliance contracts, citing commercial confidentiality. However, G4S said that it would take a hit of £30m in revenues and £2m in profits next year – a fraction of the company’s £7.4bn forecast sales and £393.7m pre-tax profits in the year to the end of December. Shares in G4S fell 4.8p at 261.7p. G4S said it was disappointed at the decision to hand the contract to its privately owned rival.

October 28, 2010 The Sentinel
A SECURITY guard who stole £20,000 worth of takings he collected from supermarkets has avoided an immediate jail sentence. Group 4 van driver Stuart Grey would park up after collecting cash from Morrisons, Asda or Somerfield and remove a bundle containing £1,000, Stafford Crown Court heard yesterday. He was caught when Morrisons launched an internal investigation over missing money and laid a trap with marked notes from its store in Stone. Pat Sullivan, prosecuting, said a collection from Stone in April was £1,000 short when it reached the company's headquarters. Police carried out a search of the defendant's Stoke-on-Trent home and found £460 of the company's money hidden in a washing machine and a mug, plus a bank deposit slip for £260. Grey explained how he had been stealing cash. He said he drove away from the store, pulled over a short distance away, opened up sealed plastic bags and took one bundle of notes containing £1,000. Grey had done it a total of 20 times over a period of 14 months from January last year. How he got away with it for so long was yet to be explained.

October 15, 2010 Bloomberg
Computer Sciences Corp., an information-technology company that relies on government business for almost 40 percent of its revenue, won $4 billion in U.S. contracts in fiscal 2009 after failing to pay more than 250 employees the wages and benefits they were owed. Computer Sciences, based in the Washington suburb of Falls Church, Virginia, topped a list of 15 companies that received more than $6 billion in federal contracts despite records of wage, health or safety violations, according to a report by the Government Accountability Office. Tyson Foods Inc., the largest U.S. chicken processor; Corrections Corp. of America, the nation’s biggest private operator of prisons; and Wackenhut Services Inc., owned by U.K.- based security contractor G4S Plc, are also among the contractors identified. The names of the companies, not revealed in the public report released Oct. 1, were provided by Representative Robert Andrews, a New Jersey Democrat who criticized the awarding of contracts to companies that didn’t meet required standards. “If a company has a pattern of violations, at the very least, it should raise greater scrutiny before they get government contracts,” Andrews, chairman of the panel that requested the investigation, said in a telephone interview. “There doesn’t seem to be much incentive to follow the laws because you can still get a contract anyway.” The report by the GAO, the investigative arm of Congress, covered a sample of contracts in the fiscal year that ended on Sept. 30, 2009. ‘Work to Do’ -- Computer Sciences, which was awarded the $4 billion from the Defense Department and NASA, was assessed $1.6 million in back pay by the Labor Department covering a five-year period. Tyson, with more than $500 million in Defense, Agriculture and Justice department contracts, was cited for more than 100 health and safety violations by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the GAO said. Wackenhut, which received $200 million in security contracts with the Defense, Agriculture and Homeland Security departments and NASA, violated fair-labor laws, according to Labor Department data cited by the GAO. “Some companies that continue to receive lucrative government contracts not only pay rock-bottom wages, but have long histories of labor and workplace safety violations,” Representative Patrick Murphy, a Pennsylvania Democrat who joined in requesting the GAO report, said in an e-mailed statement. “We have a lot of work to do to ensure that the federal contracting process encourages safe and good-paying jobs.” Workers Misclassified -- In addition to the pay violations, Computer Sciences didn’t provide protections against cave-ins for employees working in a trench more than 10 feet (3 meters) deep, according to a 2006 inspection by the occupational safety agency cited by the GAO. Chris Grandis, a company spokesman, said Computer Sciences paid the back wages to employees assigned to a U.S. immigration office in Vermont in 2009, after the Labor Department found they had been misclassified as contract workers entitled to less compensation. The company also received a minor citation from the occupational safety agency and agreed to pay a small fine, he said. Computer Sciences, a government contractor since 1961, received 37 percent of its $16.1 billion in revenue from federal contracts in the fiscal year ended April 2, according to a regulatory filing. Army, Immigration -- It ranked 12th in U.S. government contracts in fiscal 2009, the year studied by the GAO, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Its biggest federal contract that year was with the U.S. Army to provide engineering and logistics support for the Communications-Electronics Life Cycle Management Command. Computer Sciences also has a contract with the Homeland Security Department for a processing system used in applications for immigration benefits and services. The company said on Oct. 4 that it was one of four firms that will share in a $2.8 billion contract by the Social Security Administration for consulting and information technology services. Tyson has received more than 100 U.S. health and safety citations, including for an incident in which a worker died after being asphyxiated in a pit of wastewater debris, according to the GAO report. Last year, Springdale, Arkansas-based Tyson won $500 million in federal contracts, the GAO’s report showed. Gary Mickelson, a Tyson spokesman, said the company seeks to comply with federal regulations and the report doesn’t give “the full context of the issues involved, nor does it report the measures our company takes to operate responsibly.” Corrections Corp. -- Corrections Corp., based in Nashville, Tennessee, was cited for five safety violations since 2005 and for failing to follow labor laws when firing an employee for union participation, according to the GAO. Last year, it was awarded $800 million in contracts, the agency said. Steve Owen, a Corrections Corp. spokesman, said the U.S. contracts are subject to oversight and accountability. He declined to comment on safety and labor violations cited in the GAO report. Wackenhut, based in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, received $200 million in contracts, the GAO said. From 2005 through 2009, the Labor Department said the company owed $4.4 million in back wages to more than 2,100 employees, and OSHA cited the company for seven cases of health and safety violations, resulting in $9,000 in fines. The company agreed this year to pay $290,000 in back pay and interest to 446 rejected black job applicants. Susan Pitcher, a Wackenhut spokeswoman, said the company had no response to the report. Violations by other federal contractors included hiring undocumented workers, failing to meet environmental standards and fraudulently billing Medicare or Medicaid, according to the report.

August 27, 2010 Yahoo
Judge James Cacheris of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia has denied Defendants ArmorGroup North America ("AGNA"), ArmorGroup International, Wackenhut Services, Inc., and Cornelius Medley's motions to dismiss whistleblower James Gordon's lawsuit brought under the False Claims Act. On September 9, 2009, Mr. Gordon, former Director of Operations of AGNA, filed a whistleblower retaliation lawsuit under the False Claims Act in United States District Court for the District of Columbia, charging that ArmorGroup management retaliated against him for whistleblowing, internally and to the United States Department of State ("DoS"), about illegalities committed by ArmorGroup in the performance of AGNA's contracts with the United States to provide security services at the U.S. Embassy in Kabul, Afghanistan and at the U.S. Naval base in Bahrain. The Complaint charges that during Mr. Gordon's seven-month tenure as Director of Operations, he investigated, attempted to stop, and reported to DoS a myriad of serious violations committed by ArmorGroup, including: •Severely understaffing the guard force necessary to protect the U.S. Embassy; •Allowing AGNA managers and employees to frequent brothels notorious for housing trafficked women in violation of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act; •Endangering the safety of the guard force during transport to and from the Embassy by attempting to substitute company-owned subpar, refurbished vehicles from Iraq rather than purchasing armored escort vehicles as promised to DoS; •Knowingly using funds to procure cheap counterfeit goods from a company in Lebanon owned by the wife of AGNA's Logistics Manager; and •Engaging in practices to maximize profit from the contract with reckless disregard for the safety and security of the guard force, the U.S. Embassy, and its personnel. In his Memorandum Opinion (August 27, 2010), Judge Cacheris noted that "Plaintiff alleges and Defendants offer no facts to dispute that Defendants ... began to try to constructively discharge [Mr. Gordon] by 'making [his] working conditions intolerable.'" Judge Cacheris further noted that "Plaintiff alleges, and Defendants have not offered any evidence refuting the fact, that [Defendant] Medley excluded Plaintiff from management meetings, shunned him, and relegated him to a position of persona non grata in the office" and that "Medley made clear to Plaintiff by his behavior, and to other staff members by his direct boasts, that his priority was to force Gordon to quit." In denying Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, Judge Cacheris concluded that "there is a genuine issue of material fact regarding the continued nature and duration of the allegedly illegal acts Plaintiff was requested and required to participate in." The parties will now proceed into the discovery phase of the litigation. According to Debra S. Katz, counsel for Mr. Gordon, "this is an important victory for conscientious employees, like Mr. Gordon, who blow the whistle on fraudulent practices by defense contractors and wind up then paying the ultimate price. The court's decision today makes clear that such employees can bring federal claims under the False Claims Act to obtain redress."

July 29, 2010 WA Today
The family of an Aboriginal elder who roasted to death in searing heat in the back of a prison van will receive a $3.2 million compensation payment from the WA government, one of the largest such payouts in Australian history. It is an ex-gratia settlement by the government to the family of Mr Ward, whose full name cannot be used for cultural reasons, and includes a $200,000 interim payment already awarded. Attorney-General Christian Porter today revealed $1.4 million of the money would go to Mr Ward's widow, Nancy Donegan, with amounts of $400,000 to be placed in trust accounts for each of her four children. Mr Ward, 46, of Warburton, died in January 2008 while being transported 360 kilometres from Laverton to Kalgoorlie to face a drink-driving charge. Temperatures in the van, operated by private security company G4S, reached more than 50 degrees after it was revealed the air-conditioning in the van was broken. The compensation - which Mr Porter said was one of the largest ex-gratia payments by a government in Australian history, as well as that of common law countries - came after negotiations with the family's lawyers, the Aboriginal Legal Service, and on receipt of legal advice detailing what action could be brought against the state, and what that case might look like. It represented an "unequivocal apology" by the government. "It's meant to show contrition... deep, deep, remorse for what has occurred," Mr Porter said. It also took into account the fact that no criminal charges would be laid. While it did not come with an admission of liability, Ms Donegan could still take legal action if she chose. An "initial view" was that legal action would be likely, Mr Porter said. "I don't know if that position will change by virtue of this payment," he said. "If this does not bring finality to the family, (if civil action was to be launched), we don't want to stand in the way of Ms Donegan embarking on that action." ALS chief executive Dennis Eggington said that his organisation would consult with Mr Ward's family about possible civil proceedings against both the government and G4S. The ALS also requested further information to determine whether it would apply to have a coronial inquest into the death reopened. He described the culpability of G4S as "astronomical" and called on the company to apologise. "That's the least G4S can do," he said. "They have been very quiet in all of this. We've been very disappointed." ALS director of legal services Peter Collins said the role of G4S in Mr Ward's death was "absolutely diabolical". "It was their van, their employees driving the van, at a bare minimum (G4S) should be offering compensation to the family," he said.

July 28, 2010 Scoop
A private prison company that is bidding to run Mt Eden remand prison is under scrutiny in Australia for failing to make recommended changes after a high profile death in custody, said the Green Party today. An Australian parliamentary inquiry this week has heard that G4S has not implemented all the recommendations of an inquiry into the death of an Aboriginal elder in 2008. In particular, G4S has not been providing training to its workers in remote areas, according to Ian Johnston, the Australian Department of Corrective Services Commissioner. Green Party Corrections spokesperson David Clendon said “All of the prison corporations bidding to run Mt Eden remand prison have skeletons in their closets. It’s time for John Key’s Government to review whether any of these companies are suitable to operate in New Zealand,” said. “It is not good enough for the Minister to hide behind the tender process. She needs to let the public know what the minimum standards are for prison corporations who want to operate in New Zealand.” There had been two damning reports of G4S UK operations in the last month and now their Australian operations were coming under scrutiny, added Mr Clendon. “New Zealand’s public prisons are a long way from perfect but the evidence shows that privatisation is no magic bullet. It will not make our prisons safer, better or cheaper. “The community and public sector have lots of good innovative ideas about how the prison system can be improved. The Government should listen to them rather than flogging off prison management to corporations. “Private prisons have to make a profit, which means either cut backs on staff levels and rehabilitation, or charging more per prisoner. The perverse incentive to make a profit out of prisoners is at the heart of the problem,” said Mr Clendon.

July 2, 2010 APP
Protesters over an Aboriginal elder's death from heat stroke in a prison van have accused the West Australian Director of Public Prosecutions of racism for not laying charges. More than 100 people rallied outside DPP Joe McGrath's office in downtown Perth office on Friday chanting "Racist Police" and "Racist DPP". Mr McGrath announced on Monday that no charges would be laid against two security guards over the 46-year-old elder's death because there was insufficient evidence of criminal negligence.

June 27, 2010 The Western Australian
The State's top prosecutor has told the family of an Aboriginal elder who died of heatstroke in the back of a prison van that criminal charges will not be laid over his shocking treatment. The West Australian understands that DPP Joe McGrath flew to the remote community of Warburton over the weekend where he broke the news to relatives of Mr Ward. The decision is expected to get an angry reaction from family members who have long called for charges to be laid over the matter. The West Australian was unable to contact Mr Ward's relatives today. A spokeswoman for the DPP declined to comment. The latest development comes a year after State Coroner Alastair Hope handed down a damning report on the disgraceful treatment of Mr Ward, whose first name is not used for cultural reasons. Mr Hope found two transport guards, Nina Stokes and Graham Powell, the Department of Corrective Services and private prison transport company G4S had contributed to Mr Ward's death. Mr Ward died after being driven 360km in a prison van from Laverton to Kalgoorlie in 42C without air-conditioning in January 2008. Mr Ward's cousin told The West Australian earlier this month that that the matter had dragged on too long and the family wanted both drivers charged as soon as possible over the death. Daisy Ward said at the time that family members were getting frustrated about the lack of action and wanted justice. "I still want them to lay a charge," she said last month. "If it was an Aboriginal person that did that, they would get thrown behind bars. My cousin was like in a furnace…like he was cooked alive in the back of the van." Deaths in Custody Watch Committee Marc Newhouse said this afternoon that he was shocked and dismayed to learn that the DPP would not press charges against the two guards who transported Mr Ward. He said the information on how the DPP reached the decision needed to be released publicly. "There has basically been a lack of transparency in this whole process," he said. "It just highlights that there are some serious flaws in our justice system that when something of this nature happens and no-one is brought to account for negligence." Mr Newhouse said Mr Ward's family and community of Warburton would be devastated by the decision. "It is a complete kick in the guts," he said. "It is going to do nothing for Aboriginal people's confidence in the criminal justice system and particularly where Aboriginal people are the victims." "The community has been very, very patient, including the family, and that patience has just ended." Mr Newhouse said the Deaths in Custody Watch Committee would seek legal advice to determine whether charges could be brought against the Department of Corrective Services or private prisoner transport company, G4S. Mr Hope referred his report to the DPP under a section of the legislation which allows his findings to be sent to prosecutors on the basis that he believed indictable offences may have been committed. But in his written findings, Mr Hope recognised that legal issues relating to the involvement of various individuals and organisations were "complicated". "I do not wish to create unrealistic expectations on the part of the family or in the hope that they will see 'justice' as a result of such a report (to the DPP) being made," Mr Hope said.

April 7, 2010 Info 4 Security
G4S Wackenhut is changing its name to G4S, in turn reflecting the company’s vision of providing comprehensive security solutions. Brian Sims reports. By building on Wackenhut’s proven success in the States as "the premier supplier of manned security services" G4S has aggressively positioned itself to deliver a new category of integrated security solution that combines manpower and technology. Through a series of acquisitions that includes the Nuclear Security Services Corp, Touchcom Inc, Adesta and AMAG Technology, G4S will continue to evolve its core competencies from its Wackenhut roots to deliver integrated security solutions for greater performance and efficiency. “Our transformation from G4S Wackenhut to G4S is not something that happened overnight,” explained Drew Levine, president of G4S Secure Solutions. “Since before Wackenhut became part of the G4S family of companies, we’ve been developing new and more efficient means of supplementing our security officers with powerful technologies such as our Secure Trax Management Software platform." Levine added: "Now, with the global resources of G4S behind us, we can deliver a wider range of services – including security consulting, design and engineering; compliance and risk management; facilities management and remote video monitoring. That being the case, we can offer truly integrated security solutions, unlike any other company in the industry.”

February 16, 2010 Grand Rapids News
Less than a month after a federal judge rejected James and Glenna Chandler's bid to punish the security company that employed five men convicted of killing their daughter in Holland in 1979, the couple has filed an appeal, pushing their case forward. Janet Chandler's father filed the appeal Tuesday with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth District in Cincinnati, records show. The Chandlers have claimed Wackenhut Corp. -- which employed five of the six people convicted of Janet Chandler's slaying -- did not conduct sufficient employee background checks, or properly supervise their workers. They also contended Wackenhut helped hide the employees' involvement in the murder, which took nearly three decades to solve. The family was seeking cash damages for the mental pain and suffering inflicted by the death of Janet, a 22-year-old Hope College student. On Jan. 19, U.S. District Judge Janet Neff dismissed the Chandlers' claims against the Florida security firm, which hired guards during a strike at a Holland area plant. Neff said the allegations were filed after a three-year statute of limitations.

February 16, 2010 Miami-Herald
Heading to an end: the long-running dispute between Miami-Dade County, Wackenhut Corp. and a whistleblower named Michelle Trimble over millions in alleged overbillings for phantom workers at Metrorail. On Thursday county commissioners are scheduled to vote on a proposed settlement in which all parties would drop their competing lawsuits, Wackenhut would pay $7.5 million, and Miami-Dade would end its bid to keep the private security firm from doing business with the county. It would promise not to use the facts of this case against Wackenhut on current or future contracts. Out of the $7.5 million Wackenhut has agreed pay, $3 million would go to the county, $1.25 million to Trimble and $3.25 million to her attorneys, led by plaintiffs lawyer Mark Vieth and the Miami firm Josephs Jack. The proposed settlement comes nearly a year after a final audit by Miami-Dade County concluded that taxpayers were overbilled by Wackenhut -- which provided security at the county's Metrorail stops for two decades -- by $3.3 million to $5.8 million. In the proposed settlement, the county also agreed to clarify its final audit by Miami-Dade's chief auditor Cathy Jackson, saying her comments ``should not be construed to mean that the principals or management of Wackenhut engaged in fraud.'' In a memo to commissioners, County Manager George Burgess defended the proposed settlement, writing that the deal avoids the risks associated with trial and required ``all parties to make some compromises.'' Drew Levine, Wackenhut's president, declined to comment. Trimble could not be reached for comment. Vieth, who has been leading the civil case against Wackenhut since August 2005, did not return calls. Michael Josephs of the Josephs Jack firm declined to comment. If approved, the settlement will end a dispute that's been part of a broader history of waste and mismanagement underscoring the county's stewardship of the transit system. In this case, the county has been criticized for responding slowly to allegations that taxpayers were paying for guards who did not show up at Metrorail stops. In August 2005 the whistleblower lawsuit against Wackenhut was filed alleging phony billing practices; the suit is called a Qui Tam action, in which a private citizen sues on behalf of the government. Trimble worked as a guard at the county's Juvenile Services Department, where Wackenhut also previously provided security services. The county balked at participating in the case, instead ordering its own audit that was not finished until 2008. The inquiry found that Wackenhut billed the county for service not rendered. It wasn't until a year later, in April 2009, that a final audit was issued -- again concluding taxpayers were bilked. County manager Burgess had said he would replace Wackenhut once its contract expired in November and pledged to bar the firm from doing business with the county in the future. Burgess also said the county would cooperate with the Qui Tam lawsuit. At the time, plaintiff attorney Vieth said the ``evidence of overbilling has been overwhelming and existing for four years.'' For its part, Wackenhut denied wrongdoing and subsequently filed a $20 million suit against the county, saying the future damages it will suffer ``as result of this unfair and malicious taint'' on the firm's reputation ``are incalculable.'' Last month -- on the eve of trial in the whistleblower case -- the proposed settlement was reached, according to Burgess' memo.

February 11, 2010 KATU News
In a Seattle bus tunnel a 15-year-old girl was viciously attacked while security guards did nothing but call 9-1-1. The incident, in addition to sparking outrage, has many asking whether security guards in Portland are allowed to step in. Disbelief and disgust was the reaction by people who were shown surveillance footage of a girl being repeatedly kicked in the head by another girl while private security guards stood by at arm’s length and did nothing but call 9-1-1. “I know the transit isn’t exactly the same over there (Seattle), but I know it’s still good and that’s, that’s horrible,” said one man after watching the video at a MAX station. “Somebody’s getting hurt, I mean you don’t want them to get hurt, I don’t know, like, do something,” said another man at a MAX station. TriMet and its private security contractor Wackenhut, said if one of their guard’s is near a fight, they won’t just stand back and dial 9-1-1. Wackenhut project manager, Maj. Ellis Bremer, said there’s no question employees can and will get directly involved to stop fights. “We will not stand by,” he said. “We are here to protect the employees and assist the employees of TriMet and in so far as the ridership goes, of course, protect the ridership and inform the ridership.” The state only requires eight hours of classroom work to get a license to be a private security guard, but Wackenhut said it requires its people to go through an initial minimum of 80 hours and then a 16-hour refresher course every year. Most riders said they believe security should mean more than just dialing 9-1-1. Transit officers in Seattle say they are reconsidering the limits put on their private security guards.

December 8, 2009 Reuters
The State Department will not renew the contract of a security company embroiled in a scandal involving the U.S. Embassy in Kabul, where guards were accused of drunken conduct and sexual hazing. U.S. State Department spokesman Mark Toner said on Tuesday Virginia-based ArmorGroup would not have its contract renewed when it expires in June, although it will receive a six-month extension to allow the contract to be put up for new bids. Toner said officials had reviewed the contract and "concurred that the next option year should not be exercised and that work begin immediately to compete a new contract." He said the review included both recent misconduct allegations against ArmorGroup personnel and the company's "history of contract compliance deficiencies." This week a report by the non-partisan Government Accounting Office identified a number of shortcomings in the State Department's Bureau of Diplomatic Security including staffing shortage and increased reliance on contractors in high-risk posts. The Kabul embassy scandal broke in September, when a watchdog group accused ArmorGroup of jeopardizing security at the embassy by understaffing the facility and ignoring lewd, drunken conduct and sexual hazing by some guards -- and provided graphic photos as evidence. ArmorGroup North America, now owned by Florida-based Wackenhut Services, was also hit by a federal whistle-blower lawsuit that said it had ignored brothel visits by guards and other misconduct because of what a lawyer said was a "myopic preoccupation with profit" in its five-year, $187 million contract with the State Department. State Department officials said the safety of embassy staff was never in jeopardy. But they subsequently said 12 embassy guards had been removed or resigned, ArmorGroup's entire senior Kabul management replaced and alcohol banned at the group's camp. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton ordered a thorough review of how contractors are used. The GAO report noted that worldwide, the U.S. diplomatic security budget had grown to $1.8 billion in 2008 from just $200 million in 1998, when truck bomb attacks on U.S. Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania killed more than 300 people including 12 Americans. The bureau's workforce has also doubled over the same period but is failing to keep pace with rising security threats including those faced in Iraq and Afghanistan, it said. "Staffing shortages in domestic offices and other operational challenges -- such as inadequate facilities, language deficiencies, experience gaps, and balancing security needs with State's diplomatic mission -- further tax its ability to implement all of its missions," the report said. The report urged the State Department to develop a strategic plan to directly address the rising demands of diplomatic security including increased staffing.

November 24, 2009 The Guardian
The brutal truth of child detention 2,000 asylum seekers' kids a year are locked up, and the only beneficiaries seem to be firms running centres like Yarl's Wood A report by the novelist Clare Sambrook of End Child Detention Now, which campaigns against the detention of 2,000 asylum seekers' children every year, asks the very reasonable question: who does this expensive incarceration benefit? Clearly not the children who, according to every study ever written on this issue, suffer acutely from being taken from their homes on the orders of the UK Border Agency and placed in a confined space for an indeterminate period. Many argue that society benefits because it is protected from the asylum seekers and their families. Sambrook wonders how that can be when there is no evidence that asylum seekers are likely to abscond. So who benefits? Clearly the private companies that run so much of this operation have a lot to gain. G4S, the company that operates Tinlsey House, one of three detention centres where last month 10-year-old Adeoti Ogunsola tried to strangle herself after being forcibly redetained, recently reported rising profits and growth in government business which had offset weakness in commercial sectors. As Sambrook reports: "Last year G4S handed chief executive Nick Buckles a £1.4m pay package. That's £3,835 every day. He owns £4m in G4S shares, tipped by the Daily Telegraph recently as, 'a solid buy for these uncertain times'." Someone else who may reasonably be said to benefit from this policy is Christopher Hyman, the chief executive of Serco, who also earns in the region of £3,000 a day. His company runs the notorious Yarl's Wood detention centre where children have been detained far beyond the 28-day with charge maximum allowed for terror suspects. "Traumatised child inmates, who must carry ID cards at all times, refer to Yarl's Wood as 'prison' and 'the camp'," says Sambrook. Among the indirect beneficiaries she also identifies John Reid, the former home secretary, who is paid £50,000 a year as a consultant to G4S for, among other things, hosting government and security industry breakfasts. Meanwhile children are suffering. The Lorek report in the peer review journal Child Abuse and Neglect says detained children experience "increased fear due to being suddenly placed in a facility resembling a prison … the abrupt loss of home, school friends and all that was familiar to them". Some exhibit "sexualised behaviour". Older children are so stressed they wet their bed and soil their pants. Who benefits from this expensive and harsh policy? Sambrook answers her own questions with this – " some extremely wealthy grownups".

November 23, 2009 Wall Street Journal
G4S PLC (GFS.LN), an international security solutions group, said Monday it Monday it has bought Champions of the West, Inc--trading as All Star International from the Junge Revocable Trust and John P. Junge individually, by its U.S. Government Services business, Wackenhut Services, Inc. for $59.9 million in cash, on an enterprise value basis.

November 6, 2009 West Australia Today
The ongoing contract with a private prison transport company responsible for the death of an Aboriginal elder in January last year has sparked legal retaliation. The Deaths in Custody Watch Committee has told radio 6PR that it was seeking independent legal advice to appeal the decision to keep the $25million a year contract between the State Government and contractor G4S. The State Coroner found that the company was responsible for the death of 46-year-old Mr Ward, who had been arrested for drink driving and was being transported 350kms to a Kalgoorlie Court when he suffered heat stroke from the 50C heat inside the unairconditioned truck. "It is outrageous and unimaginable that they [G4S] could continue their contract. They have been responsible for six deaths in Australia in less than nine years," committee spokesman Mark Newhouse said. He said the company, under its current terms, could still be responsible for two more deaths in custody and not have its contract terminated before it expired in 2011. "What is even more concerning is that in one incident, if there are four to five deaths, that is not considered a breach of contract, which is outrageous," he said. The group is also planning on mounting a public campaign to improve proper approvals for public contracts and improving the monitoring of those being transported while in custody. Mr Newhouse said there had been no evidence from the company that any improvements had been made. G4S have refused to comment on the grounds that it was a confidential contract. The Attorney General Christian Porter was also unavailable for comment.

October 11, 2009 Weekly Standard
There seems no end to contractor abuse scandals in countries fighting terrorism or undergoing "nation-building." The latest to be reported in the media involves ArmorGroup North America, a private security firm guarding the American embassies in Iraq and Afghanistan. It began in Baghdad on August 9, when an ArmorGroup employee shot two of his colleagues dead. The victims were Darren Hoare, 37, an Australian, and Paul McGuigan, 37, a Briton and ArmorGroup executive. The alleged killer, Daniel Fitzsimons, 33, is also British. ArmorGroup North America is owned by Wackenhut Services, Inc., a Florida-based company, which is a division, in turn, of a Danish enterprise, G4S, that advertises itself as the world's largest security company. The shootings reportedly occurred late at night, inside the ArmorGroup compound in Baghdad's international area known as the Green Zone. Fitzsimons, according to a Baghdad source who declined to be named, is said to have shot his coworkers because they claimed he was homosexual. After killing them, he shot an Iraqi, Arkhan Mahdi, in the leg, then was arrested by Iraqi police (who now patrol the Green Zone). Fitzsimons faces a possible death sentence. He will be the first foreigner employed in Iraq since the beginning of the 2003 intervention to be held to account under Iraqi law. Fitzsimons says he cannot remember the incident. According to the London Sunday Times, Fitzsimons was seen on an earlier occasion injecting Valium and morphine into his leg while already drunk. Another trail of misconduct has led to an uproar in Kabul, where 16 U.S. embassy guards provided by ArmorGroup were fired in early September for alleged drunkenness and for forcing those under their control to engage in deviant and humiliating behavior. U.S. press coverage of the Fitzsimons case has been minimal, and even the contractors' misbehavior in Kabul, although documented by video, has mostly been handled with discretion by the print media. The New York Times mentioned "lurid details" and "lewd conduct" at weekly parties hosted by embassy guards. The Kabul carousing was disclosed when the Project on Government Oversight (POGO) released a report on September 1. More information emerged in a suit filed September 9 by James Gordon, a New Zealander and former operations director of ArmorGroup North America. Gordon says he is a "whistle-blower," forced out of his job after warning company executives and the U.S. Department of State about the situation at the embassy. According to the New York Times, the POGO report stated that victims of "deviant hazing" included Afghans, whose conservative Muslim culture left them especially repelled by such behavior; those who refused to submit were dismissed from their jobs. The report described a "'Lord of the Flies' environment." Fitzsimons, the accused Baghdad shooter, has been treated in the British media as a case of post-traumatic stress disorder caused by his prior military service in Iraq and the Balkans. But it would be a mistake to blame such dissolution on the stress of war alone. The Green Zone syndrome of alienation from the local population, as chronicled by critics of the Iraq war, is a ubiquitous feature of life among foreign administrators in conflict and post-conflict areas across the globe. Sex trafficking and corruption of locals have become prominent wherever operations are conducted by transnational bureaucracies like the United Nations and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) along with the attendant ranks of nongovernmental organizations and private contractors. I have observed similar patterns in the Balkans for a decade.

September 30, 2009 ABC
The West Australian Government has officially responded to the coroner's findings in the case of Mr Ward, who died of heatstroke in a prisoner transport vehicle. The coroner said the Aboriginal elder's death in searing desert heat was a disgrace, as the van was "not fit for humans". But the Government has decided not terminate the contract of the private company which transported Mr Ward. The Government says it supports all of the coroner's recommendations - some of which have already been acted on. But the full response has come three months after the coroner handed down his findings, and 20 months since the tragedy occurred. The Government agrees there should be more training and monitoring of staff, and there should not be transportation of prisoners over long distances. But the Attorney-General Christian Porter says the contract with private operators G4S is likely to continue. Mr Porter has suggested the company may have to pay a penalty. "The penalties that you've spoken of, for a death for instance, I understand are $100,000 which seems to me to be ridiculous in the scope of what occurred here," he said. "But again, the question about termination is very unfortunately a question about the legality of being able to terminate under the terms of the present contract." The coroner called for the prisoner transport fleet to be completely replaced. This will not happen until the end of next year. Mr Porter says responsibility for transporting prisoners could be brought back to the public sector. "The final decision as to whether or not this service will be public or private has not yet been made but I can say that if a determination is made to keep this service in the private sector, the contract that governs the process will be a completely different type of contract to the one that presently exists," he said. The Deaths In Custody Watch Committee says Group 4 and GSL staff have contributed to the deaths of six people in Australia. The committee's Marc Newhouse says the contract should have been terminated. "We're completely outraged that the contract with G4S - he hasn't announced the termination of it, it has to be terminated," he said. "They've been subject to critical reports by the Australian Human Rights Commission. This company is not fit to operate in this country and they should be terminated." Noongar elder Ben Taylor says he believes racism in the system is causing Aboriginal people to suffer. "There's a lotta racism there and the only ones who're gonna suffer are my people, Aboriginal people," he said. "This is got to go wider, and I'm on the Watch Committee with Marc and we're going to keep hanging on here because there's more lives that are going to be taken, and that's going to be blackfellas, Aboriginal people, my people, and that's the full stop." Mr Newhouse says the committee had also called for a speedier response in the wake of a death in custody. "That the Coroner's Act is amended in line with the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody recommendations, that a system of mandatory reporting be put in place so that government and other relevant bodies have to report within a certain time frame," he said. "The point of it is to save lives and to prevent lives being lost." But Mr Porter says the Labor state government should have ended the contract with the company. But the Opposition Leader Eric Ripper says there were other considerations. "You can't just terminate a contract without there being financial consequences for taxpayers and the government does have a responsibility to both protect prisoners and the interests of taxpayers," he said. "That's why this matter needs careful examination rather than a kneejerk reaction."

September 18, 2009 AP
A top executive of the private security contractor hired to protect the U.S. Embassy in Afghanistan was informed in July 2008 of alleged illegal and immoral conduct by guards, attorneys for a whistleblower suing the company said Friday. The claim contradicts the sworn testimony of Samuel Brinkley, a vice president for Wackenhut Services, the owner of ArmorGroup North America. Brinkley told the Commission on Wartime Contracting under oath on Monday that he and other corporate officials outside of Afghanistan didn't know until a few weeks ago of problems that reportedly included lurid parties and ArmorGroup employees frequenting brothels in Kabul. But in a 10-page letter to the commission, the attorneys say their client, James Gordon, told Brinkley during a meeting on July 15, 2008, of alleged guard misconduct. The meeting took place in Brinkley's office in Arlington, Va., Gordon said in a separate e-mail through the lawyers. Gordon was ArmorGroup's director of operations until February 2008. He says he was forced out of the job after trying to get the company to fix a long list of shortcomings with the $189 million embassy security contract that the State Department awarded ArmorGroup in March 2007. He filed a lawsuit earlier this month in federal court claiming the company retaliated against him for telling the department about the deficiencies. Brinkley and Wackenhut did not immediately respond to a request for comment. In a previous statement on the lawsuit, a Wackenhut spokeswoman called Gordon's claims baseless and said he voluntarily resigned from the company. Clark Irwin, a spokesman for the wartime contracting commission, said the congressionally mandated panel is reviewing the letter. At the commission's Sept. 14 hearing on ArmorGroup's performance, Brinkley portrayed himself and other company executives as being blindsided by the misconduct of a small number of employees. "I am not here to defend the indefensible," Brinkley said. "Certain of our personnel behaved very badly." During a series of heated exchanges, commissioners pressed Brinkley to explain why he didn't tell the State Department of reports that guards were behaving inappropriately, potentially putting security of a key U.S. diplomatic outpost at risk. Brinkley said ArmorGroup managers in Afghanistan only told him about an Aug. 11 incident involving nine employees who got drunk at a bar near their living quarters. Those workers were counseled by the on-site manager and a temporary ban on alcohol was imposed. He said the State Department was informed of this incident on Aug. 26. Brinkley said he wasn't aware of the scope and duration of the misconduct until Sept. 1 when a watchdog group released a report with photos showing guards and supervisors in various stages of nudity at parties flowing with alcohol. The watchdog group, the Project on Government Oversight in Washington, also said guards were subjected to abuse and hazing by supervisors who created a hostile work environment. The letter from Gordon's attorneys says they are concerned Brinkley's testimony did not provide the commission with a "full and accurate understanding of many of the events in question."

September 14, 2009 Government Executive
The State Department should terminate ArmorGroup North America's contract for security services at the U.S. Embassy in Kabul, witnesses and panelists said during a Commission on Wartime Contracting hearing on Monday. The recent photographs and report from the Project on Government Oversight detailing alleged lewd, drunken behavior by guards at the embassy just describe the latest and most egregious violation by ArmorGroup, witnesses told the panel. State Department Undersecretary of Management Patrick Kennedy testified that the contract has required "extensive oversight and management." Since awarding the contract to ArmorGroup on March 12, 2007, State has issued seven deficiency notices addressing 25 deficiencies, one cure notice and one show-cause notice. Each notice demanded separate correction action plans to resolve contractual issues and several involved serious allegations, including that the contractor had deceived the government in its contract proposal. Despite these problems, State has not terminated the contract with ArmorGroup and has, in fact, exercised an extension of the contract period. State officials said they are awaiting the results of an ongoing investigation into the contractor's conduct at the embassy. Commissioner Clark Kent Ervin pressed Kennedy to pledge State would terminate the contract if the probe validates the allegations made against the contract employees. While Kennedy was hesitant to speculate on a hypothetical situation, he said he could imagine an outcome of the investigation that would lead the agency to terminate the contract. "We're seeing a serious case being made for termination," he said. William Moser, deputy assistant secretary of State for logistics management, told the commission a public hearing was not the proper forum to talk about future contract actions. Regardless, he said the department is discussing potential alternatives and approaching the reevaluation of the contract "with a great deal of seriousness." Danielle Brian, executive director of POGO, said the organization's investigation shows State officials were notified of serious issues relating to the ArmorGroup contract repeatedly, and took limited action. "For the two years of this contract, State's response to whistleblowers' sustained complaints and to its own finding of severe noncompliance consisted mainly of written reprimands and the renewal of ArmorGroup's contract," Brian said. "Simply documenting a problem or even levying a fine is not effective oversight when those same problems continue to occur." Brian said State has been "stubbornly defensive" in not recognizing its own failures, and how those failures have caused misconduct and potential lapses in security. While POGO strongly believes the contract should be canceled and ArmorGroup -- or its parent company, Wackenhut -- should be debarred from doing business with the government, that will not prevent future problems, Brian said. To ensure proper conduct by contractors overseas, State must shorten the rotations of its regional security officers, perform more frequent audits and independent verification of contractor reports of compliance, and prioritize accountability, she said. "This cultural shift will be aided by canceling contracts when the contractor consistently underperforms -- which will have the added benefit of acting as a deterrent to future contractors -- and by disciplining the State Department officials who are responsible for the failed oversight of the ArmorGroup contract," Brian said. Commissioner Linda Gustitus said State already lost authority with industry by not terminating its contract with Blackwater Worldwide in the wake of the Nissor Square shooting incident in Iraq. "That helped to send a message to other contractors that you can do a lot and not have you contract terminated," Gustitus said. Several commissioners joined Brian in urging Kennedy to hold accountable the State employees responsible for managing Armor Group by firing them, withholding bonuses or taking some other disciplinary action.

September 14, 2009 Wayne Madsen Report
At a September 10 press conference at the National Press Club in Washington, two former managers for ArmorGroup North America (AGNA), headquartered in McLean, Virginia and a subsidiary of ArmorGroup International (AGI), revealed a litany of contract fraud and abuse charges against AGNA and AGI and provided further details of sexual deviancy among AGNA security guards in Kabul tasked with protecting the U.S. embassy. ArmorGroup is now owned by Wackenhut Services, Inc., headquartered in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida. The two former employees are suing AGNA, AGI, Wackenhut, and Corporation Service Company for wrongful termination, false claims, and conspiracy. John Gorman, a retired Marine Corps veteran who was the camp manager at the security guard force’s Camp Sullivan, blew the whistle on contract non-performance, security pitfalls, and sexual deviancy, and was placed under virtual house arrest in June 2007 by AGNA’s top manager in Kabul, Michael O’Connell, and flown out of the country. Gorman was terminated and confined for some 24 hours, along with two other AGNA managers, James Sauer, a retired Marine sergeant major and Pete Martino, a retired Marine colonel, who filed complaints to both AGNA and the Regional Security Office (RSO) for the U.S. embassy in Kabul, also Marine Corps veterans. Because they told the RSO they feared for their personal safety after bringing the charges against AGNA, he offered them the security of his apartment on the embassy compound, which they turned down only to later have their cell phones and weapons confiscated by AGNA and being confined before their flight out of the country. Gorman said no one at AGNA “ever mentioned or indicated a concern for the actual security at the embassy -- the greatest and only concerns were the profit margin and the bottom line.” Gorman said the project manager for the security contract, Sauer, a man with 35 years of experience as a 30-year career Marine with private security contractor experience in Iraq and Afghanistan, was “ignored, second guessed, and rejected.” Sauer had vehemently objected to allowing security personnel to be deployed to Kabul who had engaged in “lewd and deviant behavior” during their subcontractor training in Texas. After Gorman, Sauer, and Martino made their complaints known to McConnell, the corporate executive replied that ArmorGroup was a publicly traded company and could, therefore, not hire more people “because he had a responsibility to the shareholders.” The effect was the hiring of clearly unqualified personnel for the security guard force. Gorman said that there were people hired as guards who had “no DD214s, driver’s licenses, passports,” including one person who had been fired from a previous security project for pulling a pistol on another employee while drunk. AGNA, according to Gorman, covered up the security contract failures because the firm was “to assume the $187 million a year security contract for the American embassy in Kabul in less than two weeks and they were bidding on the more lucrative $500 million contract for the U.S. embassy in Baghdad. James Gordon, a New Zealand citizen and New Zealand Army veteran who is married to an American, worked for ArmorGroup Iraq as the operations manager, a subsidiary of AGI, also spoke about corporate malfeasance involving AGNA. He later became the business development director for AGNA headquarters in McLean. In 2007, Gordon took over as operations director for the Kabul embassy security contract and attempted to bring the contract into compliance with State Department requirements. Eventually, Gordon was forced out of the company because instead of correcting contract violations the firm’s only goal was to “maximize profits.” Gordon said among AGNA security personnel were unqualified personnel, some of whom had serious criminal records. Some guard recruits had engaged in “disgusting behavior” during their initial training at AGI’s subsidiary’s training facility, International Training Inc. (ITI) of Pearsall, Texas. Sauer, Martino, and Gorman had received reports that some of the AGNA recruits, while undergoing pre-deployment in Texas, had engaged in “lewd, aberrant, and sexually deviant behavior, including sexual hazing, urination on one another and equipment, bullying, ‘mooning,’” exposing themselves, excessive drinking, and other conduct making themselves unfit for service on the contract. The AGNA employees who were later forced out of the company attempted to ensure that the trainees in Texas never arrived in Kabul. Several email exchanges (“e-pong”) show they tried to block the sexual deviants from duty in Kabul. AGNA also misrepresented ethnic Nepalese Gurkha farmers hired as security guards for the Kabul embassy job as Gurkha military veterans of the British and Indian armies. In fact. the Gurkha farmers hired from Nepal and northern India were not proficient in English as required under the State Department contract. In fact, some could speak no English. The language test had never been administered to the Gurkha recruits. When some Gurkha guards walked off their jobs in May 2007 because of poor wages and treatment, Carol Ruart, AGI’s human resources director in London, ordered AGNA management in Kabul to “lock [the Gurkhas] in their rooms until they agree to work for less.” Gordon also stated that AGNA never invested in secure vehicles to transport embassy guards between the embassy and other locations. AGNA used broken down vehicles called “white coffins.” After the State Department released funds to AGNA to buy secure vehicles, the firm never bought the vehicles but transferred the money to AGI in London. AGNA also hired a “rogue” South African program manager for the embassy contract in Kabul, according to Gordon. DuPlessis replaced Sauer. Jimmy Lemmon replaced Martino as deputy program manager. During the tenure of the South African, Nick duPlessis, ammunition went missing from Camp Sullivan where the guards were bivouacked and illegal weapons were stored at the facility. Moreover, duPlessis did not possess a security clearance to receive classified briefings, a requirement for the program manager position. In addition, Gordon stated that the AGNA logistics manager, Sean Garcia, used contract funds to purchase counterfeit North Face and Altama jackets and boots for the security guards from his wife’s company in Lebanon, Trends General Trading and Marketing LLC of Beirut. Gordon said, “the cheap knock-offs could never keep the men warm during the cold winters in Afghanistan.” After Gordon notified the State Department about the contract breach, the order to remove him was ignored and the State Department continues to own sub-par counterfeit material. Gordon sent an email dated September 3, 2007 to duPlessis and his staff in Kabul. Gordon also said that the AGNA armorer in Kabul, responsible for maintaining all the weapons, had to be “forcibly removed” from a brothel in Kabul. Many of the prostitutes working in Kabul, according to Gordon, are young Chinese girls who were taken against their will to Kabul for sexual exploitation. When Gordon ordered the armorer’s immediate termination, he discovered that the AGNA medic, Neville Montefiore, and duPlessis, the program manager, had also frequented the brothels with the armorer. Gordon also discovered that there had been an outbreak of sexually-transmitted diseases among the AGNA guards in 2007 and this was never reported to the State Department as required by the contract. Prostitutes also frequently visited Camp Sullivan. Gordon also discovered that the guard force routinely visited brothels in Kabul and Montefiore’s replacement discovered the improper storage of regulated narcotics at Camp Sullivan’s medical facility, including morphine. “You can rest assured that there is no hiding of information from the DoS [Department of State]. Anyone who thinks that they can get away with this will probably end up in a Federal Penitentiary. It is our duty to report on all aspects of the contract performance and we are required to be transparent and honest in our dealings. Personally I wouldn’t accept anything else.” Gordon’s plans to visit Kabul to conduct an investigation were immediately shut down by ArmorGroup’s parent office in London. Gordon said it is contrary to U.S. law for a foreign company to direct or influence any activities on a classified contract. Moreover, the British parent conducted their own investigation, which resulted in a three-page whitewash. Gordon was denied access to all information about AGI London’s investigation. After the whitewash, Gordon received a report that an AGNA trainee wanted to be hired on as a security guard at the embassy in Kabul because he knew someone “who owned prostitutes there.” The trainee boasted that he could purchase a girl for $20,000 and earn a handsome profit each month. The trainee, according to Gordon, had previously worked in Kabul under duPlessis. Neither AGNA nor the State Department conducted a follow-up investigation of the violations of the U.S. Trafficking in Victims Protection Act by AGNA employees. AGNA responded to Gordon’s warnings by blaming him for all the contract’s failures and he was forced to leave the firm on February 29, 2008. After Wackenhut Services Inc. bought ArmorGroup, after Gordon left the company, he met with Sam Brinkley, the vice president of Wackenhut, to discuss the contract problems. Brinkley promised to remove duPlessis and investigate all the charges of misconduct. On June 10, 2009, Gordon was present during hearings held by Senator Claire McCaskill (D-MO). Gordon said that Brinkley and the State Department testified to McCaskill’s subcommittee on contracting oversight that AGNA was “fully compliant” on the security contract for the embassy in Kabul. Brinkley told the subcommittee that he “was proud” of the way the company had been managing the embassy security contract. Gordon said the situation at Camp Sullivan had worsened and the U.S. Embassy was facing a grave security threat. McCaskill and ranking Republican member Susan Collins (R-ME) never heard testimony from any of the whistleblowers on AGNA’s poor security record in Kabul. The only witnesses heard were Brinkley and William Moser, the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Logistics Management. Brinkley, in addition to the U.S. Embassy in Kabul, has responsibility for the security contract for the U.S. Naval Support Activity in Bahrain, which, according to ex-AGNA sources, may be using untrained Gurkha farmers from the Indian subcontinent as crack veterans of the British and Indian armies. The Gorman/Gordon lawsuit states that on October 10, 2007, the AGNA security force in Kabul was involved in a number of serious incidents, including: detaining a group of Afghan civilians and involuntarily transporting them to the U.S. embassy; verbally and physically engaging in an altercation with Afghan Ministry of Interior policemen and handcuffing the policemen; confronting an Afghan general and several Ministry of Interior policemen; refusing an order from the embassy RSO to withdraw from a checkpoint to defuse a potentially explosive situation. The statements of the two ex-AGNA employees reveal a culture of depravity and unprofessional behavior that Gordon stated still exists to this very day in Kabul.

September 14, 2009 AP
A member of a federal commission investigating wartime spending said Monday that photos showing private security guards in various stages of nudity at drunken parties may be as damaging to U.S. interests in Afghanistan as images of detainee mistreatment at Abu Ghraib were in Iraq. Dov Zakheim, a former Pentagon comptroller, made the comment at a hearing Monday held by the Commission on Wartime Contracting on allegations of lewd behavior and sexual misconduct by employees of ArmorGroup North America, the company hired to protect the U.S. Embassy in Kabul. Zakheim said the photos are circulating heavily on the Internet and give Muslims in Afghanistan a negative image of the United States. Patrick Kennedy, the State Department's management chief, acknowledged the department should have been paying closer attention to the activities of the ArmorGroup guards at their living quarters near the embassy. The private security contractor hired to protect the embassy said Monday it erred by not immediately telling the State Department about an alcohol-related incident involving its guards that proved far more serious than company officials first believed. "I am not here to defend the indefensible," said Samuel Brinkley, vice president of Wackenhut Services, the company that owns the contractor, ArmorGroup North America. A manager for ArmorGroup counseled nine guards after they got drunk at a bar near their living quarters in Kabul on August 10. But after photos surfaced showing the guards had been at a party where ArmorGroup employees engaged in lewd and inappropriate behavior, they realized they made a mistake by not alerting U.S. officials. Photos showed guards and supervisors in various stages of nudity at parties flowing with alcohol. Brinkley said the manager's response, which included a temporary ban on alcohol, seemed adequate at the time. "In retrospect, we were wrong in not notifying the State Department," Brinkley said in testimony before the independent Commission on Wartime Contracting. Kennedy, under secretary of state for management, told the commission the State Department is very concerned about ArmorGroup's delays in reporting its knowledge of any misconduct by its employees. The State Department has been sharply criticized for its management and oversight of the security contract at one of the country's most important diplomatic outposts. In addition to the allegations of misconduct, other problems have included a shortage of guards and inferior equipment. As the department's top management officer, Kennedy said he takes full responsibility for having failed to prevent the problems that reportedly ranged from out-of-control parties to Armor Group supervisors frequenting brothels in Kabul. The State Department has launched an investigation into ArmorGroup's handling of the $189 million contract embassy security contract. Kennedy told the commission that the misconduct "dishonored" the State Department in Afghanistan, where "the success of U.S. objectives depends on the cultural sensitivity of all mission personnel, including employees under contract." But he and other State Department officials said no decision will be made on whether to terminate the contract with ArmorGroup until the investigation is complete. Members of the commission pressed Kennedy to be more aggressive, saying the evidence already available is enough to warrant firing ArmorGroup, which was awarded the contract to protect the embassy in March 2007. "To me, it's just totally out of control and it's been going on for a long time," said Michael Thibault, co-chairman of the commission. Commissioner Clark Ervin asked Kennedy to pledge to terminate the contract if the investigation proves all the allegations prove to be true. Kennedy refused to commit, saying the inquiry needs to run its course. However, Kennedy added, "We are seeing a very, very serious case being made for termination."

September 13, 2009 Washington Post
In 2005, the State Department hired a Northern Virginia company to provide security for the U.S. Embassy in Afghanistan. Diplomats quickly became concerned about whether the new guards, who barely spoke English, could protect such a sensitive site. "They had serious problems," recalled Ronald E. Neumann, who was ambassador at the time. The department then brought in another security contractor, ArmorGroup North America. But the difficulties didn't cease. In recent days, evidence of ArmorGroup's failings has burst into public view -- photos depicting its guards in semi-naked hazing rituals and official documents showing persistent staff shortages. Harold W. Geisel, the acting inspector general of the State Department, told Congress last week that his investigators are checking for possible criminal conduct by ArmorGroup, and a congressional hearing is scheduled for Monday. Lawmakers and watchdog groups are questioning how the department could have continued to employ a company that, in addition to tolerating bullying and understaffing, failed to ensure that its guards had proper security clearances and sufficient equipment -- or that they spoke English. The criticism is particularly intense because the State Department had promised to improve oversight after a 2007 shooting incident in Iraq involving bodyguards from security contractor Blackwater that left 17 Iraqi civilians dead. "State's management of these contracts has been self-evidentially abysmal," said Peter W. Singer, an expert on government contracting at the Brookings Institution. ArmorGroup's efforts to guard the Kabul embassy were troubled from the start, according to congressional hearings, internal State Department documents and interviews. The McLean-based company submitted "an unreasonably low price" in 2007 for the contract, said Samuel Brinkley, an official with Wackenhut Services, the firm's parent company, at a congressional hearing in June. Former ArmorGroup supervisors have said in interviews that the company slashed guard staffing so it could squeak out a profit. State Department officials have expressed outrage about the lewd behavior shown in the photos. Still, they defend their selection of ArmorGroup, saying they are legally required to award such contracts to the lowest qualified bidder and noting that ArmorGroup was well-regarded. They also insist that the embassy was never endangered by the guard problems -- even though internal department documents say it was. "The fact you find something is wrong means something is wrong. But you find it," the department's undersecretary for management, Patrick F. Kennedy, said in an interview. He emphasized that many of the guards' failings emerged in documents written by department officials. "There was oversight present," he said. The troubles at the Kabul embassy raise questions about how authorities will manage what is expected to be a surge in the number of contract guards at U.S. facilities in Iraq as the American military presence declines. The scandal has also given new impetus to a debate over whether too many government wartime jobs are being outsourced. "The State Department should consider whether the security for an embassy in a combat zone is an inherently governmental function, and therefore not subject to contracting out," Danielle Brian, executive director of the Project on Government Oversight, wrote to Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton this month. Brian's group released the photos of what it called near-weekly sessions of hazing and sexual humiliation of ArmorGroup guards at their camp. The State Department has for years used local contract guards to secure the perimeters of its embassies, while generally keeping a modest Marine contingent for interior access. But in Iraq and Afghanistan, the department decided not to use local guards because of vetting concerns, officials say. Instead, as the military withdrew forces from around those embassies in recent years, the department turned to contractors such as ArmorGroup. But the department, which suffers from a shortage of contracting staff, has had a rocky history of managing such guard contracts. Each of its three contracts in Kabul has come under fire. The first was awarded to McLean-based Global Strategies, to replace a Marine combat force withdrawing from the U.S. Embassy in March 2005. The department justified the $6-million-a-month sole-source contract by saying it had received late notification of the Marines' departure. But the inspector general found that the Defense Department had given six months' official notice, and scolded the State Department for poor planning. By July 2005, the State Department had signed a contract with MVM of Ashburn, cutting its guard costs to less than $2 million a month, according to the inspector general's report. But MVM could not provide enough guards, partly because it was paying much less than its predecessor, according to Neumann. And, he said, the guards spoke so little English that they could not understand instructions. "We went back to the State Department and said, 'These people are unacceptable,' " Neumann said. State canceled MVM's contract and kept on the Global guards temporarily. MVM's chief executive, Dario O. Marquez, did not return a call seeking comment but told the Wall Street Journal last year that the State Department did not give him enough time to fix the problems. Neumann said the department was handicapped in selecting guard companies because of regulations stipulating that the contract go to a qualified U.S. firm that offers the lowest bid. "People low-bid, and then they're not competent," he said. Finally, in March 2007, the department turned to ArmorGroup. The firm, which also guarded the British Embassy in Kabul, was one of only two bidders deemed technically qualified by the department's acquisition and security specialists. Its price was about $3 million a month, officials say. "ArmorGroup was not a small, undercapitalized, underfunded, fly-by-night organization," Kennedy said. "They put forth a proposal that met every requirement." But within weeks of the company starting work, the State Department sent ArmorGroup a warning that its deficiencies -- including shortages of guards and armored vehicles -- were so serious that "the security of the U.S. Embassy in Kabul is in jeopardy," according to the House Subcommittee on Contracting Oversight. State Department officials issued eight more warnings to the company over the next two years, including one last September threatening to terminate the contract. Despite the problems, the department stuck with ArmorGroup, agreeing this summer to extend its contract for a year. State Department officials have said that the company appeared to be making progress and that changing firms would be disruptive. A spokeswoman for Wackenhut, which took over ArmorGroup North America last year, declined to comment. In a lawsuit filed last week, former ArmorGroup supervisor James Gordon accuses the company not only of failing to properly staff the embassy but also of lying to the State Department about its capabilities. The operation "was a complete shambles," he said.

September 12, 2009 New York Times
When a security guard at the United States Embassy in Kabul, Afghanistan, was leaving for breakfast Monday morning, he froze at the sight of a crude poster of a rat hanging on his door. “Warning!” the poster said in stark, black letters. “Rats can cost you your job and your family.” The guard was a whistle-blower who had told of security lapses and lewd, drunken bacchanals by fellow workers, sparking an outcry and enraging Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton. Now he wonders whether he should have kept his mouth shut. “Threats are still running rampant here,” he said in a telephone conversation from Kabul, speaking on condition of anonymity for fear of reprisal. “So even though it looks like State may finally turn things around, no one’s ready to celebrate yet.” Such skepticism may be warranted. A review of two years of e-mail messages, letters and memos reveals that the State Department had long known of the serious problems with ArmorGroup, the contractor chosen to protect its embassy. The complaints went beyond the lurid pranks that made headlines, the documents show, and included serious understaffing, bullying by management, petty corruption and abusive work conditions. In fact, the deficiencies became so severe that they threatened the security of the compound, the documents show, and State Department officials withheld payments to ArmorGroup as a way to compel it to comply with the terms of its agreement. On a few occasions, government officials warned the company that if it did not correct the most egregious problems it would lose the five-year, $189 million deal. Yet both times the contract came up for renewal, in 2008 and 2009, the State Department opted to extend it, officials confirmed. The troubles with the ArmorGroup contract, and the State Department’s frustrated dealings with the company over two years and through two administrations, illustrate how the government has become dependent on the private security companies that work in war zones, and has struggled to manage companies that themselves are sometimes loosely run and do not always play by the government’s rules. With a stretched military, the government relies on the security companies themselves to vet, train, and discipline the guards, all at the lowest cost. “It’s expensive for the State Department to withdraw a contract from one company, rebid the project and award it to a new one,” said Janet Goldstein, a Washington lawyer who represents one of the ArmorGroup whistleblowers. “So businesses know that once they get a contract, State may ding them around a little bit, but it’s not going to fire them.” The perils of this reliance were most graphically illustrated in Iraq in 2007, when security guards from another contractor, Blackwater, were involved in shootings that left 17 civilians dead on a Baghdad street. But interviews and documents show that the ArmorGroup affair, in its mundane, unsavory details, offers perhaps a more representative look inside the troubled relationship between contractors and the government in war zones. State Department officials acknowledge they had a litany of complaints about the company, none of which, they insist, compromised the security of the embassy. But they profess to being deeply embarrassed by reports of parties where security guards were photographed naked, fondling and urinating on each other. “I’ve been doing this for 37 years; I’m proud of what I do,” said Patrick F. Kennedy, the undersecretary of state for management who oversees outside contractors. But, he added, “This is humiliating.” Mr. Kennedy, however, defended the State Department’s overall handling of the contract. The frequent letters of complaint the government sent to ArmorGroup, he said, were evidence that the department was keeping close tabs on the company. The “greatest majority” of the failures cited in the letters were addressed, he said. Part of the problem, officials said, was that the guards are housed in a complex six miles from the embassy, Camp Sullivan, with little oversight by State Department officials. Susan Pitcher, a spokeswoman for Wackenhut Services, the American subsidiary of the Danish company that owns ArmorGroup, referred questions to the State Department, saying only that it was cooperating with the government’s investigation. On Monday, the independent Commission on Wartime Contracting in Iraq and Afghanistan will hold a hearing to examine the State Department’s oversight of the contract. Christopher Shays, a former congressman and co-chairman of the commission, said there was “a serious failure on the part of the State Department in being unable to compel the contractor to fulfill its commitment.” The disclosures, which were originally made by a nonprofit organization, Project on Government Oversight, deeply rattled the State Department. At a staff meeting following the release of the group’s report, senior officials said, Mrs. Clinton vented her anger about the lurid pictures. Karl W. Eikenberry, a retired Army general who became President Obama’s ambassador to Afghanistan last May, was livid, an official said, because he had never been briefed about the problems. Despite their unease with contractors, officials acknowledged the department had no choice but to keep using them. “In situations where there is a surge of intense security requirements, it is a real challenge,” said Jacob J. Lew, the deputy secretary of state for management and resources. “We cannot reduce the security presence.” The State Department was not in a buyer’s market when it looked for a company to protect its embassy in Kabul. It picked ArmorGroup in March 2007, after its previous choice, MVM, proved unable to marshal the necessary personnel or equipment, officials said. Of the eight companies that bid for the contract the second time around, only two were deemed technically capable. ArmorGroup was the cheapest. The company’s most recent contract extension was granted in June this year, after a Senate hearing in which one of its executives, Samuel Brinkley, a Wackenhut vice president, said in sworn testimony that his company was in full compliance with the terms of its contract, and a State Department official, William H. Moser, a deputy assistant secretary of state, also under oath, said he was satisfied with the company’s performance. In interviews, ArmorGroup whistleblowers said they felt betrayed by the testimony. By many measures, they said, things were worse, not better. After largely uneventful company barbecues morphed into what have been described as scenes from “The Lord of the Flies,” at least a dozen of the men started a document trail of their own, sending e-mail messages and photographs to the Project on Government Oversight. According to interviews and those documents, from July 2007 to April 2009, the State Department issued ArmorGroup at least nine warnings, nearly one every other month, about contract violations that ranged from mundane concerns about the company’s ability to keep accurate personnel logs, to more critical concerns about corruption among company managers and the hardships faced by sleep-deprived, underpaid guards — the majority of them Gurkhas from Nepal — who could not understand simple commands in English. While the Gurkhas were largely the source of the language problems, the lewd hazing rituals were largely the activity of the native English speakers, a mix of Americans, South Africans, New Zealanders and Australians. In 2008, after ArmorGroup was acquired by the Danish company, G4S, Wackenhut informed the State Department it was taking control of the Kabul contract, and promised to fix any problems. Government officials agreed to give the new owners a chance. According to their own correspondence, their optimism seemed to dim fairly quickly. On Aug. 22, 2008, the State Department wrote to ArmorGroup to express concerns that staffing shortages were so severe the company might not be able to provide security after a situation with mass casualties. On Sept. 21, 2008, the State Department deducted $2.4 million in payments from ArmorGroup, warning that its failure to provide a sufficient number of guards “gravely endangers the performance of guard services.” In March 2009, the department again advised ArmorGroup that it had “grave concerns” about staffing shortages, noting that inspectors on a recent tour found 18 guardposts left uncovered. In April, it denied ArmorGroup’s request for a third waiver to the requirement that it teach its foreign guards English. A month later, without much explanation, ArmorGroup told the State Department that deficiencies relating to language and staffing had been resolved. And a month after that, a senior State Department official told the Senate Subcommittee on Contracting Oversight that “despite contractual deficiencies, the performance by ArmorGroup North America has been and is sound.” “I sat in the audience that day, and shook my head in disbelief,” said James Gordon, a former ArmorGroup executive who has filed a whistleblower’s lawsuit against the company. He says he was forced out for complaining about the problems. “I knew that conditions at Camp Sullivan were deteriorating, that the contract continued to be understaffed, that the conditions in Kabul were getting more dangerous, and that the U.S. Embassy was facing grave threats.”

September 10, 2009 New York Times
Two former employees of a private contractor hired to provide security at the United States Embassy in Afghanistan charged that State Department officials were aware as early as 2007 that guards and supervisors were involved in lewd conduct. In a lawsuit filed Wednesday, one of the former employees, James Gordon, a native of New Zealand who served as director of operations at the contractor, ArmorGroup North America, charged that he had spoken numerous times with State Department officials about significant problems that threatened security at the embassy. Among other things, he said that ArmorGroup hired guards who could not speak English and had no security experience; that the company employed fewer guards than needed and worked them for longer hours than at other embassies to cut costs; and that it allowed managers and employers to hire prostitutes. “Their goal was to perform the contract as cheaply as possible,” said Mr. Gordon, speaking by telephone from Kabul, Afghanistan’s capital, where he is now employed by another private security contractor which he declined to name. “Their goal was to do everything they could to prevent the State Department from discovering their multiple contract violations and operational shortcomings. Their goal was to provide a fig leaf of security at the embassy, and to pray to God that nobody got killed.” Mr. Gordon and another former supervisor, John Gorman, said they warned State Department officials in Kabul several times that ArmorGroup was plagued with problems and that it was determined to cover them up. They said that as a result of their efforts to correct the problems and to make the government aware of the issues, ArmorGroup forced them to leave their jobs. As evidence to support his assertions, Mr. Gorman provided a packet of memos and e-mail messages that he said he and two other former employees gave State Department officials in June 2007, including a three-page memo in which he outlined an array of contract violations. Among them, he wrote: “The training program run for new hires has been plagued with hazing and intimidation of students by students. This included physical threats and perversions.” Senior State Department officials said they were unaware that guards had engaged in that kind of activity at their living quarters at a base in Kabul. The officials spoke anonymously because they were not authorized to speak about a continuing investigation. The charges echoed those in a report released last week by an independent group, the Project on Government Oversight, which accused the guards and supervisors of deviant behavior. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton ordered an investigation, and about 16 guards and supervisors were fired or have resigned. ArmorGroup North America, based in McLean, Va., was acquired in 2008 by a Danish security company, G4S, and its American subsidiary, Wackenhut Services Inc. In a written statement, Wackenhut described Mr. Gordon’s allegations as “overstated, ill-founded, not based on any personal knowledge or otherwise lacking in legal merit.”

September 10, 2009 AP
A former manager for the security contractor protecting the U.S. Embassy in Afghanistan says the company lowballed its bid for the work and then failed to hire enough guards or fix faulty equipment. The allegations come after an independent watchdog group said last week that ArmorGroup guards were subjected to abuse and hazing by supervisors who created a climate of fear and intimidation. On Thursday, James Gordon, former director of operations at ArmorGroup North America, alleged the company bid too low in order to win the contract and then cut corners to keep profits up. Gordon says he was fired for reporting the problems. He also claims ArmorGroup withheld from Congress information about employees who went to brothels. Wackenhut Services, ArmorGroup's parent company, had no immediate comment.

September 2, 2009 The Guardian
Pictures have emerged showing private contractors at the embassy holding 'deviant and lewd' parties. The US secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, has ordered an investigation into allegations that private contractors employed to protect the American embassy in Afghanistan were engaged in "deviant and lewd" parties that have been compared to Lord of the Flies. The decision to launch the inquiry came after an independent group sent her a 10-page dossier yesterday claiming that the security guards at the embassy had been engaged in drunken parties involving prostitutes and the kind of ritual humiliation associated with gang initiation. Pictures and video footage were attached to the dossier. The dossier, compiled by the independent investigative group Project on Government Insight, includes an email allegedly from a guard currently serving in Kabul describing scenes in which guards and supervisors are "peeing on people, eating potato chips out of [buttock] cracks, vodka shots out of [buttock] cracks (there is video of that one), broken doors after drnken [sic] brawls, threats and intimidation from those leaders participating in this activity". The allegations are an embarrassment at a time when the Obama administration is struggling to win hearts and minds in Afghanistan and the Muslim world in general. It comes against the backdrop of the continuing controversy over the widespread use by the US of private contractors in war zones, of which the most notorious was Blackwater, now named Xe. The group at the centre of the new allegations are the ArmorGroup, part of the Florida-based Wackenhut group, one of the biggest private security organisations in the US. The organisation did not respond immediately today to the allegations. The Project on Government Insight, which was established in 1981 to track military procurement and bring to light evidence of any corruption, described the environment at Camp Sullivan, where the guards were housed outside Kabul, as comparable to the anarchy in William Golding's Lord of the Flies. It said about 300 of the 450 ArmorGroup guards are Gurkhas and the rest are a mix of Australians, South Africans and Americans. In the dossier, it said that guards were "engaging in near-weekly deviant hazing and humiliation of subordinates" . It claimed that some guards had barricaded themselves in their rooms out of fear that the alleged hazing might harm them physically. It further claims that guard force supervisors "made no secret that, to celebrate a birthday, they brought prostitutes into Camp Sullivan, which maintains a sign-in log." According to the report, Afghan nationals, as Muslims, were humiliated by the behaviour and the apparently free-flowing use of alcohol. The pictures could be picked up by the Taliban and used as propaganda against the US and its allies. But the Project on Government Insight stressed that comparisons should not be made with the pictures of abuse at the Iraqi prison, Abu Ghraib, because no allegations of torture are being made. The report says that the general breakdown in discipline poses a threat to the security of the embassy. Ian Kelly, the state department spokesman, said of the reports of wild, anarchic partying: "These are very serious allegations, and we are treating them that way." Clinton has "zero tolerance" for the behaviour described and has directed a "review of the whole system" for farming out security to private contractors that may have threatened the safety of embassy personnel, Kelly said. The embassy said today: "Nothing is more important to us than the safety and security of all embassy personnel - Americans and Afghan - and respect for the cultural and religious values of all Afghans." It added: "We have taken immediate steps to review all local guard force policies and procedures and have taken all possible measures to ensure our security is sound." Senator Claire McCaskill, a Democrat who heads a subcommittee on contractor oversight, wrote to the state department calling for the inquiry in the light of the report. McCaskill's committee earlier this year conducted its own hearings on the involvement of ArmorGroup in Afghanistan.

September 1, 2009 Washington Post
Private security contractors who guard the U.S. embassy in Kabul have engaged in lewd behavior and hazed subordinates, demoralizing the undermanned force and posing a "significant threat" to security at time when the Taliban is intensifying attacks in the Afghan capital, according to an investigation released Tuesday by a government watchdog group. The Project on Government Oversight launched the probe after more than a dozen security guards contacted the group to report misconduct and morale problems within the force of 450 guards that lives at Camp Sullivan, a few miles from the U.S. embassy compound. In one incident in May, more than a dozen guards took weapons, night vision goggles and other key equipment and engaged in an unauthorized "cowboy" mission in Kabul, leaving the embassy "largely night blind," POGO wrote in a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton outlining the security violations. The guards dressed in Afghan tunics and scarves in violation of contract rules and hid in abandoned buildings in a reconnaissance mission that was not part of their training or mission. Later two heads of the guard force, Werner Ilic and Jimmy Lemon, issued a "letter of recognition" praising the men for "conspicuous intrepidity (sic)" with the U.S. State Department logo on the letter head. "They were living out some sort of delusion," one of the whistle-blower guards said Tuesday in an interview with The Washington Post from Kabul. "It presented a huge opportunity for an international incident," said the guard who spokes on condition of anonymity because he feared retribution. The report recommends that Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates immediately assign U.S. military personnel to supervise the guards and remove the management of the current force. It also calls on the State Department to hold accountable diplomatic officials who failed to provide adequate oversight of the contract. The report also found that supervisors held near-weekly parties in which they urinated on themselves and others, drank vodka poured off each other's exposed buttocks, fondled and kissed one another and gallivanted around virtually nude. Photos and video of the escapades were released with the POGO investigation. "The lewd and deviant behavior of approximately 30 supervisors and guards has resulted in complete distrust of leadership and a breakdown of the chain of command, compromising security," POGO said in the letter to Clinton. The guards work for ArmorGroup, North America, which has an $180 million annual contract with the State Department to secure the embassy and the 1,000 diplomats, staff and Afghan nationals who work there. The State Department renewed the contract in July despite finding numerous performance deficiencies by ArmorGroup in recent years which were the subject of a Senate subcommittee hearing in June. Susan Pitcher, a spokeswoman for Wackenhut Services, Inc., the Palm Beach Gardens, Fla. company that owns ArmorGroup, declined to comment on Tuesday's POGO report. Conduct of contractors providing security in Iraq and Afghanistan has been the subject of controversy and other investigations in recent years. The government relies heavily on such contractors for security and other needs. A new Congressional Research Service report has found that as of March, the Defense Department had more contract personnel than troops in Afghanistan. The 52,300 uniformed U.S. military and 68,200 contractors in Afghanistan at that time "apparently represented the highest recorded percentage of contractors used by DOD [Defense Department] in any conflict in the history of the United States," the report said. Some 16 percent of the contractors are involved in providing security, a much higher percentage than the 10 percent that were used in Iraq. Although contractors provide many essential services, "they also pose management challenges in monitoring performance and preventing fraud," according to Steven Aftergood, who first disclosed the congressional report on his Secrecy News Web site.

May 16, 2009 The West
He literally cooked to death. Trapped in a prison van for four hours, suffocated by temperatures that climbed to more than 50C, the Aboriginal elder had no way to communicate with security officers sitting just a metre away, in the airconditioned cab. His only sustenance was a small bottle of water and a meat pie. When he finally collapsed on the van floor, the metal was so hot it seared his skin. Yesterday, Corrective Services Commissioner Ian Johnson travelled to Kalgoorlie to publicly apologise to Mr Ward’s family, accepting responsibility for the 46-year-old’s death in January last year. It was a dramatic end to a coronial inquest that has revealed a litany of failures in the justice and custodial systems in WA’s outback. Widow Nancy Ward and her children will return to Laverton next week after sitting quietly and with dignity throughout the case, which has attracted the attention of the United Nations and the Australian Human Rights Commission. Mr Ward, a conservation worker, a supporter and interpreter for local police and an advocate and educator for children of the Gibson Desert, was an international ambassador for the Ngaanyatjarra people. His family say he was treated like an animal. Mr Ward had been drinking on Australia Day last year in the remote Goldfields town of Laverton when he was arrested for driving with more than four times the legal alcohol limit. Conducting a quasi-court hearing for Mr Ward at his cell door at the local police station, justice of the peace Barrye Thompson remanded him in custody to face court in Kalgoorlie the following day. Mr Thompson told the inquest he had no formal training when appointed as a JP and could not even remember whether he had read the Bail Act. The Aboriginal Legal Service was not contacted. Guards and police officers testified the prison vans used by Global Solutions Limited and maintained by the State were notoriously unreliable, sub-standard and the air-conditioning was often faulty. GSL’s supervisor in Kalgoorlie, Leanne Jenkins, had warned her management an incident would occur unless the vehicles were replaced. At 11.20am, the GSL prison van pulled into a secure area at Laverton police station where the guards were told they would have a trouble-free passenger. Mr Ward made a comment about the warm day and a guard told him “the quicker he got into the van, the quicker the air-conditioning would kick in”. But the air-conditioning did not work: it had been reported faulty in the GSL maintenance log more than a month earlier. Before making the continuous 360km journey to Kalgoorlie, the guards did not tell Mr Ward there was a duress alarm in the back of the van in case he needed help. Towards the end of the trip, they heard a loud thump. Pulling over on to the side of the road and opening the outer door of the van, the guards felt the heat radiating from the rear pod and they saw Mr Ward face-down on the van floor — unconscious and unresponsive. Reaching into the back of the van felt like a “blast from a furnace”, according to Dr Lucien LaGrange, who assisted in removing Mr Ward’s lifeless body at Kalgoorlie Hospital. Doctors found full-thickness contact burns on his stomach and tried for 20 minutes to resuscitate Mr Ward, whose skin felt like a “hot cup of coffee”. They managed to get a brief return of a heartbeat, but after putting him in an ice bath, his body temperature was still 41.7C. Coroner Alastair Hope is due to deliver his findings on June 12. For now, the Ward family will have to return to a community missing a leader. It is little comfort to them that money was allocated in this week’s State Budget to replace the fleet of transport vans — four years after the Department for Corrective Services undertook to do so. “I am sorry,” Mr Johnson told Mrs Ward yesterday. “I have a deep regret but no matter what I say, it’s not going to change what happened.”

April 30, 2009 Miami Herald
Three weeks after Miami-Dade County declared that Wackenhut Corp. bilked taxpayers of millions and would no longer do county business, the security firm fired back with its own show of force: a $20 million lawsuit against the county and two top officials. The escalating fight centers on allegations that Wackenhut Corp. overbilled Miami-Dade Transit for security services at Metrorail stops and failed to adequately staff guard posts. The Palm Beach Gardens-based firm, which does other security work for the county, has held the mass transit security contract for 20 years, though its latest contract expires in November. But the stakes for Wackenhut may go beyond its current business with the county. In its lawsuit, filed Wednesday in U.S. District Court in Miami, the security company said the move by Miami-Dade to bar the firm from working for the county could jeopardize contracts with other government agencies across the country. The future damages we ''will suffer as a result of this unfair and malicious taint'' on our ''reputation are incalculable,'' Wackenhut said in the lawsuit, which seeks $20 million in damages and asks the court to stop the county from relying on an audit which concludes time sheets were doctored and transit stops unguarded. The suit also names as defendants County Manager George Burgess and County Auditor Cathy Jackson. Wackenhut contends the county audit used improper methodology. ''It has no basis in reality,'' said Wackenhut President Drew Levine. ``We've done our job and done it well.'' Miami-Dade County spokeswoman Victoria Mallette said the county stands by the report authored by the government's Audit Management Services department. ''We want to be made whole,'' said Mallette. ``We haven't been made whole. It would be irresponsible for us to continue doing business with an entity that we believe has overbilled us.'' Earlier this month, Burgess wrote in a memo to commissioners that as a result of the audit the county would seek to recover $3.4 million in alleged overbillings and support an ongoing whistle blower's civil case against Wackenhut. Burgess named several firms to replace Wackenhut guards at Miami-Dade railway stops and bus facilities, the Juvenile Services Department and Public Works Department. The county manager also declared the county will seek ``debarment.'' The county move earlier this month and subsequent lawsuit Wednesday come several years after charges of overbillings and so-called ''ghost posts'' were first raised. The county -- roundly rebuked for poor stewardship of the transit system -- has been criticized for reacting slowly to the allegations. The whistle blower's civil court case against Wackenhut was filed in 2005 and the audit was completed in 2008.

March 14, 2009 Sunday Mail
Former Defence Secretary John Reid faced fierce criticism yesterday as it emerged the world's largest security firm had won a huge contract from the Ministry of Defence weeks after taking him on as a consultant. Mr Reid - who ran the MoD until May 2006 before resigning from the Cabinet while Home Secretary in June 2007 - was hired by G4S three months ago for £50,000 a year to offer 'strategic advice'. This week, it was awarded a four-year contract to supply private security guards for around 200 MoD and military sites across Britain in a deal thought to be worth tens of millions of pounds. While many former ministers have taken private-sector jobs, it is unusual for such a senior Government figure and sitting MP to work for a company so closely linked to their former department. Opposition MPs last night said Mr Reid's earnings from G4S were 'totally inappropriate', while the Taxpayers' Alliance campaign group called for the rules governing employment for ex-ministers to be reviewed urgently.

January 22, 2009 Morning Star
DAVID Miliband said that the war on terror was an error, but some people don't regret it. Private security companies like Group 4 made a mint. Now, it wants to spread its good fortune - this month, Group 4 Security gave a £50,000 position to former Labour minister John Reid as an "adviser." Reid fits in this part-time job when he isn't too busy representing the good people of Airdrie and Shotts as their Member of Parliament. Group 4 has plenty of reasons to want access to the contact book of a former home and defence secretary - the firm now supplies the armed guards looking after British officials in Iraq and Afghanistan while locking up prisoners, asylum-seekers and "terror suspects" in Britain, so Reid is worth every one of the five million pennies that they are giving the man. Reid was once a Communist Party member, but abandoned Marxism in favour of new Labour. This is odd, because his career seems to illustrate the crudest and most determinist kind of Marxism. For years, Marxists have been grappling with the subtle and sophisticated ways in which the capitalist class dominates society, but Group 4 opted for a very unsubtle approach - the capitalists just hired Labour's representative. Reid hasn't always hawked his brawn for the money men. Back in 1992, Reid signed a House of Commons motion calling on Sir Norman Fowler to resign from the board of Group 4. The motion said that the House "regrets that the right honourable Member for Sutton Coldfield (Norman Fowler), chairman of the Conservative Party, has not seen fit to resign his directorship of another Group 4 company, Group 4 Securitas, and urges him to do so." It added: "The government should suspend all further moves to privatisation within the criminal justice system." Reid's call for Fowler to resign from Group 4 and for the government to shun the firm came after the company let a number of prisoners escape from their vans on the way to court. Whizz forward a decade and a half and Reid, having demanded that Fowler abandon Group 4, has himself taken a job with the firm. In the meantime, Conservative and Labour governments have not stopped their "privatisation of the criminal justice system," they have expanded it. Group 4 has men with truncheons in Britain and men carrying guns in Iraq. Nor has the firm become any less accident-prone. Group 4 Security prefers to be called G4S because, in ad people's language, the brand is tarnished. Group 4 was even described as a "national laughing stock" by the government's own lawyers in court in 2003 after a riot at an immigration detention centre that it ran which was later burned to the ground. Things haven't improved since. Reid himself sent the firm to new frontiers, where the firm ran new fiascos. When Reid was home secretary, the Law Lords told him that just labelling foreigners "terror suspects" didn't mean that he could lock them up without trial. Reid turned to Group 4 for help. It cobbled together something called "control orders," a house arrest for these "terror suspects" administered by Group 4 and other private firms. Control orders were simultaneously too draconian and too lax - prisoners, including vulnerable men who had been tortured in their home countries, were tagged and monitored by Group 4. Those who stuck by the rules were pushed to the edge of mental illness by the isolation of the strict house arrest. At the same time, Group 4 allowed another prisoner to simply disappear. This may have been embarrassing for the firm and for Reid, but they manfully hid their red faces and entered into a new relationship when Reid left government. Group 4 has risen thanks to the crudest economic determinism - Reid, who authorised the signing of cheques for Group 4 as a minister, ends up getting cheques from the firm. Reid is not alone. A small squad of politicians worked to get Group 4 where it is today. First, Tory chairman Fowler helped the firm get into the prisons business in the 1990s. Group 4 tightened its grip on British jails last year when it took over rival private prisons firm GSL. It bought GSL from an investment company called Englefield Capital, which employs another Labour ex-minister, former defence secretary George Robertson, as an adviser. Group 4 then broke into the international mercenary trade by buying a company called Armor Group, whose armed men guard British officials in Iraq and Afghanistan. Up until this, Armor Group's chairman had been another top politician - leading Tory MP Malcolm Rifkind. Twenty years ago, the idea that a private company would run our jails and wars would have looked like science fiction. By hiring politicians, the "security industry" made it a reality.

January 11, 2009 The Observer
John Reid, the former home secretary, has cashed in on his ministerial experience by taking a £45,000-a-year job with private security company G4S, the Observer has learnt. His appointment comes just days after a parliamentary committee warned that former ministers have been exploiting their insider knowledge "with impunity". Formed from a merger of Group 4 and Securicor, G4S is Britain's largest security firm with contracts ranging from private prisons to the armed guards defending British officials in Iraq. The appointment was disclosed by the advisory committee on business appointments, which polices former ministers' job applications. Reid has been judged free to lobby ministers and officials on behalf of the security company. The public administration committee (PAC) called last week for all lobbying activity to be registered and monitored by a tougher watchdog - claiming the industry's attempt at self-regulation had entirely failed. "We are strongly concerned that, with the rules as loosely and as variously interpreted as they currently are, former ministers in particular appear to be able to use with impunity the contacts they built up as public servants to further a private interest," said a statement from the PAC.

June 18, 2008 NBC6
Miami-Dade County said it is poised to make good on its promise to fire Wackenhut Security from its massive contract on Metrorail trains unless it repays taxpayers millions of dollars. NBC6 has obtained internal county memos that confirm that Miami-Dade County is asking other security firms to submit bids to replace Wackenhut on Metrorail trains and other facilities. The county said Wackenhut's only hope of not getting fired is if it returns up to $6 million in taxpayer dollars. The Metrorail and Metromover systems are guarded by Wackenhut Security in a lucrative no-bid contract. The county said it is getting ready to replace Wackenhut, cutting short the existing contract unless Wackenhut makes amends. "It's very troubling," said Miami-Dade Mayor Carlos Alvarez. In May, Alvarez threatened to fire Wackenhut. On Tuesday, it was clear that was no idle threat. "We are prepared to cancel all contracts with the Wackenhut corporation and demand that we get the money that's owed to us," Alvarez said. The county said Wackenhut scheduled guards to work partial shifts while billing taxpayers for a full shift and sometimes billing taxpayers for a post that had no guards at all, NBC6's Jeff Burnside reported. The allegations were the same as those contained in an NBC6 investigation called "A Question Of Security." The amount in question is up to $6 million. An independent audit claimed it was much more. One problem is that any company that replaces Wackenhut might need to hire some of Wackenhut's guards because of the size of the contract. In an internal memo, Wackenhut called that, "underhanded … tactics by third-party instigators." A labor union urged county commissioners Tuesday to improve working conditions in any new contract. Wackenhut had no response on Tuesday, Burnside reported. Previously, the company has disputed the allegations.

May 9, 2008 Miami-Herald
The Wackenhut Corp. overbilled Miami-Dade County as much as $6 million over three years for phantom security guards at county transit stations, according to a long-awaited audit released Thursday. County auditor Cathy Jackson -- who reviewed a sample of the bills -- found that Wackenhut, one of the country's largest security firms, routinely charged the county for empty guard posts at Metrorail stations and along bus routes, and relied on inaccurate and falsified records to try to cover up the overbilling. Miami-Dade Mayor Carlos Alvarez has given Wackenhut 90 days to repay the county or rebut the audit findings or he will cancel the company's no-bid contract, along with a separate Wackenhut contract for guards at a juvenile detention center. Jackson said Wackenhut should also pay the county an additional $233,000 for violating the terms of its contract. Wackenhut's billing is also being examined by public-corruption detectives with the Miami-Dade Police Department. 'There is no disputing that [Miami-Dade Transit] was billed for hours not worked by Wackenhut security officers, which is a very serious offense,'' County Manager George Burgess wrote in a memo to Alvarez. Wackenhut, however, does dispute the audit. The company says Jackson used unreliable records to determine that posts were uncovered, and ignored other records that could prove guards were on duty. FIGURES DISPUTED -- While Wackenhut says it will reimburse the county for any ''substantiated billing errors,'' the company says Jackson's conclusion of $6 million in overbilling from 2002 to 2005 is an exaggerated estimate based on a small sample. ''If you start with a false premise, you end up with a false conclusion,'' said Bruce Rubin, a company spokesman. ``We respectfully but forcefully disagree with the auditor's methodology.'' Jackson based her estimate on a review of 505 billing records -- only .25 percent of the bills submitted in the three years studied -- which found $14,722 in questionable charges. She also found $83,665 in suspicious charges, but these were not included in her sample for estimation purposes. Wackenhut has been providing security for Miami-Dade Transit since 1989, and the contract has been awarded without bidding since 1994. The current contract, which pays Wackenhut as much as $17 million a year, is set to expire in November 2009. The security company, based in Palm Beach Gardens, has also spent the past three years fending off an unusual lawsuit brought by a former guard at the county's Juvenile Assessment Center, who accused her former employer of padding its bill to the county. The former guard's attorney, H. Mark Vieth, has said he believes the overbilling could be as much as $3.6 million a year. He has compiled sworn statements from ex-guards who said they struggled to fill unmanned posts, submitted false records and received pay for hours they didn't work. Jackson ''found exactly what we've been telling the county for a while now,'' Vieth said. ''I could have practically written that report for her. The only difference, really, is that we're auditing 100 percent of the bills and she's found this much fraud'' based on a far smaller sample. Wackenhut has denied wrongdoing in the suit and has challenged Vieth to provide proof of specific instances of overbilling. Vieth has enlisted a team of investigators and bookkeepers to sort through Wackenhut bills, sign-in sheets, log books and other records to prove his case, which is not yet scheduled for trial. If he wins the case -- brought under the county's False Claims Act -- his client will receive 25 percent of any damages and the county will receive 75 percent. REFUSED TO TESTIFY -- Yet the lawsuit has put Vieth at odds with the county. Last month he sought a contempt of court order against Jackson after she refused to testify about the audit before it was completed. Vieth plans to call her again for a deposition next week. The audit was costly to Wackenhut even before its release. The company had been selected by county staffers to win another $4.8 million county security contract -- before county commissioners, worried about the audit findings, decided Tuesday to scrap the bids and start over. In her audit, Jackson said Wackenhut constantly shifted guards around to cover unguarded posts, pulling in supervisors or patrols from the bus routes, but the county was billed as though all these jobs were filled. In some cases, log books at Metrorail stations contained no notes to prove a guard was there, the audit found. In other cases, the logs and other records showed guards in two different locations at the same time. Records showed that one armed guard was on duty for 34 ½ hours in a row -- violating a rule capping guards at 13 ½ hours in a 24-hour period and ''leaving in question the ability of armed employees to remain alert and responsive,'' the audit said. Wackenhut officials said the log books were never intended to be used for timekeeping, and said the absence of notes in the books do not prove a guard wasn't on duty.

May 7, 2008 Palm Beach Post
The chief of staff in training for de facto Senate President Jeff Atwater is officially off the payroll, Atwater said Wednesday. Millionaire "Budd" Kneip of Palm Beach Gardens earned a $7,000-a-month salary from the state for one month and two days to learn the ins and outs of the legislature, which was dealing with a $5 billion budget deficit. Kneip was the founder and owner of the Oasis Group, a division of Wackenhut Corp. He has no legislative experience but has run campaigns, including the one for Palm Beach County's 2004 half-penny sales tax increase to build schools. Normally, the chief of staff assumes his position when the Senate president is appointed in the fall. Atwater, R-North Palm Beach, is being challenged in his reelection bid by Skip Campbell, D-Tamarac, who formerly served in the Senate with him. Florida Democrats on Tuesday formally requested public records about Kneip's hiring and asked Atwater use his campaign account to reimburse the state for Kneip's salary. "Floridians are hurting, Sen. Atwater, but your campaign coffers are not," Democratic Party Chairwoman Karen Thurman said in a letter to Atwater on Tuesday. "We were going out spending money foolishly when we don't have the money to spend," Campbell said. "Let's be honest about it. There is no chief of staff until you become senate president." Before Thurman's letter became public, Atwater said he had arranged in the final days of the legislative session for Kneip to go off the payroll. The session ended Friday. "Budd's assistance during session was invaluable. ... He has returned home to continue developing a transition plan; I look forward to Budd coming back to the Senate this fall," Atwater said. Thurman's demands were a way to help Campbell, Atwater said Wednesday. "This is a chairman trying to insert herself into a local race with no information," he said.

April 12, 2008 Palm Beach Post
Sen. Jeff Atwater has hired an aide who will get on-the-job training before he becomes Senate president chief of staff, and Atwater's campaign opponent is criticizing the expenditure. Robert "Budd" Kneip is a Palm Beach Gardens businessman with no legislative experience. He founded The Oasis Group, an outsourcing division of Wackenhut Corp. Kneip, who is earning $7,000 a month, needed to come on board early to get the feel of how the legislature runs and how government budgets are developed and negotiated before his new boss officially takes over, Atwater said. Normally the chief of staff is appointed after the legislative leader assumes his role in the fall. Atwater is being challenged for reelection in November by Democrat Skip Campbell, a trial lawyer who formerly served in the Senate alongside Atwater. Campbell criticized Kneip's salary at a time when lawmakers are slashing about $5 billion from the state budget because of plummeting tax collections. "How can we be hiring somebody for on the job training at 7K a month when we're cutting education, food for the poor, Medicaid treatment for the mentally ill? This is one of the most hypocritical actions I've seen in government," Campbell said. Kneip has sat on the advisory boards for Florida Atlantic University and the Juvenile Diabetes Foundation, and served as chairman of the Palm Beach County Task Force on Business Development. In the latter role, he successfully pushed a 2004 referendum for a half-penny sales tax hike to pay for building schools to comply with the constitutional amendment limiting class sizes. Kneip's know-how at implementing state policy at the local level and business acumen are why he's right for the job, said Atwater, a North Palm Beach Republican. "He doesn't have the experience in this process," Atwater said. "To have him be able to watch how this works is going to help me as we think about structure, the design, the flow and process of work."

January 25, 2008 WSMV
The I-Team has uncovered a cozy relationship between a Metro employee and the security contractor he oversees.  Bill Kostrub said he doesn't want to talk about it, but part of his job with Metro government is approving payments to Wackenhut Security, a company for which he used to work. Wackenhut is now under investigation for billing irregularities at the election commission. “I appreciate your coming out, but all the questions go through Velvet,” he said. He referred reporter Nancy Amons to Velvet Hunter, who is second in command at Metro General Services, where he works. Kostrub's job at General Services includes reviewing the bills for security guards submitted by Wackenhut. Kostrub was a salesman at Wackenhut until October 2006. During the time, Wackenhut was negotiating the contract with Metro to provide security for all of its buildings. In December 2006, while contract negotiations were still going on, Kostrub went to work for Metro. Now he has the power to OK Wackenhut's invoices. Amons shared the findings with Councilman Jim Gotto. "It doesn't sound good. It doesn't look good,” he said. Channel 4 obtained a stack of invoices under the Open Records Act that shows 67 times in the last three months, Kostrub signed off on security guard bills submitted by Wackenhut. The bills cover the months when Metro auditors said Wackenhut appeared to be billing Metro for ghost employees. Metro said guards were supposed to be patrolling the Howard Office Building every Saturday. Tax dollars paid for it, but Metro said there's no evidence the guards were there. At least five of the Saturday bills were approved by Kostrub. “I'm really interested that you used to work for Wackenhut and now you approve their invoices,” said Amons. “And I can appreciate that. Talk to Velvet about it. You guys have a good day,” Kostrub said. "There's nothing wrong with this gentleman working for Metro, but he certainly doesn't need to be working for Metro on this particular contract,” Gotto said. Hunter said late Friday that Kostrup was hired through an open and competitive process and that Metro did not have a problem with his former employment. Channel 4 and the I-Team are not implying that Kostrup did anything wrong; they are just asking if it creates an ethics issue.

January 17, 2008 AP
Seven guards have been caught sleeping at the Y-12 nuclear weapons plant in Oak Ridge since 2000, a federal spokesman said Wednesday. Three were fired and the rest were disciplined, said Steven Wyatt, spokesman for the National Nuclear Security Administration, a Department of Energy unit that oversees the Y-12 complex. The administration reported Monday only two guards had fallen asleep at their posts in four years at the high-security plant, about 20 miles west of Knoxville. But Wyatt said Wednesday that did not cover the full extent of Wackenhut Services Inc.'s Oak Ridge security contract, which began in January 2000. Six cases of guard-napping involving seven officers were found during the seven-year period. Y-12, a potential terrorist target containing the key ingredients for a "dirty bomb," makes uranium parts for every warhead in the U.S. nuclear arsenal. It also dismantles old weapons and is the nation's primary storehouse for bomb-grade uranium. Wackenhut Services' napping-guard record in Oak Ridge came up for questioning after its parent company, The Wackenhut Corp., recently lost a security contract for 10 nuclear power plants after sleeping guards were found at a Pennsylvania station. However, Florida-based Wackenhut Services Inc. is considered an independent subsidiary of The Wackenhut Corp., and has its own board of directors. "Given how serious NNSA considers our responsibility of safeguarding our nuclear facilities, we feel it is important to provide you with a complete accounting of inattention incidents involving security police officers found sleeping on the job at Y-12," Wyatt explained. Three officers were found "intentionally sleeping on duty" and were terminated -- two guards in 2000 and one in 2002. The other cases were less blatant, with discipline ranging up to three weeks' suspension without pay and 12-month probation for all of them.

January 9, 2008 NBC TV6
The CEO of Wackenhut Security, a South Florida company that has been surrounded by controversy, is stepping down. A representative with the company declined to say why Gary Sanders made the decision to quit pending a formal announcement on Wednesday. The change at the top came at a time when Wackenhut Security was facing mounting criticism in various cities, including some in South Florida where its Miami-Dade County operation is the target of a criminal probe. The county audit, which was detailed in an NBC 6 investigation of Wackenhut billing practices, is examining whether Wackenhut overcharged taxpayers millions of dollars. Sanders had been with Wackenhut for more than 25 years.

December 10, 2007 NBC TV6
Miami-Dade and federal investigators raided the headquarters Friday night of one of the county's largest government contractors. NBC 6 was the first to report in May that Wackenhut Security is under a criminal investigation for overbilling taxpayers millions of dollars, money for work on transit and the downtown juvenile center. NBC 6 camera's filmed public corruption investigators and police removing boxes filled with documents from Wackenhut's Miami-Dade headquarters on Blue Lagoon Drive. Investigators were there for several hours and were being assisted by top Wackenhut executives. Wackenhut has repeatedly declined to be interviewed, but said in a statement that the company was cooperating with authorities. "The Wackenhut Corporation ('Wackenhut') continues to cooperate with Miami-Dade County ('MDC'), and voluntarily provided MDC additional records and documents yesterday to assist and facilitate MDC’s investigation and audit of Wackenhut’s performance under its security contract with the Miami Dade Transit Authority," said Drew Levine, president of the Security Services Division. "Wackenhut is proud of its service and performance under its contracts with Miami-Dade County and is very confident that after a thorough investigation the County will conclude that Wackenhut acted properly and performed its responsibilities under the contract in a highly professional and responsible manner." The company has previously denied overbilling taxpayers. Miami-Dade County is nearing completion of an audit of Wackenhut's billing practices. The preliminary audit found serious discrepancies.

December 18, 2007 Yahoo Business Wire
Cognetas, an independent mid-market pan-European private equity firm specialising in complex deals, today announces the sale of Global Solutions (GSL) for £355 million to G4S. The sale, subject to EU merger clearance and South African competition commission clearance, is expected to complete in 2008. GSL is a leading provider of outsourced support services to public authorities and corporate organisations worldwide. Services are typically provided under long-term contracts (5 to 30 years) either directly to the end customer or through joint ventures and Public Private Partnerships with government and corporates. GSL has operations in the UK, South Africa and Australia. Its service offering covers three areas: Custodial services, including prison management, escorting, immigration, custody and training; Public Services, for example healthcare, education and Local Authority services; and Business services, comprising utilities, office accommodation and other managed services. Cognetas backed the original MBO of GSL in 2004 in a £207 million (€309 million) transaction. At the time, Cognetas underwrote equity and debt to facilitate certainty for the vendor with an initial commitment of £105 million (€158 million) on behalf of Cognetas Fund I. This was reduced within two months to £54 million (€81 million) by introducing senior debt. The balance of the funding was provided by Englefield Capital on behalf of the Englefield Funds. Since then Cognetas has supported management in the implementation of a growth plan that has seen revenues increase from £291 million in 2004 to over £400 million in 2007 through organic growth, in fill acquisition and expansion of services in its sectors over three continents with the number of staff employed increasing by over 25% to more than 9,500. Nigel McConnell, Managing Partner of Cognetas commented: “We are delighted to be associated with the success of GSL over the past three years and we are pleased to see that the dynamic management team has built the business into a worldwide quality provider of outsourced services. We leave the business on extremely sound and robust grounds which will help sustain its continued growth. I am confident that being part of a larger global business like G4S will take this business forward to a new level and I wish them well”.

November 29, 2007 The Telegraph
Group4Securicor is in talks to buy Global Solutions, a company it used to own, for around £350m. Earlier this year, private equity firm Cognetas appointed investment bank UBS to carry out a strategic review of Global Solutions, which runs a number of Britain's prisons and detention centres. However, the credit crunch forced Cognetas to put the review of Global Solutions on hold. Since then, the company has received a number of approaches, including one from Group4Securicor. Cognetas bought Global Solutions, which also manages hospitals, schools and tourist offices, from Danish security firm Group 4 Falk for about £200m three years ago. Group4Securicor is now understood to be carrying out due diligence on the business. However, it is not the only company bidding. Sources said US group GEO and several private equity firms have also made approaches for the company. Global Solutions has previously come under the spotlight for the way it runs its prisons and detention centres, following the Government's privatisation of the sector. Earlier this year, there was a Panorama investigation by an undercover BBC reporter, who worked as a custody officer, in one of Global Solutions' prisons at Rye Hill. None of the parties involved would comment.

November 20, 2007 This Is Hampshire
A SECURITY firm employee who was heavily in debt stole £25,000 following an extraordinary blunder by two colleagues, a court heard. The cash had been collected from the London Road branch of Nat West in Southampton - and left overnight at the depot. The following day, Paul Dean spotted the bag and stole it, dropping it off at home before continuing with his deliveries. Police carried out a major investigation during which Dean and a co-driver were suspended from their jobs with Group 4 Securicor. Seven months after the theft last November, they executed a warrant at Dean's home and recovered more than £10,000. Some of the proceeds had been spent on a large slim line television, Mr Anderson added. Southampton Crown Court heard the two men who had left the cash behind were fired and Dean's colleague, though exonerated, had resigned. Dean, 51, of Maclean Road, Bournemouth, admitted theft and was jailed for 12 months. In mitigation, Christopher Gair said Dean lost his wife in a road accident in 1994 and had debts of £24,000. A month before the theft, he had been given two county court judgments against him. "In a moment of madness he took advantage of the money left there," said Mr Gair.

November 1, 2007 This Is Leicestershire
An "inside man" involved in a plot to steal £1 million from a Securicor van has been jailed for four years. Ex-soldier Neil Colbourne, from Hinckley, worked for the firm in the lead-up to the robbery bid, which would have involved kidnapping a driver's wife. He was among six gang members who were jailed in connection with the case. A court heard how the plan involved two kidnappers seizing a driver's wife at her home in Swanscombe, Kent, and holding her hostage while others raided her husband's security van at gunpoint. But the plan to target a depot in Dartford, Kent, was foiled when a seventh member of the gang, brothel keeper Vincent Calleja, turned himself in to police. Police swooped on the gang's headquarters the night before the heist last June and found two guns and ammunition, balaclavas, and cable ties. They also found keys to a stolen Renault Espace. Four of the men were found guilty on June 29 of conspiracy to rob and were sentenced on Monday at Guildford Crown Court. Ashley O'Driscoll (21), from Eaton Grove, in Mitcham, Surrey, Billy French (22), from Steers Mead, Mitcham, and Michael Cloherty (41), of no fixed address, were each sentenced to 15 years. The father of Billy French, unemployed Clive Tedder (42), from Spencer Roady, Mitcham, received 18 years. Colbourne, now 34, who had an address in Hinckley and Orpington, Kent, had worked as a guard for Group 4 Securicor and was sentenced to four years, while 33-year-old Wayne McKenna-Bruce, from Chislehurst, Kent, was sentenced to three years in prison. The pair's conspiracy to steal pleas were accepted after a court heard they had not known about the full scale of the plot. The seventh member, Vincent Calleja (45), from Tadworth, has pleaded guilty to conspiracy to rob and seven unrelated human trafficking and prostitution charges, and is to be sentenced.

November 1, 2007 PR News
The Wackenhut Corporation ("Wackenhut" or "the Company") today filed a civil action against the Service Employees International Union ("SEIU" or "the Union"). The lawsuit is in response to the SEIU's malicious, four-year, international corporate campaign to force Wackenhut to recognize the Union as the employees' bargaining representative while denying the employees their federal rights to free choice and a secret ballot election. The SEIU's top-down, wholesale, organizing attack also would compromise the quality of Wackenhut's services by forcing the Company to deal with a union that also represents workers other than guards which federal law specifically prohibits as an appropriate unit for representation and bargaining. Filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, the lawsuit alleges violations of the federal Racketeering Influenced Corporations Act, 18 U.S.C. section 1961 et seq., and seeks injunctive relief, treble compensatory damages and costs.

September 14, 2007 BBC
A security worker has been jailed for stealing almost £130,000 in coins from parking meters on Teesside. Bryn Lynas, 47, of Ormesby, Middlesbrough, was employed to empty the machines in Redcar and Cleveland. At Teesside Crown Court, the former Group 4 Securicor Cash Services employee pleaded guilty to the theft of £128,301 from January 2004 to May 2006. Jailing him for 21 months, Judge Tony Briggs told Lynas he had grossly abused a position of trust. Group 4 was contracted by Redcar and Cleveland Council to empty parking meters. An audit revealed tens of thousands of pounds was missing and when Lynas was arrested last year he told police: "I've got a bag full of money on my back seat." He was interviewed and admitted taking cash from the machines, but said he had been doing it for only 10 months The court was shown footage from a camera covertly placed by police in Lynas' van, in which he repeatedly attempts to prise open cash boxes with a screwdriver. He also admitted money laundering between June 2004 and last May, but disputed stealing £40,000 of the total, claiming that he was not employed on some of the days stated in the case. But Judge Briggs said "the loss of at least £80,000-£90,000" and "dishonesty of this magnitude" required a significant sentence.

September 14, 2007 24 Dash
A security worker who stole nearly £130,000 in coins from parking meters he was employed to empty is facing jail. Bryn Lynas, 47, plundered the machines in Cleveland for two years before his bungled get-rich-quick scheme was uncovered by his bosses. When Lynas was arrested in May last year, after an audit revealed tens of thousands of pounds were missing, he told police: "I\'ve got a bag full of money on my back seat." Officers searched his vehicle and found a bag containing more than £500 stuffed in the footwell of the Renault Megane. Lynas was interviewed and admitted taking cash from the machines, but said he had been doing it for only 10 months. Police inquiries revealed that his partner, Susan Shaw, also 47, had received £23,655 in her bank account from Lynas. She was arrested for a money laundering offence, but had the charges dropped by prosecutors at Teesside Crown Court in August. Lynas, of Ormesby, Middlesbrough, pleaded guilty at Teesside Crown Court on August 8 to the theft of £128,301 between January 2004 and May last year, and money laundering between June 2004 and last May. His case was adjourned until today for reports. Lynas was employed by Group 4 Securicor Cash Services, which was contracted by the borough council to empty parking meters. Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council said it was pleased Lynas had been brought to justice but added the cash collecting contract was re-tendered last year and given to a different company.

September 6, 2007 News Shopper
A FORMER soldier has been jailed for four years for his part in a plot to steal more than £1m from security vans - including his own. Neil Colbourne had worked for Securicor for two years when he was the "victim" of an armed robbery outside the HSBC bank in Sydenham. But he was an accomplice and slipped the money box containing £25,000 out of the back of his van to a waiting vehicle before calling the police claiming he had been robbed. Prosecutor Maria Kariaskos told Guildford Crown Court the 33-year-old later changed his story, saying there was no gun involved. He also failed to pick out the real "robbers" in an identification parade. Officers arrested him after studying CCTV footage of the incident on May 16 last year. He could be seen waiting for a minute-and-a-half until the vehicle being used by the "robbers" arrived. Colbourne, of Station Square, Petts Wood, admitted a charge of conspiracy to steal. He also pleaded guilty to another count of conspiracy to steal for helping a gang to plot a £1m theft from another van. The cash handler and his old Army friend Wayne McKenna-Bruce, aged 33, gave the gang the van driver's name and the registration numbers of his car and of two Securicor vehicles. This enabled them to follow their intended target to his house and plan their attack. McKenna-Bruce, from Sevenoaks, pleaded guilty to one charge of conspiracy to steal and was sentenced to three years in jail. James Scobie, representing McKenna-Bruce, said the two defendants thought the driver in the second incident was in on the plot and violence would not be threatened or used.

August 26, 2007 Sunday Mail
A SECURITY van driver who claimed he was robbed by gunmen wearing fake Mexican moustaches has admitted lying to steal more than £300,000. Ian Watt, 44, made up the far-fetched tale about how his Group 4 van was robbed at gunpoint because he was desperate for cash. Watt even went to the trouble of driving himself to a forest outside Edinburgh and bound his own hands to make it look as if he had been assaulted and robbed. Police issued an appeal for witnesses through TV and newspapers and quizzed 500 drivers close to where the alleged robbery was meant to have happened. But they later found CCTV footage of Watt sitting in his vehicle at a time he said he was being beaten, bound and blindfolded by the desperado gang. Then they checked the tracking system on his van and found it did not match his story. Detectives confronted the ex-soldier, who admitted he had buried the load in a nearby wood. Last week he was jailed for 16 months for stealing £271,963.94 in cash, £41,928.72 in cheques and £236.61 in euros. He also confessed to wasting police time. Watt claimed he took the money to help bail out his new girlfriend, who was going through an expensive divorce. A police insider said: "This is one of the most bizarre cases we have ever dealt with. "The guy went to extreme measures to look convincing and on the face of it this was a very serious robbery. "The guys working on the case were incredulous when the truth emerged." Watt had been working for Group 4 security for more than 20 years when he faked the robbery in May.

March 23, 2007 The Telegraph
Ministers have been forced to act after receiving disturbing evidence of equipment failures and doctored record-keeping within Group 4 Securicor Justice Services, which operates 60 per cent of tags for offenders released early under the Home Detention Curfew scheme. A 130-page dossier obtained by a BBC journalist, who worked undercover for five months in the security company's Nottingham operations centre, includes the following allegations: A manager secretly taped saying that three paedophiles were not being monitored. A prisoner incorrectly returned to jail for seven weeks because of a blunder by the security company. A violent offender breached his bail conditions by going into a pub 10 minutes after removing his tag the night before his court appearance. An employee mocked Victor Bates, a campaigner against tagging whose wife Marian was shot dead in their jewellery shop after the gunman's accomplice had ripped off his tag. A prisoner convicted of indecent assault on home leave was unmonitored for several days because his tagging equipment failed. The revelations will further undermine confidence in tagging after figures revealed that inmates let out under the system committed more than 1,000 violent crimes including four manslaughters, one murder, 56 woundings and more than 700 assaults since it was introduced in 1999. The investigation also discovered evidence of staff fabricating records to save money. G4S is paid around £45 million a year by the Home Office to administer the curfew system. After being confronted with the evidence G4S, which has admitted there was faulty equipment, has been forced to apologise and has suspended five employees in Nottingham. A spokesman for the Home Office said: "Public protection is the Government's first priority. The findings of this programme are of concern. We are reviewing the contract and will be asking G4S urgent questions to ensure that these allegations are thoroughly investigated and issues arising are addressed." The investigation by a team from BBC Inside Out East Midlands disclosed that the monitoring boxes in tagged offenders homes, which relay information about their movements, routinely broke down. One factor in the failure of the system could be that G4S, which has admitted there was a batch of faulty equipment in Nottingham, uses the mobile telephone network technology rather than fixed lines. Steve Green, the Chief Constable of Nottinghamshire, said the Home Office had to establish whether the Nottingham problems were nationwide. "I want to urgently know if is this a Nottingham problem or a G4S problem. If it is a G4S problem and this is the way company is run then that puts a huge responsibility on the Home Office to tackle and address because that is not acceptable," he said. Ian Ridgely, chief operations officer at G4S, said: "We believe in a small number of cases that we may not have been monitoring to the level that we would expect to, we apologise for that, we accept that. From that point of view we recognise that the Home Office requires us to work to a very high standard and of course we are sorry that in some minor number of instances, we may not have operated to those standards."

February 20, 2007 Great Yarmouth Mercury
An opportunist thief stole a Securicor van containing more than £35,000 after a guard left the keys in the ignition and the engine running, a court heard yesterday. The Securicor guard had just collected the cash from Norwich city centre car parks leaving his security van unlocked, when Martin Chapman, 31, saw his chance and stole the van containing the cash, Norwich Crown Court heard. Duncan O'Donnell, prosecuting, said the van was later found abandoned at Swanton Road travellers site in Norwich and Chapman was later arrested and £26,000 of the cash was recovered. However Mr O'Donnell said the security guard responsible for leaving the van unattended had since lost his job. Chapman, of Rosedale Gardens, Belton, near Yarmouth, admitted taking a Securicor van and stealing £9,239.50 on October 18. He was given a 12-month jail sentence suspended for a year and ordered to do 200 hours unpaid work. Guy Ayers, mitigating, said it was an unusual set of circumstances. “It was purely opportunistic. He saw the van left in this way and thought it was careless and took advantage of that particular driver's way of working.” He said Chapman was genuinely sorry that the guard had lost his job. Chapman who was of previous good character was unlikely to re-offending, Mr Ayers added.

August 12, 2006 Daily Telegraph
INDIA'S biggest private airline Jet Airways would suspend a British employee arrested in London over an alleged plot to blow up US airliners, it said today. "(Asmin) Tariq is being suspended pending a full investigation, having not reported for duty for the past couple of days," an airline statement said. Tariq, a Jet security employee, was among 24 people arrested in Britain earlier this week over the alleged plot to use suicide bombers with explosives to blow US airliners out of the sky. One person was later freed. Jet said Tariq, who holds a British passport, was transferred to Jet in March from global security group G4S - previously called Securicor - after the airline ended its contract with the company. Jet, which flies to London and other international destinations as well as serving Indian domestic routes, said under British employment law, it had been obliged to take on employees working for G4S before the contract ended.

July 15, 2006 Preston Today
Police have launched a manhunt after a rapist from Preston prison escaped on his way to court. Mustafa Ismail, 35, was being taken from HMP Preston to the Manchester Asylum and Immigration Tribunal Court when he escaped from the Group 4 Securicor vehicle. Detectives are appealing to the public for information about Ismail but warning not to approach him. The Somalian was at the end of a five year sentence for rape. He was on remand at HMP Preston pending a decision over his deportation. The hearing he was due to attend was to hear his application for asylum in the UK. Police have described him as a black man with black hair and brown eyes, about 6ft (1.8m) tall and of slim build. He was travelling in an escort van when he escaped near the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal Court in Manchester's Piccadilly, at about 11.30am on Thursday. It is believed he was being handcuffed when he pushed over one of the guards and fled on foot. A Home Office spokeswoman said: "We can confirm that on 13 July, at approximately 11.15am, an immigration detainee escaped from our care at Manchester Asylum and Tribunal Court. "Greater Manchester Police were informed and we are working closely with them to ensure the apprehension of the detainee. "The incident will be fully investigated and any necessary action will be taken in conjunction with the Home Office." Group 4 guards were trying to handcuff Ismail when he fled. They took chase but were unable to catch him. Nobody was injured. CCTV footage from the van is now being examined, as well as cameras from the local vicinity.

May 23, 2006 The Mirror
IN THE latest major Home Office blunder, 2,700 innocent people were branded as criminals. They were labelled robbers, thieves and sex offenders because their names and dates of birth matched those of convicted criminals. As a result, many were refused jobs, turned down for university or threatened with the sack. The shambles was the fault of the Home Office Criminal Records Bureau, which is managed by private-sector IT firm Capita. Unions say the increasing involvement of private firms in government departments will lead to more mistakes. A Unison spokesman said yesterday: "So many different parts of our public services are in disarray, and privatisation has played a big part in this. "There's a conflict between the motivations of private companies and their clients, the government. For private firms there's a pressing need to be competitive and deliver profits to the shareholder. Prison security COMPANY: Group 4 RESPONSIBLE for a catalogue of blunders, including allowing seven prisoners to escape while ferrying them between prison and court in the East Midlands and Yorkshire in 1993. In the same year, a prisoner fled Group 4 custody at a Hull court. Two years ago, killer Gordon Topen escaped from HMP Rye Hill. Now known as Group 4 Securicor, it detains and escorts asylum seekers, and made a profit of £254million last year.

May 19, 2006 The Mirror
A WHISTLEBLOWER last night claimed the UK's deportation system is a shambolic failure that does nothing to ease our spiralling immigration crisis. The Group 4 Securicor officer, who escorts deportees back to their home country, insists an amazing 6 in 10 efforts end in failure. He says many manage to get sent back to UK detention centres by harming themselves or their children on the way to the airport. Others cause such uproar on the plane that pilots insist they are removed. In the worst cases private jets allegedly have to be charted at vast expense to get them home. And the officer claims it will take 23 years to clear out huge backlog of illegal immigrants. He said: "It's about time people knew what a state the system is in. We have a 60 percent cancellation rate on deportations and it's getting worse. "The deportees will use every trick in the book to avoid getting kicked out. The men will kick and spit and scream that they have HIV. The officer said many corrupt officials in foreign countries refuse to let the deportees in - unless they get a large backhander. He said: "We are often going to banana republics where the authorities will say they don't have the right paperwork or deny the deportee is from their country. Then they ask us for bribes." The officer claimed he and his colleagues often have no choice but to pay the backhander with company cash or credit cards that are supposed to be used for expenses. He added: "Although it's not our money, we try and keep the price down as we resent paying bribes." The whistleblower is a Detention Custody Officer with Group 4 Securicor, which has the Home Office contract to run detention centres and escort failed asylum seekers. He is from the West Midlands but works at Group 4's Overseas Escorting headquarters in Crawley, West Sussex. His duties include collecting failed asylum seekers from UK detention centres and escorting them home. He claims that for high-profile or troublesome deportees, Group 4 Securicor charters a private jet to fly them home - at a rate of up to £1,500-an-hour. The officer said: "It's a shocking waste of taxpayers' money. But the bosses say it's the only way." According to a 2005 National Audit Office report, the average cost of deporting an illegal immigrant is £11,000 per person. Group 4 Securicor last night denied company money was used to pay bribes. A spokesman said: "We provide credit cards and petty cash to cover incidental expenses. We deny paying bribes." The company said the whistleblower's claims of a 60 percent failure rate were false, saying "Less than one per cent of our removals result in immigration detainees being returned to the UK." The firm refused to reveal how many deportees fail to leave the UK. The Home Office admitted chartering flights "when economical and efficient to do so". The spokesman added: "We strongly refute these allegations and do not recognise the figures being quoted."

July 9, 2005
Here is a story about your taxes at work. It concerns a company called GSL (Australia) Pty Ltd, previously known as Group 4 Correction Services, a wholly owned subsidiary of the British security company Group 4 Securitas, whose core business includes running prisons. GSL's parent has merged twice in the past five years. The second time was a year ago, with a British-based multinational called Securicor to create "one of the largest security companies in the world, with 340,000 employees in 108 countries", according to GSL's website.  On July 13, 2004, GSL was sold, for $500 million, as a stand-alone company to "two of Europe's leading private equity companies, Englefield Capital and Electra Partners Europe". The GSL website says GSL has 8000 employees globally, including 1064 in Australia.  A year earlier, on August 27, 2003, GSL signed a contract with the Australian Government's Department of Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs to take over the operation of all its mainland "immigration detention facilities". The contract runs for four years, with a government option for another three years.  The cost to taxpayers: $90 million a year.  That is, $90 million "not including overheads and contract administration", according to the Auditor-General, whose office has just investigated the Immigration Department's management of the GSL contract. What do taxpayers get for their $90 million?  Well, the first thing they get is a bill for another $30 million, which is what the Audit Office found it now costs the department in annual overheads to administer the contract. These costs have gone up at the same time as the number of detainees has gone down. In 2003-04 administration costs totalled $20 million, while in the year just ended June 30 they were "projected to reach $30 million".  The number of detainees, as at June 29, was 844. Do your sums on a total cost of $120 million and you'll find the detention of each and every detainee cost taxpayers an average $142,000 throughout 2004-05. Perhaps this is why GSL Australia's managing director, Peter Olszak, is quoted on the company website as "expressing confidence 'we will continue to go from strength to strength'."   The Audit Office, in its report released this week, says the Immigration Department stated it funded $120.5 million in 2004-05 to provide "lawful, appropriate, humane and efficient detention of unlawful non-citizens". It also found the department's "internal monitoring and reporting arrangements" neither defined nor measured "lawful, appropriate, humane or efficient detention".  The report's overall conclusion, in part: "The contract does not establish clear expectations for the level and quality of services delivered, mechanisms to protect the Commonwealth's interests are not clear, and there is insufficient information about the quality of services and their costs to allow a value-for-money calculation."  All of which means what?  Labor's Sharon Grierson, deputy chairwoman of Parliament's public accounts and audit committee, was the only MP to respond to the Audit Office report. Grierson said in a statement on Thursday: "The department has no idea what is going on inside detention centres. The last thing we should do is assume anything about these centres, given the culture of complacency and the lack of proper review. The ANAO report makes it clear there is simply no way of knowing whether the Commonwealth is receiving value for money or, more importantly, whether the needs of detainees are being met. The department simply shuts its eyes and hopes for the best. DIMIA has absolutely no idea if (or to what extent) it is insured for incidents at detention centres, why the cost of detention is rising even while the number of detainees is falling, or even what assets and equipment it owns in these centres."  A lot of "don't knows" for $120 million.

June 30, 2005 The Statesman
Britain’s asylum policy came under renewed scrutiny on Monday as dozens of Zimbabweans staged a hunger strike in protest at their imminent deportation and Kurdish Turks mourned a teenage detainee who has killed himself. The Archbishop of Canterbury and former Labour leader Lord Kinnock joined protests over the decision to send failed asylum-seekers back to Robert Mugabe’s regime. Dr Rowan Williams said it would be “deeply immoral” to send failed claimants back to a country where they could face persecution and torture. Lord Kinnock said it would be better to let “a couple of dozen” unjustified claimants remain in Britain than risk sending back people who needed protection. Zimbabweans at the Campsfield detention centre in Oxfordshire said they had been told the Government has delayed further deportations for two weeks, which would forestall the embarrassing prospect of Tony Blair hosting the G8 summit that will focus on the plight of Africa while dozens of Africans are in Britain on hunger strike at his government’s policy.

May 30, 2005 Financial Times
The government is reviewing the future role of the private sector in the Prison Service, while putting on hold further building under the private finance initiative. The rethink was signalled last week when Charles Clarke, home secretary, decided to postpone until the autumn plans to privatise the first cluster of three state-run prisons. Although the private sector has built and run prisons under PFI, these would have been the first group of older prisons to be taken over by independent companies. The decision is part of a deal reached with the Prison Officers' Association and commits the union to helping to improve standards at the three prisons on the Isle of Sheppey, Kent, which together hold 2,000 men. The prisons - Elmley, Standford Hill and Swaleside - were earmarked in March for "market testing", under which private companies were to be invited to compete with the public sector to run them. Group 4, one of the bigger companies involved in the prison sector, said it was "disappointed" by last week's decision. The company suspects that the decision reflects an unresolved process of change within the sector following the creation last year of the National Offender Management Service to run prison and probation services. According to a report published last January by the Prison Reform Trust, despite the dramatic increase in the role of the private sector in the Prison Service, private companies are no better at running prisons than are their public sector counterparts. An estimated 10 per cent of the record prison population in England and Wales of 76,035 are held in private prisons, making the UK the most privatised prison system in Europe. Of the 139 prisons, nine have been built and are being run by private companies under PFI contracts.

April 9, 2005 The Guardian
Security firms involved in the deportation of failed asylum seekers are facing more and more claims of intimidation and assault. Group 4/Global Solutions Ltd (GSL) topped the league table of complaints by asylum seekers and their lawyers. Campaigners who studied 35 complaints now being pursued by lawyers revealed GSL was involved in 30% of cases. GSL, which deals with by far the majority of deportees in Britain, recently won a 10-year Home Office contract to run Bicester Accommodation Centre for asylum seekers. The firm was criticised last month after the broadcast of the BBC documentary Asylum Undercover, which contained claims of abuse by GSL guards. Most of the alleged assaults analysed involve incidents on the way to or at airports. Most concern incidents resulting in cuts, bruises and swelling, although deportees have complained of head injuries, damaged nerves, and sexual assault.

March 31, 2005 IRR News
Recent unannounced inspections of centres used to hold asylum seekers in transit to detention centres and to ports for deportation have found that no centre meets the minimum requirements in relation to child protection. Officials carried out their first (unannounced) inspections into 'holding' centres for asylum seekers between June and October 2004. The holding centres, all run by private company GSL Ltd, (formerly Group 4) were: Communications House (Old Street, London), Lunar House (Croydon), Electric House (Croydon) and Dallas Court (Manchester). The report states that 'all four holding centres had inadequate provision for childcare and child protection. None had a child protection policy in place, and staff likely to be in contact with children had not undergone enhanced Criminal Records Bureau (CRB) checks.' At Lunar House the inspection team reported that they 'spoke to one woman detainee with a two-year-old child during the mid-afternoon. She and the child had been in other areas of the building since 8am that morning. Neither she nor her child had been offered anything to eat during that time and had to wait for relocation to a residential centre that evening.' They found that this was 'unacceptable'. At Dallas Court, the team found that 'a weekend shift recently complained when they discovered a young woman in the holding room who had miscarried a few days previously. She had been collected from a hospital following psychiatric referral, had not eaten for three days and had to be helped to and from the van. She was subject to a live F2052SH self-harm monitoring form because she kept asking for her baby and said she wanted to die. Having been delivered to the holding room in the morning, she was not due to be collected by another vehicle until more than six hours later.' For the first time it emerged that other private contractors (unnamed in this report) are being used to move asylum seekers - though GSL Ltd remains responsible for the four holding centres inspected here. The inspection teams also found a worrying 'absence of operational or independent oversight, compared to other immigration detention facilities. There was no Independent Monitoring Board, and no on-site monitor to provide daily oversight of service provision, as there is in immigration removal centres (IRCs). Senior Immigration and Nationality Directorate (IND) staff visited only occasionally, and, with the exception of Dallas Court, had little involvement with the centres.'

January 13, 2005 PR Newswire
The Wackenhut Corporation, the U.S.-based division of the large U.K. and European security contractor, Group 4 Securicor, has apparently persuaded the U.S. National Labor Relations Board ["NLRB"] to pursue allies of Protects USA. Late last week, the NLRB notified Protects USA ally at the non-profit Prewitt Organizing Fund ["POF"] a formal investigation was under way. "They are requesting private information on activists, allies and funding. It's clearly a continuation of G4-Wackenhut's witch hunt for scapegoats," says Protects USA spokesperson Adam Wilson. "Protects USA and POF are not parties in any matter before the NLRB. We will notify the NLRB that the request will be taken under advisement as it comes in tandem with the intimidation lawsuit G4/Wackenhut filed last month to silence Protects USA," said Wilson. Since last summer, Protects USA and similar groups [Denver PROTECTS, New York/New Jersey PROTECTS, California PROOFERS, Albuquerque-based BOCAS] have conducted more than 200 peaceful public information events in 14 states, aimed at educating the public about the current condition of homeland security. U.K.-based G4/Wackenhut filed a lawsuit in federal court on December 6 to silence its U.S.-based critics and stop public advocacy conducted by Protects USA. Protects USA, a citizen-based homeland security advocacy project, seeks to educate the public on the perils of handing over the security of our most sensitive sites to private profiteers with spotty records or worse.

April 25, 2004
Police may charge private security company Group 4 tens of thousands of pounds after an 11-day hunt to recapture a dangerous escaped murderer.  Gordon Topen, who was 12 years into a life sentence for killing a businessman, broke free from two Group 4 security officer sat Walsgrave Hospital, Coventry, on Good Friday.  West Midlands Police launched a huge manhunt for the murderer - who had been in hospital for a blood transfusion - involving officers, sniffer dogs and helicopters but he evaded capture.  More than 20 Coventry detectives spent 11 days in a nationwide operation to catch the killer who, it was feared, could try to hunt down the Midland ex-girlfriend whose evidence put him behind bars.  He was finally snared when officers in London discovered Topen holed up in a friend’s house following a tip-off.  Now the Sunday Mercury understands that West Midlands Police may hit Group 4 with a bill for the costs of the manhunt if it believes the security firm was negligent in the escape.    (Sunday Mercury)

MANCHESTER'S new £30m court is at the centre of a new storm after dozens of prisoners were hours late arriving from their cells.  Furious lawyers sat around for up to three hours yesterday waiting for their clients to arrive from police stations, including Bootle Street less than a mile away.  GSL, the private security firm that ferries prisoners to the court, blamed "logistical problems" and has apologised to court authorities.  It is the latest in a string of problems at the court since it opened in May.   Around 40 people were due to be moved from holding cells in Manchester to the court before 10am yesterday, in time for morning hearings.  Less than half were delivered on time and more were dropped off at 11am and 11.45am. Lawyers were still waiting for at least eight clients at 12.30pm. GSL, part of Group 4, said the final transfer was made at 12.45pm.  Court bosses have already threatened to fine GSL for previous failures to get prisoners into court on time.  (Manchester Online)

September 16, 2003
THE man charged with bringing about a dramatic improvement at Liverpool Prison has left to join the private sector.  John Smith was governor at the troubled Walton jail for just six months and has now joined the board of directors at Premier Prisons.  After he quit on Thursday, Prison Service chiefs moved quickly to replace Mr Smith with Liverpool Prison's first female governor.  Catherine James took up her new post yesterday and is now charged with providing a much improved service at the jail which faces being privatised after it was branded as a "failing" operation earlier this year.  Ms James has previously been employed at Liverpool Prison (Walton) in a role as governor with responsibility for health care before leaving to take up a post at Stoke Heath Young Offenders Institute.  When John Smith became governor in April he pledged to stave off privatisation.  Last night, one prison officer told the Daily Post: "The first we knew about the governor leaving was when we were called into a meeting on Friday.  "We were all stunned because we hadn't heard anything beforehand.  "The fact that he was allowed to leave with immediate effect and there was already someone ready to come in and replace him seems a bit strange though.  "It is all a bit ironic because when he took the job Smith told us that he was desperate to keep Liverpool, and all prisons, out of the private sector and yet he has now gone to work for Premier Prisons which has just opened a new private sector prison in Peterborough."  A spokesman for Premier Prisons said: "John Smith is a very able governor and prison manager and since we are looking to strengthen our corporate office he comes as an excellent addition to our team.  "We have been strengthening from within but we have also been looking to bring someone in with outside experience. John gave his notice in to the Prison Service and we are delighted he has decided to join us."  Last night the Home Office was keeping tight-lipped about the reasons for Mr Smith leaving only to stress that his departure had nothing to do with an impending report on the prison's performance.  Four Prison Service troubleshooters have been based at Walton for the last six months and are due to report back to the Home Office next Monday on how the regime meets security and safety targets and how offenders are resettled in the community after release.  If the report says the prison is still failing it could be contracted out, without an in-house bid, in which case management of the jail would pass to the private sector.  A spokesman for the Home Office said: "I can confirm that John Smith has left Liverpool Prison with immediate effect.  "He has been replaced by Catherine James who has already taken up her position. The performance report is due to be presented next week but this is not connected to Mr Smith's departure in any way."  Liverpool Prison has the largest prison population in Europe. It houses 1,450 inmates - 260 more that it is supposed to and only 30 short of its capacity.  It is understood more than 200 prisoners are being kept two to a single cell and inmates are only being let out of their cells for six hours a week.  GIVEN SIX MONTHS TO IMPROVE LIVERPOOL Prison began a performance testing process in April after it was branded a "failing centre" and was given six months to improve or be sold off to the private sector.  In May, the Chief Inspector of Prisons, Ann Owers, said the regime was "unacceptable" and found cockroach infestations, broken windows and poor hygiene.  At the time, the prison's new management team, led by trouble-shooting governor John Smith, was given until September 22 to put together a recovery plan.  Mr Smith (pictured), who had the reputation of being a reformer, keen on the positive social modelling of prisoners, was brought in from Manchester's tough Strangeways jail where he cracked down on drug abuse and unlocked cells for 12 hours a day.  The married father-of-two pledged to spend 80pc of his time creating a programme to improve standards at the Victorian prison which houses almost 1,500 inmates.  Day-to-day running of the jail was placed in the hands of his deputy governor, Clive Chatterton, with a series of instant changes made for the prisoners including more time out of the cells, a bigger range of education and rehabilitation programmes and more sport and physical exercise.  The success of these changes will be judged shortly with the prison due to be inspected again in October and a decision on the jail's future will be made in December.  (Cheshire Online)

Hassockfield Secure Training Centre
Doncaster, England
Group 4 (formerly Serco, formerly run by Wackenhut)
November 22, 2011 The Guardian
Serious injuries or other life-threatening warning signs have been detected on 285 occasions when children have been physically restrained in privately run jails over the past five years, according to Ministry of Justice figures. The figure reflects the number of "exception reports" submitted by the four privately run secure training centres to the youth justice board since 2006. The warning signs triggering an exception report include struggling to breathe, nausea, vomiting, limpness and abnormal redness to the face. Serious injuries are classified as those requiring hospitalisation and include serious cuts, fractures, concussion, loss of consciousness and damage to internal organs. The MoJ figures, which have been disclosed for the first time, show that there were 61 such exception reports made last year. There have been 29 so far in the first 10 months of this year. Their disclosure comes as a two-day High Court challenge is due to get underway over the MoJ's refusal to identify and trace hundreds of children who have been unlawfully restrained in the privately run child jails using techniques that have since been banned. Children's rights campaigners believe they should be entitled to compensation. The Children's Rights Alliance for England (Crae) has brought the case challenging the justice secretary, Ken Clarke's, refusal to contact former detainees dating back to 1998, when the first secure training centre opened. The legal challenge follows a second inquest earlier this year into the death of 14-year-old Adam Rickwood, who was found hanging in his room at Hassockfield Secure Training Centre, where he was on remand in 2006. It concluded there was a serious system failure which gave rise to an unlawful regime at the child jail. The use of several "distraction" restraint techniques, that involved inflicting pain with a severe blow to the nose or ribs, or by pulling back a child's thumb, were banned in 2008. The use of physical restraint techniques to control teenagers simply for the purposes of "good order and discipline" was also ruled unlawful by the court of appeal. Carolyne Willow, Crae's national co-ordinator, said their lawyers will argue there had been a chronic failure by the authorities to protect vulnerable children over many years. "It was not children's responsibility to know about, challenge and stop unlawful and abusive treatment," said Willow, adding there were potentially thousands of former detainees who should now be contacted. "Children in custody are among the most disadvantaged in society and they were held in closed institutions where unlawful restraint was routine and ordinary. It was the state, and the private contractors, who were duty-bound to protect the welfare and rights of vulnerable children." She said that government officials now had a duty to notify potential victims that their rights had been infringed. The abuses should no longer remain hidden and unchallenged. The security company, G4S, which operates three of the four child jails is also joining the case as an 'interested party'.

April 25, 2011 The Independent
Juveniles in private prisons are at risk of serious injury or death through the use of illegal restraints, according to research by the penal reform charity the Howard League. Some privately run Secure Training Centres (STC) are using unlawful restraints which have resulted in bruising, broken bones and a number of deaths of under 18s in penal custody, according to researchers. The report from Howard League lawyers documents the daily violence the juveniles have faced while they have been in custody. A 15-year-old boy in a STC said in evidence given to a Howard League lawyer: "I had bruised shoulders from when one of the staff dragged me across the room and shoved me into the wall. I had bruising on my back from where I was slammed into the wall in my cell." The report reveals that there were 142 injuries to children recorded as a result of the restraint of boys in prisons between April 2008 and March 2009. Lord Carlile of Berriew QC is holding a series of public hearings in the House of Lords into the policies and practices of using force on children in custody. In an independent inquiry into the use of physical restraint in 2006, Lord Carlile recommended that it should never be used as punishment or to secure compliance. He added that the infliction of pain was not acceptable and may be unlawful. The report, Twisted: the Use of Force on Children in Custody, comes after the death of 14-year-old Adam Rickwood who was found hanging in his cell in 2004 after being restrained by staff at Hassockfield STC in County Durham. At a second inquest into his death, held at Easington earlier this year, a jury found that the unlawful use of force by staff had contributed to it. A secret manual published by the Ministry of Justice that was publicly disclosed after legal action in 2010 shows that staff were authorised to use pain-inflicting distraction techniques on the thumbs, ribs and noses of children. According to the Youth Justice Board, 6,904 incidents of restraint were reported between 2009-10 in England and Wales, 257 of which resulted in injury. However, the report highlights that statistics are likely to underestimate the extent to which physical restraint is used, as not all incidents are recorded. Frances Crook, director of the Howard League, said: "These shadowy private companies who profit from children being locked up have disguised their methods of painful holds on children for years. It is time we revealed what is really happening."

February 15, 2011 The Guardian
A high court challenge has been launched over the Ministry of Justice's refusal to identify hundreds of children who have been unlawfully restrained in privately run child jails using techniques that have since been banned. The Children's Rights Alliance for England (Crae) has applied for a judicial review of the refusal by the justice secretary, Ken Clarke, to identify and contact children who may have been unlawfully restrained in the privately run secure training centres. The legal battle follows the second inquest two weeks ago into the death of 14-year-old Adam Rickwood, found hanging in his room at Hassockfield secure training centre where he was on remand in 2006. The inquest concluded that there was a serious system failure which gave rise to an unlawful regime at the jail. The use of several "distraction'' restraint techniques, which involve inflicting pain with a severe blow to the nose or ribs, or by pulling back a child's thumb, were first suspended in 2007 before being banned in 2008. The use of physical restraint to control teenagers in child jails for the purposes of "good order and discipline" was also ruled to be unlawful by the court of appeal in the same year. Carolyne Willow of Crae said she believed that there may be hundreds, if not thousands, of children who have been unlawfully restrained in secure training centres since they first opened in 1998.

January 11, 2011 Evening-Chronicle
GUARDS at a privately-run young people’s unit acted illegally leading up to a teenager’s prison cell suicide, an inquest heard. Tragic Adam Rickwood was found hanging just hours after he was mistreated by warders. His mother Carol Pounder, told jurors she would be “locked up” if she had behaved towards her son the way authorities had in the moments leading up to his death. At a second hearing into the tragedy, following a High Court appeal, Durham’s Assistant Deputy Coroner Jeremy Freedman revealed previous jurors were not informed prison staff had used unorthodox methods to restrain Adam and were acting “unlawfully and illegally” on the evening of his death on August 9, 2004. The 14-year-old, from Burnley, was found hanged by his shoelaces in his cell by staff at the Serco-run Hassockfield secure training centre in Consett, while on remand for an alleged wounding charge. Hours before his death, at 6pm, he was involved in an altercation with staff who ordered him to return to his cell from the social area he was in. The order came after a note was passed to him by another inmate which contained “unflattering remarks” about a female member of staff. When Adam refused to go back to his cell and instead sat on the floor in the communal area, back-up was called and he was physically removed. Four officers restrained him – two holding his arms, one holding his head and one holding his legs. Adam was placed in his cell face down and, because the officer holding his head feared Adam was trying to bite his fingers, he employed a “nose distraction method” to control Adam’s behaviour – a painful manoeuvre which left his nose swollen and bruised. Mr Freedman, who is leading the second inquest into his death, said the previous jury had not been told “three important things”. He said: “When they removed Adam from the free association area, in these circumstances, it was unlawful and illegal. “Second, they weren’t told that the use of Physical Control in Care in taking him into his cell in these circumstances was, too, unlawful. “And thirdly, they weren’t told that the use of the nose distraction technique was in any circumstances unlawful and illegal.”

July 18, 2010 AP
Brutal techniques to restrain children held in private prisons have been made public after mounting pressure from children's rights groups. The Observer disclosed details of the techniques used to train staff in restraining young offenders in the country's four privately-run secure training centres. The secret manual, Physical Control in Care, was created by the HM Prison Service and approved by the Department of Justice in 2005. The government's Youth Justice Board (YJB) had initially fought the Information Commissioner's order to hand over the documents. When the Children's Rights Alliance (CRAE) called on the Justice Secretary to hold an independent judicial inquiry, YJB finally relented. The Observer revealed that control measures authorised for staff to use include "an inverted knuckle into the trainee's sternum and drive inward and upward," "alternate elbow strikes to the young person's ribs until a release is achieved," and "drive straight fingers into the young person's face, and then quickly drive the straightened fingers of the same hand downwards into the young person's groin area." The manual went so far as to warn staff that some techniques risk a "fracture to the skull" and "temporary or permanent blindness caused by rupture to eyeball or detached retina." One passage states in regard to administering a head-hold that "if breathing is compromised the situation ceases to be a restraint and becomes a medical emergency." Carolyne Willow, CRAE's national co-ordinator stated, "Until now, we've seen a compulsive reliance on secrecy and an absolute failure to face up publicly to the disgraceful and unlawful treatment of children the State officially describes as vulnerable." The campaign to make the information public came after the deaths of two children, Gareth Myatt, 15, and Adam Rickwood, 14, who died in the custody of Rainsbrook and Hassockfield secure training centres in 2004.

March 8, 2008 The Northern Echo
BRUTAL restraint techniques used before the suicide of a 14-year-old boy at a North-East secure unit are illegal and must be banned, MPs and peers will demand today. In a damning report, the Joint Human Rights Committee condemns the "state sanctioned infliction of pain against children" as young as 12, who misbehave in private prisons. The restraint techniques include hitting a child's nose from underneath - the restraint method used on Adam Rickwood by staff at the Serco-run Hassockfield Secure Training Centre, near Consett, County Durham. Six hours later, on August 9, 2004, Adam, from Burnley, Lancashire, became the youngest person to die in custody in Britain when he hanged himself from a curtain rail, using his shoelaces. Last night, Adam's mother, Carol Pounder, welcomed the report and said the treatment her son received should never have been allowed to take place. She said: "Sometimes you need to restrain a child to protect them from themselves, but there is a difference between restraining a child and beating a child. "What gives them the right to do these things to our children? If I had punched Adam in the nose and caused pain and bleeding at home, I would be taken to court. But because it happens behind closed doors nobody knows. "The best thing this Government could do is withdraw this distraction technique, not just put a suspension on it." Describing the so-called distraction techniques as unlawful under international human rights laws, the committee warns they have had "tragic results". Andrew Dismore, the committee's Labour chairman, said: "What is, in effect, state-sanctioned infliction of pain against children to ensure good order and discipline should not continue. "It must be absolutely clear that inflicting pain on children is never justified and the use of force is an absolute last resort, for use only when all alternatives have been demonstrably exhausted." The committee also condemns the Government for refusing to release the staff manual for restraining children, which means the full details of the hold techniques remain secret. As well as "nose distraction" - the upward chop to the septum used against Adam - the techniques include the "double basket", where the arms are crossed and held behind the back. In December, the Government agreed to suspend the use of both techniques after medical advice. Today's report demands their permanent removal from the manual. The report includes an extract from a note found in Adam's room after his death. The 14-year-old wrote: "When I calmed down, I asked them why they hit me in the nose and jumped on me. "They said it was because I wouldn't go in my room, so I said what gives them the right to hit a 14-year-old child in the nose, and they said it was restraint." The inquest into his death returned a verdict of suicide. It heard the officer who used the nose distraction technique on the boy later noticed it had drawn blood. The director of the Howard League for Penal Reform, Francis Crook, said last night he was very pleased with the committee's opposition to the use of painful restraint. He said: "Treatment that would see a parent or teacher in front of social services is not only allowed in these child jails but positively encouraged by recent rule changes." A spokeswoman for the Ministry of Justice said: "Force is only ever used as a last resort. "However, some young people in secure training centres can be very violent and staff need appropriate and effective methods to contain and resolve dangerous situations. "The Youth Justice Board's Code of Practice on behaviour management makes it explicit that restrictive physical interventions must only be used as a last resort." Serco, which runs the centre, declined to comment.

A flagship "jail" for young boys faces closure after The Mirror revealed it has been rocked by violence, vandalism and vicious attacks on staff. Offenders as young as 12 are running riot. There are three serious incidents a day and more than 150 last month alone, with staff in riot gear deployed on several occasions. Now the Home Office has drawn up plans to close Hassockfield secure training centre in Consett, Co Durham, after more than half the staff quit for fear of attack. Premier Prison Services, the private firm running it, is set to lose fulfill its contract. (The Mirror)

June 6, 2002
TWO OF the world's biggest security companies could find themselves in court in a row over their joint venture to run privatised prisons and immigration centres. UK-based Serco wants to buy out the half of Premier Custodial Group owned by America's Wackenhut Corrections Corporation. But the US company refuses to sell and is ready to go to court to defend the right to retain its 50 per cent stake in PCG.   The row illustrates the growing demand for prisons run by private companies, despite the controversy they attract.   PCG manages four jails, including Doncaster, one combined prison and youth offenders' institution and a centre for asylum seekers near Glasgow.   Serco has wanted control of the business since rival Group4 Falck took a 57 per cent stake in WCC, listed on the New York Stock Exchange, last month.   Group4 is a strong rival to Serco in this country, running three prisons and three immigration centres, including Yarl's Wood, Bedfordshire, which was badly damaged by fire this year.  (The Express)

Hardy House
Isle of Portland, Dorset
January 29, 2003
A FORMER naval barracks was badly damaged by fire minutes after the end of an angry public meeting to oppose plans to use it to hold up to 750 asylum-seekers.  Hardy House, a derelict, ten-story block on the Isle of Portland, Dorset, suffered extensive damage to one floor.  The attack followed a warning by David Blunkett, the Home Secretary, that whipping up fears about asylum-seekers could lead to a breakdown in community relations.  The building is now owned by a property company, Comer Homes, which bought it from the Ministry of Defense for 30 million.  The company recently applied for planning permission to convert it to 350 luxury flats.  Portland has been in uproar since it was disclosed ten days ago that the Home Office is in negotiations with t he developers to use the building as a centre for up to 750-asylum-seekers who would be housed there while their applications to stay in Britain are processed.  (Times Online)

Harmondsworth Detention Centre, London, England
GEO Group (formerly run by Kalyx, UK Detention Services, AKA Sodexho)
August 5, 2011 The Guardian
Separate investigations into three deaths in immigration removal centres (IRC) in the past month have been launched by the police, amid growing concern about the treatment of detainees. The spate of deaths has caused alarm among critics of the government's detention policy, who warn that the system is at "breaking point" with poor healthcare putting people's lives at risk. Two men died from suspected heart attacks at Colnbrook near Heathrow airport and the third killed himself at the Campsfield House detention centre in Oxfordshire on Tuesday. John McDonnell, Labour MP for Hayes and Harlington, who has two detention centres including Colnbrook in his constituency, said he feared there would be more deaths as the system struggled to cope with the number of people being detained. "The government is now detaining people on such a scale that the existing services are swamped," he said. "It is inevitable if we put the services under such relentless strain that there will be more deaths as a result … we are dealing with people who are extremely stressed and extremely vulnerable and the services are not able to cope and not able to guarantee their safety." The first man who died was Muhammad Shukat, 47, a Pakistani immigration detainee who collapsed at around 6am on 2 July. His roommate Abdul Khan says that in the hours before he died Shukat was groaning in agony, had very bad chest pains and was sweating profusely. Khan, 19, from Afghanistan, said he began raising the alarm around 6am and pressed the emergency button in the room 10 times in a frantic effort to get help. Khan claimed that on three occasions members of the centre's nursing team entered the room and found Shukat on the floor where he had collapsed. Khan said they put him back into bed, took his temperature and some medicine was administered, but did not call emergency assistance immediately. According to Khan, the nurses initially said that Shukat could go to see the centre's doctor at 8am. According to the London Ambulance Service, Colnbrook staff called an ambulance just before 7.20am. Attempts were made to resuscitate Shukat, but he was pronounced dead on arrival at Hillingdon Hospital. A postmortem found the provisional cause of death to be coronary heart disease. Shukat's body has been returned to Pakistan and his family are understood to have no concerns about the medical treatment he received. The second man to die at Colnbrook has not yet been named. According to the Metropolitan police he was 35 and was found dead in his cell at 10.30am last Sunday. London Ambulance Service officials pronounced him dead at the scene. "A postmortem held on 1 August found the cause of death to be a ruptured aorta. The death is being treated as unexplained," said a police spokesman. Colnbrook IRC is managed by Serco. In a statement to detainees about Shukat's death, deputy director at Colnbrook, Jenni Halliday, described her "deep regret" and extended her condolences. In a statement to detainees about the second Colnbrook death, Serco's contract manager, Michael Guy, informed detainees that a resident in the short-term holding facility had died and that the death was thought to be from natural causes. On Tuesday, a 35-year-old man hanged himself in the toilet block at Campsfield House detention centre in Oxfordshire. A fellow detainee, who refused to give his name, said the man had been hours away from being deported and had become very anxious. "He was normally a very quiet person … but the pressure is too much for people in here." It is understood the man had only been at the centre for a few days before he died. The Home Office refused to give any more details saying his extended family had yet to be informed. Emma Ginn, from the campaign group Medical Justice, said the deaths had heightened concern about the poor healthcare on offer to those being kept in UK detention centres. "Based on medical evidence from many hundreds of detainees, Medical Justice has documented the disturbingly inadequate healthcare provision that often vulnerable immigration detainees are subjected to in Colnbrook and other immigration removal centres... [this] combined with the perilous and frightening conditions of detention, is a lethal cocktail, a disaster waiting to happen." The UK Border Agency declined to comment on the specific circumstances of each case. It said the police and the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman always investigated deaths in immigration detention centres and it would be inappropriate to comment until these were complete. David Wood, director of criminality and detention at the UK Border Agency, said all detainees at immigration removal centres have access to health services seven days a week. "All detainees are seen by a nurse within two hours of arrival and are given an opportunity to see a GP within 24 hours," he added. "The health of all detainees is monitored closely, and the healthcare professionals are required to report cases where it is considered that a person's health is being affected by continued detention. "The UK takes its responsibilities seriously, which is why we consider every case on its individual merits and will continue to offer protection to those who need it. However, detention is an essential part of our controls on immigration in the UK." A groundbreaking ruling -- A man with severe mental illness was unlawfully locked up in a UK detention centre for five months and subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment, according to a high court ruling. The man, a 34-year-old Indian national, was detained in Harmondsworth immigration removal centre between April and September last year. On Friday a judge ruled that his treatment amounted to a breach of article 3 of the European convention human rights. The man's lawyer said the ruling – thought to be the first of its kind – raised wider questions about how the government treats people with mental illnesses in the immigration and detention system. "The court's decision that my client suffered inhuman or degrading treatment at a UK detention facility sends a very loud and clear message to the authorities," said. "We would urge the minister to conduct a fundamental review into how people suffering from mental illness are treated in the immigration detention estate." The man, referred to as "S" in the ruling, had a history of serious ill treatment and abuse before arriving in the UK. He served time in prison for wounding and assault before being transferred to a secure psychiatric hospital until his discharge in April 2010. Following his release the UK Border Agency said there was "no evidence" he was mentally ill and he was detained in Harmondsworth where his health deteriorated and he began to have psychotic episodes and self harm. The high court intervened and he was released on bail. His lawyers said he had been living with his family since then and had fully complied with the conditions of bail set by the court. In the ruling judge David Elvin said: "S's pre-existing mental condition was both triggered and exacerbated by detention and that involved both a debasement and humiliation of S since it showed a serious lack of respect for his human dignity. It created a state in S's mind of real anguish and fear, through his hallucinations, which led him to self-harm frequently and to behave in a manner which was humiliating…" A UK Border Agency spokesperson said: "We regularly review our detention policies and will look at the findings in this case to ensure lessons are learned. Detention is an essential part of our immigration control but we recognise the importance of ensuring it remains appropriate on a case by case basis."

April 4, 2011 The Sun
BRITISH workers at a deportation centre are to be sacked and replaced by inmates on just £1 an hour. Staff are in uproar at the unit, which cages failed asylum seekers and foreign prisoners awaiting the boot from the UK. Up to 20 full-time kitchen workers, who earn £300 a week, are to be made redundant under the plan. Inmates who take over their jobs at Harmondsworth, near London's Heathrow airport, will earn nothing like the £5.93-an-hour national minimum wage. One worker at the unit said: "It's a disgrace. They're doing things on the cheap in a scandalous way. Where are these 20 sacked British staff going to find jobs in the current climate? "Surely we should be giving priority to British workers in these troubled times." Another worker added: "Apart from the sackings, it is wrong to use the inmates as virtual slave labour." Privately-run Harmondsworth Immigration Removal Centre is the biggest deportation unit in Europe, with 615 inmates. Original contractors Kalyx were replaced in 2009 by the American private security company, GEO Group. Jonathan Sedgwick, acting Chief Executive of the Home Office's UK Border Agency, said: "Detainees working in cleaning and catering roles is common in our detention centres. "It allows us to keep detainees occupied while arrangements are made to return them. This is nothing new and has been praised by HM Inspector of Prisons and independent monitoring boards."

July 31, 2009 Daily Star
BRITISH workers facing the sack at an immigration detention centre say their jobs are being taken by “illegals” who are being held there. The detainees, who have no legal rights to work in the UK, have been handed £15-a-week cleaning jobs. But the real cleaners are among up to 74 workers expected to be made redundant this month at the Harmondsworth Immigration Removal Centre near Heathrow Airport. The Home Office denied that the cleaners are being replaced by ­detainees at a fraction of the cost. But one cleaner said she thought the Government’s British Jobs for British Workers claim was “a joke”. She added: “Not only are foreign workers exploiting British employment opportunities, but now it seems that even failed asylum seekers in detention centres are taking our jobs.” The Harmondsworth centre was taken over by GEO Group last month. It houses immigrants who are awaiting deportation, some of whom are failed asylum seekers or those who have overstayed their visas. The Home Office confirmed none of them would have a legal right to work in the UK. A GEO Group spokesman said six cleaners were to be made redundant but declined to comment further. Lin Homer, chief executive of the UK Border Agency, said: “No staff facing redundancy at the centre will be replaced by an immigration detainee.” But she said a recent report had said detainees should be able to do more paid work.

June 29, 2009 News Ticker
The GEO Group, Inc. (NYSE: GEO) ("GEO") announced today that its wholly owned U.K. subsidiary, GEO UK Ltd., has assumed management functions at the 256-bed Harmondsworth Immigration Removal Centre (the "Centre”) located in London, England. GEO U.K. will manage the Centre under contract with the United Kingdom Border Agency. The contract for the management and operation of the Centre will have a term of three years and is expected to generate approximately $14.0 million in annual revenues for GEO. Additionally, the Centre will be expanded by 364 beds bringing its capacity to 620 beds when the expansion is completed in June 2010. Upon completion of the expansion, GEO’s management contract is expected to generate approximately $19.5 million in annual revenues.

March 17, 2009 Worthing Herald
The Government was wrong not to order an independent inquiry into allegations of mistreatment at Harmondsworth immigration detention centre in west London 2006, the Court of Appeal has ruled. But the appeal judges held it was now too late to hold an effective investigation and the question of whether the state had breached the human rights of detainees fell to be decided by way of pending civil damages claims. Human rights group Liberty brought the case against the Home Office and the managers of the centre, Kalyx Ltd, on behalf of three detainees who claimed they were subjected to "inhuman or degrading treatment" during disturbances caused by other detainees at the centre near Heathrow Airport on November 28 2006. Referred to only as "AM and others", the detainees allege they were denied food and water for up to 40 hours; locked in overcrowded, pitch-black rooms flooded with water for more than 24 hours; forced to urinate and defecate in front of each other; and strip searched in front of several officers. Their appeal, in which lawyers argued that their alleged treatment was sufficient to trigger the UK's legal obligation to hold an official investigation, was upheld by Lord Justices Sedley and Elias, with Lord Justice Longmore dissenting. Anna Fairclough, legal officer at Liberty, said after the judgment: "With so many people languishing in immigration detention, it is shameful that the Home Secretary refused to investigate these very serious allegations of mistreatment. "The judgment leaves the Government nowhere to hide should anything of this nature happen again."

July 26, 2007 The Daily Mail
Rioting foreign criminals and failed asylum seekers were fed McDonald's takeaway meals by prison staff during a £60million orgy of destruction which wrecked an immigration detention centre. Fearful that the human rights of inmates would be breached, staff ferried sackfuls of Big Mac meals with fries and soft drinks from a nearby branch of the fast-food chain. The revelation came in a damning official report into the riot at Harmondsworth Immigration Removal Centre near Heathrow Airport last November. More than 500 inmates awaiting deportation wrecked and burned down much of the site, and it took riot squads almost two days to regain control. The report also reveals: • Walls and doors in the centre were so flimsy that inmates kicked them down with ease, especially after they were soaked by the sprinkler system; • The fire brigade got lost because there were no signposts to the centre; • CCTV cameras were easy for rioters to destroy - meaning control room staff had no idea what was going on; • Increasingly desperate calls to the Prison Service headquarters begging for help were ignored for an hour. The official Home Office investigation blames the riot partly on the huge pressure on the centre after last summer's foreign prisoners scandal. Hundreds of foreign national criminals were rounded up after being released from Britain's jails without being considered for deportation. Of the 501 men in the detention centre at the time 177 were foreign prisoners awaiting deportation - a volatile group who had 'nothing to lose'. The riot was triggered by inmates watching a TV news bulletin reporting criticisms of Harmondsworth from prison watchdogs. Fires were started and inmates began smashing CCTV cameras and attacking staff, who were unable to contain the violence. As control room managers lost their grip, staff were ordered to retreat and seal the gates, as police arrived to guard the perimeter. Thirteen riot squads entered the centre next morning but took more than 24 hours to regain control. During the day a row broke out between senior officials over whether to send food in for rioters. Those who favoured starving inmates into submission were overruled, as managers ordered that 'minimum needs of food and drink' must be supplied. "In the early stages food came from McDonald's," according to the report by senior civil servant Robert Whalley. Yesterday the Daily Mail tracked down a worker at the West Drayton branch of McDonald's who recalled Harmondsworth staff placing a huge order for £3.59 burger meals. He said: "I remember prison officers turning up and ordering around 100 Big Mac meals with fries and fizzy drinks. For a couple of hours they kept turning up with big bags, filling them up with meals and then ferrying them off in Securicor vans and then they'd return for more." The Home Office was last night unable to provide details of the cost of the emergency supplies. The cost of dealing with the riot and rebuilding large parts of Harmondsworth is expected to top £65million. Tory immigration spokesman Damian Green said: "This situation required a fast response, and all they got was fast food. "We now know that this dangerous incident happened because the Government was forced to mix foreign prisoners with failed asylum seekers. Because of prison overcrowding, this is still going on."

May 20, 2007 Observer
Hunger strikes, rioting and self-harm are now endemic in Britain's biggest detention centres as detainees become increasingly desperate about living in what they claim are deteriorating conditions. At Yarl's Wood in Bedfordshire, more than 100 women are refusing to eat, and there have been recent reports of major disturbances at Lindholme, South Yorkshire, and at Colnbrook in Middlesex. Self-harm is particularly acute at Yarl's Wood, which reopened in September 2003 after half of it was gutted by fire during rioting in February 2002. It now houses hundreds of women, many of whom have attempted to claim asylum in Britain after fleeing war zones. Amid growing concern over Britain's overstretched asylum system, the campaign group Liberty will call tomorrow for the Home Secretary, John Reid, to order a public inquiry into the large-scale riot at Harmondsworth detention centre in west London last November. If Reid refuses, the group says that it intends to seek a judicial review of his decision on behalf of seven detainees it is representing - an unprecedented move that would see Britain's immigration system placed under scrutiny in the courts. 'Well-documented abuses at Harmondsworth detention centre sparked the disturbance in November,' said Liberty's legal officer, Alex Gask. 'These men deserve a public inquiry into the ill-treatment they faced; anything less could result in legal action.' The deteriorating situation in the detention centres has sparked a surge in self-harm, according to campaigners. Every other day detainees harm themselves to such a serious degree that they require medical treatment, according to the National Coalition of Anti Deportation Campaigns. Between April 2006 and March 2007 there were 199 attempts to self-harm that required medical treatment. An investigation last year into conditions at Yarl's Wood found 70 per cent of women at the centre had reported rape, nearly half had been detained for more than three months and 57 per cent had no legal representation. Conditions have not improved, according to campaigners. Assaults are said to be commonplace. One woman was stripped and thrown naked into a van taking her to the airport for deportation only for the pilot to refuse to allow her to fly as she had no clothes. The women also allege staff regularly refer to them as 'black monkey', 'nigger' and 'bitch'. They claim vital faxes from solicitors are going missing and information on basic legal rights is being withheld. Detainees also complain they are given days-old reheated food in which they have found hair, dirt and maggots. Campaigners are also concerned about conditions at Harmondsworth, where detainees rioted after being banned from watching news coverage of a damning report on the centre. The Liberty report, to be published tomorrow, contains a clutch of testimonies from detainees about the conditions in Harmondsworth before the riots. One man interviewed for the study told how he was taken to the centre's medical clinic suffering from a bad back. 'They just abandoned me,' the man said. 'There was no doctor and, when I asked where the doctor was, the detention officers laughed at me ... One of them stepped on the hem of my trousers to make me fall over. He then started laughing and called me a "fucking negro".' Solitary confinement as a punishment for speaking out at Harmondsworth is common, according to Liberty. 'If we made a complaint we would be given a warning,' one man known as 'K' told Liberty. 'If we were given three warnings, we would be put in an isolated cell. We were scared of making complaints against officers because we expected to be treated badly if we did. We were treated like pigs and very unfairly, as if we were serious criminals.' A spokesman for Kalyx, which runs Harmondsworth, declined to comment. Serco, which took over Yarl's Wood on 26 April, denied conditions had deteriorated and said that many of the detainees' original concerns had been addressed. A Serco spokesman said staff had been praised by the prisons inspector for their good relationship with detainees. 'We take any complaints seriously,' he said.

December 10, 2006 The Guardian
The company running the detention centre at which hundreds of asylum seekers rioted last month is to be forced to pay the government more than £5m for a series of performance failures. The huge amount, believed to be a record sum for a private contractor to have to return to the public coffers, is likely to be seized upon by critics of Britain's asylum system, who have long campaigned for better conditions at the Harmondsworth detention centre, near Heathrow. The payout comes soon after a damning report by the chief inspector of prisons slated conditions at the detention centre. Anne Owers said her report was the 'poorest' she had ever delivered on an immigration centre. It highlighted a number of areas where there were causes for concern, including the poor relations between staff and detainees and the fact that staff were unable to recognise torture victims. Over 60 per cent of detainees said they had felt unsafe, while 44 per cent said they had been victimised by staff. The news that Kalyx, the US security and services giant that runs a number of private prisons in the UK, is to return £5,096,000 to the government was revealed in a House of Lords debate last week by the Home Office minister, Baroness Scotland. Neither Kalyx nor the Home Office would be drawn on why the company has had to pay such a sizeable sum. But Scotland suggested it was at least partly to do with the company's failure to manage the centre properly. She told the Lords that 'rigorous attempts to manage the situation in Harmondsworth' had now been put in place. 'That was the basis of the concerns expressed and of the disagreement... between management,' Scotland said. The payout is a significant blow to the reputation of Kalyx. Last month, in an attempt to improve its image, the controversial company changed its name from UK Detention Services. The company claims on its website that it provides 'nationally recognised standards of service, delivered by high-calibre staff' and provides 'protection and care associated with the growth of the individual and strength'. It makes no reference to the recent Owers report. There have been three suicides at Harmondsworth. The latest was Bereket Yohannes, 26, who was found hanging in January. Since Owers' damning report, a new centre manager has been introduced and the government has pledged to act on its recommendations. Nicholas Hopkins, a spokesman for Kalyx, said he would 'not be drawn' into commenting on the matter. A Home Office spokeswoman confirmed Kalyx would soon be paying out. 'The Immigration and Nationality Directorate has been in dispute with HDSL (a subsidiary of Kalyx) over its contractual performance at Harmondsworth,' the spokeswoman said. 'The dispute reached mediation point in summer 2006 and reached an agreed settlement; the details of this are being finalised by lawyers with full completion anticipated by the end of this month.' The impending payout comes as the government fears it could lose a crucial Commons vote tomorrow over plans to introduce more competition into the prisons and probation sector. Prisons Minister Gerry Sutcliffe is so worried he has taken the highly unusual step of emailing Conservative MPs offering them a private briefing in a last-ditch attempt to get them onside. The move has inflamed Labour MPs, between 25 and 30 of whom have signalled that they will vote against the bill.

November 29, 2006 BBC
A mutiny inside the UK's largest immigration centre has been contained, the Home Office has said. Detainees at the 500-capacity Harmondsworth centre in west London staged a protest about living conditions in the early hours. Fires were started and about 50 asylum seekers spelt out "help" and "SOS" with bed sheets in the courtyard. The Home office said the situation was contained but some of the detainees would be moved from Harmondsworth. Lin Homer, head of the immigration and nationality directorate, said: "The perimeter remains secure, and no-one has escaped. There has been no risk to the public. No injuries to staff or detainees have been reported." Repeated disturbances: She said 150 immigration offenders at centres across the UK would be bailed to make space for the detainees that were moved from Harmondsworth. "These are people who have been detained in order to better enforce their removal. We will priorities the cases according to risk. No foreign national prisoners will be released," Ms Homer added. The disturbance erupted following the publication of a prisons' watchdog report which criticised the centre's regime after repeated disturbances there.

November 28, 2006 BBC
An immigration detention centre with a violent history including a death and repeated disturbances is getting worse, the prisons watchdog has warned. Chief inspector of prisons Anne Owers said Harmondsworth in west London was hard to run - but her report was the poorest ever on a removal centre. Detainees said they feared bullying, and staff were unaware of a special plan to prevent suicides. The Home Office said it would draw up a plan to improve the centre. The centre near Heathrow Airport is the largest in the country, handling thousands of people facing deportation every year. In 2004 a detainee committed suicide, sparking a major disturbance that led to its temporary closure. Since then, Harmondsworth has been at the centre of ongoing campaigns against detention of failed asylum seekers. In 2005, some 50 Zimbabweans held at the centre launched a hunger strike to try to force their cases back into the courts, saying they had been unfairly treated. In their July inspection, inspectors found: More than 60% of detainees felt unsafe Almost half (44%) said they had been victimised by staff Detainees described custody officers as aggressive, intimidating and unhelpful The report also criticised the management's over-emphasis on physical security and their strict control of all movements. These measures went as far as banning detainees from keeping nail clippers. At the same time, actions to prevent self-harm and suicide were weak, despite the commitment of one co-ordinator.

July 31, 2004
Campaigners against the detention of asylum seekers have begun a series of protests around the country.  The demonstrations came after two apparent suicides in removal centres, one of which led to disturbances.  Organisations backing the protests say they want to see an end to detention of people who have not been convicted of any crimes.  The demonstrations are taking place outside five institutions which have been used to hold asylum seekers.  On Monday 19 July, a Ukrainian asylum seeker was found hanged at Harmondsworth Removal centre, near Heathrow Airport. The man had been waiting a date for deportation.  The death sparked significant disturbances in the centre which detainees protesting against conditions.  (BBC)

July 21, 2004
The authorities finally regained full control of a detention centre today where a “significant disturbance” was sparked by the death of a detainee.  Up to 100 asylum seekers at Harmondsworth, near Heathrow, surrendered rather than face the power of specialist “tornado” teams of trained prison officers.  Fires were set and windows broken as trouble erupted at 11pm yesterday, just hours after a 31-year-old detainee was found hanged.  Harmondsworth was expected to be empty by later this evening as the detainees were moved to other immigration sites and prisons.  In a report last September, Chief Inspector of Prisons Anne Owers said it was “failing to provide a safe and stable environment” for detainees.  (Scotsman)

July 20, 2004
Hundreds of detainees at an asylum centre, where a man's death sparked a serious disturbance are to be moved.  The trouble at Harmondsworth Detention Centre, which included fires being lit, started after the man was found hanging at 2000 BST on Monday.  The situation has "quietened right down" but a number of detainees are yet to be brought under control. Earlier, staff had to leave for their own safety.  In September last year Chief Inspector of Prisons Anne Owers said thecentre was an unsafe place for staff and detainees, despite hard work by staff.  And in May, at least 20 detainees staged a five-day hunger strike in protest against alleged abuses, including the physical treatment of those facing deportation, according to BBC sources.  (BBC)

October 11, 2003
A report issued by the chief inspector of prisons in England and Wales into conditions at the Harmondsworth Detention Centre in 2002 has called for a police investigation into reports of detainees being beaten by staff. Several detainees are alleged to have been assaulted during transfers in and out of the centre, often as they are sent for deportation. On several occasions during detainee transfers, prison service Tactical Intervention Squads—armed with riot gear—have been called in to assist the private security guards that man the centre.  The author of the report, Anne Owers, met one asylum-seeker who had required hospitalisation for injuries sustained during an attempt to deport him and others who had suffered serious assaults at the hands of guards. She acknowledged that allegations by detainees of assault were “common” but that few were referred to the police.  “It is extremely important,” Owers said, “that such claims should be fully investigated and, if necessary, prosecuted, but we are told that police and prosecutors were reluctant to act. If so, this is unacceptable.”  Of the nine assaults against detainees reported to the police in the past year all were dismissed as unsubstantiated.  The report also criticises the centre as being an “essentially unsafe place for detainees and staff.” There were “increasing levels of disorder” in the facility and a detainee-on-detainee assault rate of approximately seven attacks per week. There is an average of one self-harm incident a week officially recorded by the centre, a figure likely to be far higher in reality. Despite this the inspectorate found that “suicide, self-harm and anti-bullying procedures were not efficiently managed.” There was also found to be insufficient mental health support for detainees held in the centre’s medical unit.  Owers claimed that Harmondsworth was “frightening and potentially dangerous” and “not well equipped to ensure detainees’ protection.” Levels of desperation among detainees at the centre are understandably high, with many having been resident in one or more detention centre for months. Harmondsworth is situated next to London’s Heathrow Airport and serves as the last port of call for thousands of asylum-seekers before their forced removal from Britain.  The report criticised staff shortages and poor health and safety protection. It pointed out that a number of small fires at the centre had “severely tested the fire response capability” there. Like the Yarl’s Wood Detention Centre that was ravaged by fire in 2002, Harmondsworth is not fitted with a sprinkler system. During the blaze at Yarl’s Wood staff were unable to cope, leaving the panicked detainees to their own fate. Conditions in Harmondsworth are directly comparable to those that existed in Yarl’s Wood prior to its near destruction—an event that could have claimed the lives of scores of detainees and staff.  Harmondsworth has a family unit capable of holding dozens of families with children. There were 25 children held at the centre at the time of the inspection. Owers found that the educational, recreational and developmental requirements of young people at the centre were being inadequately provided for. Furthermore, the lack of personal security for detainees and the presence of many traumatised adult asylum-seekers created an environment wholly unsuitable for children. “Given the inherent insecurity of the centre as a whole, we remain of the view that, as in other centres in England, children should only exceptionally be detained in Harmondsworth, and not for any period longer than seven days,” the report stated.  The children of asylum-seekers, whether at a single centre or cumulatively by being moved from one centre to another, often spend large portions of their childhood in these grim and dangerous facilities prior to being deported.  The report comments that many of the problems at Harmondsworth are common to all the asylum centres: “Many of the systematic problems that detainees experienced at Harmondsworth have already been covered in the Inspectorate’s six previous reports.”  These include: “the inability of the Immigration Service to progress cases efficiently or communicate effectively with detainees; the absence of sufficient competent legal advice and representation; the need for independent welfare advice to assist detainees to deal with practical problems during detention and on removal; and the need for more activities for detainees, including the ability to work.”  It is not the first official report to criticise Burns International, the private security firm contracted by the Home Office to run Harmondsworth until earlier this year. In April this year a Home Office report—only published following pressure from the human rights group Liberty—on an investigation into the suicide in 2000 of Lithuanian asylum-seeker Robertus Grabys exposed some of the conditions facing vulnerable asylum-seekers in Harmondsworth. The Home Office concluded that there had been insufficient care for Mr. Grabys who was known to be suffering from severe depression. Found hanging in his cell on the day he was to be deported, he had been dead for over an hour. Burns International had not placed him on a suicide watch, and the centre was found to have no formal policy to prevent suicides.  In February Burns International—a division of the Swedish-based multinational security company Securitas—was outbid for the Harmondsworth contract by Premier Detention Services Ltd., which currently runs the much criticised regime at the Dungavel asylum centre in Scotland.  (www.wsws.org)

September 26, 2002
A private company that runs the Harmonsworth detention centre for asylum seekers and provides services to many NHS health trusts warned yesterday that "serious errors of management" in part of its British business would blow a near pounds 20m in profits.  Shares in French-based Sodexho Alliance plunged 30% on the Paris stock market, sending in a shockwave across the support services sector that dragged rival Compass down 10% in London.  Sodexho had dismissed a number of top executives from its UK food and management business and accused its auditors, PriceWaterhouseCoopers, of being "insufficiently vigilant".  Sian Herbert-Jones, chief financial officer at Sodexho Alliance, said there was no evidence of fraud and she was confident the problems would be solved by restructuring.  Sodexho would tighten up management of food and personnel costs, renegotiate some contracts and reduce overheads.  About 85 staff are to lose their jobs and there would be tighter controls on wages, but Ms. Herbert-Jones insisted that key services should not be hit.  But the latest profit warning is the third year and investors are wary of all unexpected announcements in a jittery stock market enviroment.  "A company can't afford this kind of news in this kind of market," said one trader.  The Harmonsworth centre in west London, which was hit by an embarassing breakout by nine asylum seekers earlier this year, is run by Sodexho's UK Detention Centre Services, which has its own management seperate from the food and management group.  (NWOM-news)

Harrow Crown Court
London, UK
Serco

January 20, 2012 UKPA
A former Harrow Crown Court prison guard has been jailed for four years for trying to smuggle heroin. Dean Nelder, 28, was caught taking a package containing cannabis and heroin into the court in April last year. Police were alerted to the plan after a note was left in a cell at Wormwood Scrubs prison tipping them off. Passing sentence at the Old Bailey, the Recorder of London Peter Beaumont QC said: "You've let yourself down, you've let your family down, and those who care for you, and you've made it very difficult to get a responsible job in the future." Nelder was jailed for four years for conspiracy to supply class A drugs, two years for conspiracy to commit misconduct in public office and three years for possession of a class A drug with intent to supply, to run concurrently.

Heathrow Airport
England
Group 4 (formerly run by Sodexho/UK Detention Services)
April 15, 2009 The Independent
Thousands of foreign visitors and refugees who are detained at Heathrow airport each year are forced to endure degrading living conditions and "deep-seated" negative attitudes about their welfare, an independent report concludes today. The findings will add to growing concerns about the treatment of foreign people held in detention in the UK before they are granted entry clearance or sent home. The report by the Independent Monitoring Board (IMB) makes note of cockroaches in Terminal 4 kitchens and the absence of proper washing facilities for detainees held overnight. The monitors were so angered by one case, the comprehensive failure to care for the needs of a disabled visitor who was travelling to the UK with her young son, that they sought personal apologies from the staff concerned. Some of the visitors held at Heathrow are incoming passengers detained for questioning or refused entry to the UK. Others are brought to Heathrow from immigration removal centres, prisons or police stations to be deported. The authors said: "The generic term 'detainee' casts no light on the humanity of the men, women and children to whom it is applied. The IMB perceives a deep-seated negative attitude towards their wellbeing while in detention at the airport, at both policy and operational levels." Other language which the report said reflected these views included the use of the phrase "these people" to describe visitors held in what staff inappropriately referred to as "pens". Between 2008 and 2009, 33,100 people were detained at the airport, of whom 22,000 were detained in holding rooms and 11,100 in Queen's Buildings, which is mostly used for holding failed asylum-seekers before they are returned to their own countries. The UK Border Agency has hired G4 Securicor to staff the short-term detention facilities but the report makes it clear that the IBM thought the Government had "failed repeatedly to supervise its staff in key areas, all impacting on detainees' welfare." The IMB called on G4 Securicor to address these issues urgently. It said: "We urge the [UK Border Agency] to take necessary steps, whether in terms of their own processes, or the performance of G4S as escort contractor, to drive down the length of time many are detained. Action is overdue."

June 15, 2008 Sunday Mail
SUSPECTED
ILLEGALIMMIGRANTS AREBEINGHELDIN"HOLDING rooms" at UK airports and ports withoutregularindependent scrutiny of their welfare and human rights, three years after the prisons watchdog recommended in a report to the home secretary that detainees should be monitored. The situation is affecting thousands of people detained each year over visa and other document irregularities by the UK Border Agency at three non-residential facilities run by Group 4 Securicor at Edinburgh and Glasgow airports, and Scotland's immigration reporting centre at Festival Court in Glasgow. Anne Owers, the chief inspector of prisons in England and Wales - who has responsibility for inspections because immigration is reserved to Westminster, -recommendedmonitoringofthe facilities after spot checks on Glasgow airportandFestivalCourtin2005. Heathrow, which has holding facilities at each of its five terminals, is the only UK airport which has set up Independent Monitoring Board (IMD) committees - members of the public who visit the facilities every week. TheUKjusticedepartmenthas not even begun talks with its Scottish counterpart, which must approve the proposal, and it is feared it could take another year to set up. One insider said: "It's shocking they have been allowed to get away with this at a time when the Border Agency is targeting more people coming into regional airports. "This is as big a political hot potato as dawn raids. Even if these people are only detained for a matter of hours before their cases are rejected and they are put on planes home, they are still entitled to basic human rights, which includes access to full legal representation. "There would have been an outcry had this happened at Dungavel detention centre, which does have independent monitoring." John Wilkes, chief executive of the Scottish Refugee Council, said: "In 2005, the chief inspector of prisons had many reservations about the holding facilities in Glasgow airport. She found people were not being given adequate information in their own language about their reason for detention. Crucially, people were not offered information on their legal rights and, as they had no access to phones, email or fax, legal or other assistance was impossible. "In this report, three years ago, she strongly recommended the need for independent monitoring, but this has not yet happened in Glasgow. This must happen as a matter of necessity." Asylum lawyer Fraser Latta said: "It's not uncommon for claimants to be detained on a Friday and spend several hours in one of these places, and it must be extremely frustrating if they can't get access to legal help." Latta said it was an example of the breakdown of Westminster-Holyrood relations following former first minister Jack McConnell's failure to win a separate asylum protocol for Scotland. There has also been a sharp rise in the number of people being held at the Glasgowfacilities.BetweenJanuary and the end of March 2005, 34 people were detained. This year, over the same period, 242 people were held, including some at Edinburgh airport. Most were held for less than eight hours, but one person was held in Edinburgh for more than eight hours but less than 12, according to the UK Border Agency. The August 2005 report claimed legal information for detainees was "deficient"; childcare and child protection provision was inadequate; and staff had notundergoneenhancedCriminal Records Bureau checks. Those held in Glasgow were not routinely seen by a health professional, there were "insufficient" activities to relieve boredom and there was no hot food available. Glasgow airport did not even have a television. Theinspectorscouldalsoseeno evidence of notices or leaflets "designed to inform detainees about legal rights or how to get immigration advice". At the airport,accessinglegaladvicewas "impossible" as no free phone calls were automatically offered. Neil Powrie, head of the Association of Prison Visiting Committees in Scotland, which hopes to help the IMB find volunteers, revealed he has only recently been sent an email by the organisation asking him for "a chat" about the plans. "When people are being detained there are always concerns if their conditions are not being monitored," he said. "The fact the chief inspector made the recommendation three years ago and nothing has been done since is down to the Home Office. It would be a lot smoother if these issues were devolved." Norman McLean, head of the IMB Secretariat,said:"Wearerollingout the programmegradually and it is a major exercise. I don't want to be seen as intruding in Scotland and that's why we must have approval from the executive." Tayside Police chief constable John Vine, who has been appointed the first chief inspector of the UK Border Agency, said: "I am very conscious of the fact we are dealing with human beings who in many cases have a legitimate right to come to Britain and seek a better life. Although I will principally be reporting to Westminster, I will have to establish good relations with the devolved government as well." A UK Border Agency spokesman welcomed monitoring of the facilities and added that Edinburgh airport's holding facility is currently being refurbished.

January 16, 2007 IC Coventry
Conditions in holding centres for immigration offenders awaiting deportation still need to be improved, the jails watchdog has said. Chief Inspector of Prisons Anne Owers published reports on four immigration short-term holding facilities at Colnbrook near Heathrow Airport, Sandford House in Solihull, and Liverpool's Reliance House and John Lennon Airport. Inspectors found that detainees at Colnbrook spent unacceptably long periods locked in single rooms, and there was a lack of information and independent advice for people facing removal. But it had avoided some of the problems seen in other facilities because it was managed by the Immigration Removal Centre, offering access to healthcare facilities, welfare and race relations support, Ms Owers said. Staff at the three centres in Liverpool and Solihull - all run by Group 4 Securicor - needed more training in the care and protection of children, her report found. The facilities also required reorganising for a mixed population, it added. Ms Owers said: "Accommodation still remains inadequate in many centres and the needs of detainees in relation to healthcare, information and advice, and preparations for release are not yet sufficiently met." Home Office Minister Liam Byrne said: "I take very seriously the recommendations, and action plans responding in detail are currently being drawn up to ensure further improvements are made. "It is important to remember that non-residential short-term holding facilities are intended to accommodate people for very brief periods of time." Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman Nick Clegg said: "The inspector's report confirms what has been apparent for some time: that, for the Government, these people are out of sight and out of mind. "Any society should be ashamed when people are treated like this just because they are to be deported."

April 6, 2006 Gulf Daily News
Holding cells used by British immigration officials at a French freight terminal were so crowded and filthy that staff called them "the dog kennels," a prison watchdog said yesterday. Chief Inspector of Prisons Anne Owers also said staff were unsure whether they could stop a detainee from fighting, trying to escape, or committing suicide because they did not know whether English or French law applied. Her report concerned the centres at Calais seaport and the Channel tunnel freight and tourist terminals at Coquelles, which were set up on French soil under an international treaty to hold detainees seeking entry to Britain. Accommodation at Coquelles freight terminal was described by staff as the "dog kennels," Owers said. The six 13 feet by 10 feet cells at Coquelles freight terminal featured hole-in-the-ground toilets and on busy days one cell could be used to hold six people. Furnishing, ventilation and heating were all inadequate, her report added. Records suggested average detention time was seven and a half hours, with the maximum nearly 12 hours. The chief inspector made 49 recommendations for improvement, including one that an independent monitoring board should have regular access. Figures for May to July last year showed 661 detainees had been through Calais Seaport detention centre, 11 of whom were children. The average period of detention was four hours, although the longest was 17. In all, 17 per cent were given permission to enter Britain. At the third centre at Coquelles tourist terminal, average detention time was three hours but the maximum recorded was nearly 16 hours. None of the facilities, run by private firm Group 4 Securicor, could appropriately separate men, women and children. The chief inspector also published a report on detention facilities at Heathrow airport, including the Queen's Building, which handles the greatest number of forced removals from Britain. People could be detained there for up to 36 hours, the report said. Owers complimented the staff's approach to welfare of detainees but called the system inhumane. "Some of those we observed in detention had been dealt with as though they were parcels, not people, and parcels whose contents and destination were sometimes incorrect," Owers said.

September 1, 2001
Britain's policy on asylum seekers was engulfed in fresh controversy last night after a French company behind a new detention centre was set to be given the go-ahead to pay refugees 34p an hour for cleaning and cooking.  In a move branded 'inhumane' and akin to forced labour camps in Communist China, the Government plans to grant the company a unique opt-out to save staff costs by paying refugees at the centre less than one-tenth of the minimum wage.  Confidential Home Office documents obtained by The Observer reveal that UK Detention Services, a subsidiary of the French catering conglomerate Sodexho, has been waived the legal obligation to pay the minimum wage to refugees at a detention camp which will hold 500 people near Heathrow airport when it opens later this month.  Norman Baker MP said that if asylum seekers were allowed to work they should be paid the minimum wage. 'It is a disgrace that the Government is prepared to pay millions to a company that is prepared to exploit asylum seekers in such a cruel manner.'  (The Guardian)

Home Office
G4S teaches UK Border Agency how to care for children: openDemocracy, July 9, 2012, Clare Sambrook. It’s no joke — the world’s biggest security company is training immigration staff in “Keeping Children Safe”.
Police, magistrates and prisons by G4S. Is this what the British people want?: openDemocracy, March 6, 2012, Mel Kelly. Scary story about G4S taking over everything. This is dangerous folks. A must read.

September 9, 2012 The Guardian
Home Office ministers have ordered weekly reports on the progress of two new contracts with the private security companies G4S and Serco to house and provide support services for thousands of asylum seekers and their families. The chief executive of the UK Border Agency (UKBA), Rob Whiteman, has confirmed that serious concerns about the ability of the two companies to find housing for thousands of asylum seekers across the north of England by November has led to closer monitoring at the most senior levels of the Home Office. The £883m a year Compass contract to provide support services for dispersed asylum seekers is the largest project run by the Home Office. The two private security companies took over the five-year asylum housing contracts in four of the six UKBA regions across Britain from social landlords, including councils, in March. The companies were expected to start moving people in June. But after a contractual dispute G4S dropped its housing subcontractor for the Yorkshire and Humberside region, United Property Management, in June and its new subcontractors have yet to find enough homes. Two councils, Sheffield and Kirklees, have raised concerns about their ability to deliver the housing contract within the expected timetable. Kirklees council said that a fortnight ago, only one family out of 240 asylum seekers had been moved as part of the transition from the council to the new providers. "There are 240 asylum seekers being assisted. We understand the subcontractors are finding it difficult to procure accommodation and the council has been asked to continue to provide assistance until the end of October. There is no suggestion however that the council's contract will be renewed after this time," Whiteman has told the Commons public accounts committee there were also concerns about the two Serco contracts, one covering north-west England and the other Scotland and Northern Ireland, including the "speed at which properties are being acquired". He said the issue had been "escalated" to directly involve himself and Jeremy Oppenheim, the UKBA director of immigration and settlement. Weekly reports are also being sent to ministers. "It is not at this stage anywhere near penalties because they are acting within the contract in terms of how the work is handed over to them," Whiteman told MPs. "We do have concerns about mobilisation. We are escalating this and I have been involved in meetings on that but it is at a relatively early stage." He added there were other remedies available under the contracts but he hoped the difficulties would be resolved.

September 7, 2012 Reuters
Embattled security firm G4S will be forced to relive its embarrassing London Olympics staffing failure on Tuesday when its boss returns for a second showdown with British lawmakers demanding to know how the debacle was allowed to happen. Group Chief Executive Nick Buckles and David Taylor-Smith, who is the group's UK and Africa CEO, w ill be pressed for further explanation of the recruitment failure which has hit shares and raised questions about its prospects on future deals. "Everyone now accepts that G4S let the country down before the Olympics began. We need to ascertain the reasons why this happened and who else was responsible for the pre-Olympics shambles," Keith Vaz, chairman of the Home Affairs Committee and a member of Parliament for the opposition Labour party, told Reuters. Vaz said the committee had quizzed Home Secretary Theresa May, who is in charge of domestic security, on Thursday, and had received a detailed letter outlining the department's oversight of the contract and the minister's meetings with Buckle and the Olympics organizers during the run-up to the Games. G4S, the world's largest security firm, which in Britain runs services for airports, prisons, immigration and the police, admitted just 16 days before the Games began that it could not supply a promised 10,400 venue guards. It eventually raised 7,800 at peak times, leaving the military to make up the shortfall. The failure embarrassed the government, one of G4S's core clients which accounts for more than half of its 1.8 billion pounds British revenue. More than 20 percent of its pipeline of potential UK work also stems from that market. Those numbers mean the UK public sector is one of the biggest global clients for the group, whose revenue for 2012 is forecast at just over 8 billion pounds according to a Reuters poll of 21 analysts. G4S has said it expects to take a 50 million pound ($79.7 million) loss over the contract failure, but the potential for a longer-lasting reputational blow goes beyond the UK market. A week before it conceded recruitment problems, the company told Reuters it expected its work at the 2012 Games would help it win a bigger share of a four-year cycle of global events whose safety and security budget has been estimated at more than $10 billion.

July 23, 2012 Ekklesia
The Howard League for Penal Reform has revealed new findings from polling firm Populus showing that half the public oppose privately run prisons. While just 37 per cent describe themselves as comfortable with private prisons, 49 per cent are uncomfortable, including 23 per cent very uncomfortable. The gap is even wider amongst women (32 per cent comfortable, 50 per cent uncomfortable) and the electorally crucial over-65 age group (32 per cent comfortable, 59 per cent uncomfortable). When the specific example of G4S running a local prison is presented, just one in four (26 per cent) describe themselves as comfortable with the idea and even fewer (23 per cent) view the service as suitable for a payment by results approach. Frances Crook, Chief Executive of the Howard League for Penal Reform, which campaigns for less crime, safer communities and fewer people in prison, said: “It’s clear that the public understands the dangers of putting such a key service as the prison system into the hands of unaccountable companies, who are driven by cutting costs rather than cutting crime. "The scandal of the Army having to step in to provide security at the Olympics after private firm G4S failed to do its job proves yet again that when private firms underperform, the public pays through the nose and safety is compromised. We shouldn’t be allowing the same thing in our prison system.”

May 30, 2012 Our Kingdom
On Tuesday 8 May a Bradford asylum seeker and her twelve week old baby were given barely a week’s notice by private landlord UPM to quit their home. On Thursday 17th they were transported forty miles to a tiny flat in Doncaster with no cooker, table or chair, and only a tiny sink to wash dishes and clothes. Campaigners in Bradford and Doncaster supported the mother and engaged with local medical services and the Red Cross, and protested to the UK Border Agency and local authorities. The protests prompted a Border Agency inspector to visit the Doncaster flat. On Monday the Border Agency declared the flat “contractually non-compliant” and “not suitable in its present state for mothers and babies”. The Border Agency claimed it had instructed UPM to relocate the mother and baby as a matter of urgency. But they remain in the Doncaster flat, marooned 40 miles from anybody they know. This is the new world of asylum seeker housing controlled by G4S, the world’s biggest security company. In March G4S won a massive £30 million UK Border Agency contract to house asylum-seekers in the Midlands, the East of England, the North East, Yorkshire and Humberside. Using the “prime contractor model”, which G4S tells investors is “attractive”, the company granted subcontracts to UPM and the charity Migrant Help. UPM, or United Property Management (slogan “Serve like a charity. Perform like a business”), describes itself as “a market leading provider of accommodation and support services to people from all walks of life.” They’re based just up the road from Manchester’s Victoria Station. Beatrice Botomani, a worker at Bradford Refugee Action Forum who has coordinated protests and emergency help for the Bradford women and children, said: “We met UPM at the end of April and they gave a long list of pledges about not taking children out of Bradford and away from social and medical services and schools, and giving adequate notice on removals. Only a few days later they started evictions and removals with less than a week’s notice. Some of these women and children have been in Bradford for two years or more awaiting decisions on asylum claims. UPM has not told us where people are going and we cannot alert local support services to contact them – many of these people are already traumatised and have fled from terrible conditions in their home lands, UPM is adding to their stresses.”

November 22, 2011 The Guardian
Serious injuries or other life-threatening warning signs have been detected on 285 occasions when children have been physically restrained in privately run jails over the past five years, according to Ministry of Justice figures. The figure reflects the number of "exception reports" submitted by the four privately run secure training centres to the youth justice board since 2006. The warning signs triggering an exception report include struggling to breathe, nausea, vomiting, limpness and abnormal redness to the face. Serious injuries are classified as those requiring hospitalisation and include serious cuts, fractures, concussion, loss of consciousness and damage to internal organs. The MoJ figures, which have been disclosed for the first time, show that there were 61 such exception reports made last year. There have been 29 so far in the first 10 months of this year. Their disclosure comes as a two-day High Court challenge is due to get underway over the MoJ's refusal to identify and trace hundreds of children who have been unlawfully restrained in the privately run child jails using techniques that have since been banned. Children's rights campaigners believe they should be entitled to compensation. The Children's Rights Alliance for England (Crae) has brought the case challenging the justice secretary, Ken Clarke's, refusal to contact former detainees dating back to 1998, when the first secure training centre opened. The legal challenge follows a second inquest earlier this year into the death of 14-year-old Adam Rickwood, who was found hanging in his room at Hassockfield Secure Training Centre, where he was on remand in 2006. It concluded there was a serious system failure which gave rise to an unlawful regime at the child jail. The use of several "distraction" restraint techniques, that involved inflicting pain with a severe blow to the nose or ribs, or by pulling back a child's thumb, were banned in 2008. The use of physical restraint techniques to control teenagers simply for the purposes of "good order and discipline" was also ruled unlawful by the court of appeal. Carolyne Willow, Crae's national co-ordinator, said their lawyers will argue there had been a chronic failure by the authorities to protect vulnerable children over many years. "It was not children's responsibility to know about, challenge and stop unlawful and abusive treatment," said Willow, adding there were potentially thousands of former detainees who should now be contacted. "Children in custody are among the most disadvantaged in society and they were held in closed institutions where unlawful restraint was routine and ordinary. It was the state, and the private contractors, who were duty-bound to protect the welfare and rights of vulnerable children." She said that government officials now had a duty to notify potential victims that their rights had been infringed. The abuses should no longer remain hidden and unchallenged. The security company, G4S, which operates three of the four child jails is also joining the case as an 'interested party'.

November 13, 2011 The Guardian
The privatisation of public services has been branded a scandal by unions who say that leaked tender documents reveal that the opening-up of the prison system to competition is "heavily biased" in favour of private firms. The Ministry of Justice has introduced competitive tendering for five jails as ministers seek to expand the role of the private sector. They claim that competition will result in more efficient services and a better deal for the taxpayer, but unions fear that it will result in widespread redundancies, poorer working conditions and reduced pensions for workers. Prison governors warn that expanding the private sector's role in the custodial system will create a profit-maximising culture that favours incarceration and cutbacks to rehabilitation. Internal documents seen by the Observer show that the in-house public sector teams seeking to run the first five prisons subjected to the new competition process were forced to increase the total cost of their bids by more than 21%. An earlier document, in 2009, forced an increase of only 13%. Unions claim the substantial "add-ons" rendered the public sector bids uncompetitive compared with those put forward by their private sector rivals. The Principles Of Competition document, updated in August 2010, applies to Birmingham, Buckley Hall, Doncaster, Featherstone II and Wellingborough prisons. The document's terms have prompted claims that Tory ministers are seeking to outsource the entire prison system to the private sector. Currently in the UK, there are 13 private prisons holding 15% of the incarcerated population. "Prison privatisation is no longer based on efficiency, it's now ideological," said Harry Fletcher, assistant general secretary of the probation union, Napo. "It's extraordinary that the public sector is forced to take into account huge additional costs. It puts public prisons at a total disadvantage. If this continues, there will be no state-run prisons in five years."

August 5, 2011 The Guardian
Separate investigations into three deaths in immigration removal centres (IRC) in the past month have been launched by the police, amid growing concern about the treatment of detainees. The spate of deaths has caused alarm among critics of the government's detention policy, who warn that the system is at "breaking point" with poor healthcare putting people's lives at risk. Two men died from suspected heart attacks at Colnbrook near Heathrow airport and the third killed himself at the Campsfield House detention centre in Oxfordshire on Tuesday. John McDonnell, Labour MP for Hayes and Harlington, who has two detention centres including Colnbrook in his constituency, said he feared there would be more deaths as the system struggled to cope with the number of people being detained. "The government is now detaining people on such a scale that the existing services are swamped," he said. "It is inevitable if we put the services under such relentless strain that there will be more deaths as a result … we are dealing with people who are extremely stressed and extremely vulnerable and the services are not able to cope and not able to guarantee their safety." The first man who died was Muhammad Shukat, 47, a Pakistani immigration detainee who collapsed at around 6am on 2 July. His roommate Abdul Khan says that in the hours before he died Shukat was groaning in agony, had very bad chest pains and was sweating profusely. Khan, 19, from Afghanistan, said he began raising the alarm around 6am and pressed the emergency button in the room 10 times in a frantic effort to get help. Khan claimed that on three occasions members of the centre's nursing team entered the room and found Shukat on the floor where he had collapsed. Khan said they put him back into bed, took his temperature and some medicine was administered, but did not call emergency assistance immediately. According to Khan, the nurses initially said that Shukat could go to see the centre's doctor at 8am. According to the London Ambulance Service, Colnbrook staff called an ambulance just before 7.20am. Attempts were made to resuscitate Shukat, but he was pronounced dead on arrival at Hillingdon Hospital. A postmortem found the provisional cause of death to be coronary heart disease. Shukat's body has been returned to Pakistan and his family are understood to have no concerns about the medical treatment he received. The second man to die at Colnbrook has not yet been named. According to the Metropolitan police he was 35 and was found dead in his cell at 10.30am last Sunday. London Ambulance Service officials pronounced him dead at the scene. "A postmortem held on 1 August found the cause of death to be a ruptured aorta. The death is being treated as unexplained," said a police spokesman. Colnbrook IRC is managed by Serco. In a statement to detainees about Shukat's death, deputy director at Colnbrook, Jenni Halliday, described her "deep regret" and extended her condolences. In a statement to detainees about the second Colnbrook death, Serco's contract manager, Michael Guy, informed detainees that a resident in the short-term holding facility had died and that the death was thought to be from natural causes. On Tuesday, a 35-year-old man hanged himself in the toilet block at Campsfield House detention centre in Oxfordshire. A fellow detainee, who refused to give his name, said the man had been hours away from being deported and had become very anxious. "He was normally a very quiet person … but the pressure is too much for people in here." It is understood the man had only been at the centre for a few days before he died. The Home Office refused to give any more details saying his extended family had yet to be informed. Emma Ginn, from the campaign group Medical Justice, said the deaths had heightened concern about the poor healthcare on offer to those being kept in UK detention centres. "Based on medical evidence from many hundreds of detainees, Medical Justice has documented the disturbingly inadequate healthcare provision that often vulnerable immigration detainees are subjected to in Colnbrook and other immigration removal centres... [this] combined with the perilous and frightening conditions of detention, is a lethal cocktail, a disaster waiting to happen." The UK Border Agency declined to comment on the specific circumstances of each case. It said the police and the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman always investigated deaths in immigration detention centres and it would be inappropriate to comment until these were complete. David Wood, director of criminality and detention at the UK Border Agency, said all detainees at immigration removal centres have access to health services seven days a week. "All detainees are seen by a nurse within two hours of arrival and are given an opportunity to see a GP within 24 hours," he added. "The health of all detainees is monitored closely, and the healthcare professionals are required to report cases where it is considered that a person's health is being affected by continued detention. "The UK takes its responsibilities seriously, which is why we consider every case on its individual merits and will continue to offer protection to those who need it. However, detention is an essential part of our controls on immigration in the UK." A groundbreaking ruling -- A man with severe mental illness was unlawfully locked up in a UK detention centre for five months and subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment, according to a high court ruling. The man, a 34-year-old Indian national, was detained in Harmondsworth immigration removal centre between April and September last year. On Friday a judge ruled that his treatment amounted to a breach of article 3 of the European convention human rights. The man's lawyer said the ruling – thought to be the first of its kind – raised wider questions about how the government treats people with mental illnesses in the immigration and detention system. "The court's decision that my client suffered inhuman or degrading treatment at a UK detention facility sends a very loud and clear message to the authorities," said. "We would urge the minister to conduct a fundamental review into how people suffering from mental illness are treated in the immigration detention estate." The man, referred to as "S" in the ruling, had a history of serious ill treatment and abuse before arriving in the UK. He served time in prison for wounding and assault before being transferred to a secure psychiatric hospital until his discharge in April 2010. Following his release the UK Border Agency said there was "no evidence" he was mentally ill and he was detained in Harmondsworth where his health deteriorated and he began to have psychotic episodes and self harm. The high court intervened and he was released on bail. His lawyers said he had been living with his family since then and had fully complied with the conditions of bail set by the court. In the ruling judge David Elvin said: "S's pre-existing mental condition was both triggered and exacerbated by detention and that involved both a debasement and humiliation of S since it showed a serious lack of respect for his human dignity. It created a state in S's mind of real anguish and fear, through his hallucinations, which led him to self-harm frequently and to behave in a manner which was humiliating…" A UK Border Agency spokesperson said: "We regularly review our detention policies and will look at the findings in this case to ensure lessons are learned. Detention is an essential part of our immigration control but we recognise the importance of ensuring it remains appropriate on a case by case basis."

May 23, 2011 Daily Mirror
PRIVATE jail bosses paid from the public purse are putting profits offshore to avoid tax, MPs will be told this week. Firms making millions out of the privatisation of British justice are not paying their due, says a Prison Officers’ Association report. Taxpayers pick up the bills for land and buildings of these jails. But the people running them have parent companies which the POA has traced to tax havens such as Jersey and investment banks. The report says: “Billions of pounds of taxpayers’ money is being diverted from essential public service provision that could benefit society as a whole. “Often those that benefit most are registered in tax havens.” POA general secretary Steve Gillan said it was “a national scandal”. Justice Secretary Ken Clarke recently announced plans to let contractors run large prisons in Birmingham and Doncaster plus ¬a new one near Wolverhampton. They will join 11 jails in England and Wales and four young offender units which are run privately. The report says: “Making a profit out of incarceration is morally repugnant. Companies have a vested interest in keeping the prison population high to maximise profits.” It says firms have no incentive to go along with Mr Clarke’s “rehab¬¬ilitation revolution” – aimed at cutting the ¬crippling expense of ¬prisons by ¬reducing the number of inmates. The POA paper, being sent to all MPs, says the true costs to the nation are “hidden behind a -smokescreen of ¬commercial secrecy”. The report demands an inquiry into private prison finances. The Ministry of Justice said: “Contracts to run prisons have been awarded through open competition to deliver best value for the taxpayer without ¬affecting standards.”

December 26, 2010 The Guardian
A security company has recruited two former senior civil servants, sparking an outcry about the "revolving door" between Whitehall and the company. G4S, formerly Group 4 Securicor, hired Dr Peter Collecott, the one time director of corporate affairs at the Foreign Office, and David Gould, the Ministry of Defence's former chief operating officer in charge of defence equipment, according to a government report. The company, whose guards are under investigation over the death of deportee Jimmy Mubenga, supplies armed guards for embassy staff around the world. It has recruited former ministers including Lord Reid as well as senior figures in offender management. The disclosure comes two weeks after Sir George Young, the leader of the Commons, said he would examine the "revolving door" between Whitehall and defence companies. Denis MacShane, the Labour MP for Rotherham, called for a closer examination of civil servants before they are allowed to take private sector roles that may overlap with their former public duties. "There is great excitement over politicians and outside interests but the real issue is the gilded path from Whitehall where billions of pounds worth of public spending decisions are made into employment with companies that gained from such contracts and contacts," he said. "We need new rules so that anyone in public service cannot go straight into employment with companies to which they previously awarded contracts." Harry Fletcher, the assistant general secretary of the probation union Napo, who has been critical of the way G4S has recruited senior civil servants from the Home Office, said: "Appointments such as these give G4S a commercial advantage over their rivals and will encourage others to go down the same route." The appointments are listed in the latest report from the Advisory Committee of Business Appointments, released earlier this month. Collecott, 60, was the ambassador in Brazil from 2004 to 2008. He was a member of the Foreign Office's senior leadership forum that brought together the most senior heads of mission overseas. G4S said he has worked for their company on two separate domestic projects – once in 2009 and again this year, a contract which ended in September. The company has declined to explain the nature of the project. Gould, the MoD's former chief operating officer of defence equipment and support – which put him in charge of billions of pounds worth of procurement contracts – took up a consultant post with G4S last year. He left the MoD in 2008, and has also had roles at Selex Sensors and Airborne Systems Ltd. A spokesman for G4S said he worked on a specific project with G4S in 2009. Last month, G4S prompted an outcry by hiring Philip Wheatley, the former director general of the National Offender Management Service. Wheatley's G4S role, which he takes up just as Ken Clarke launches a plan to privatise much of the probation service he managed until June, has been criticised by probation unions. Wheatley's appointment is part of a pattern of G4S lobbying over probation privatisation. The company paid for a meeting at the last Conservative conference, where G4S "offender management" executive Jerry Petherick, spoke alongside the prisons minister, Crispin Blunt.

July 18, 2010 AP
Brutal techniques to restrain children held in private prisons have been made public after mounting pressure from children's rights groups. The Observer disclosed details of the techniques used to train staff in restraining young offenders in the country's four privately-run secure training centres. The secret manual, Physical Control in Care, was created by the HM Prison Service and approved by the Department of Justice in 2005. The government's Youth Justice Board (YJB) had initially fought the Information Commissioner's order to hand over the documents. When the Children's Rights Alliance (CRAE) called on the Justice Secretary to hold an independent judicial inquiry, YJB finally relented. The Observer revealed that control measures authorised for staff to use include "an inverted knuckle into the trainee's sternum and drive inward and upward," "alternate elbow strikes to the young person's ribs until a release is achieved," and "drive straight fingers into the young person's face, and then quickly drive the straightened fingers of the same hand downwards into the young person's groin area." The manual went so far as to warn staff that some techniques risk a "fracture to the skull" and "temporary or permanent blindness caused by rupture to eyeball or detached retina." One passage states in regard to administering a head-hold that "if breathing is compromised the situation ceases to be a restraint and becomes a medical emergency." Carolyne Willow, CRAE's national co-ordinator stated, "Until now, we've seen a compulsive reliance on secrecy and an absolute failure to face up publicly to the disgraceful and unlawful treatment of children the State officially describes as vulnerable." The campaign to make the information public came after the deaths of two children, Gareth Myatt, 15, and Adam Rickwood, 14, who died in the custody of Rainsbrook and Hassockfield secure training centres in 2004.

September 4, 2009 Morning Star
Leaders of the prison officers' union have accused the government of "corruption at the highest levels" for colluding with privateers to sell off Britain's jails. Prison Officers Association (POA) general secretary Brian Caton made the damning accusation as he exposed exclusively to the Morning Star the defection to security privateer Serco of the head of a public-sector bid to run Buckley Hall jail near Rochdale. Former prison governor Steve Hall, who had been appointed by the National Offender Management Service (NOMS) to lead the bid, was revealed to have taken up a position with the huge multinational despite government rules insisting that civil servants must "put the obligations of public service above your own personal interests." Mr Caton declared that the government "wants to auction off the prison service and is fully aware that civil servants like Steve Hall take the information that they have gathered and defect to the private sector. "This is corruption at the highest levels," he stressed. "This is not first time this has happened and it comes despite Justice Minister Jack Straw giving us an absolute assurance that it would not happen again," Mr Caton added. The Civil Service code explicitly states that government workers "must not misuse your official position, for example by using information required in the course of your official duties to further your private interests." But Mr Caton insisted that NOMS director of human resources Robin Wilkinson had admitted that Mr Hall, who was appointed by the head of the government's public-service bids unit Colin McConnell, had done exactly that. Calling on NOMS director Phil Wheatley, Mr Wilkinson and Mr McConnell to all resign, Mr Caton said that "the POA believes that this affair represents a conspiracy to act in a corrupt manner and we will be demanding that an independent inquiry should be conducted by the police - that's how serious this is." The revelation comes just days after the POA announced that its members had voted by a crushing four to one to strike against the government's drive to sell off the Prison Service and hand jails over to private security firms such as Serco. Mr Caton pointed out that Buckley Hall prison had to be renationalised after its previous experience with privatisation proved a failure. "Of 11 private prisons in Britain, 10 are in the bottom quarter of the government's prison performance league - that's how bad they are," he asserted. "Privatisation is about driving down standards and paying prison officers less because all these companies care about is profits," Mr Caton added. "It is an insult to our members at Buckley Hall, who gave information to Steve Hall to support the bid to keep the jail in the public sector, that he has now stuffed that information into a briefcase and taken it to Serco." Mike Nolan, president of Civil Service union PCS prison service group, emphasised that such a breach of the Civil Service code was "undoubtably immoral. "This has happened a few times, but what is worse is that prison managers are actually being targeted by the private-sector companies that want to take over prisons - and Serco in particular is now riddled with them," he added. Serco and the Ministry of Justice had not responded to requests for information as the Morning Star went to press.

June 29, 2009 Independent
Figures obtained by More4 show four of Britain's 10 private prisons received the second-lowest rating in Government tests. Britain's private prisons are performing worse than those run by the state, according to data obtained under the Freedom of Information Act. The findings, based on the overall performances of 132 prisons in England and Wales, appear to undermine claims by ministers that the greater use of private jails is raising standards for the accommodation of more than 83,000 prisoners held across both sectors. Separate figures, also released under the right-to-know law, show that nearly twice as many prisoner complaints are upheld in private prisons as they are in state-run institutions. The Government is committed to building five more private prisons to accommodate the growing prison population, which is predicted to rise to 96,000 by 2014. But the poor performance ratings among 40 per cent of private prisons in England and Wales throw into question the cost savings and other benefits of using outside businesses to tackle the prison crisis. The data obtained by More4 News shows that four of the 10 private prisons scored the second lowest rating of 2, "requiring development", and only one above an assessment of "serious concern." The Ministry of Justice introduced the Prison Performance Assessment Tool (PPAT) last year, providing the first direct comparison between public and private prisons. It ranks the prisons out of four gradings using a wide range of measurements, including escapes, assaults and rehabilitation. In the second quarter of last year, the average overall score for prisons in the private sector was 2.7. For the 123 public sector prisons the average was 2.83. In the following quarter this gap had widened to 2.6 and 2.85. This is a difference of almost 10 per cent. No private prison attained the top mark of 4, defined as "exceptional performance." There were also disparities in the number of complaints upheld in private and state-run prisons. Rye Hill Prison, a private prison run by G4S, which has been a focus of particular criticism since it opened in 2001, saw a total of 22 complaints, well above the average in both the public and private sectors.

March 14, 2009 Sunday Mail
Former Defence Secretary John Reid faced fierce criticism yesterday as it emerged the world's largest security firm had won a huge contract from the Ministry of Defence weeks after taking him on as a consultant. Mr Reid - who ran the MoD until May 2006 before resigning from the Cabinet while Home Secretary in June 2007 - was hired by G4S three months ago for £50,000 a year to offer 'strategic advice'. This week, it was awarded a four-year contract to supply private security guards for around 200 MoD and military sites across Britain in a deal thought to be worth tens of millions of pounds. While many former ministers have taken private-sector jobs, it is unusual for such a senior Government figure and sitting MP to work for a company so closely linked to their former department. Opposition MPs last night said Mr Reid's earnings from G4S were 'totally inappropriate', while the Taxpayers' Alliance campaign group called for the rules governing employment for ex-ministers to be reviewed urgently.

January 22, 2009 Morning Star
DAVID Miliband said that the war on terror was an error, but some people don't regret it. Private security companies like Group 4 made a mint. Now, it wants to spread its good fortune - this month, Group 4 Security gave a £50,000 position to former Labour minister John Reid as an "adviser." Reid fits in this part-time job when he isn't too busy representing the good people of Airdrie and Shotts as their Member of Parliament. Group 4 has plenty of reasons to want access to the contact book of a former home and defence secretary - the firm now supplies the armed guards looking after British officials in Iraq and Afghanistan while locking up prisoners, asylum-seekers and "terror suspects" in Britain, so Reid is worth every one of the five million pennies that they are giving the man. Reid was once a Communist Party member, but abandoned Marxism in favour of new Labour. This is odd, because his career seems to illustrate the crudest and most determinist kind of Marxism. For years, Marxists have been grappling with the subtle and sophisticated ways in which the capitalist class dominates society, but Group 4 opted for a very unsubtle approach - the capitalists just hired Labour's representative. Reid hasn't always hawked his brawn for the money men. Back in 1992, Reid signed a House of Commons motion calling on Sir Norman Fowler to resign from the board of Group 4. The motion said that the House "regrets that the right honourable Member for Sutton Coldfield (Norman Fowler), chairman of the Conservative Party, has not seen fit to resign his directorship of another Group 4 company, Group 4 Securitas, and urges him to do so." It added: "The government should suspend all further moves to privatisation within the criminal justice system." Reid's call for Fowler to resign from Group 4 and for the government to shun the firm came after the company let a number of prisoners escape from their vans on the way to court. Whizz forward a decade and a half and Reid, having demanded that Fowler abandon Group 4, has himself taken a job with the firm. In the meantime, Conservative and Labour governments have not stopped their "privatisation of the criminal justice system," they have expanded it. Group 4 has men with truncheons in Britain and men carrying guns in Iraq. Nor has the firm become any less accident-prone. Group 4 Security prefers to be called G4S because, in ad people's language, the brand is tarnished. Group 4 was even described as a "national laughing stock" by the government's own lawyers in court in 2003 after a riot at an immigration detention centre that it ran which was later burned to the ground. Things haven't improved since. Reid himself sent the firm to new frontiers, where the firm ran new fiascos. When Reid was home secretary, the Law Lords told him that just labelling foreigners "terror suspects" didn't mean that he could lock them up without trial. Reid turned to Group 4 for help. It cobbled together something called "control orders," a house arrest for these "terror suspects" administered by Group 4 and other private firms. Control orders were simultaneously too draconian and too lax - prisoners, including vulnerable men who had been tortured in their home countries, were tagged and monitored by Group 4. Those who stuck by the rules were pushed to the edge of mental illness by the isolation of the strict house arrest. At the same time, Group 4 allowed another prisoner to simply disappear. This may have been embarrassing for the firm and for Reid, but they manfully hid their red faces and entered into a new relationship when Reid left government. Group 4 has risen thanks to the crudest economic determinism - Reid, who authorised the signing of cheques for Group 4 as a minister, ends up getting cheques from the firm. Reid is not alone. A small squad of politicians worked to get Group 4 where it is today. First, Tory chairman Fowler helped the firm get into the prisons business in the 1990s. Group 4 tightened its grip on British jails last year when it took over rival private prisons firm GSL. It bought GSL from an investment company called Englefield Capital, which employs another Labour ex-minister, former defence secretary George Robertson, as an adviser. Group 4 then broke into the international mercenary trade by buying a company called Armor Group, whose armed men guard British officials in Iraq and Afghanistan. Up until this, Armor Group's chairman had been another top politician - leading Tory MP Malcolm Rifkind. Twenty years ago, the idea that a private company would run our jails and wars would have looked like science fiction. By hiring politicians, the "security industry" made it a reality.

January 14, 2009 Politics.Co.UK
An official investigation into those working in the immigration services has begun after it was revealed two members of staff are British National party (BNP) members. One guard was revealed to be a member after his name was discovered on the membership list released on the internet last year. Another has been suspended while his links to the party are investigated. The only two services where membership of the BNP constitutes grounds for dismissal are the police and the Prison Service. Anyone who works in immigration or removals must sign a declaration saying they are not a member of any far-right group, including the BNP. The UK Border Agency said: "All allegations are investigated and the UKBA can revoke an individual's accreditation to work for the agency or have any contact with detainees." Labour MP and anti-racist campaigner Diane Abbott told the Independent - which broke the news following a long-term immigrant rights campaign - that the use of private contractors for detention and deportation was at the root of the problem. "If it is true that staff employed to work with asylum-seekers and immigrants are members of the BNP then it is yet another sign that the Home Office are allowing for the mistreatment of immigrants in this country," she told the newspaper. "For years, campaign groups and my colleagues and I have been pointing out that hiring private contractors to work as immigration guards is a bad idea. It seems we will now have more proof of this." The suspended security guard is being investigated by a private contractor.

January 11, 2009 The Observer
John Reid, the former home secretary, has cashed in on his ministerial experience by taking a £45,000-a-year job with private security company G4S, the Observer has learnt. His appointment comes just days after a parliamentary committee warned that former ministers have been exploiting their insider knowledge "with impunity". Formed from a merger of Group 4 and Securicor, G4S is Britain's largest security firm with contracts ranging from private prisons to the armed guards defending British officials in Iraq. The appointment was disclosed by the advisory committee on business appointments, which polices former ministers' job applications. Reid has been judged free to lobby ministers and officials on behalf of the security company. The public administration committee (PAC) called last week for all lobbying activity to be registered and monitored by a tougher watchdog - claiming the industry's attempt at self-regulation had entirely failed. "We are strongly concerned that, with the rules as loosely and as variously interpreted as they currently are, former ministers in particular appear to be able to use with impunity the contacts they built up as public servants to further a private interest," said a statement from the PAC.

June 11, 2008 Mail on Sunday
The Home Office squandered £29million of taxpayers' money on a flagship giant asylum centre which was never built - including hiring in a 'financial advisor' who charged almost £16,000 a month. A scathing report from MPs exposes a catalogue of costly blunders and lambasts the failing department for a 'startling absence of common sense' in one of its most embarrassing fiascos of recent years. Seven years after officials started working on the ambitious plans to house thousands of asylum seekers on a former RAF station at Bicester, Oxfordshire, the site remains empty and derelict with 'no benefit' to the taxpayer. Vast sums were paid to consultants, private advisors and contractors and when ministers pulled the plug on the entire project in 2005 they were forced to hand over millions more in cancellation fees. Officials failed to understand how fierce local opposition and legal challenges would drag out the process, and made no attempt to plan for future uses of the site or the risk that other immigration policy changes would scupper the scheme. Last night the Home Office claimed the disaster had led to an 'overall positive impact for the public' because officials had learned important lessons. Former Home Secretary David Blunkett announced the scheme in 2001, as part of a strategy to speed up and streamline the creaking asylum system by housing applicants in a series of huge accommodation centres across the country. Thousands were to be placed in the first centre at an isolated site outside Bicester, but crucially it would not be secure and the immigrants would be free to come and go as they pleased. The plans brought a storm of protests, not only from local residents but also from refugee support groups who claimed leaving so many asylum seekers to languish at a remote site, far from any local community, was a disastrous plan. Planning inspectors rejected the plans, but John Prescott used his powers to overturn their decision, further infuriating locals. Finally ministers realised in 2005 that the centre was unnecessary and unworkable, but not before almost £30million of public money had been wasted. The PAC report reveals how the Home Office hired a Financial advisor at a cost of £15,743 per month, and a procurement advisor who was paid £15,559 per month, because no civil servants were judged to have the right expertise. The pair, who have not been named, were paid more than £1.1million for less than three years work, on top of £6.3million paid out to consultants. MPs complained that the Home Office was unable to show whether the highly paid consultants 'added value'. Private contractors Global Solutions Limited were paid £7.6 for design work, but claimed almost £8million in termination fees when the Bicester scheme was axed. PAC chairman Edward Leigh said the project 'embodied lack of foresight, poor business planning and a startling absence of common sense.' He said the scheme was 'always going to provoke opposition in the local community' but the Home Office took no account of that, or of objections from refugee groups, and made no effort to make contact with local interest groups or MPs to discuss objections. Nor did the department realise - until it was too late - that a decline in the number of asylum seekers and some success in speeding up the system meant the centre was increasingly pointless. Last month the Home Office announced plans to build a secure immigration detention centre on the Bicester site, although it will not be open until 2012 at the earliest and will require planning permission. Shadow Immigration Minister, Damian Green, attacked the Bicester debacle as 'a symptom of long-term incompetence by immigration ministers, who failed to notice that asylum numbers were dropping just when they were planning this new centre. 'Their latest plan is to turn the derelict site into a detention centre. I hope they have done their homework better this time.' A Home Office spokesperson said: 'At the time, we believed accommodation centres to be the right decision but as circumstances changed and the project was delayed, we reviewed that decision. 'Our experience with this project has taught us some important lessons, and this, along with the other improvements put in place, has led to an overall positive impact for the public.'

January 18, 2008 BBC
Privately-run prisons perform worse than those run by the public sector, a document leaked to the BBC suggests. The Prison Service papers include an internal "league table", which ranks all jails in England and Wales. It shows that most privately-managed prisons score badly on security and maintaining order and control. Prison governors want the government to re-think private management of prisons. But the Prison Service says private and public sector jails cannot be compared. BBC home affairs correspondent Danny Shaw said the report would re-open the debate about private sector involvement in prisons, at a time when private companies were bidding to fund and operate a series of new jails. A national table, ranking performance in six categories, showed that 10 of the 11 privately-run prisons in England and Wales were in the bottom quarter. Assessments 'subjective' -- Peterborough Prison, managed by a private firm for three years, came last out of 132 prisons and prison clusters, with low marks for reducing re-offending, organisational effectiveness and decency. The Prison Governors Association has called on the government to re-think its policy of involving private firms in the management of prisons. But sources within the private security industry said the findings shown in the documents were based on subjective assessments. The Prison Service said direct comparisons between the private and public sectors were "not appropriate" because some figures were counted differently. Privately-managed prisons, which were introduced to the UK in the 1990s, are assessed by HM Inspectorate of Prisons in the same way as public sector prisons.

September 27, 2007 BBC
A detention lorry that will hold suspected illegal immigrants is being trialled at a Dorset ferry port. Up to 10 people can be held in the privately-owned truck for a maximum of 12 hours while their details are checked out. The purpose-built lorry was unveiled at Poole, Dorset, on Thursday and will be used at ports along the south coast. The Border and Immigration Agency said similar trucks could be used around the UK if the trial was a success. The five-month trial of the mobile unit will test whether it can speed up the processing of offenders so they can be deported more quickly. The lorry is operated by GEO Group Inc, a multinational company that specialises in correctional and detention management.

February 1, 2006 The Guardian
The Home Office yesterday became the first Whitehall department in living memory to present accounts to parliament that were delivered so late and so flawed that the National Audit Office is unable to tell MPs whether they are correct. The department, which spends £13bn a year of taxpayers' money, will be hauled before parliament to explain "spectacular" errors and a failure by senior management under Sir John Gieve, the former permanent secretary and now deputy chairman of the Bank of England, to put together proper accounts. The report by Sir John Bourn, the comptroller and auditor general, reveals that two versions of the accounts from the Home Office were presented to the NAO which were so different that no single account balance was the same. The report says: "The accounts were riven with numerous inaccuracies." The figures were so disparate that one set says the Home Office overspent by £68m while the second set said the Treasury owed the Home Office £112m, a difference of £180m. Other examples included wrongly putting the cost of the private prison estate, which is paid by contractors, on the taxpayers' account.

Lowdham Grange Prison
England
Serco (bought Premier)

May 23, 2010  The Daily Telegraph
Under the scheme, the publicly-funded broadcaster handed over footage to inmates who earn just £30 a week rather than members of its own 23,000 staff. Convicts at a privately run Category B jail, the second-highest security level, transferred tapes of old television shows to computer to save them for posterity. Senior staff in the BBC’s archives department visited the jail to watch the work in progress while meetings were held to discuss a landmark deal for the prisoners to digitise all 1million hours of programmes in its vaults. Fearful about the controversy the scheme could cause, the BBC never discussed it publicly and even the broadcasting union, Bectu, was unaware of it. Details were obtained by this newspaper through a Freedom of Information request that took more than four months rather than the usual 20 working days. The BBC insists that it has not given any money to Serco, the private jail operator, for the secret scheme nor signed any contracts, following the pilot project last year. However emails disclosed by the corporation show that it had shown considerable interest in the innovative project proposed by Serco, which runs four prisons in England. The BBC owns more than 1m hours of historic content, some of it decades old and at risk of being lost. It employs 66 people to look after it, at a cost of £5m a year, in its Information and Archives department. The corporation estimates it would take 10 years to safely copy all 100m items in its collection into longer-lasting digital formats. In December 2008 it was approached by Serco to become involved in Artemis – Achieving Rehabilitation Through Establishing a Media Ingest Service – a new project for prisoners to transfer archive documents to computers. Serco said it would provide “high-quality employment” and the chance of an NVQ qualification for inmates and HMP Lowdham Grange, a 628-capacity jail near Nottingham all of whose inmates are serving at least four years. The firm said this would mean it could provide a “stable work force”. The BBC was told it would prove a “very cost-effective” way of digitising its archive, and several meetings were organised to discuss plans. Managers agreed to hand over 20 hours of old videos, including episodes of Horizon and Earth Story, so prisoners could transfer them to computer and also add “meta-data” – typed detailed descriptions of the footage to help producers search through it more easily. The British Library and National Archives also provided material for the pilot project. In September last year, five members of BBC staff visited the jail, where a production workshop had been built, and were reported to be “pleased” with what they saw of the prisoners’ work and enthusiasm. However David Crocker, the driving force behind the scheme at Serco, admitted: “The major concern was around the potential negative newspaper headlines that the BBC may attract.” The company did discuss the scheme with one newspaper and one trade magazine but made no reference to the BBC’s involvement. In November, Mr Crocker told the BBC: “I can’t thank you enough for finding a project for us to kick-start Artemis.” He said his staff were drawing up “terms of reference” and would then “cost the project” of a full-scale digitisation of the BBC’s archive. However no deals have yet been signed. The BBC said: “The BBC did hold discussions with Serco about their planned project to digitise archives. As part of this the BBC, alongside other organisations, provided some material for Serco to use as part of its feasibility study for the project. “No payment was made to Serco as part of this, nor was any guarantee or promise of work entered into. “The BBC has no plans to work with Serco to digitise its programme archive and has not come to any agreements nor signed any contracts with any firms about utilising the prison workforce on any project.”

December 17, 2009 Liverpool Daily Post
A LIVERPOOL prison is among five in the country allowing its inmates to watch satellite television. More than 4,000 prisoners enjoy the privilege in private jails nationwide. Altcourse Prison, in Fazakerley, is among the contractor-run prisons allowing access to a “limited number” of satellite channels. The number of prisoners allowed to watch satellite varies according to behaviour. But Justice minister and city MP Maria Eagle revealed the number was currently around 4,070. The Garston MP was responding to a written question from Tory MP Philip Davies. She said no inmates in public sector jails have access to satellite in their quarters. But they do at Altcourse and other GS4-run prisons in South Wales and Warwickshire. The other private prisons offering satellite television are run by Serco in Staffordshire and Nottingham. Ms Eagle said: “In these establishments, satellite television in cells is generally only available to prisoners on the enhanced or standard level of the incentives and earned privileges scheme.” There are 84,500 prisoners in England and Wales, meaning around one in 20 has access to satellite TV.

March 28, 2005 Nottingham Evening Post
An investigation has been launched after a man was found hanged in his prison cell. The discovery of Thomas Maughan's body at Lowdham Grange Prison was made by officers on a routine check at 11.45pm on Saturday. He was pronounced dead shortly after midnight, the Home Office said. A spokeswoman for the prison service said: " A staff patrol found him hanging from his cell's toilet door. "They tried CPR and paramedics continued when they arrived, but he was pronounced dead at 12.20am." The 45-year-old, from Sheffield, was jailed for six years in 2003 for burglary. Premier Custodial Group spokesman David Bandey said: "I can confirm he was found dead. It will now go to a full inquiry." In January, a report by the Prison Reform Trust called Private Punishment: Who Profits? said private prisons like Lowdham - one of ten in the country - were missing key targets on reducing serious assaults, drugs and 'purposeful activity' among inmates.

Medway Secure Training Centre
Rochester, UK
Group 4 Securicor

January 5, 2009 Kent News
Inmates at the Medway Secure Training Centre – which houses some of Britain’s most hardened criminals – enjoyed a weekend of tropical fun, playing bongo drums and limbo dancing, and even being given access to an alcohol-free beach bar. During the two-day knees-up, the convicted criminals were also allowed to play games including Scalectrix in a specially-themed youth club and each wing of the jail took part in a competition to come up with the best Hawaiian decorations. Group Four Securicor, which runs the centre, has not revealed the full cost of the party. Taxpayers’ Alliance spokesman Susie Squire branded the weekend event “a waste of money” given the current economic crisis. She said: “Every penny of public money is now incredibly precious. “We’re all tightening our belts in the recession – the public sector should be doing the same. “While we must encourage young offenders to improve themselves and keep busy and active, there’s no need for this sort of frivolity. “I would view this very much as a luxury."

National Health Secretary
January 21, 2011 The Northern Echo
MORE than a year after a company chairman’s wife donated £21,000 to the office of Health Secretary Andrew Lansley, the same company has been awarded a £53m NHS prison health contract. The contract, awarded by the North-East Offender Health Commissioning Unit, has been awarded to Care UK rather than current NHS providers. Last night, Grahame Morris, the Labour MP for Easington and a member of the Commons Health Select Committee, said it represented a clear conflict of interest. Trevor Johnston, North- East head of health for the Unison union, said: “Questions have to be asked why it would go to this particular company.” A year ago, it was revealed that Mr Lansley’s private office was given £21,000 by Caroline Nash, wife of the then chairman of Care UK, John Nash, to help fund their operations. The November 2009 donation was part of a total of £203,500 given to the Conservative Party by Mr Nash and his wife over the past five years. Mr Nash is no longer chairman of Care UK, but remains a consultant to the company. Until the contract was put out to tender last year, the primary health care service for 5,000 inmates at eight North- East prisons and young offender establishments was provided by more than 400 NHS staff. Care UK provides services for about 500,000 people including hospitals, walk-in centres, care homes and GP practices. It also runs 59 residential care facilities. About 96 per cent of its business is on behalf of the NHS.

Northhampton Crown Court
Northhampton, UK
Group 4
May 25, 2004
A violent criminal who escaped from prison guards while being taken to jail was arrested this evening, police said.  Carl Townsend, 22, was being transported by Group 4 security guards from Northampton Crown Court to Bedford prison after being sentenced to three and a half years for aggravated burglary and assault when he escaped on April 30, this year.  (Scotsman)

Nottinghamshire Prison
Premier (formerly Group 4 prison)
December 17, 2009 Liverpool Daily Post
A LIVERPOOL prison is among five in the country allowing its inmates to watch satellite television. More than 4,000 prisoners enjoy the privilege in private jails nationwide. Altcourse Prison, in Fazakerley, is among the contractor-run prisons allowing access to a “limited number” of satellite channels. The number of prisoners allowed to watch satellite varies according to behaviour. But Justice minister and city MP Maria Eagle revealed the number was currently around 4,070. The Garston MP was responding to a written question from Tory MP Philip Davies. She said no inmates in public sector jails have access to satellite in their quarters. But they do at Altcourse and other GS4-run prisons in South Wales and Warwickshire. The other private prisons offering satellite television are run by Serco in Staffordshire and Nottingham. Ms Eagle said: “In these establishments, satellite television in cells is generally only available to prisoners on the enhanced or standard level of the incentives and earned privileges scheme.” There are 84,500 prisoners in England and Wales, meaning around one in 20 has access to satellite TV.

June 23, 2004
Inmates at a Nottinghamshire prison have too little to do, according to a new report.  An unannounced inspection was carried out at privately-run Lowdham Grange by the Prison Inspectorate in March.  The study also said low staffing levels identified four years ago are still a problem.  Chief Inspector of Prisons Anne Owers said the prison is generally doing a good job and is "managing some difficult prisoners well".  But she said: "They must provide more purposeful activity for the prisoners because that is very important."  She said the prison has "a low staffing level, inexperienced staff and a high staff turnover", but added the prison does have control of its prisoners.  (BBC)

February 26, 2003
Prison escort firm Group 4 has been brought before magistrates for contempt after failing to deliver prisoners to court on time.  While on Monday, a spokesman for Northamptonshire Magistrates Court warned Group 4 that if it "disrupted court business" it could face further court action.  Last week, the company apologised to magistrates after Group 4 staff failed to deliver eight separate prisoners - who were due to appear for a morning session.  Jon Price, deputy clerk to the justices at Northamptonshire Magistrates Court, said Group 4 had been charged with contempt of court, but magistrates had accepted an apology from the company.  A spokeswoman for Group 4 said the failure to produce the prisoners on time was "most regrettable".  She said the service for Northamptonshire had been hit by a shortage in the number of staff needed.  Group 4 are applying the Government for extra funds for staff in the Northamptonshire contract.  (BBC News)

Nuneaton Magistrates Court
June 8, 2004
Police were continuing their hunt today for a prisoner who knocked a security guard unconscious and escaped from a first-floor window.  Timothy Augustus Smith, 23, from Wolverhampton, was being held on remand in Nuneaton, Warwickshire, when he overpowered the guard to whom he was handcuffed.  A Warwickshire Police spokesman said Smith had escaped from the custody of a private prison security officer after being remanded in custody yesterday afternoon at Nuneaton Magistrates Court for breaching his bail.  (AP)

Oakhill Secure Training Unit
Oakhill, UK
Group 4 (formerly Securicor)

May 14, 2008 Channel 4
The consortium running Oakhill young offenders' centre is given 60 days to bring it under control. Simon Israel reports It was once a flagship young offenders' centre. But now the private consortium that runs Oakhill has been given 60 days to bring it under control and to meet its contractual obligations. Last year the centre's director was replaced after two highly critical inspections. Since then there has been little progress in stopping attacks on staff and the restraint of youngsters held inside. Today the prisons minister, David Hanson, said G4S, formerly Group 4, has been given been ordered to improve a series of failings, including staff training.

March 17, 2008 The Times
A privately run child jail should be closed temporarily after high levels of assaults on staff and “staggering” use of force to control children, a report published today recommends. Anne Owers, the Chief Inspector of Prisons, makes the unprecedented suggestion to close the jail after finding a lack of control and order at Oakhill secure training centre. Teachers were visibly frightened of the children, young girls and boys were badly behaved and staff embattled at the centre, run by G4S, formerly Group 4, in Milton Keynes. Youngsters were allowed to sprawl on bench tops to do their work and used offensive language unchecked by teachers. Force was used 757 times in nine months to control children, and on 532 occasions at least three members of staff were involved, including one holding a child’s head. There had been 377 assaults on staff in the first nine months of last year. Classrooms have become war zones, teachers say -- Staff lacked the skills to challenge the 48 children aged 13 to 17 at the centre, which moved out a quarter of its residents last year because of concerns about the lack of order and control on the premises. Today’s report is the fourth, and most critical, highlighting significant weaknesses at Oakhill since it opened in 2004 on a 25-year contract. Ms Owers said the scale of improving Oakhill was daunting, with staff turnover running at almost 60 per cent a year: “It might be more realistic to empty the centre briefly, so that it can be relaunched with a properly trained and reinvigorated staff, focused on plenty of good-quality, purposeful activity, dynamic security, and an emphasis on appropriate behaviour within clear boundaries.”

July 13, 2007 The Guardian A quarter of young offenders at a troubled privately run child jail have been moved out and a new director appointed after official concern over the rising use of restraint by staff to control violent teenagers. The Youth Justice Board said last night it had acted after two unpublished inspection reports confirmed concerns about control at the Oakhill secure training centre, near Milton Keynes. The latest figures show it recorded the highest use of distraction restraint techniques, which involve inflicting pain on a youngster's nose or thumb, in the child jail network. They were used on 110 occasions in 2006 in a centre which holds only 80 trainees. Non-painful restraint was used 921 times. The centre is run by G4S, formerly Group 4. The announcement was made as MPs debated the outcome of the inquest into the death of Gareth Myatt, 15, who died in nearby Rainsbrook secure training centre after being restrained. The outcome is uncertain of a Lords vote next week on regulations expanding the circumstances in which restraint can be used in child jails. The YJB admitted that recruiting staff to Oakhill had been a problem. It said it had cut the number of children there from 80 to 60 because "without the required staff on duty there will always be a risk". A YJB statement said: "There has been a rise in the number of incidents of violence by young people on other young people and against staff, as a result of which the use of restraint has increased. This happens from time to time." The YJB said it would continue to monitor the situation at Oakhill to ensure that restraint was used as a last resort: "With the new director in post we will expect to see rapid improvements in the centre." The centre, one of five in the national network of child jails for the most persistent teenage offenders, has had a troubled history. A 2005 inspection report said it had been struggling to care for trainees with limited staff, and a "difficult and challenging period" at the end of 2004 led to its first management shake-up. The second director, Lee Barnes, left two months ago. The new director, Malcolm Stephens, who joined on Monday, said he was committed to working with the YJB to provide the highest standards of specialist care. The director of the Howard League for Penal Reform, Frances Crook, described the change of director at Oakhill as significant, particularly bearing in mind the recent change to the rules on the use of physical restraint at secure training centres. "If staff at Oakhill have experienced difficulties with order and control, then replacing rules that explicitly spelt out appropriate circumstances for restraint with catch-all terminology and ultra-vague references to 'good order and discipline' will only make things worse."

March 24, 2005 Milton Keyes Today
THE Home Office is closely monitoring the Oakhill Secure Training Unit where inmates – who are among the most dangerous teenagers in the country – started two 'mini riots' in the past month. And an officer says he fears for the safety of him and his colleagues because the young people in the centre, known as trainees, rule by intimidation and bad behaviour goes unpunished. In one incident during the past month a female officer was jumped by four youths and had her keys taken. There were also two 'mini riots' in which up to 10 teenagers attacked staff. The officer said: "Some days it can be quite terrifying. I've known officers walk out of a shift and just burst into tears in their car. "During the training courses they said it would be challenging, but it would be rewarding because these kids would lead better lives. But before long an officer will get seriously hurt – or worse." The centre, dubbed 'Jokehill', which is run by Securicor Justice Services, was designed to educate and rehabilitate the 12 to 17 year olds who have been convicted of offences including rape and murder. But ever since it opened in August, Oakhill has been dogged with problems. Equipment, including computers, CD players and DVD players are constantly destroyed and even the security doors in the education block are hanging off their hinges. The officer also said staff feel they are not supported by the management and when the Youth Justice Board came to inspect the centre, the trainees were promised a McDonalds, Kentucky Fried Chicken meal or £5 for their telephone card if they behaved themselves. He added: "They need to change the rules. They need harder, stricter rules and more discipline. The Youth Justice Board do not see what we see every day." MP Phyllis Starkey said she has spoken to prisons minister Paul Goggins about the problems at Oakhill and as a result a senior member of Home Office staff is monitoring the centre. Dr Starkey said: "The Home Office was not satisfied with the way it was progressing, which is why they have reduced the speed with which people are brought into the centre. "The number will only be increased when they are satisfied procedures are tightened up." An Oakhill spokesman said: "It is standard procedure when populating any secure establishment in the start up period to take a phased approach and was the case with each of the other three secure training centres. "It is taking slightly longer at Oakhill to reach full capacity as the centre requires further staff. Group Securicor are working hard to recruit and rigorously train new employees to ensure appropriate staffing levels are met. We expect the number of young people to rise as new staff are taken on." When asked about the two mini riots and key taking incident, she added: "Like any secure environment, incidents of a varying nature do occur. However at Oakhill these are de-escalated as quickly as possible using staff who are comprehensively trained to deal with such matters."

Oakington Asylum Reception Center
Cambridgeshire
Group 4 (bought Global Solutions, formerly run by Group 4 Securicor)

May 26, 2010 BBC
Yarl's Wood was used to hold families before deportation Children are no longer to be detained in detention centres like Yarl's Wood in Bedfordshire or Oakington in Cambridgeshire. The new government announced the end of the practice in the Queen's speech on Tuesday. Yarl's Wood has been the main removal centre holding women and families facing deportation for many years. Chief prisons inspector Dame Anne Owers said in March some children were being held at Yarl's Wood unnecessarily. And her report said half the centre's children were later released because they were either no longer facing removal or were being allowed to live normally while legal appeals were considered by the courts. Each year, about 2,000 children were held at the centre for an average of 15 days. There have been a number of protests at Yarl's Wood, including a hunger strike by women reported to be campaigning against their length of stay at the detention centre.

May 6, 2010 British Safety Council
The British Safety Council has today announced that it will be withdrawing the 2009 International Safety Award bestowed on G4S Oakington Immigration Removal Centre pending the completion of official investigations currently taking place into the death of Mr Eliud Nyenze at the centre on 14th April 2010. The eligibility conditions for the British Safety Council’s International Safety Award preclude member organisations receiving this award where a fatality has taken place at the specified site. The British Safety Council will give further consideration to G4S Oakington IRC’s award application once the results of the investigations into the cause of Mr Nyenze’s death are known. Our deepest sympathy goes to Mr Nyenze’s family and friends.

December 12, 2008 The Guardian
Conditions have deteriorated significantly at Oakington immigration removal centre in Cambridgeshire, with half the detainees saying they feel unsafe and staff increasingly using force, according to the chief inspector of prisons. A report by Anne Owers, published today, says that Oakington, which had been a flagship "fast-track" asylum centre, has lost direction and purpose and is not performing well, especially in the areas of safety and respect. The relationships between the private security staff running the centre and the 328 detainees have deteriorated to the extent that they are significantly worse than at any other removal centre. The chief inspector says the management and staff take so little interest in individual detainees that they were unaware of the fact that they had been holding one Chinese man for nearly two years. Owers says that Oakington has changed considerably since it was the fast-track processing centre and now holds only men, some for long periods, and all facing the possibility of deportation. The threat of closure has been hanging over the centre for the past four years, which means many of the staff are temporary. "None of this makes for a stable, secure and positive environment," says the inspection report. "Half the detainees, compared with a third last time [2005], said that they had felt unsafe. Only 60%, compared with 89% last time, and 94% in 2004, said that most staff treated them with respect. These are significant and troubling slippages." One source of fear is the use of poorly supervised dormitory accommodation, with failed asylum seekers locked up with foreign national prisoners also facing deportation. The use of force to control detainees has also increased at the centre - which is run by the private security company Global Solutions Ltd - from 53 incidents last year to 34 in the first six months of this year. The number of detainees put on segregation for breaching rules has also risen, from 328 times in the whole of 2007 to 220 in the first six months of this year. "This was a disappointing inspection of an establishment which seemed to have lost direction and purpose," Owers says, adding that the UK Border Agency should quickly clarify Oakington's future. The agency said it would consider the report's recommendations. "We take any concerns about the welfare of our detainees extremely seriously. Our removal centres play a vital role in enforcing immigration rules and we are determined to make sure they are well run, safe and secure."

October 1, 2008 The Sun
FOUR illegal immigrants were on the run yesterday after a Colditz-style escape through a web of tunnels. The Vietnamese men are thought to have stumbled on details of the network beneath their detention centre on the internet. They realised sunken grass paths that “criss-cross” the site’s grounds marked out the passages. The four, who were all facing deportation, lifted turf over one and found concrete slabs. They removed one slab — carefully re-laying the grass — and hid it in a locker. The men then waited until dark to crawl into the network. Fleeing -- They found their way under a perimeter wall before smashing above ground and fleeing into surrounding countryside. Oakington Immigration Centre in Longstanton, Cambs, twigged at a 10pm roll-call last week. Cops haven’t found them. A source said: “It’s like something out of Colditz and so embarrassing.” The passageways, which house electrical ducting, used to link World War Two bunkers at the ex-airbase. The centre source added: “They could have found out about them in the site’s IT room.” The 352 all-male centre houses illegal immigrants and asylum seekers. They are locked up from 10pm to 7.30am, but are free to roam at other times. Group 4 Securicor, which runs the site for the UK Borders Agency, now faces a fine of up to £3,000 for each escaper. The agency confirmed: “We are working to re-capture four detainees. They don’t pose a threat.”

November 14, 2006 Cambridge Evening News
A report by Anne Owers, Chief Inspector of Prisons, found bosses had failed to implement improvements recommended following an earlier inspection in several key areas designed to improve the welfare of detainees. Highlighting her concerns, she warned the centre would have to take note of its shortcomings if, as is planned, it stays open for another three years. She said: "Oakington remains a reasonably safe environment. It was, however, disappointing several of our recommendations on suicide and self-harm had not been implemented, and that anti-bullying procedures were weak. "This will be of increased importance if the centre remains in operation, and holds men who are detained for longer periods, with no on-site access to independent legal advice or to the immigration service." The centre was also rapped for failing to improve its race relations procedures, although staff were not accused of being racist towards detainees. Ms Owers said: "We were extremely disappointed to find there to be insufficient attention to basic protective race relations structures, such as effective ethnic monitoring procedures. "There can be no excuse for failing to put in place effective mechanisms to detect and prevent racial discrimination."The lack of suitable activities and welfare support for detainees was also criticised, and Ms Owers said the centre was in a period of transition. A CULTURE of bullying and abuse was exposed by an undercover investigation at Oakington Reception Centre. Global Solutions Ltd (GSL), which runs the centre, launched an investigation after an undercover reporter spent three months working there, filming abuse that went on. One member of staff, Jason Martin, known to colleagues at Oakington as Wolfie, was filmed telling a detainee whose mental well-being was reportedly causing concern: “Get out of ******* bed before I do you some damage.” Martin, right, then tipped him out of bed after saying: “You just don’t want to do it because I’m white. And you think you’re not going to do anything because a white person tells you what to do. Well I’m afraid you’re wrong. My great- grandfather shot your great-grandfather and nicked his ******* country off you for 200 years. “I’m not to be ****** about with. Personally I don’t go with this Gandhi ****. Passive resistance means **** all to me.” GSL said Mr Martin subsequently moved on to a job as a prison custody officer for a private company.

December 15, 2005 Virgin.net
New safeguards are to be introduced after evidence of racism was uncovered at an asylum seeker detention centre. The Prisons and Probation Ombudsman will act as an independent monitor of complaints from October next year, ministers said. The ombudsman, currently Stephen Shaw, investigated Oakington fast-track detention centre in Cambridgeshire earlier this year after a BBC documentary exposed allegations of racism and mistreatment. "The behaviour of some of those working for the contractor company, as seen in the BBC documentary and confirmed by Stephen Shaw's report, was unacceptable." Oakington, which is already marked for closure by the end of next year, is run by the private company Global Solutions Ltd. Oakington officers boasted of hitting detainees and made racist comments while a BBC researcher was working undercover at the Cambridgeshire centre.

March 4, 2005 Interactive Investor
The government asked the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman to investigate allegations of abuse at the Oakington immigrant detention centre, said Home Office Minister Des Browne. The independent probe was established after a BBC television documentary showed staff at the centre racially and physically abusing asylum seekers. Ombudsman Stephen Shaw's remit will be to investigate the allegations made in the documentary and review the centre's own probe into the affair, Browne said.  Oakington is run by Global Solutions Ltd. GSL was formed after Group 4 Falck merged with with Securicor in 2004. Electra Partners Europe and Englefield Capital each took 50 pct stakes in GSL last July, according to GSL's website.

March 3, 2005 Financial Times
A BBC film showing asylum seekers being assaulted, racially abused and sexually humiliated by guards has prompted demands for a public debate into how government policy is fuelling human rights abuses and miscarriages of justice. The film, shown last night, has generated adverse publicity for Global Solutions, one of the government's largest contractors, which runs Oakington detention centre near Cambridge and the in-country escorting contract featured in the undercover documentary. The Home Office said it was taking the matter "extremely seriously" and would decide on what further action to take once it had all the facts. GSL was formed in 2004, when Group 4 Falck of Denmark merged with Securicor, its UK rival. It inherited a number of public-private partnership contracts, from healthcare and schools to the construction and servicing of the new GCHQ, one of the largest buildings developed under the private finance initiative. What has shocked human rights and refugee groups is that Oakington had been considered one of the better-run and more humane detention centres. The documentary has fuelled concerns that the abuses at Oakington are but the symptoms of a wider malaise across the system that has long generated protests to the Home Office from human rights lawyers.

November 9, 2004 The Guardian
Children detained in the Oakington asylum reception centre in Cambridgeshire are not being cared for properly, with some found to be suffering distress, according to the chief inspector of prisons. Anne Owers says in a report published today that when she visited the privately run centre she found that 41 children were being detained, some for weeks. The chief inspector's report also discloses that the agreed procedures for detaining the children of asylum seekers had not been followed. "The centre made conscientious attempts to identify and support children at risk of harm, but residential staff lacked the necessary qualifications or support from social services," she says.

Olympics
Group 4

September 28, 2012 The Upcoming
Two senior executives from G4S (Group 4 Securicor) have resigned after a report blamed management failings for the Olympics’ security fiasco. G4S, the world’s largest security firm, failed to provide the contracted and adequate number of security personnel to cover the Olympics in a public blunder that nearly overshadowed the successful Games. Nick Buckles survives the G4S management cull in the wake of the Olympics scandal. G4S chief operating officer, David Taylor-Smith, and the managing director for G4S Global Events, Ian Horseman-Sewell, are stepping down in wake of the scandal.

September 22, 2012 Reuters
G4S's bill for its embarrassing London Olympic staffing failure could rise after a government committee demanded the embattled security firm waive its management fee and compensate Games staff neglected in its chaotic recruitment drive. The world's biggest security firm has been under fire since admitting just two weeks before the Games began that it could not provide a promised 10,400 venue guards, embarrassing the government - a key customer - and forcing British troops to cancel holidays and fill the shortfall. G4S has already estimated a 50 million pound loss on the Olympic contract relating to the cost of deploying additional police and military personnel and the likely penalties the London Organising Committee of the Olympic and Paralympic Games will impose, but that may prove conservative. In a report published on Friday, the Home Affairs Committee, which twice hauled in G4S chief Nick Buckles to explain the Olympic debacle, said responsibility for the failure was with G4S and that its most senior personnel should be held accountable for making misleading staffing assurances to security officials so close to the start of the Games. "Far from being able to stage two Games on two continents at the same time, as they recklessly boasted, G4S could not even stage one," said Keith Vaz, Chairman of the influential Home Affairs Committee, referring to an interview managing director of G4S Global Events, Ian Horseman Sewell, gave to Reuters in July. "G4S should waive its 57 million pound management fee and also compensate its staff and prospective staff who it treated in a cavalier fashion." LOCOG has so far parted with only 90 million pounds of the 237 million pound contract and earlier this month insisted the remainder would have to be negotiated.

September 13, 2012 GMA News
Security firm G4S has a fight on its hands to convince Olympic chiefs to hand over the rest of its contract fee that remains unpaid, after the group failed to deliver enough venue guards and forced the military to step in. So far, G4S has been paid only 90 million pounds ($144 million) of the 235 million pounds contract with the London Organising Committee of the Olympic and Paralympic Games (LOCOG) and the rest will have to be negotiated. The total Olympic security contract is worth 284 million pounds including work already paid for in 2011 by the Olympic Delivery Authority. Payments to G4S were stopped on July 13, two days after the world's largest security firm admitted it would not be able to supply a promised 10,400 guards, said Paul Deighton, head of LOCOG, who was addressing a Home Affairs Committee looking into the debacle on Tuesday. With G4S having previously estimated the problems would result in a deduction of 50 million pounds from the contract fee, a potential storm is brewing between the group and LOCOG as the two thrash out the remainder of the contract and penalties incurred. The firm's Chief Executive Nick Buckles, back in parliament for a second time to face the committee, said G4S, which also runs prisons in Britain, expected to be paid for its work. "I'm not going to sit here and say we did a great job, but we delivered a significant proportion of the contract. I expect them to pay us in line with the terms of the contract," he said.

September 7, 2012 Reuters
Embattled security firm G4S will be forced to relive its embarrassing London Olympics staffing failure on Tuesday when its boss returns for a second showdown with British lawmakers demanding to know how the debacle was allowed to happen. Group Chief Executive Nick Buckles and David Taylor-Smith, who is the group's UK and Africa CEO, w ill be pressed for further explanation of the recruitment failure which has hit shares and raised questions about its prospects on future deals. "Everyone now accepts that G4S let the country down before the Olympics began. We need to ascertain the reasons why this happened and who else was responsible for the pre-Olympics shambles," Keith Vaz, chairman of the Home Affairs Committee and a member of Parliament for the opposition Labour party, told Reuters. Vaz said the committee had quizzed Home Secretary Theresa May, who is in charge of domestic security, on Thursday, and had received a detailed letter outlining the department's oversight of the contract and the minister's meetings with Buckle and the Olympics organizers during the run-up to the Games. G4S, the world's largest security firm, which in Britain runs services for airports, prisons, immigration and the police, admitted just 16 days before the Games began that it could not supply a promised 10,400 venue guards. It eventually raised 7,800 at peak times, leaving the military to make up the shortfall. The failure embarrassed the government, one of G4S's core clients which accounts for more than half of its 1.8 billion pounds British revenue. More than 20 percent of its pipeline of potential UK work also stems from that market. Those numbers mean the UK public sector is one of the biggest global clients for the group, whose revenue for 2012 is forecast at just over 8 billion pounds according to a Reuters poll of 21 analysts. G4S has said it expects to take a 50 million pound ($79.7 million) loss over the contract failure, but the potential for a longer-lasting reputational blow goes beyond the UK market. A week before it conceded recruitment problems, the company told Reuters it expected its work at the 2012 Games would help it win a bigger share of a four-year cycle of global events whose safety and security budget has been estimated at more than $10 billion.

July 31, 2012 Manchester Evening News
Embattled security firm G4S was booted out of Old Trafford before the first Olympics football match there, the M.E.N. can reveal. Hundreds of G4S staff workers were supposed to patrol United’s home ground while it hosted matches at the 2012 Games. The arrangement was part of a £284m contract between Games organisers Locog and the crisis-hit company. But a string of problems led to the decision to drop G4S at Old Trafford and bring in security firm Controlled Event Solutions, (CES) which looks after the stadium for Reds’ matches. A United source said the final straw for Olympic bosses had come when G4S sub-contractors walked out, claiming they had not been paid. The source added: “Someone has looked at it and said enough is enough and they have sent them packing and brought in CES.”

July 16, 2012 The Guardian
The slide in the G4S share price on Monday reflected the Olympic-sized blow to the private security company's reputation, not only in Britain but throughout its global operations. The company has been here before. In its former incarnation as Group 4 in the early 1990s it became a national joke in Britain, as its first contracts to escort prisoners from courts to jail were hit by one high-profile escape after another. Since those dark days – helped by the fact that it was not then a publicly quoted company with a share price to protect – Group 4 not only recovered but has gone on to become a global success story, with 657,000 employees in 125 countries. G4S is now the largest player in global security, with 8% of the market and contracts that include protecting ships from pirates in the Indian Ocean and supplying security systems to the Pentagon. But its proud boast to be "securing your world, in more ways than you might realise" has been dealt a massive blow by overstretching itself on such a high-profile contract. While Olympic tier-one sponsors such as British Airways and Adidas have paid more than £700m to ensure they harvest a positive boost to their profiles, G4S is experiencing a turbocharged PR meltdown. Will this prove fatal to the company's UK reputation as the go-to contractor for everything in the criminal justice system from running police stations to managing prisons? Replacing its chief executive, Nick Buckles, 51, may not prove sufficient to repair the damage, especially if he pockets, as he will be entitled to, £20m in pay and benefits if he goes. The company will already have written off its hopes of winning the security contracts at the 2014 football World Cup and the 2016 Olympics, both in Brazil.

July 13, 2012 RT
Despite spending more than £1.5 billion on security, the London Olympics face a safety crisis, after a whistleblower revealed malpractice at its main contractor, which has created severe “security loopholes.” ¬A secret source in charge of training security guards for the Games told UK channel Sky News that recruits are given “completely insufficient” training, and failed to conduct body searches or operate scanners. He also noted that despite the low standard of recruits, the company operates a “no-fail” policy, and anyone who attends is certified to provide safety at the Olympics. “I think if you walked through into one of the Olympic venues with a lethal capability on you then you have a 50-per-cent chance of getting through that screening procedure and getting into the venue,” says the whistleblower. G4S is a private security giant with a yearly turnover of £7.5 billion that employs more than 600,000 people. It was awarded the £283-million contract to supply 13,000 staff for the games last year, but decided to train staff “just-in-time” for the Olympics, to make sure fewer people would drop out.

Onley Young Offenders' Institution
Warwickshire, England
July 23, 2003
The youths were then ordered to clean up their mess in "deplorable" conditions described by the Chief Inspector of Prisons.  Inmates from Onley Young Offenders' Institution near Rugby in Warwickshire must travel to and from jail in the privately-run prison vans with no toilet facilities, the Chief Inspector's report said.  The report, published on Wednesday, also said inmates were left shivering in sub-zero temperatures in their cells last winter.  (BBC News)

Parc Prison
Bridgend, South Wales
Group 4/Securicor
June 29, 2012 The Independent
Two private companies with lucrative prison and police contracts across Britain have been criticised by a jury for the role they played in the suicide of a vulnerable inmate with mental health problems. Shaun Beasley, 29, was found hanging in his cell at Parc prison in Bridgend, south Wales in August 2010. He had a history of self harm and had previously made several serious suicide attempts. A jury at the inquest into his death ruled that he "took his own life in circumstances contributed to by neglect of healthcare and prison". Parc prison and young offenders institute is the only private prison in Wales. It is run by G4 Securicor, the second biggest commercial employer in the world, which has six prison contracts with the Ministry of Justice. At the time of Mr Beasley's death, G4S had sub-contracted out the healthcare services to Primecare Forensic Medical Services, which provides primary care or GP like services in prisons, police and other secure institutions across the country. Prison inspectors found "chaos and crisis" within Parc's healthcare unit shortly after Mr Beasley death which they said was "foreseeable and preventable". Inspectors said the provision of care and treatment by Parc to Mr Beasley was "grossly inadequate" leading to a systematic failure to protect him from suicide. Similar systematic failures were identified in the healthcare wing run by Primecare at the 2009 inquest into Aleksy Baranovski death at Rye Hill in 2006. G4S took over running Rye Hill in 2008. Experts last night called for urgent action to increase accountability of private contractors. Deborah Coles, co-director of Inquest said: "Shaun's tragic death was an accident waiting to happen. What is deeply concerning is that Parc's healthcare was allowed to descend into such a state of chaos, again. "This begs the question, what control and accountability is in place when things go wrong with private contractors? What must happen now is national scrutiny and learning to address these deficiencies."

July 19, 2010 Western Mail
FEARS have been raised over an escalating culture of violence at Wales’ only private prison after fights among inmates trebled in a year. The number of recorded fights at Parc Prison in Bridgend jumped from 56 in 2000 to 189 last year. This compares with fewer than five fights recorded in Cardiff and at the Usk/Prescoed prison. Former probation officer turned Plaid Cymru AM Leanne Wood obtained the evidence of a trebling of violence from the Ministry of Justice following a Freedom of Information Request. Parc Prison is run by G4S, a “secure solutions company” with a turnover of more than £1bn. There are 1,200 prisoners and 600 staff at Parc today; a new housing block will make it one of the UK’s three biggest prisons with 1,670 prisoners and around 800 staff. South Wales Central AM Ms Wood said: “The extent of violence at Parc Prison is very disturbing. These figures paint an emphatic picture of frequent fighting at the prison. “From speaking to people involved in the Prison Officers’ Union, I know there are concerns about low staffing levels at the prison, overcrowding and a high turnover of staff. If this is the case, then it should be looked at immediately in order to try and make the prison a safer place.” A Welsh Assembly Government spokesperson said: “Prison issues are a matter for the Ministry of Justice. However, the Welsh Assembly Government is concerned about the levels of violence reported at Parc Prison and will seek clarification about this from the National Offender Management Service Cymru.” Plaid wants responsibility for the police force, probation, prisons and courts in Wales to be devolved to the Assembly Government. Ms Wood added: “Prison is not only meant to punish offenders but also rehabilitate them and I question whether any such programmes within the jail can have the maximum effect if there is a culture of violence at Parc.” There were a further 30 incidents at Parc in 2009 involving “multiple known assailants”, 97 incidents involving “single known assailants” and 56 incidents with “unknown assailants”. Parc opened in November 1997. It houses both convicted adults and young people and offenders who are convicted or on remand. G4S has challenged the accuracy and the interpretation of the figures and said the “high-risk” nature of Parc’s population made it impossible to make comparison with other establishments.

May 12, 2010 Western Mail
A PRIVATE prison has been accused of letting down a vulnerable young remand prisoner who hanged himself in his cell. Plaid Cymru AM Leanne Wood said Emmanuel Buyoya could still be alive if there had been a specialist remand unit in Wales for people like him accused of crimes. Instead he was sent to Parc Prison, Bridgend. Mr Buyoya, 20, originally from Burundi in central Africa, had been accused of indecently assaulting his 22-year-old female flatmate in Cardiff. A six-week inquest into Mr Buyoya’s death concluded with the jury issuing a statement that said: “We have unanimously agreed that Mr Emmanuel Buyoya on June 29 2006, took his own life whilst the balance of his mind was disturbed. “Emmanuel Buyoya was received on remand at Parc Prison on December 23, 2005 for alleged offences. During his time at Parc he was moved to the segregation unit on two occasions, the second occasion lasting from March 23, 2006 until his death on June 29, 2006. “We feel this was a considerable length of time for a young and vulnerable person to be in segregation, but unfortunately this was the only option available to Emmanuel at that time. We also feel that his mental health deteriorated to such an extent it contributed to him taking his own life. “We also feel that the documentation and communication of Emmanuel’s everyday behaviour, such as his violent outbursts and sometimes bizarre behaviour, should have been more closely monitored and recorded more accurately, and this was a missed opportunity for a better and more relevant care plan to have been put into place for the wellbeing of Emmanuel.” The coroner, Peter Maddox, recommended that Prime Care, the private medical company responsible for health care in Parc Prison, should put together a multidisciplinary team to improve the assessment of vulnerable prisoners. He also recommended that the Ministry of Justice should heed concerns about the lack of a specialist unit in Wales for vulnerable adults accused of crimes and remanded in custody. Ms Wood said: “This is a really disturbing and desperately sad case which shows that Parc Prison failed Emmanuel Buyoya. It has left us wondering whether the system can take appropriate care of other vulnerable young people. “The coroner has recommended that the Ministry of Justice should look at the issue of a lack of a specialist unit in Wales for vulnerable adults accused of crimes and remanded in custody, and this is something I wholeheartedly support. It is possible that Mr Buyoya would have been alive today if he had received the necessary care and support.”

December 17, 2009 Liverpool Daily Post
A LIVERPOOL prison is among five in the country allowing its inmates to watch satellite television. More than 4,000 prisoners enjoy the privilege in private jails nationwide. Altcourse Prison, in Fazakerley, is among the contractor-run prisons allowing access to a “limited number” of satellite channels. The number of prisoners allowed to watch satellite varies according to behaviour. But Justice minister and city MP Maria Eagle revealed the number was currently around 4,070. The Garston MP was responding to a written question from Tory MP Philip Davies. She said no inmates in public sector jails have access to satellite in their quarters. But they do at Altcourse and other GS4-run prisons in South Wales and Warwickshire. The other private prisons offering satellite television are run by Serco in Staffordshire and Nottingham. Ms Eagle said: “In these establishments, satellite television in cells is generally only available to prisoners on the enhanced or standard level of the incentives and earned privileges scheme.” There are 84,500 prisoners in England and Wales, meaning around one in 20 has access to satellite TV.

June 8, 2009 South Wales Echo
A PRISONER assaults another inmate at least once a day at a privately-run jail in South Wales. There were 381 attacks in a single year at Parc Prison in Bridgend, which includes a young offender institution, according to figures released today. South Wales Central AM Leanne Wood, below, who requested the statistics, said: “This is a damning indictment of the present criminal justice system which is chronically overcrowded. “It is much more difficult to maintain control and this could be an explanation for the increase in prisoner- on-prisoner attacks.” The figures, given to Plaid Cymru by the Howard League for Penal Reform, showed prisoner-on-prisoner attacks at Parc soared by 68% from 227 in 2004 to 381 last year. Attacks at Category B HMP Cardiff, which has a capacity of 784, fell by 64% from 53 to just 19 in 2008. Four fires were started at the capital’s jail last year, compared with 2004. At Parc, they rose from 13 to 18. Attacks on prison officers at Parc fell from 57 to 53, and at Cardiff from 15 to four. Ex-probation officer Ms Wood called for the Ministry of Justice to take over Parc, which is operated by Group 4 Securicor, now called G4S. “I’ve always been of the view prisons are better run in the public sector with experienced prison officers employed on decent wages, terms and conditions. “These figures provide further evidence of the need for all prisons to be in the public sector, and for a strategy designed to reduce the prison population.” Howard League director Frances Crook said: “This shocking rise in violence is far above what might be expected as we lock up ever increasing numbers of men, women and children whose mental health problems and addictions will never be properly treated within our flooded and failing jails. “As these are recorded statistics, it is likely to be just the tip of the iceberg with real levels of assaults, rapes and arson much higher than the Prison Service is admitting. Overcrowded, squalid prison conditions lead to rioting, violence and chaos.” Prison Reform Trust director Juliet Lyon said: “Figures on increased violence and shocking levels of self-harm in prison, as well as reflecting improved repor- ting of incidents, also point to the urgent need to reserve prison for serious and violent offenders only. “For prison staff to have a chance to reduce re-offending, they should not have to shoulder the additional burden of trying to care for people who are mentally ill and at risk of suicide and self-harm.” A spokeswoman for Parc, which has 580 staff and is Wales’ biggest jail, said: “Parc’s figures would appear disproportionately higher than other prisons due to our complex population mix and higher operational capacity at 1,200. “In general terms, both young offenders and young people prisoner-on-prisoner assaults are far more prolific than that of adult offenders, hence our figures are skewed on the high side due to our younger population. “If however you compare our proven cases of assault like for like, our figures are broadly similar to other establishments, if not lower,” she said.

April 2, 2009 BBC
Inspectors have criticised Parc Prison in Bridgend for not having enough resources to carry out its role as a training prison for Wales. An official report said there were only 70 education spaces for 1,200 male prisoners at the private jail. The Prison Reform Trust said prisoners needed to learn adequate skills to be properly prepared for their release. Parc said it was reviewing the matter but the local MP said inmates must have up to 40 hours a week on training. Bridgend MP Madeleine Moon told BBC Radio Wales: "We've all got to be worried about that because if we don't use the opportunity while these people are in prison to give them access to the skills that they need to have a different life on the outside, we're wasting the time in the prison. She said academic staff at the prison were "working their guts off" but they had too much to do.

November 16, 2008 BBC
Inadequate mental health care provision at a young offenders' institution has been criticised as scandalous by Wales' children's commissioner and an MP. Both Keith Towler and the MP Madeline Moon have demanded urgent action by the Welsh Assembly Government to address the issue at Parc Prison in Bridgend. Currently, young offenders with mental health care needs have to be sent to England to serve their sentences. The assembly government said it was committed to support young offenders. Mr Towler and Ms Moon have called on the assembly government to set up a community mental health service at Parc, the only institute for young offenders in Wales. The category B prison, Wales' only private jail, has more than 1,000 male adults and young offenders. Primary health care, such as GP services, is provided to the private prison by Primecare, but other health services such as dealing with serious and enduring mental illnesses are the Welsh Assembly Government's responsibility. "Parc Prison has never had an in-reach mental health service - a child and adolescent mental health service - reaching into the prison and we have a serious problem here," Ms Moon told the BBC's Politics Show Wales. "Parc was opened specifically so that Welsh youngsters could serve their sentence in Wales as close to their families and communities. "Those most needy youngsters with mental health problems have had to be sent to England," she added. Ms Towler agreed with Ms Moon's view that the situation was a national disgrace. "These are children in need regardless of their behaviour and they deserve a response that can meet that mental health requirement," said Mr Towler. "The stark fact is that we do not have those resources available. "It is a scandal," he added. Levels of serious mental health illnesses are believed to be higher among young offenders and female prisoners, according to professionals working in mental health care. Reports dating back to 2002 have outlined concern of a lack of adequate mental health care.

August 22, 2008 BBC
A father on remand accused of murdering his baby son has been found hanged in his prison cell, it has been revealed. David Cushing, 35, from Ystrad Mynach, Caerphilly county was in Parc Prison, Bridgend on remand awaiting trial for the murder of four-week-old Alexander. Mr Cushing was found hanging from a door last Saturday, three days before he was due at Cardiff Crown Court. An investigation has been launched but a South Wales Police spokesman said there were no suspicious circumstances. Police investigating Mr Cushing's last Saturday death said he was not high-risk and was not on suicide watch by prison officers.

April 13, 2008 Wales on Sunday
AN OFFICIAL report has uncovered “serious failings” at a prison pharmacy where a health chief was suspended last year after prescription drugs went missing. The damning report into HM Prison Parc, in Bridgend, also reveals how prescription drugs intended for inmates had gone missing inside the jail. The conclusions come just months after Wales on Sunday exposed how healthcare manager Rachel Bourne had been suspended following the disappearance of medical drugs. It has now emerged that Ms Bourne has been reinstated, but a second, unnamed person was still suspended pending an investigation. An unannounced inspection back in October revealed “several irregularities” in the pharmacy’s management at the prison, for remanded and sentenced 15 to 18-year-olds. Chief inspector of prisons Anne Owers wrote: “We identified serious failings with the pharmacy that required immediate rectification.” * Private prescriptions were being dispensed for staff; * medicines sent to wing treatment rooms had not been received and some medications no longer required on wings were left outside the pharmacy and then “went missing”; * policies covering use of the out of hours medicines cupboard were not followed; Ms Bourne, who was contracted to work for the jail through the national independent health firm Primecare, was at the centre of an inquiry into the disappearance of vital medication for prisoners stored in the healthcare wing. Following the discovery, Primecare carried out a full investigation into the claims, which were made public by the guards at the jail. A spokeswoman for G4SJustice Services Limited, which manages Parc, said Ms Bourne has since been reinstated. “Allegations were investigated by Primecare as part of their disciplinary process. “We are happy with how they conducted the investigation and happy with the outcome,” she said. The prison report made a series of recommendations, including ensuring that the pharmacy door remained locked at all times, and that medicines should remain locked up. Other failings at the prison included inadequate mental health provision and healthcare beds being used to separate badly behaved young people, which was considered “an inappropriate use of scarce specialist accommodation”. But Ms Owers added: “Our inspection found that the unit was now more settled and was providing a reasonably safe and respectful environment, with plenty of purposeful activity and a sound approach to resettlement.” Parc is a category B training prison, which is managed by private firm, Group 4 Securicor (G4S). A spokeswoman for G4S Justice Services Limited said all recommendations, which fall within Parc’s jurisdiction, have been carried out. “For those, which do not fall within our control, the relevant parties have been provided within the information to act where necessary,” she said.

March 5, 2008 IC Wales
VIOLENT attacks at a privately-run prison leapt by more than a third, according to official statistics. There were 315 violent incidents at Parc Prison, Bridgend, last year, compared with 241 the previous 12 months – a rise of 35 per cent. Eight-five per cent of all assaults in Wales’ four prisons took place at Parc, which is home to sex offenders and youths, as well as adult non-sexual offenders. Meanwhile, attacks at Cardiff jail, Adamsdown, almost halved from 47 in 2006 to 25 last year. The figures were released in a Parliamentary answer to Cardiff Central MP and Liberal Democrat justice spokeswoman Jenny Willott. She said: “It is completely unacceptable that in Welsh prisons, there is at least one violent incident every day and that one in seven inmates is a victim of prison violence. “How can we expect offenders to be rehabilitated within the penal system if they are exposed to such high levels of violence? These figures suggest there is a real risk they may become more dangerous criminals than when they went in.” Parc, which opened in November 1997, houses more than 1,100 inmates. It is Wales’ only private prison and is managed by Group 4 Securicor. A spokeswoman said all incidents of violence were recorded, “from the very minor to the major”, but she said there were very few incidents of serious violence. She said young offenders at Parc meant the institution had more incidents. She also said national prisons’ overcrowding impacted on figures. The spokeswoman said: “The high-risk nature of Parc’s population, added to the complexity of offenders housed, which includes adults, young offenders and young people, make it impossible to make any comparisons to any other Welsh establishments.

December 2, 2007 Wales on Sunday
UNDER-FIRE Parc Prison faces more questions this weekend after it emerged almost 1,400 prisoners managed to self-harm while held there in the past five years. Astonishing figures released to Wales on Sunday revealed that seven out of every 10 prisoners found to be self-harming in Welsh jails had done so at Parc. Prison bosses have defended the figures, insisting it is unfair to compare it with other jails. But prison reform campaigners said inmates’ mental state should be monitored more closely, while Shadow Welsh Secretary Cheryl Gillan, who obtained the figures, blamed it on the strain put on jails due to overcrowding. A total of 1,393 prisoners have self-harmed in Parc Prison since the start of 2003. That was out of a total of 2,013 across Wales’ five jails, according to figures held by the Department of Justice. One had killed himself. Cardiff Prison recorded 351 incidents of self-harming, Swansea 264 and Usk and Prescoed four between them. Juliet Lyon, director of the Prison Reform Trust, said prisoners should be monitored more carefully for signs they could self-harm.

December 2, 2007 Wales on Sunday
SHADOW Welsh Secretary Cheryl Gillan is to hold talks with Parc Prison bosses Group 4 Securicor after failing to get the answers she wanted on their huge number of sacked officers. She is set to meet with the firm later this month after the Department of Justice was unable to answer questions about what disciplinary proceedings were taken against staff and whether criminal charges or prosecutions followed their dismissals. In addition, numbers kept by the Government on reasons for dismissal did not tally with the actual number of those sacked. Ms Gillan said: “I want to know exactly what happens to these officers and have got an appointment to see G4. “I want to know how prisons can operate functionally if there are no records kept on officers disciplined. They can then go and get a job elsewhere. “And the numbers of reasons for dismissals don’t add up to the number of dismissals in the original answer, so the Government can’t even get that right. Once again it just shows what a shambles this government is in.” Delyn MP David Hanson, a Justice Minister, said: “Disciplinary proceedings cease once a member of staff has been dismissed from service. “The Prison Service does not maintain records of criminal charges or prosecutions that are instigated against a former employee.” The reasons figures on the number of dismissals and reasons for those dismissals did not tally was “due to a difference between the local and central records held at Her Majesty’s prison and young offenders institution Parc,” he explained. A spokesman for Group 4 Securicor confirmed the company was to meet with the MP.

December 2, 2007 Wales on Sunday
A WARDEN who was sacked from Bridgend’s Parc Prison today claims there is a culture of bullying among prisoners and staff. Now the guard plans to take the company which runs the prison, Group 4 Securicor (G4S), to a tribunal claiming wrongful dismissal. The man, who wishes to remain anonymous, contacted Wales on Sunday following our revelation that shadow Welsh secretary Cheryl Gillan is asking questions about the running of the private jail. She has demanded answers over Parc’s record of sacking 42 officers in the past 10 years. The former warden, who insists he holds an unblemished 10-year employment record, claims staff disputes with management explain the prison’s high turnover. But G4S have strongly denied the claims, saying: “The management team at Parc upholds rigorous standards of employee behaviour and expects its officers to act responsibility and professionally at all times. We do not tolerate bullying or harassment of any kind.” The warden, a former Royal Welsh Fusilier, was sacked for gross misconduct in July over allegations he sexually harassed a female guard while on duty. But he claims that was not true and that charges were brought because he complained about the prison’s “bullying culture”. Now, as he prepares for his tribunal, citing wrongful dismissal and victimisation, the married guard explains: “I’m one of the officers that was dismissed this year. I was dismissed for gross misconduct following a complaint by a female member of staff. “I believe the allegation was made because I gave evidence about a member of staff who was bullying others. Because of the allegations made against me, I feel I have been labelled a sex offender.” The guard says he received five commendations for prisoner care during his time at Parc, including one for saving a prisoner’s life who attempted suicide. He said: “When I was dismissed I was two months’ short of my 10th anniversary,” he said. “I was one of the 350 staff who opened the jail in November 1997. I was never disciplined in all this time until this disciplinary and was sacked for not owning up to something I didn’t do.” The prison, which has a history of racism and poor management, has dismissed eight officers this year alone – just one less than the total figure of all the other Welsh jails combined have in an entire decade. And the guard said: “Staff don’t like the way they are treated by management. They feel there is a lack of training. Some don’t want to be there. They are trained for half a day, once a week. They don’t feel they’re learning anything. It’s about time the Assembly looked at what was going on. I have lost my livelihood. I have been accused of something I haven’t done.” On Friday, G4S said bullying was not tolerated at Parc but refused to comment on the guard’s forthcoming tribunal.

November 18, 2007 Wales on Sunday
A WELSH MP has demanded answers after shock new figures showed Bridgend’s Parc Prison has sacked an astonishing 42 officers in the past 10 years. Shadow Welsh Secretary Cheryl Gillan, who obtained the figures, said she would be seeking to find out exactly why the figure was so high. The private prison, which has a history of racism and poor management, has dismissed eight officers this year alone – just one less than the total figure of all the other Welsh jails combined have in an entire decade. But a spokesperson for Group 4 Securicor, which runs the jail, said it simply “reflects the facility’s stringent disciplinary policy”. Ms Gillan said: “I need to know why so many people have been dismissed by Parc Prison. “How many disciplinary proceedings followed the dismissals of prison officers? What were the reasons? “Something has gone badly wrong and I want to know why. So far I’m not there yet, but I’m working on it. “I think questions need to be asked. Also, I think we need to find out what the outcomes were.” The prison provides more than 1,000 places for adults, young offenders and non-convicted juveniles. The figures have led to fears the prison could have reverted to the turbulent years it experienced after opening in 1997. It was criticised in a Prison Inspectorate report in 1999 when it emerged a racist group with links to the Ku Klux Klan were virtually running an entire wing and management had to avoid housing black prisoners there. One inmate had pictures of Hitler and newspaper cuttings about racist attacks pushed under his cell door. In 2004 it was rated the worst performing privately-run prison in Wales and England. Last year it failed to meet inspection tests and in the past five years there have been three changes in management at Parc. Six officers were dismissed in 1999 and five in 2000, but numbers dropped to one or two a year between 2001 and 2004. But in 2005 nine officers were sacked in one year and six more were dismissed last year. In comparison, in the whole of the past 10 years, Cardiff Prison has sacked six officers, Swansea two and Usk just one. The prison does not recognise the Prison Officers Association, the main union for prison workers. The spokesperson for Group 4 insisted it just treated ill-discipline more seriously than at other prisons. “We can confirm that 42 officers have been dismissed from Parc Prison over a period of 10 years,” he said. “This figure reflects the facility’s stringent disciplinary policy. G4S upholds rigorous standards of employee behaviour and expects its officers to act responsibly and professionally at all times. “All dismissals are conducted in accordance with G4S HR Policies which take account of all appropriate employment legislation. G4S works to ensure that Parc operates to the highest standards that have been established by the Ministry of Justice.” Imran Hussain, of the Prison Reform Trust, said private prisons such as Parc tended to take on “inexperienced” officers who may not be up to scratch on disciplinary offences. “Private prisons like Parc tend to have less experienced staff and a higher turnover – that’s a point both the Chief Inspector of Prisons and the National Audit Office have made,” he said. “Places with a higher turnover add to the stress of already undervalued and overworked prison officers but also makes it much harder to secure a safe environment for prisoners.”

August 1, 2007 BBC News
The presence of mentally ill prisoners in HMP Parc, Wales's only private jail is a "constant concern," according to a new report. The Independent Monitoring Board (IMB) said it was also concerned there was no psychiatrist who specialised in young people with mental illness. However, the report commended the company which runs Parc, Group 4 Securicor (G4S) on recent improvements. Parc, near Bridgend, has around 1,110 places for adults and young offenders. The IMB, which monitors the state of prison premises and the treatment of inmates, issued the report covering the period between March 2006 and February 2007. Deportation -- According to its findings, there were more than 80 referrals of prisoners with mental healthcare needs between March and November 2006. Also in November 2006 a mental health team at Parc treated 52 cases, the majority of them adults. Both the IMB and G4S voiced an "urgent need" for a dedicated "young offenders own interest" unit in south Wales. John Homfray, chair of the Independent Monitoring Board at the jail, said the 15-place health care facility was used like a "cupboard" to keep mentally ill patients. He told Radio Wales: "What happens is that if somebody goes on a normal wing and is found to be mentally ill - and therefore can't cope properly on that wing or causes terrible disruptions - then they get transferred to health care.

November 2, 2006 IC Wales
A prisoner 'pretending' to be ill attacked his guards and tried to escape while being checked over in the middle of a busy hospital. The HM Prison Parc inmate caused chaos when he lashed out in the middle of the Princess of Wales Hospital casualty department, in Bridgend. During the scuffle, a chain was wrapped around the prison officer's neck. Hospital staff, ambulance crews and by-standers raced to help the prison officers as they fought to bring the man under control during what jail bosses have confirmed was an attempted security breach. A spokeswoman for Group 4 Securicor Justice Services, which runs Parc Prison in Bridgend, said: 'There was an attempted security breach by an adult male. 'The prompt actions of prison and hospital staff ensured this attempt was unsuccessful. The individual concerned remains in lawful custody.'

August 9, 2006 24Dash.com
A privately-run prison which has had three changes of director in four years and recently allowed an inmate on remand to walk free by mistake, has been criticised in a report released today. A HM Chief Inspector of Prisons report found that HMP & YOI Parc in Bridgend, south Wales, was unable to meet the inspectorate's tests of safety, respect and purposeful activity. But it noted that the prison was moving forward under a new director. The Category B prison, which houses around 900 convicted men and convicted or on-remand young offenders, recently hit the headlines for allowing 20-year-old Martin Burnell to walk free on July 4. Burnell, 20, who was in custody for alleged muggings, was eventually recaptured by police later that month. The prison, which opened in November 1997 and is the only private prison in Wales, is managed by Group 4 Securicor Custodial Services on behalf of the Prison Service. Inspectors found during their visit between January 9 and 13 that although Parc was not unsafe and there were relatively low levels of use of force and segregation, serious faults emerged. They expressed concern that reception, first night and induction procedures were weak; there were gaps in the management and support for prisoners at risk of self-harm or suicide; and a good violence-reduction strategy was not being operated properly on the wings, nor were managers monitoring this. Other major concerns included officers on lightly staffed units not being able to routinely engage with prisoners, black and ethnic prisoners having an even more negative perception of the jail than their white counterparts and a lack of evidence of an action plan to deal with issues raised in the recent critical Commission for Racial Equality investigation. Inspectors also noticed that although prisoners were out of their cells for up to 11 hours a day with many attending workshops, there was little work achieved. On one morning, it was observed that only 6 of the 69 prisoners in workshops were actually working; and there was little work-skills training. Inspectors reserved praise for the prison's juvenile unit which they said was "well run and focused on the needs of young people." They said the unit's training planning was done well, and staff engaged positively with the young men there. Chief Inspector of Prisons Anne Owers said: "Though this was a disappointing inspection, we were clear that the prison was moving forward under a new director. "The pockets of good practice show what can be achieved, given motivation, leadership and resources. "But it is of some concern that Securicor, who managed the prison, and the Office for Contracted Prisons, had not taken decisive action earlier to halt and reverse the drift downwards. "Parc can be a significant resource for Wales. But its role needs to be clarified, and its contract examined to ensure that it provides the right incentives and sufficient resources for that role. "There is now a Director of Offender Management for Wales, with direct oversight of Parc, and we would urge that she and her team undertake that task with some urgency, to ensure that progress this time is sustained and developed." Sian West, acting Director of Offender Management for Wales, said: "I am satisfied that the report is a fair and accurate reflection of Parc prison at the time the inspection took place." She added: "I firmly trust that this progress will be maintained into the future and will be working closely with Parc over the coming months to monitor that progress." Juliet Lyon, director of the Prison Reform Trust, said: "Inconsistent leadership, as the prison has got through three directors since the last inspection, seems to be the main reason for Parc's slide downhill. "The Chief Inspector's detailed report of its failure to meet the tests of a healthy prison should now enable Parc to move forward." Jerry Knight, Custody and Rehabilitation Director for Group 4 Securicor Justice Services, said: "We have taken various steps to action the recommendations in the report to ensure that the continued improvement of HMP & YOI Parc is sustained. "Within the past six months, the Prison Service has published performance tables which, when considering improvements, placed Parc 9th out of 134 establishments in England and Wales." He added: "The report acknowledges that solid foundations are in place at Parc to sustain performance improvements in the future."

July 19, 2006 BBC
An investigation has been launched at the privately-run Parc Prison at Bridgend after an alleged mugger was freed by mistake before trial. Martin Burnell, 20, from St Mellons in Cardiff, was on remand in connection with seven city street robberies. He is alleged to have robbed teenage boys and young women of mobile phones and cash in a week-long crime spree. Prison officials said he was released from custody "in error". A judge has issued a warrant for his arrest. Martin Burnell was released on 4 July after spending 10 weeks on remand. But the mistake was only spotted when his case came up at Cardiff Crown Court on Monday.

July 1, 2006 BBC
A 20-year-old man has been discovered hanged in a single-person cell at a south Wales prison. Parc Prison at Bridgend, a category B jail, said the man was pronounced dead at 0520 BST on Thursday. South Wales Police are investigating and the prison is carrying out an internal inquiry. Group 4 Securicor, which runs the prison, confirmed the death and said: "We have informed his family and offered our condolences". An inquest is due to be opened. Parc houses about 900 adult prisoners and young offenders, including those on remand. It has been open eight-and-a-half years and is Wales' only privately-run prison.

April 8, 2005 IC Network
A PRISON worker claimed yesterday she was sacked after she had an affair with a prisoner. The 20-year-old prison assistant said she began the affair with the man while he was serving part of his eight-year sentence at Parc Prison in Bridgend.

October 7, 2004 BBC
A teenage inmate found hanging in his cell had not been checked for more than two hours, a jury inquest has heard. Ian Powell, 17, was on remand at HM Parc Prison in Bridgend when he was found hanged from a light fitting. The jury also heard how two days before his death, a probation officer had found other accommodation for him but had not had time to tell the prison. A verdict of misadventure was recorded. Ms Stringer told the jury how despite efforts to find him suitable accommodation none could be found at the time of his court appearance and he was remanded in custody at HM Parc prison.

September 7, 2004 Western Mail
A nurse at a Welsh prison has been sacked after falling for an inmate. Married Carol Evans, 43, had an affair with serial Cardiff burglar Alan John, 27, while working as a nurse and counsellor at Parc Prison in Bridgend.     Her managers at the Securicor-run jail were tipped off about the relationship when they were spotted together and sacked Carol from her £25,000-a-year job on the grounds of misconduct. Other nurses had complained about the couple's behaviour.

August 10, 2004 BBC
Parc Prison in Bridgend has been rated the worst performing privately-run prison in Wales and England.  A report published by the Independent Monitoring Board (IMB) for prisons also found that there was a lack of separate health-care facilities for juveniles, and issues of staff morale.  The research was carried out over a period of 12 months, ending in February this year.  In response, the prison said that things had improved since then.  The prison, run by Securicor, provides over 1,000 places for adults, young offenders and non-convicted juveniles.  The report found that by the end of February 2004 it had fallen to 132nd place on HM Prison Service's performance standard weighted scorecard, thus making it the poorest performing privately-run prison in Wales and England.  The research also highlighted a number of concerns which had been raised before. These included a "repeated failure to fill the 28-bed Juvenile Remand Unit", and the "continuing inability to meet certain contractual requirements."  The "failure" to provide separate healthcare facilities for juveniles was also pointed out, as were the "totally inadequate level of dental provision" and "issues" of staff morale.  In addition, the report found that there were seven outstanding inquests into deaths in custody at the prison.  These dated back, it said, as far as 21 September 2002 and included the final inquest into the death in custody of a 17-year-old trainee found dead in his cell on 6 October 2002. 

June 10, 2004
THERE was outrage last night when a prison officer had a sex-discrimination claim dismissed even though a tribunal acknowledged her managers had stopped her getting a promotion.  Caroline Jones did not get promoted at Parc Prison, Bridgend, despite being the highest-scoring candidate in an assessment.  Although a Cardiff employment tribunal said she had proved she was discriminated against, it dismissed her case because she had not applied for a hearing within a three-month time limit.  Delivering the tribunal's adjudication yesterday Mr Davies said, "We are satisfied that the applicant has shown, in the failure to promote her in that period of time, that she was the subject of sex discrimination."  (Icenetwork)

May 19, 2004
A FEMALE prison officer was locked in a cell on a sex offenders' wing by an inmate when she was forced to use it as an office, an employment tribunal heard yesterday. Caroline Jones complained she was "set up" by managers who wanted to force her out of Parc prison, Bridgend. Miss Jones, 49, of Margam, near Port Talbot, is claiming sexual discrimination and unequal pay at a Cardiff industrial tribunal. The senior prison officer says she suffered a series of setbacks to her career, beginning with her complaint about verbal and physical abuse from a colleague she worked with in January 2000. The tribunal heard that prison officer Nigel Bond spread rumours among inmates that Miss Jones used to be a lap dancer. He tormented her by tripping her and telling her it was a woman's job to make the tea. Bond was stripped of his badge for abusing prisoners. One said Bond had kicked him "and opened him up", it emerged yesterday. (Western Mail)

December 19, 2003
The Prison Service has been found guilty of racial discrimination in a report by Britain's race relations body into Wales' newest jail.  The Commission for Racial Equality (CRE) report into privately-run Parc Prison, near Bridgend, found that both staff and inmates were subjected to racist abuse, which was allowed to continue unchecked.  The investigation, which was triggered by a racist murder at Feltham Young Offenders Institution in March 2000, focused on Parc, which is run by Securicor for HM Prison Service. It also looked at Feltham and Brixton jail, in London.

October 13, 2003
Nineteen-year-old Liviu Marin, who is Romanian, was serving time for burglary and theft.    He escaped from the privately-run Parc Prison in Bridgend by hanging underneath a van which travelled to Swansea Prison.  He eventually dropped free when it stopped at traffic lights after leaving the jail.  Independent investigators from the Prison Service are at Parc Prison on Monday, conducting an inquiry.  A police spokesman said Marin was believed to have made his escape by climbing underneath a prison van and clinging on as it left the grounds, using a piece of clothing to strap himself to the chassis on the Securicor van.  He held on to the van as it drove at up to 70 miles an hour for 20 miles along the M4 motorway to Swansea prison, only letting go as the vehicle stopped at traffic lights. Detectives are concentrating their search on the Swansea area after he was last seen climbing out form under the van in Oystermouth Road, at about 1140 BST on Friday.  But it has been revealed that the prisoner has connections in the West Midlands and police are appealing to motorists to remember if they have given anyone who matches his description a lift since Friday morning.  A South Wales Police spokesman said: "Marin was in Park Prison for burglary - we don't believe him to be dangerous but advise the public not to approach him. An external investigation is to be held at Parc Prison to discover how the prisoner breached security.  (BBC News)

May 31, 2003
Wales' privately-owned Parc Prison has reacted swiftly to criticism of safety by employing 14 new staff.  New staff at the jail at Bridgend - which has suffered a series of inmate suicides - will include 10 officers to work directly on supervisory duties, with the remaining four jobs involving helping and advising prisoners on resettlement.  Earlier in May, HMP Parc was criticised by Chief Inspector of Prisons Anne Owers who said staffing levels were "too low" and as a result the safety of inmates and prison officers could not be guaranteed.  She said: "Additional staff are urgently needed to ensure that levels of safety are maintained."  A Parc prison spokeswoman stressed that this criticism had now been addressed with the creation of the 14 new prison staff posts.  The news comes on the day the Securicor group - which owns Parc under the company's Justice Division - announced profits of £35m for the six months to March 31.  Parc was the first prison to be designed, constructed and managed under the Government's Private Finance Initiative, and was awarded a 25-year contract by HM Prison Service in 1995.  (BBC News)

May 23, 2002
EDMONTON, May 23, 2002 (Canada NewsWire via COMTEX) -- A study of Alberta's corrections programs announced today by the Solicitor-General Department is a waste of taxpayers' money, says the president of the union that represents provincial jail guards, case workers and probation officers. "Most of the issues that have been announced as topics for this study have been studied to death for years and it's crystal clear what the province needs to do," said Dan MacLennan, president of the Alberta Union of Provincial Employees. The department itself conceded in its news release this morning that Alberta's jails are the most cost-effective to run in Canada, MacLennan observed. "So we have to wonder why we are spending tax dollars to study them when there are far more pressing issues, such as health care and education, on society's agenda." MacLennan said AUPE members are particularly concerned by suggestions in the release that the panel of three government MLAs will be asked to study privatized correctional programs in Ontario and possibly elsewhere. "Jail privatization has been a failure wherever it has been tried," he said. "If Alberta goes that route, it will be bad news for everyone except the people who sell deadbolt locks - because Albertans will need to be buying plenty of deadbolts for their homes." Jail privatization leads to increased violence in jails, greater chances of escapes and less-safe communities, he said.  Rennich said that because of poor pay in private jail facilities in other jurisdictions, professional correctional officers will not work in them. Safety and security standards decline accordingly. Rennich said the suggestion that privatization is a possibility will be extremely upsetting to employees of Alberta's correctional facilities, many of whom will feel the need to look for other work. (Canada Newswire)  

May 2, 2003
The safety of inmates and wardens at Wale's only privately-run jail cannot be guaranteed because staffing levels are too low.  The chief inspector of prisons, Anna Owers, revealed her concerns on Friday in a report into HM Parc Prison, near Bridgend.  The report said new staff were urgently needed in order to ensure the safety of prisoners and wardens.  Low staffing at the jail - managed by Securicor Custodial Services - meant that prison officers had to unlock inmates single-handedly, a practice considered as unsafe.  The 82m jail has suffered a number of high-profile problems and suicides by inmates and has been dogged by disturbances.  (BBC News)

May 18, 2002
A SECURITY guard shot in a armed robbery seven years ago has won the right to claim compensation for his employers.  Appeal court judges in Leeds ruled that Securicor for which Geoffrey Henser-Leather worked, should have provided him with full body armor.  Lord Justice Kennedy ruled that the risk of armed attack in that area of Leeds has been "forseeable", and that under the 1992 Personel Protective Equipment at Work regulations, Securicor was obliged to make body armour available to its staff.  A future compensation claim against it would be lawful.  Mr.Henser-Leather, now 63, was shot in August 1995 when he was sent to collect $5,000 in cash and cheques from a service station in Leeds.  A robber grabbed the cash box and when Mr.Henser-Leather tried to wrestle it back he was shot at point-blank range with a .38 calibre revolver.  The only protective clothing with which he hah been issued was a visor.  Lord Justice Kennedy ruled that Securicor and other security firms had clear obligations under existing rules to assess risks and to ensure that suitable body armour was provided.  Penny Stead, Mr.Henser-Leather's solicitor, said that the ruling opened the way to a $100,000 injury compensation calim by her client, as well as those in similar positions.  Neil Derrick from the GMB trade union, who helped bring the case to court, said he hoped that Securicor would review its policy and provide body armour for all security guards who transported cash.  Securicor said after the case:"In line with the rest of the security and cash-in-transit industry, Securicor does not routinely offer body armour to its cash-in-transit officers.  (Times Online) 

February 8, 2002
A former inmate today alleged he was stripped naked and handcuffed by guards as he writhed in agony having a heart attack when he was in prison.  Former newsagent Nicholas Jones, 32, says he was treated worse than an animal by guards at the privately run Parc Prison, in Bridgend, south Wales.  The unemployed father of three from Llanelli, Carmarthenshire says he begged for help in the belief that he was dying, but was ordered to strip before being rushed to hospital.  Parc Prison, which is the only private prison in Wales, is staffed and run by Securicor.  (Press Association)

Peterborough
Cambridgeshire
Kalyx (Sodexho)
December 18, 2010 Peterborough Today
A CITY MP has called for a review of prison procedures following revelations that prisoners were wrongly released from HMP Peterborough. According to a Freedom of Information (FOI) request made to the Ministry of Justice (MoJ), over the last three years six prisoners have been released by mistake from the prison in Saville Road, Westwood, Peterborough. It is not known how many are still at large or whether they have been returned to jail. MP for North West Cambridgeshire Shailesh Vara said: “This is very worrying. “I am writing to the prisons director asking for their procedures to be urgently reviewed to ensure that these errors are not repeated in the future.” Kalyx, which runs the Category B prison, were unavailable to comment about the findings. The FOI also revealed that in the last year 69 inmates were released by mistake from prisons in England, Scotland and Wales.

August 21, 2010 Peterborough Today
A PRISONS watchdog has slammed HMP Peterborough’s staffing levels as “inadequate” and said drugs are being easily smuggled inside during visits as a result. The Independent Monitoring Board (IMB), which is charged with looking at the humane treatment of prisoners and reports annually to the Secretary of State on how well the prison meets standards, said unless the staffing problem was tackled urgently, the illicit drugs trade at the prison, in Saville Road, Westwood, could increase. The hard-hitting report into the Category B mixed prison said: “The board has become increasingly concerned about the apparent ease with which contraband, in particular drugs and mobile phones, enter the prisons. “The staffing levels in the visits departments are often inadequate and this should be addressed as a matter of urgency if the problems are not to continue and even increase. “A culture has arisen that drugs are more easily imported at evening and weekend visits when, due to staffing levels, security is less.” The concern over the “constantly fluctuating” number of officers assigned to male and female visits was one of the issues that the report’s authors have highlighted to the justice minister. They also raised fears about the prison receiving an increasing number of people with severe mental health issues and said the time taken to find them more secure accommodation in appropriate hospitals was too long.

July 11, 2008 The Sun
THE most dangerous prison in Britain was last night revealed as Peterborough jail. There were 115 assaults on its warders and staff last year – more than two a week. The prison is run by private firm Kalyx, with an official capacity of 840 lags but currently housing 983. The Cambridgeshire nick is the country’s only purpose-built jail which holds both men and women. The disclosure came in official figures uncovered by Tories which show attacks on prison staff have rocketed as jails struggle to cope with record overcrowding. Inmates launched 2,916 assaults on warders last year – up 15 per cent in just four years. A total of 312 attacks were so bad they were reported to police. Of the ten jails with the most assaults, seven are seriously overcrowded. They include Birmingham which has a 1,121 capacity yet houses 1,451. Feltham Young Offenders Institution in Middlesex was second most dangerous with 107 assaults on staff. Shadow Justice Minister Edward Garnier said yesterday: “It is significant the highest levels of attacks on officers are in the most overcrowded prisons. “These figures clearly show the Government has both failed to provide enough room for prisoners – and failed to protect their staff.”

January 18, 2008 BBC
Privately-run prisons perform worse than those run by the public sector, a document leaked to the BBC suggests. The Prison Service papers include an internal "league table", which ranks all jails in England and Wales. It shows that most privately-managed prisons score badly on security and maintaining order and control. Prison governors want the government to re-think private management of prisons. But the Prison Service says private and public sector jails cannot be compared. BBC home affairs correspondent Danny Shaw said the report would re-open the debate about private sector involvement in prisons, at a time when private companies were bidding to fund and operate a series of new jails. A national table, ranking performance in six categories, showed that 10 of the 11 privately-run prisons in England and Wales were in the bottom quarter. Assessments 'subjective' -- Peterborough Prison, managed by a private firm for three years, came last out of 132 prisons and prison clusters, with low marks for reducing re-offending, organisational effectiveness and decency. The Prison Governors Association has called on the government to re-think its policy of involving private firms in the management of prisons. But sources within the private security industry said the findings shown in the documents were based on subjective assessments. The Prison Service said direct comparisons between the private and public sectors were "not appropriate" because some figures were counted differently. Privately-managed prisons, which were introduced to the UK in the 1990s, are assessed by HM Inspectorate of Prisons in the same way as public sector prisons.

January 31, 2007 BBC
A demonstration has taken place outside a privately-run jail in Cambridgeshire over the death of a female inmate. Lucy Wood, 28, died on 15 January 2007 at HMP Peterborough, Cambridgeshire. Bouquets of flowers were laid by protest organiser Pauline Campbell whose 18-year-old daughter Sarah died in Styal Prison in January 2003. Ms Campbell said the number of women committing suicide was unacceptable. A prison spokesman said any death in custody was a matter of deep regret. "We naturally offer our commiserations to Lucy Wood's family and friends. Used bedding: "The inquest has yet to take place and we are therefore unable to make any further comment," he said. Lucy Wood, serving two years for threatening to kill, was said to have used bedding to take her own life. "HMP Peterborough prisoner Lucy Wood was found in her cell apparently having attempted self-strangulation," a prison spokeswoman said. The demonstration on Wednesday at Peterborough prison was the 21st demonstration organised by Ms Campbell since protests began in 2004. Ms Campbell said she has been arrested 14 times on previous demonstrations and on Wednesday attempted to stop a prison van. "I am saddened and angry that yet another woman prisoner has died in the 'care' of the State'," she said. "It is of particular concern that Ms Wood lost her life while locked up by a private company, and her death also raises very serious issues about the dubious ethics of making profit out of punishment." "Thirty-four women prisoners have died [self-inflicted deaths] since my daughter's death in January 2003." HMP Peterborough which is run by Kalyx Ltd opened in 2005, and is a private jail accommodating both women and men.

June 1, 2005 BBC
Inmates at a new mixed prison in Cambridgeshire are to be offered massages and relaxation treatments. Operators of the 840-place Category B prison at Peterborough, United Kingdom Detention Services (UKDS), want to recruit two holistic therapists. Reflexology, aromatherapy and Indian head massage would be offered. Peterborough MP Stewart Jackson has accused the prison of pampering inmates and sending out the wrong message to hard-working families. Mr Jackson said: "It is wrong prisoners are treated in this way. Are they using it as a Butlins holiday camp? "Inmates should be taught the basic skills, such as reading and writing, to aid their rehabilitation."

February 20, 2003
Interserve PLC said it has closed a Private Finance Initiative (PFI) contract with the UK prison service to create and operate a new prison in Peterborough , Cambridgeshire. Opening in early 2005, it will be the first purpose-built facility in the UK to accommodate both male and female inmates, it added. It said Interserve Project Services will be responsible for the design and construction, beginning immediately, while partner United Kingdom Detention Services (UKDS) will operate the prison for 25 years from opening. Interserve and other consortium members Sodexho Alliance (UKDS's parent company) and Royal Bank of Scotland are taking equity stakes in the project through their respective investment subsidiaries. (AFX News)

Premier Custodial Group/Serco
May 4, 2009 The Telegraph
Tom Riall admits he broke the speed limit but says he did not realise how fast he was travelling. Mr Riall was photographed doing 102mph in his 2.7 litre Volvo on a 70mph stretch of the A11 as he travelled to a business meeting. Mr Riall, 49, a former soldier, is chief executive of Serco, which oversees more than 5,000 cameras on Britain's roads. He is due to appear before magistrates in Sudbury, Suffolk, on Wednesday, where it is understood he will plead guilty to driving with excessive speed. Anyone caught doing more than 100mph faces a driving ban of up to two years and a £2,500 fine. There is also the option of taking a "speed awareness" class to reduce the length of the disqualification. Mr Riall, who earns around £150,000 a year, fully admits he broke the speed limit. "I was travelling from my home to a business meeting on a clear A-road and I was unaware of my speed. "I regret driving at this speed and will ensure I mitigate it in future. "In my job, I understand the consequences of speed and want to apologise to the court", he said outside his home in Reading, Berkshire. Road safety campaigners have reacted angrily to the confession. "We're concerned a driver doing 102mph claims to be unaware of his speed – what sort of message does this put out to other road users?", said Claire Armstrong, of the Safe Speed campaign group. "A man who makes his income from speed cameras should know better." In 2008 Serco led an anti-speeding campaign called Safe Drive Stay Alive, which was backed by the Government. Mr Riall said at the time: "In courts and prisons we see the direct consequences of reckless and dangerous driving every single day. "For far too many young people it ends with a prison sentence – but for the families left behind the pain lasts much longer. "Serco is delighted to support Safe Drive Stay Alive because we want to help bring about change for the young drivers and all those whose lives are affected." There are around 8,000 speed cameras on Britain's roads, which generate about £100 million every year in fines.

April 29, 2009 Bromley Times
A PRISON van driver ran over and killed a woman in "a moment of complete madness" after she started dancing in the street, a court heard. Andrew Curtis, 49, of The Ridge, Orpington, edged forward into Naomi Benjamin, 34, until she slipped and fell under the wheels of the vehicle on April 22 last year. He then drove over her body, twisting her head until her neck was broken and dragging her 10 metres along the road, jurors were told at his murder trial at the Old Bailey this week. Horrified witnesses surrounded the driver and beat on the sides of the van in anger after the incident in Brixton. Bystander Susan Fraser, giving evidence on Tuesday, said: "She was in front of the prison van dancing, waving [her] arms around and shouting. There was a lot of action going on. "The prison van eventually moved forwards and Naomi moved backwards. The van moved forwards again and almost touched her. She was obstructing the vehicle, she was shouting but I couldn't understand any words." She then jumped up and pulled the passenger windscreen wiper down before tumbling to the floor. Ms Fraser added: "That was when the prison van escalated. She fell under the wheel and the van continued moving up the hill and she was underneath it. I was in shock. "I remained there until she was run over and I made my way towards the van. "There was an immediate rush of people towards the van, screaming and shouting at the van to stop. "It was very nasty. Things got a bit nasty." Curtis, who had worked for Serco for six years, was transporting prisoners from a court in Westminster to Brixton prison during rush hour. He had stopped at the traffic lights outside the KFC in the middle of the three-lane carriageway heading southbound on Brixton Road. Prosecutor Simon Denison said: "She was killed suddenly and utterly needlessly by this defendant in a moment of complete madness. "She slipped and fell in front of the centre of the van. You may think he must have realised what had happened but quite incredibly he continued to drive the van forward and he went over her." The victim was still alive when the first paramedic arrived but by the time she could be moved from under the vehicle she was dead. Describing Ms Benjamin, Mr Denison said: "She was well known in the community, a local character. She was often dressed in brightly coloured clothes. She was outgoing and a loud person. Unfortunately she was often drunk." The trial continues.

April 26, 2009 The Independent
Children held in the infamous Yarl's Wood immigration detention centre are being denied urgent medical treatment, handled violently and left at risk of serious harm, a damning report by the Children's Commissioner for England will say tomorrow. Sir Al Aynsley-Green's investigation paints a shocking picture of neglect and even cruelty towards children trapped within the centre's razor-wired walls, and finds "substantial evidence that detention is harmful and damaging to children and young people". Since opening in 2001, the Bedfordshire detention centre has been plagued by hunger strikes, self-harm incidents, a suicide and riots. It was severely damaged by fire during disturbances in 2002. Despite repeated scandals – and the damning findings of this report – planning permission was given last month to double the centre's capacity from 405 places to nearly 900. Around 2,000 children a year are held in immigration centres – half in Yarl's Wood, which has been run by a private company, Serco, since 2007. The experience they described is prison in all but name. Politicians, immigration experts and doctors last night called for an end to the detention of children and for urgent measures to ensure other detainees are treated humanely. The report, based on the most recent inspection by Sir Al, reveals that basic safeguards for children in Yarl's Wood are failing. Welfare issues raising "serious concern" were ignored, with children forced to remain in custody even when they were seriously ill or in danger from parents with mental health problems, the report says. It also criticises the "scant regard to basic welfare needs" during arrest and transportation to the centre. Key meetings between social services, the UK Border Agency (UKBA) and Yarl's Wood staff designed to discuss the welfare implications of keeping a child locked up for more than 28 days dwelt instead on PR and legal concerns. The commissioner calls for an urgent review to "ensure the best interests of the child are central to decisions on detention". The UKBA claims that steps have now been taken to protect children since the inspection last May, but Lisa Nandy, policy adviser at The Children's Society, disputes this. "The agency has not made the improvements necessary to safeguard these children," she said. "The Secretary of State for Children must intervene immediately as this report exposes serious child protection risks which have not been adequately addressed." The commissioner found that seriously ill children were denied hospital treatment, while bureaucracy substantially delayed others with critical conditions from getting to hospital. A baby with pneumonia and a teenager with severe mental health problems were among those affected. Despite being the main detention centre for children, no one on the Yarl's Wood health team has child health qualifications, the report says. Sir Al found major healthcare shortcomings at the centre, describing safeguards, records and professionalism as inadequate and below NHS standards. He reports that two children with sickle cell disease were not allowed to bring their penicillin with them when they were seized from their homes. As a result they became seriously ill and required urgent treatment. Instead of being referred to hospital for intravenous fluids and antibiotics they were simply given paracetamol. Under the NHS this would be categorised as a life-threatening "Serious Untoward Incident". Children suffering from serious medical conditions and the mentally ill were routinely kept in detention despite guidelines stating clearly they should not be. One diabetic child had three emergency treatments in the 24 days she was detained – including two occasions where her blood sugar left her "un-rousable" – but was still not released. An eight-month-old baby with asthma was neither released nor given an inhaler. Immunisations were denied to children documented as needing them, creating a health risk. One child was even given the wrong vaccine, while the centre's policy for preventing malaria was described as containing "serious errors" and being "unacceptably poor". Doctors working for Medical Justice, an organisation that provides voluntary medical assistance for Yarl's Wood families, insist there is wider evidence of medical abuse beyond the commissioner's report. They say they have documented evidence of a child under 12 being given his mother's anti-depressant drugs on removal; of a young person in severe pain with sickle cell disease being denied painkillers because he was unable to walk to the clinic to receive them in person; and of children contracting severe malaria on being returned to their home country because they were refused suitable preventative medicine. Paediatrician Dr Fred Martineau said: "The detention of children, whether newborn babies or adolescents, almost invariably causes them physical or emotional suffering. Doctors from Medical Justice regularly see the effects of this, ranging from a failure to give immunisations against potentially fatal diseases, through to clinical depression ...The only way of preventing this harm is to end their detention." Healthcare at Yarl's Wood has long been a problem, with outbreaks of vomiting bugs and chickenpox common. The centre was last night understood to be in the middle of yet another chickenpox quarantine. The report describes the ordeal of "dawn raids" – where up to 20 officers arrive to seize families in the early hours of the morning. Children repeatedly reported being treated with violence, including being dragged on the floor and thrown to the ground. Young people told how traumatised they were by the experience, noting that officers seemed to be laughing at them and "taking pleasure in the family's distress". The study said: "In a large majority of cases, children reported that officers' behaviour had been aggressive, rude and, on a few occasions, violent." Children were even watched by officers of the opposite sex while they dressed, which the report called "an unacceptable safeguarding risk which must be addressed immediately". They also had to watch parents being handcuffed and heavily restrained – a direct flouting of UKBA guidelines. One mother, so distressed at being handcuffed in front of her family and thrown into a caged van, tried to hang herself with her son's shoelaces. Caged prison vans are routinely used to transport children to the centre near Bedford, despite promises that people carriers would be used for families. Children were denied toilet breaks or food and drink. The vans, the report says, are "stained with urine and vomit". The commissioner also expressed concern at the increase in the length of time for which children are being held, which threatens their mental well-being. Last week, the Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith, told MPs: "Detention is a final option and is only used for the shortest period necessary." But the Children's Commissioner says: "The average length of time children and young people are being detained is increasing, and, crucially, the decision to detain them is neither being used as a last resort nor for the shortest period of time as required by Article 37 of the UN Convention on the Rights of a Child." In conclusion, Sir Al calls for an end to the detention of children. "Each year in the UK, we detain around 2,000 children for administrative purposes. This has to end," he said. His call was echoed by the Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg, who said: "The incarceration of thousands of children accused of no crime, often for months on end, is inhumane. The treatment of these vulnerable children in Yarl's Wood is a shameful indictment of the Government's failed immigration policy." The Border and Immigration minister Phil Woolas said: "If people refuse to go home then detention becomes a necessity. We don't want to split up families, so we hold children with their parents, and while they are in our care we treat them with sensitivity and compassion." Taken away: 'They came for us at night' -- Dominic Mwafulirwa trembles at the words "Yarl's Wood". The eight-year-old was asleep when six guards wrenched him and his mother, Cecilia, 35, from their Swansea home in the early hours three months ago. They had arrived in the UK from Malawi when Dominic was a year old. Cecilia, who had run away from an abusive husband, started a new life in Wales, where Dominic excelled at school. That life ended abruptly when the men arrived. "Dominic didn't say a word from the time they came until we were locked up," Cecilia says. "It was hard to keep his spirits up. When I asked him why he wasn't going to the school at Yarl's Wood, he said: 'What's the point? We're not learning anything.' He refused to wash and started smashing things. He's still really angry and confused. "We spent 50 days in that place. I lost 20kg. I'm a sickle cell patient and by the end of the 50 days my haemoglobin was too low. I'm really anaemic and they knew I had depression. They changed my medication and they threatened to take my son away." Cecilia and Dominic have been out of Yarl's Wood since the end of March. They have yet to find out whether they will be allowed to stay in the UK.

March 27, 2009 The Australian
THE research director of a British-based group that is expected to bid for contracts to operate two jails in NSW has backed privatised facilities in which inmates have keys to their cells and are on a first-name basis with their jailers. Gary Sturgess, research director of the Serco Group, will tell a NSW parliamentary inquiry today that decency, not efficiency, is the main reason to privatise jails. He says overseas experience shows that prisoners enjoy more privileges -- including being given the keys to their own cells -- in correctional systems where private and public providers compete. Prisoners in these systems spend more time out of their cells and have far greater interaction with their jailers -- with whom they are frequently on first-name terms -- than in systems where public providers face no competition, Mr Sturgess says. The results are safer jails and lower rates of reoffending. Serco is expected to bid for the contracts to operate Cessnock prison, in the Hunter Valley, and Parklea prison, in western Sydney, when the jails are privatised this year. The company already operates one jail in Victoria and one in Western Australia. The decision by NSW Premier Nathan Rees to privatise the two prisons has aroused heated opposition from public sector unions and the Greens, and is opposed by a minority of MPs in the Labor caucus. The privatisation of the jails is being driven by Prisons Minister John Robertson, who led the campaign against power privatisation as a union leader. Mr Sturgess's submission to the upper house inquiry links private jail services in Britain to the "decency agenda" pursued by former British prime minister Tony Blair. "Contract prisons in the UK are more humane, partly because government demanded a higher standard when writing the original contracts, partly because price was not allowed to dominate the procurement process, and partly because the political and policy environment at the time when the market was first established was focused on the quality of prison life," the submission from Serco argues. As NSW cabinet chief under former Liberal premier Nick Greiner between 1988 and 1992, Mr Sturgess drove a reform agenda that included the corporatisation of government enterprises such as the railways and electricity transmission. He told The Australian yesterday the British experience showed governments could use competition in prison services as a way to set higher standards, not just to get better value for money. "It gives a government an opportunity to say, 'What kind of prisons do we want here?'," Mr Sturgess said. He said the inmates in low- and medium-security prisons in Britain had been allowed to hold duplicate keys to their own cells, which improved both efficiency and decency. "If (the warder) is the only one with a key, then every time a prisoner wants to go in and out of their cell you've got to send somebody to look at it," he said. "This way, the inmate has the dignity of having private space and a greater sense of security." The higher proportion of women officers in private jails had changed the atmosphere. "The difference is that if you've got a prison full of males, with all the testosterone pumping around, people will attempt to man up," he said. "You're not going to get any credit for assaulting a woman." While such arguments will confound critics of prison privatisation on the Left, Mr Sturgess, as a stalwart of NSW politics, knows another obstacle will be the tough-on-crime stand of the major parties. "The objective has got to be to reduce the cycle of reoffending," Mr Sturgess said. "If the consequence of failing to address quality issues is that we do not break the cycle of reoffending, we're actually increasing the crime problem."

March 6, 2009 The Examiner
THE father of a Government MP who accepted a $2000 donation from a private prison operator is a lobbyist for another company bidding to run two more NSW jails listed for privatisation. Leo McLeay, whose son Paul also chaired a committee that reviewed private prison contracts, appears on the NSW Premier's Department lobbyist register as a consultant for Enhance Corporate. Enhance lists Serco as a client. Serco, a multinational that runs a jail in Western Australia, has lodged an expression of interest with the NSW Government to run Parklea and Cessnock jails. But both Leo McLeay, a former speaker of the House of Representatives, and Serco say Enhance Corporate is not involved in lobbying for the jails contract. A spokeswoman for Serco, Emma Needham, said the company had engaged another lobbying firm, Government Relations Australia, for the contract. "We are not using Enhance on this project," Ms Needham told the Herald. "Our most recent relationship with them was earlier this year. They were advising us on transport issues. That work concluded earlier this week." Mr McLeay confirmed he had worked with Serco but "on a small scoping study". He said: "It is completely unrelated to prisons." According to a list posted by the NSW Department of Commerce, four other companies have also tendered for the contract. They are GSL Australia, Management and Training Corporation, the London-based Sodexo and GEO Group Australia, which donated $45,000 to the Labor Party before the state election in 2007 and which Paul McLeay said had paid for a table at one of his fund-raising dinners. Leo McLeay's firm lists several blue-chip corporations and organisations as clients in NSW, including Cisco Systems, Lend Lease, United Group, the Australian Rugby League and the Law Society. The executive director of the group is the former Queensland deputy premier, Jim Elder, who quit politics in late 2000 after being caught up in an electoral fraud scandal. An associate director is Chris Ellison, the former justice minister for the Howard government. Meanwhile, NSW prison officers will begin overtime bans at Long Bay jail this morning, with staff at Parklea, Grafton and other prisons expected to impose similar bans over the weekend. The officers are angry about comments made last week by Ron Woodham, the Corrective Services Commissioner, to an upper house inquiry into the proposed privatisation of Cessnock and Parklea jails, in which he accused them of the "manipulation" of overtime rosters. "Commissioner Woodham has repeatedly claimed that prison officers are chasing overtime, when the reality is the prisons rely on overtime because of low staff levels," said the chairman of the Prison Officers Vocational Branch, Matt Bindley.

August 7, 2006 Sharewatch
Support services company Serco Group PLC confirmed today it has held talks with potential investors over the possible sale of its investments in some of its private finance initiative (PFI) projects. The company, which was responding to media reports, said it would retain management of the PFI projects and the associated long-term service contracts in the event of any sale. It added there was no certainty that any deals will be agreed. Serco is talking about selling the majority of its PFI equity investments to I2, the joint venture fund set up by Barclays Private Equity and SG Corporate & Investment Banking, according to the Financial Times. Serco plans to dispose of seven of its 11 PFI equity investments, which are understood to be worth more than 70 mln stg, the newspaper reported. It is understood the investments up for sale include Serco\'s equity in the Joint Services Command and Staff College, a flagship PFI project, and the company\'s equity stake in Premier Prisons, the private prisons and correctional services contractor, although Serco\'s involvement in those projects would continue.

June 12, 2003
Support services group Serco has taken Wackenhut Correction Corporation (WCC) to court over the future of Premier Custodial Group, their joint-owned subsidiary The court action began just days after Group 4 sold its interest in WCC back to the company.  The companies are in dispute over the future of Premier's UK operations following the take-over of Wackenhut, WCC's parent company by Group 4 earlier this year. The action began on 6 May the court is expected to reach its decision by the end of the month.  Serco is claiming that the take-over, which had placed the 57% of WCC formerly owned by Wackenhut under Group 4's control, triggered a clause in the original contract agreement which allows it to buy out WCC's half of the company at 90% of fair market value.  A Serco spokesman said: "As far as we are concerned, Group 4's buy-out of Wackenhut Corporation triggered the shareholder's agreement and we are intending to exercise that."  Premier has won three PFI contracts to build and run prisons, making it one of the largest players in the PFI corrections market, along with the Sodexho-owned United Kingdom Detention Services and Group 4's own Global Solutions Limited.  (Public Private Finance)

Prisoner Tagging
Group 4 Securicor, Serco
17 May 2013 www.bbc.co.uk

Serco and G4S face billing probe over electronic tagging. The £700m tagging contracts were signed in 2004. Two major private security firms face an investigation into whether they were overpaid for contracts to electronically tag criminals. G4S and Serco will be investigated after Ministry of Justice officials identified potential "billing" issues. Justice Secretary Chris Grayling said the companies had promised to reimburse his department if errors had been made. Both firms defended their services and said they were co-operating fully with the audit. The contracts are worth £107m a year but unions say this could rise to more than £1bn by 2015. Report within weeks Mr Grayling said potential issues had been thrown up during the retendering process for the contract to track offenders by satellite. Electronic tagging is used to monitor criminals when they are released and to make sure they stick to any curfews. Offenders have the tag attached to their ankle and their movements recorded via a monitoring unit in their home. Any curfew breaches or interference with the tag is reported to a control centre. "I take this issue very seriously and my priority is to ensure that taxpayers' money is spent appropriately and delivers value for money," the justice secretary said. But Keith Vaz, chair of the influential Home Affairs Select Committee, accused the government of failing to monitor the contracts "despite knowing the difficulties with G4S". "G4S and Serco currently hold 17 contracts with the Home Office and it is essential a complete audit of these contracts is now conducted," Mr Vaz said. Auditors Price Waterhouse Coopers will look at information supplied to the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) by the two companies during the tendering process and the department's management of the contract. They are expected to report back on their findings within six weeks. "Our suppliers have told me that they take this seriously too," Mr Grayling added. "They are co-operating fully and they have given me clear assurances that if any adjustment is required to charges made to date, this will be put right promptly and repayments made." 'Rush to privatise' In a statement, G4S said it was carrying out the electronic monitoring of offenders in a "completely open and transparent way". "We have worked with successive governments to provide electronic monitoring services and under the current agreement, which started in 2005, we estimate we have delivered savings to the UK taxpayer of more than £2 billion," the statement said. Serco's Elaine Bailey said the company had "every confidence" in the service provided to the MoJ and would co-operate fully with the audit. But probation officers' union Napo called for the two firms to be "disallowed" from delivering services until the audit was complete, and criticised the government's "rush to privatise the probation service". Government plans to out-source much of the probation service to providers on so-called payment-by-results contracts were recently criticised by senior probation officers. Charities, voluntary groups and private firms like G4S and Serco stand to benefit from the proposals.

August 29, 2011 UKPA
Two members of staff at a private security firm have been sacked after an electronic tag was put on an offender's false leg, the company said. Christopher Lowcock, 29, wrapped his prosthetic limb in a bandage and fooled G4S staff who failed to carry out the proper tests when they set up the tag and monitoring equipment at his Rochdale home. Lowcock could then simply remove his leg - and the tag - whenever he wanted to breach his court-imposed curfew for driving and drug offences, as well as possession of an offensive weapon. A second G4S officer who went to check the monitoring equipment also failed to carry out the proper test. Managers became suspicious last month, but when they returned to the address a third time Lowcock had already been arrested and was back in custody accused of driving while banned and without insurance. A G4S spokeswoman said: "G4S tags 70,000 subjects a year on behalf of the Ministry of Justice. Given the critical nature of this service we have very strict procedures in place which all of our staff must follow. "In this individual's case two employees failed to adhere to the correct procedures when installing the tag. Had they done so, they would have identified his prosthetic leg. Failure to follow procedure is a serious disciplinary offence, and the two employees responsible for the installation of the tag have now been dismissed." A Ministry of Justice spokesman added: "We expect the highest level of professionalism from all our contractors, and there are strict guidelines which must be followed when tagging offenders. "Procedures were clearly not followed in this case and G4S have taken action against the staff involved. Two thousand offenders are tagged every week and incidents like this are very rare."

June 3, 2008 Scunthorpe Telegraph
A PENSIONER faced being tagged as criminal and raided by police when a security firm turned up at the wrong address. Michael Chafer (65), of Hindon Walk, Scunthorpe, received a visit from Group 4 Securicor after the firm was given the wrong details. The company, which issues tags on behalf of the Home Office, has apologised to Mr Chafer for the mistake, which happens in just one per cent of tagging cases. The tag was meant for a juvenile who had given a false address. Mr Chafer was woken at 9pm on Friday by someone knocking on his bedroom window. Afraid of what could happen, he let the man into his property in the hope that the situation would be resolved. He said: "I tried to tell him that there must have been some kind of mistake as they had the right address and first name but the wrong last name. "The man told me that if he did not tag me the police would be round within two hours knocking my back door down." Mr Chafer had to make a signed statement before the Group 4 man would leave. "It was so distressing for my wife and I. I have been a law-abiding citizen all my life. I have never even received a parking ticket so I was so shocked when the man turned up on my doorstep with an electronic tag." Mr Chafer later contacted the police, suspicious that he may have been the victim of a bogus caller. "The man was unshaven and did not have a uniform on. As everything happened so quickly I did not think to ask for ID, or that he may have been a bogus caller, but afterwards it started playing on my mind." A spokesman for Humberside Police said: "We would like to commend this man for having the nous to get in touch with us and tell us he had a visit from a suspicious caller. "The man did receive what he deemed to be a suspicious call and he reported this to police but this turned out to be an innocent mistake." A Group 4 Securicor spokeswoman said she wanted to apologise to Mr Chafer for the inconvenience and the stress the mistake may have caused, saying it happened in only one per cent of cases. "We are sorry for the stress caused and we would like to offer our sincere apologise to Mr Chafer. "The address given by the prison service was wrong. "The person in question has now been tagged." Approximately 11,000 people are tagged in Britain at any one time. The system works by attaching an electronic device to the subject's ankle, which transmits a signal. If the subject is not back in their house for a curfew either the local authority, the probation service or the police are alerted immediately. Mr Chafer was shaken by the event but realises it could have had more serious consequences. "It was very upsetting and it is also scary to think that someone from the prison service is not doing their job properly. "The situation could have been far worse if it had been someone worse off than myself and more vulnerable. I just don't know what they would have done."

July 7, 2007 Daily Mail
Alarming failures in the way that terror suspects are kept under surveillance by electronic tagging have been revealed. Staff working for the company responsible for maintaining a round-the-clock watch on individuals linked to terrorism have no idea who they are monitoring. And the system itself frequently crashes - sometimes, it is claimed for as long as eight hours at a time. As security chiefs continued their investigations into the terror threat following the failed London and Glasgow airport bombing attacks, it emerged that: •The 'eye' which monitors the tagged suspects relies on the mobile phone network operated by O2 - making it vulnerable to a complete crash whenever the phone system goes down. •The system is rendered useless when some offenders take a bath - allowing them to use it as an excuse for avoiding detection. •Anonymity orders set by courts mean that terror suspects are referred to by staff as the "Alphabet Men' - Mr A or Mr B - keeping their real identity a secret from those monitoring their movements. •Offenders can remove the metal tag by melting it with a cigarette lighter. Last night the Justice Ministry pledged a change in 'operational procedures' in response to what it described as 'very serious allegations', while Opposition MPs demanded a Commons statement. The BBC's Panorama programme will reveal its own investigation into the tagging system, after an undercover reporter got a job at the Norwich headquarters of Serco, which has the £100million contract to run the Government's Home Detention Scheme. Serco is also responsible for keeping track of a number of the 17 terrorism suspects subject to control orders imposed by British courts as an emergency measure after the Government found it impossible to hold them without trial. At any one time, 2,700 criminals are supposed to be closely monitored under the tagging regime to ensure they do not leave home during curfew hours, which are usually between 7pm and 7am. The Mail on Sunday has separately been told that one network failure, rendering the tagging system unworkable in large parts of the country, lasted for eight hours after the O2 signal went down. Last night Serco denied the failure lasted that long, saying it had lasted for 'no more than an hour'. Offenders who abuse the tagging system also have aget out<$$> ready-made excuse - because the tags do not work in the bath. If an alarm signals that the subject has absconded, Serco staff who phone up his or her home address to check up are often told that the missing person is 'in the bath', where the system may not work. The company said that this only occurred if the bath was made of cast iron. But most older baths common in rented properties are made of cast iron. Panorama reporter Irene Kyme kept a diary of her time working for Serco, which has 29,000 employees in the UK and dozens of multi- million contracts with Whitehall departments and councils. The diary is not included in the programme to be shown on Tuesday but has been disclosed to The Mail on Sunday. Her entry for February 21 reads: "One of my team-mates took a call from O2 today who told her all of the network in the country might go down temporarily. This would mean losing contact with all of the [electronic tagging] boxes in the country. Her entry for the next day says: "I had assumed this [network failure] had not happened because I heard no more about it. "But today we all received several calls from subjects [tag wearers] saying their boxes had rung a couple of times and then stopped." On March 5 Kyme wrote: "More O2 signal problems tonight. We were given a pile of papers with hundreds of postcodes that had serious outages where we could not monitor the boxes. It was because O2 was doing engineering work all over the country. "I would have thought they would have arranged for a back-up system if they knew they could not rely on the O2 mobile phone signal." According to Kyme, the network was down for eight hours between 10pm and 6am. Serco, however, says the cut-out lasted for 'no more than an hour'. Liberal Democrat MP Bob Russell, a member of the Commons Home Affairs Select Committee, said: "People who come before the courts should not be handed over as a commodity to private companies that run private prisons, private prison vehicles or electronic tagging and whose motive is profit. "There is clearly something wrong with the electronic tagging system which needs to be looked at urgently by the Home Office and the Ministry of Justice. "I shall be raising this with the Select Committee. Whether it's somebody in breach of an ASBO or somebody more serious like a potential terrorist suspect, we particularly need to know whether any of those tagged can induce a malfunction. "This would be worrying at any time, but concerns have been heightened by the failed terrorist attacks of the past week." A Ministry of Justice spokesman said: "These are very serious allegations and any failures will be thoroughly investigated. Officials will be working with contractors to ensure that lessons are learned, with changes made to operational procedures where appropriate." A Serco spokesman said: "We regret that the BBC over the course of five months have repeatedly refused to make their material available to us so we can address any issues that arise. "We will investigate the matters they raise and where necessary take action. If the BBC has identified areas for improvement, we will of course act on this." He added: "Even if the phone signal does go down, there are back-up systems to make sure that contact and monitoring is maintained. "As soon as the connection is restored, all the information about the offender's whereabouts during the period in question will be automatically downloaded to the control centre."

June 1, 2007 Oxford Mail
A teenager who stole car keys and drove away the owners' vehicles during a spate of night-time burglaries has been jailed. The 16-year-old from Bicester breached a court-imposed curfew to commit more burglaries, Banbury Youth Court heard. The teenager, who cannot be named, admitted breaking into a house in Cypress Gardens, Bicester, and stealing car keys before driving away the owner's Vauxhall Corsa on April 6. He asked for four other burglaries in the Southwold area of Bicester to be taken into consideration. They included three burglaries in Spruce Drive and one in Sycamore Gardens between April 16 and 26. The court heard that the items taken included four sets of car keys, three vehicles, two mobile phones, a laptop computer, electrical items, a handbag, credit cards and alcohol. He was given a 10-month detention and training order. Carolyn Oakley, prosecuting, said the youth was caught after a member of the public spotted him acting suspiciously around a car stolen in the first burglary and reported the registration number to police. The court also heard the teenager had a previous conviction for a house burglary and had breached his curfew to commit the first two offences. Peter Gotch, defending, said: "Group 4 security did not inform the Youth Offending Team about these breaches so they were not able to take action."

March 23, 2007 The Telegraph
Ministers have been forced to act after receiving disturbing evidence of equipment failures and doctored record-keeping within Group 4 Securicor Justice Services, which operates 60 per cent of tags for offenders released early under the Home Detention Curfew scheme. A 130-page dossier obtained by a BBC journalist, who worked undercover for five months in the security company's Nottingham operations centre, includes the following allegations: A manager secretly taped saying that three paedophiles were not being monitored. A prisoner incorrectly returned to jail for seven weeks because of a blunder by the security company. A violent offender breached his bail conditions by going into a pub 10 minutes after removing his tag the night before his court appearance. An employee mocked Victor Bates, a campaigner against tagging whose wife Marian was shot dead in their jewellery shop after the gunman's accomplice had ripped off his tag. A prisoner convicted of indecent assault on home leave was unmonitored for several days because his tagging equipment failed. The revelations will further undermine confidence in tagging after figures revealed that inmates let out under the system committed more than 1,000 violent crimes including four manslaughters, one murder, 56 woundings and more than 700 assaults since it was introduced in 1999. The investigation also discovered evidence of staff fabricating records to save money. G4S is paid around £45 million a year by the Home Office to administer the curfew system. After being confronted with the evidence G4S, which has admitted there was faulty equipment, has been forced to apologise and has suspended five employees in Nottingham. A spokesman for the Home Office said: "Public protection is the Government's first priority. The findings of this programme are of concern. We are reviewing the contract and will be asking G4S urgent questions to ensure that these allegations are thoroughly investigated and issues arising are addressed." The investigation by a team from BBC Inside Out East Midlands disclosed that the monitoring boxes in tagged offenders homes, which relay information about their movements, routinely broke down. One factor in the failure of the system could be that G4S, which has admitted there was a batch of faulty equipment in Nottingham, uses the mobile telephone network technology rather than fixed lines. Steve Green, the Chief Constable of Nottinghamshire, said the Home Office had to establish whether the Nottingham problems were nationwide. "I want to urgently know if is this a Nottingham problem or a G4S problem. If it is a G4S problem and this is the way company is run then that puts a huge responsibility on the Home Office to tackle and address because that is not acceptable," he said. Ian Ridgely, chief operations officer at G4S, said: "We believe in a small number of cases that we may not have been monitoring to the level that we would expect to, we apologise for that, we accept that. From that point of view we recognise that the Home Office requires us to work to a very high standard and of course we are sorry that in some minor number of instances, we may not have operated to those standards."

October 27, 2006 The Times
JOHN REID blocked a move by The Times yesterday to compel him to release the names of two terrorism suspects on the run after breaking house arrest-style orders. Mr Justice Collins criticised the Home Secretary for failing to respond to the media’s initial application and ordered him to pay the costs of the court application. He added: “These proceedings were only rendered necessary by his failure to respond to their initial application.” The Home Office had failed “to give sensible information” to the media at an early stage. The Home Secretary had originally kept secret the escapes of both men, an Iraqi asylum-seeker and a British-born Muslim. Yesterday Mr Justice Collins accepted the Home Office argument that anonymity was necessary because of police concern about the effect on ongoing anti-terrorism operations if the men’s names were released. He said that the issue of anonymity should be kept under review in case circumstances changed. The media organisations who attempted to have the names ban lifted included The Times, other national newspapers and the BBC. It is feared that one of the fugitives, the Iraqi asylum-seeker, has left the country, even though the Home Office has his passport. He is alleged to have been part of a six-man recruitment team sent to Britain to enlist young volunteers to join attacks on British and US troops serving in Iraq. The suspect, who can be identified only as LL, has been on the run since August, when he was under a control order being monitored by Group 4 Securicor. Police are still trying to discover how he managed to abscond before the High Court could announce that he and five other Iraqis had won their appeals against their 18-hour curfews. By the time police arrived at the suspect’s home in the Manchester area to serve a new control order, an hour before the court ruling was made public, LL had already vanished.

October 16, 2006 The Conservative Voice
The 17-year-old was tagged, that is, he had his ankle bracelet - "tagging." The criminal’s leg jewels were to tend to civility under police surveillance, assuring the set-free would behave. That particular teen however must’ve forgotten the purpose of the ankle thing and so killed a 16-year-old girl while wearing the jewels, the latter worn per his bail conditions on a theft charge. This goes on all the time in England. It adds up to more than a thousand "violent offences - including murder and rape - since the controversial scheme was introduced, shocking new figures reveal," per Daily Mail’s Matthew Hickley. It is disgraceful that this Government is happy to put people who are clearly unsuitable for tagging right at the heart of our communities resulting in over 1000 violent offences including 5 deaths. "If tagging is merely used as a means to combat the prison overcrowding crisis then no one wins: the victim gets no justice, the public get no protection, the offender gets no rehabilitation and the whole scheme is undermined," according to Shadow Home Secretary David Davis. Now what to do with Group 4 Securicor Justice Services and Serco Home Affairs, two contractor outfits. They were to pay up £140,000 in financial penalties, "mostly for failing to warn the authorities promptly of breaches." No money in yet.

October 1, 2006 The People
Twenty-five jailbirds went on the run in the past 18 months after giving them the slip. And escapes alone led to fines of £326,000 - £100,000 up on 2004-2005. The latest was armed robber Craig Hickinbottom, 24 - sprung last week by two gunmen from a Reliance security van in Redditch, Worcs. Fines also included more than £1m for getting prisoners to court late and almost £800,000 for other errors. Lib Dem spokesman Nick Clegg said: "Labour can't even manage basic criminal justice system tasks." Harry Fletcher, of the National Association of Probation Officers, said escort duties would be far more reliable if they were returned to the Prison Service.

October 1, 2006 The Observer
An urgent review was under way last night into how a rapist with a history of violence was able to abscond from a hostel in Yorkshire, remove his electronic tag and flee 250 miles to Somerset - despite being classed as one of the most dangerous offenders released from prison under licence. A series of apparent failures to supervise Kelly Edney, which are exposed by The Observer today, are likely to provoke comparisons with a number of recent high-profile cases involving violent offenders who were out on licence and went on to commit further serious crimes. Edney, 26, who was jailed for seven years for the rape of a 16-year-old girl in 1998, was under what the Home Office terms 'enhanced supervision'. He was supposed to be checked on every half an hour by staff at Box Tree Cottage hostel in Bradford, which is run by the Langley House Trust, a charity that works with offenders. His criminal history meant he was subject to a Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangement order, which meant the hostel staff had been warned that he posed a serious risk. In 2004 Edney was jailed for a further four years for making hoax phone calls from prison in which he threatened to blow up Heathrow airport and a number of railway stations. He also has convictions for arson, burglary and assault. Yet last Tuesday night Edney broke off his electronic tag and made for Leeds railway station, where he caught a train to the West Country. He was picked up by police on Friday afternoon in Taunton, Somerset. The Observer has established that Edney was not registered with Group 4 Securicor, the company charged with tagging him, as a high-risk offender, as he should have been under the protection arrangement. This meant the firm treated him as a less serious offender under home curfew.

September 20, 2006 The Independent
A LIVERPOOL man was on the run for 26 days and did not even know it. David Parker was jailed after his mother Ann Marie Patchell took him into a police station, unaware a warrant had been issued for his arrest. Mrs Patchell is now calling for an inquiry into the handling of her son's case. The 22-year-old had earlier been paroled on a tag from Walton jail after serving a six-month sentence for affray and dangerous driving. But, he says, on August 10 the tag fell off as he walked down the stairs at his Fazakerley home. He called Securicor who sent a technician to replace the tag, and Mr Parker continued with his call centre job and curfew. But a month later the second tag came off and he was told to report to Lower Lane police station where he was arrested, returned to Walton and had 26 days added to his sentence. It later emerged a warrant had been issued for his arrest since the first time the tag fell off. Merseyside police say they never received the warrant, otherwise they would not have allowed him to remain at large.

March 16, 2006 Kable's Government Computing
Home Office assumptions about the high performance of tagging equipment, used to monitor prisoners on early release, is based on "woefully inadequate" evidence, MPs on the Public Accounts Committee were told on 15 March 2006. The MPs heard from barristers that two of their clients, released from prison under a home detention curfew, were fitted with electronic tags by Home Office's contractor, Group 4 Securicor (G4S). When both men reported to G4S that the tags had come off due to problems with their straps, they found themselves back in prison. The Home Office rejected the men's appeals against recall to prison and the straps were destroyed, despite the request that they be retained for evidence. Last year the Home Office spent more than £100m on electronic tagging. The system is now integral part of the criminal justice system and there are plans to extend tagging for offenders and asylum seekers. But the MPs heard that although more than 225,000 people have been tagged since 1999, Home Office figures show that only two straps have been tested during that time. Both tests were carried out on a single occasion on 2 July 2004. The committee was following up on a National Audit Office (NAO) report, published in February 2006, which shows that Home Office requirements that contractors carry out manual checks every 28 days, are not adhered to. Two barristers, Ian Wise and Caoilfhionn Gallagher from London's Doughty Street Chambers, go further: "We are not aware of any independent monitoring or auditing of tags and equipment performance once fitted. We are not aware of any independent monitoring of contractors' staff competence at installing and fitting electronic monitoring," they told MPs in a written report submitted at the hearing. Financial penalties imposed on the tagging contractors for poor performance, create an incentive to not to take proper responsibility for problems, said the barristers. Tom Riall, chief executive of tagging supplier Serco Home Affairs, told the committee that in 2005 his company paid the Home Office £41,000 in penalties. G4S managing director David Taylor-Smith said in the last 12 months his company had paid £100,000 in penalties. Taylor-Smith said that most of this was before April 2005, when his company introduced a new national IT system to streamline its processes. Taylor-Smith said he was 100% satisfied with his company's equipment. "We have yet to find an example of someone circumventing the equipment," he said. The barristers believe the current electronic tagging system is poorly structured, with private contractors being responsible for implementing a system and monitoring their own performance. They also claim the NAO's report does not fully examine equipment performance and "does not touch on" human error in fitting tags. "Rigorous and independent scrutiny of electronic monitoring schemes is required," Wise and Gallagher's report said. "Without such scrutiny, it is difficult to assess whether the schemes represent value for money and respect the rights of those most affected by electronic monitoring – those who wear the tags." Conservative MP Richard Bacon, acting chair of the committee, also raised the issue of problems with finalising paperwork so that prisoners can be released. The NAO examined 100 case files. It found that 58 prisoners were granted release under a home detection curfew, but only 28 of these (48%) were released on their eligibility date.

January 29, 2006 UPI
British criminals convicted of assault and burglary are breaking their home curfews unhindered, in some cases staying out for hundreds of hours. The Sunday Times of London reports flaws in the tagging system -- created in 1999 to reduce Britain's prison population -- have been exposed by a monitoring center run by Group 4 Securicor, which oversees most of the 11,000 tagged offenders. The records for one center show 600 criminals -- two-thirds of those the center is supposed to manage -- broke their curfews. Home Office figures show offenders let out of jail early under the home detention curfew scheme may have been responsible for more than 7,000 crimes since Jan. 1999. In one case, a released convict accrued 348 hours of violations -- the equivalent of ignoring his curfew for four weeks in a row -- yet was fined only £45 ($76.50), the newspaper said. In another case, officials took a week to contact a man who had skipped his curfew for 120 hours.

January 19, 2006 IC Surrey
A JUDGE has criticised the system that let a young crook slip off his tag and pose as a plain-clothed policeman, stealing cash from elderly victims while on early release for almost identical crimes. Albert Smith, 19, of Reigate Road, Brockham, was sent back to a young offenders' institution for three years on Friday. In sentencing him at Guildford Crown Court, Judge John Bull QC said the authorities were aware Smith was repeatedly breaching his curfew and going out without his tracker device but did nothing. He said: "If someone had gone to see whether he had a tag on perhaps they might have taken some action and two people might have found they weren't burgled." But Smith had been given only one warning, despite numerous breaches of his home curfew being reported. His repeated non-compliance went unchecked after he told probation and Group 4 security officials what they wanted to hear, allowing him to continue.

Prisoner Transport
Group 4 Securicor (formerly Global Solutions), Reliance, Serco
January 12, 2012 This Is Local London
POLICE are looking for a man who escaped from a security van window as he was being driven to Belmarsh. Tyran Reid, 33, had just appeared at Greenwich Magistrates’ Court and was being driven back to prison in a Serco-Wincanton van on January 6 when he escaped at 4.10pm. Whilst the van was stationary in traffic in Woolwich Road at a junction with Fingal Street, Greenwich, Reid managed to slip through a skylight window.

October 16, 2011 BBC
More than 25,000 cab journeys have taken place since August, Serco said. The Ministry of Justice has admitted a private security firm is using black cabs to take prison inmates to court. The firm, Serco, has a seven-year deal - with a further three-year option - worth up to £420m. But the company has been forced to transport inmates in London and east England in cabs after their computerised booking system failed. Conservative MP Patrick Mercer said he would raise the issue with Home Secretary Theresa May. 'Extraordinarily expensive' -- Mr Mercer said he was worried about the cost of hiring cabs, and the perception defendants were being driven around in luxury. "I just think it is ridiculous that a security company such as Serco misjudges things so badly that prisoners are moved to and fro in black taxis," he said.

August 16, 2011 BBC
An investigation is under way after a prisoner escaped in Hereford while being transported by a security firm. The 17-year-old was being taken from Hereford Youth Court by Reliance on Monday afternoon when he fled in the Aylestone Hill area of the city. He was recaptured later in the evening after a search involving the police helicopter and dogs. Two staff from Reliance were taken to hospital with severe bruising. They were taking the prisoner to Werrington Young Offenders' Institution in Stoke-on-Trent. A statement from Reliance, which is now investigating the escape, said: "We transport and oversee the welfare of 200,000 prisoners every year with incidents of this nature being extremely rare."

July 20, 2011 BBC
The trial of an alleged gang accused of using guns and grenades to intimidate rivals collapsed after two defendants escaped from a prison van. Kirk Bradley and Tony Downes, both 25, were being taken to Liverpool Crown Court when the security van they were in was ambushed by armed men. The van was attacked in Trinity Way, Manchester on Monday morning. Judge Henry Globe, the Recorder of Liverpool, discharged the jury following a 10-week trial. He sent the jurors home after asking if they could ignore Monday's events and consider the case only on the evidence they had heard. Judge Globe said: "In other words, an insufficient number of you have been able to confirm that you will be able to ignore the events of Bradley and Downes' escape from the prison van last Monday. "The events of last Monday are extremely rare and were very unexpected and their impact cannot be underestimated. "The fact of this decision is that the trial simply cannot continue." The judge said it was not clear if the armed men who sprung them from the van were friends or enemies Before being discharged the jury was told that Mr Bradley and Mr Downes remained "at large" and that it was not known whether the armed men who sprung them from the prison van were "friends or enemies" or if they went "willingly or unwillingly".

July 19, 2011 BBC
Police have mounted an international search for two men who escaped from a prison van after it was attacked by an armed gang in Manchester. Kirk Bradley and Tony Downes fled after the gang stopped the van in Trinity Way on Monday morning, attacked the driver and forced him to open the vehicle. The men, both 25 and from Liverpool, were being transported to Liverpool Crown Court, where they were on trial. Police said efforts were being made to see if they have left the country. Bradley and Downes stand accused of conspiracy to possess firearms with intent to endanger life and conspiracy to commit criminal damage with intent to endanger life.

July 18, 2011 BBC
Two prisoners have escaped from a jail van after it was ambushed by armed men on the outskirts of Manchester city centre. A number of men attacked the van in Trinity Way at about 0830 BST, Greater Manchester Police said. They fled in a Saab, which was found abandoned about a mile away in Barrow Street, Salford. A security guard has been taken to hospital but his injuries are not believed to be life threatening. Det Sgt Paul Copplestone urged anyone with information to contact Greater Manchester Police.

February 8, 2011 The Guardian
The Guardian has obtained a training video used by Securicor - now G4S - to instruct guards deporting asylum seekers on flights. The footage forms part of a dossier of evidence produced by G4S whistleblowers. The inaugural flight to Afghanistan should have been a showcase for a multinational company vying for the lucrative contract to deport foreign nationals on behalf of the British government. The plane heading to Kabul on 26 January 2004 had been chartered by a company that would go on to become part of the world's largest private security firm – G4S. Its cargo included refused asylum seekers in handcuffs. A number had their legs bound with tape and had been placed in the first-class cabin. But according to new evidence some of the guards on that flight, recruited to supervise the deportation, had not completed a full training course, and they included a number of inexperienced prison staff. Some had not even received Home Office accreditation. Shocking details about that flight and dozens more are contained in previously unseen evidence to parliament obtained by the Guardian. The documents reveal how G4S employees spent several years raising concerns about the potentially lethal methods being used on refused asylum seekers. The most disturbing technique involved bending deportees over in their seats and placing their head between their legs. The procedure became known within the company as "carpet karaoke" because it would force detainees, struggling for breath, to shout downwards toward the floor. Although an apparently successful method of keeping disruptive detainees quiet, it can lead to a form of suffocation known as positional asphyxia. Its alleged use is documented in written testimony by four G4S whistleblowers, submitted to the home affairs select committee in the aftermath of the death of Jimmy Mubenga, an Angolan who died on a British Airways flight from Heathrow in October last year. The cause of Mubenga's death remains unknown. Passengers on BA flight 77 reported seeing three guards heavily restraining the 46-year-old, who they said had been bent over and complained of breathing difficulties before his collapse. Police later arrested the guards in connection with the death and recently extended their bail until next month. Grievances -- All four whistleblowers have registered personal grievances against G4S, including some that have been settled out of court. Some are understood to have been themselves accused of inappropriate behaviour or later barred from conveying their concerns to the press. However, they now accuse G4S managers of presiding over a "macho" corporate culture that ostracised staff who showed compassion towards detainees or questioned the safety of their treatment. One of the whistleblowers, the company's serving charter operations manager, concedes that his detailed dossier to parliament is likely to result in his dismissal. The dossier records how he repeatedly wrote to his seniors expressing concerns, including one letter in which he stated that some G4S employees were playing "Russian roulette with detainees' lives".

January 15, 2011 The Sun
THREE private security guards were arrested over claims prisoners were sold cocaine - at TWO sprawling courts. The two men and a woman were nicked in swoops hours apart, not thought to be linked. They were suspended by security firm Serco and are on police bail. Cops, Serco and the Prison Service launched a joint operation after "intelligence" was picked up alleging cocaine sales. It is understood the continuing probe also focuses on whether other contraband - including mobiles and SIM cards - was also being supplied.

January 13, 2011 Streatham Guardian
The escape of a dangerous prisoner from a Wimbledon court has sparked an investigation – as magistrates voiced concerns about security at the building. Private security firm Serco, which is contracted to escort prisoners appearing at Wimbledon Magistrates’ Court, has said it will examine how he was able to climb out of the dock to go on the run for 11 days before handing himself in to the police in Battersea on Friday. The man, who was not handcuffed when he appeared in the locked dock last Monday after his arrest in Wandsworth, climbed on to a bench before hauling himself over a plastic wall that supposedly sealed the dock from the rest of court number one. The escape of the 21-year-old from West Norwood prompted police appeals, in which the public were told he was dangerous and should not be approached. He had just been told he was to be kept in custody for two months before facing three charges of robbery, allegedly stealing cash and electrical equipment in Merton and Wandsworth last year, and one of carrying a bladed weapon. One magistrate at the Alexandra Road court said they heard there was not enough security in the court building on the day of the escape. They said: “If he was on the loose I would have to dive under the table.”

October 29, 2010 Financial Times
G4S, the security group, is to be replaced on a £30m-a-year ($48m) contract to deport detainees from the UK, the Home Office said. The loss comes after three security guards employed by G4S were arrested over the death of an Angolan man last week. However, the UK Border Agency said its decision to award a new four-year “escort services” contract to Reliance Security rather than G4S, which had done the job for the past five years, had no connection with the incident. Jimmy Mubenga, a 46-year-old deportee, died after he collapsed onboard a British Airways flight that was preparing to depart to his homeland from London’s Heathrow airport. The Home Office declined to disclose the sums involved in the G4S or Reliance contracts, citing commercial confidentiality. However, G4S said that it would take a hit of £30m in revenues and £2m in profits next year – a fraction of the company’s £7.4bn forecast sales and £393.7m pre-tax profits in the year to the end of December. Shares in G4S fell 4.8p at 261.7p. G4S said it was disappointed at the decision to hand the contract to its privately owned rival.

May 28, 2010 London Evening Standard
A CROWN court security officer has been jailed for six years for supplying defendants in his cells with drugs and mobile phones which they could later sell in prison. Daniel Birkett, 30, would provide the prisoners with cannabis, cocaine and pay-as-you-go phones, which they would hide in their clothes or internally before returning to HMP Wandsworth. Birkett received up to £150 a time for these exchanges at Blackfriars crown court holding cells. Inner London crown court heard that mobile phones are a "vital commodity" in prisons and change hands for up to £500. Inmates use them to keep up criminality behind bars and potentially to intimidate witnesses. Drugs can be sold in prison for three times their street value. Birkett, who worked for security firm Serco, was caught last December after another security officer found wraps of drugs in a defendant's waistband. A further search revealed two hollowed batteries concealed in his body containing 10 more wraps of drugs. All the security staff's lockers were searched and drugs and a large tub of Vaseline were found in Birkett's locker, as well as two mobile phones. Birkett, who admitted charges of conspiracy to supply Class A and B drugs and to convey a list B article (the phones), claimed that he was "frightened of the prisoners" and that they had threatened to hurt his family if he told police or refused to co-operate. However, Judge Roger Chapple said Birkett, of North Woolwich, had entered the conspiracy "willfully and for financial gain".

January 4, 2010 BBC
A prisoner has admitted escaping from the crown court in Swansea after using a shoe lace to tamper with a lock. James Stevenson, who is 30, also admitted separate charges of stealing 28 gold rings and assault with intent to resist arrest. Stevenson, who fled the Guildhall court in October after being given a five-year term for firearm offences appeared via video link at Swansea Crown Court. He also asked Judge John Diehl to be sentenced via video link. The judge said he would be sentenced as soon as possible and that sentencing could be as early as Tuesday as no pre-sentence report was required. The court heard Stevenson had used a shoe lace to tamper with a latch on his cell door during the escape. He remained at large for 17 days before being arrested. Following his arrest questions were raised about security at the court building. Judge Diehl heard private security firm Reliance had completed its own internal investigation into the escape, and he would be provided with a copy at the sentencing hearing.

November 2, 2009 Daily Mail
An illegal immigrant rapist was on the run today after escaping guards while being taken to the toilet. Imtiaz Hussain, 44, said to be a 'serious threat to women', was being escorted to the Pakistan High Commission in London when he fled. He had been at a meeting to get a new passport so he could be deported at the end of nine-year sentence for trying to rape two women at knifepoint. Hussain was being escorted by security guards from G4S Care and Justice Services when he fled the building through a window on Friday afternoon. He was last seen running across Sloane Square. A Home Office spokesman said they could not confirm whether he had been handcuffed at the time, or how many security officers were with him before he escaped. DCI Brent Lancaster said: 'This individual is believed to be very dangerous and we need to apprehend him as soon as possible.

October 5, 2009 BBC
A "dangerous" prisoner who escaped from a Swansea court just after being sentenced had previously broken out of prison, it has been reported. James Stevenson, 29, who has a previous conviction for manslaughter, fled court on Friday after being given a five-year jail term for a firearms offence. The South Wales Evening Post has reported he had briefly escaped from a prison in Dorset in 2005. Questions are now being asked about the security at the Guildhall building. Rene Kinzett, leader of the Conservative group on Swansea council, said the escape was worrying for residents of the city. South Wales Police have warned the public not to approach him. In 2002, Stevenson killed his mother's boyfriend by stuffing newspaper in his mouth and gagging him. He then dumped his body in a river. At his trial later that year, Stevenson denied murder but pleaded guilty to manslaughter and was sentenced to five years. He escaped from a Dorset prison in 2005 but was caught after half an hour, the Evening Post said. It is thought Stevenson managed to leave a basement custody suite at the Guildhall building before fleeing on Friday afternoon after being jailed for breaching the terms of his licence and possessing a .410 shotgun. He should have been taken from Swansea to Cardiff prison to begin his sentence, with the private security firm Reliance making the transfer, before he absconded at about 1300 BST. According to an eyewitness, he made his way across the flat roof of the court building before clambering down a drainpipe and escaping into the city. Reliance has launched an investigation into how Stevenson was able to escape and is working with police to return him to custody. The firm said incidents like this were "extremely rare". The National Offender Management Service is also carrying out its own investigation. The court building he absconded from is often used as an overspill for the nearby main court. Sanctions -- Mr Kinzett said that Stevenson's escape raised a number of questions, including whether the Guildhall was secure enough for high-profile cases. He also wanted to know what role Reliance played in what happened and what sanctions it could face if it is at fault. "I am very worried that people of Swansea have been put at risk," he said. "They have been exposed to a huge risk through the escape of this dangerous man and obviously people need to co-operate with the police."

June 11, 2009 This Is Nottingham
A SUICIDAL prisoner ran through the grounds of a primary school naked in a violent escape bid. Patrick Jones, 29, had just assaulted two prison guards in their van after they saved his life. Nottingham Crown Court heard he was "lashing out like a crazed animal" when they brought him round from a failed suicide attempt. "He broke free, ran off down the motorway embankment into some trees," said Dawn Pritchard, prosecuting. "He removed his jeans and ran off naked. He ran through the grounds of Trowell Primary School naked at 12.15pm on April 16 last year. He was located near Cossall village." Global Solutions custody officers Maxine Starbuck and Richard Carrington stopped their van 15-20 minutes into their journey when Jones made a "half-hearted" suicide attempt with a ligature. The court heard the father-of-two dropped forward and went blue. The officers cut the ligature from his neck and he took a gasp for air. Mr Carrington was hit in the legs and Ms Starbuck's hair was pulled. "He said there were voices in his head to kill himself and that's what he intended to do," said Miss Pritchard. Jones was being driven from Derby Magistrates' Court to Nottingham Prison when the drama unfolded. The officers were aware he was considered a suicide risk. Judge Dudley Bennett sentenced Jones to nine months in prison consecutive to a three-year sentence he is serving for burglary. The judge said that prison officers had to be protected from violence. "If you offer them violence you serve a sentence for it." Jones, of St Giles Road, Derby, pleaded guilty to escape and two counts of assault causing actual bodily harm on the officers. Mark Watson, in mitigation, said: "He was very unwell at the time of this offence and that impacted on his behaviour."

May 27, 2009 Morning Star
The Home Office has come under fire as allegations have emerged that an African national was so badly beaten by guards during an attempted deportation this month that he required hospital treatment. The shocking claims have raised further questions over the abuse of asylum-seekers in detention and the Home Office's deportation protocols. The man, who cannot be identified for fear of reprisals, is alleged to have suffered vicious beatings as the authorities attempted to deport him from Britain to his native country via France. He was left bleeding and battered to such a severe degree at the hands of G4S - formerly Group 4 - security guards that a French pilot refused to allow him on the flight which would have returned him to Africa, supporters claim. As a result, the man has now been returned to detention in Britain, where it is feared that there will be yet another attempt to deport him. The allegations, made to the Morning Star by anti-deportation campaigners on Wednesday, add to a litany of cases in which detainees, overwhelmingly of African origin, have suffered racist and physical abuse at the hands of state-sanctioned private security personnel. So grave is the problem that campaigning group Medical Justice compiled a report on the issue - Outsourcing Abuse - which was published last year. The report documented over 300 cases where abuse was alleged, often at the hands of security firms operating government contracts for the "escort" and removal of deportees. Summarising its findings, Medical Justice stated: "While the practice of using private companies for running detention centres and escorting of forced removals may contribute to a certain level of 'see no evil, hear no evil,' our understanding is that the Home Office is aware of an unacceptable level of alleged abuse through its own complaints procedure. "We consider the evidence in this report reveals what may amount to state-sanctioned violence, for which ultimate responsibility lies with the Home Office." In the latest case, the detainee was deported as far as Paris, having been handcuffed, had fingers jammed into his nostrils and been beaten and stamped on by guards. So blatant were his injuries that the Air France pilot refused to take the injured man on the flight. This also does not appear to be an isolated incident. The report gives one example of abuse as follows: "The officers kicked and punched him and kneed him in the nose. He was then placed in the segregation unit and left naked and without a mattress to sleep on. "Later that evening, the applicant attempted to kill himself. He was visited by police officers who convinced him to withdraw his complaint. Under duress, the applicant agreed." Last November, an investigation was launched into allegations that Cameroonian Anselme Noumbiwa suffered similar brutality. He too was deported to Paris where an Air France pilot refused to fly him to Africa and contacted police over the barbarity of his treatment. A UK Border Agency spokesman said: "UKBA takes all allegations of assault extremely seriously. We expect the highest levels of integrity from those carrying out duties on our behalf and the majority of staff carry out their roles with professionalism and integrity. "We are committed to ensuring that removals are always carried out in the most sensitive way possible, treating those being removed with courtesy and dignity. "Any allegations of misconduct are thoroughly investigated and all allegations of abuse are referred to the police. If evidence of alleged abuse during a removal is presented to us retrospectively we will fully investigate the claims." The Morning Star contacted G4S for comment but, by time of press, it had not replied.

May 11, 2009 BBC
A prison van driver has been cleared of murdering a woman who was dancing in front of his vehicle. Andrew Curtis was also cleared of the manslaughter of Nyaraui Benjamin. Ms Benjamin, described as "eccentric" and prone to dancing in traffic, was trapped under the van in Brixton, south-west London, in April 2008. Mr Curtis, 49, told the Old Bailey that Miss Benjamin's death had been an accident, as he could not see her after she moved his windscreen wiper. During the trial he said: "If she was in front of my vehicle, as we now know, I could not see her and I did not see her." Judge Martin Stephens said it had been a "most difficult and unusual case" for everyone involved.

May 7, 2009 Hounslow Guardian
A scarfaced prisoner who escaped from court after duping guards by telling them he was desperate for the toilet has handed himself in. Roger Buckingham appeared at Isleworth Crown Court charged with a string of offences. These included a serious assault and car theft and was warned he could be jailed if convicted. But soon after appearing in front of a judge, the 26-year-old fled. He spent less than 24 hours on the run before handing himself to HMS Wormwood Scrubs yesterday morning and taken back into custody. On Tuesday Buckingham fooled prison guards by begging them to let him use the toilet before they left the court, and then escaped on foot at around 4.20pm. Buckingham faced charges of aggravated vehicle theft, taking a vehicle without consent, assault occasioning actual bodily harm, another charge of theft and attempting to steal a car, all in February. It is not known how Buckingham fled from prison guards. Police launched a London wide appeal for Buckingham, who has three scars across his face and cops warned members of the public he could be dangerous. A spokesman for Serco, which transports prisoners to and from court, said: “We can confirm that a prisoner who was in the care of our court escort service escaped from Isleworth Crown Court. “We are working closely with the Metropolitan Police and the court authorities to ensure that this individual is returned to custody as quickly as possible. “This incident is regrettable and we will conduct a full investigation into how it occurred.” Serco refused to comment on how Buckingham gave its guards the slip. A Ministry of Justice spokesman confirmed it was investigating the circumstances which led to Buckingham’s escape.

April 29, 2009 Bromley Times
A PRISON van driver ran over and killed a woman in "a moment of complete madness" after she started dancing in the street, a court heard. Andrew Curtis, 49, of The Ridge, Orpington, edged forward into Naomi Benjamin, 34, until she slipped and fell under the wheels of the vehicle on April 22 last year. He then drove over her body, twisting her head until her neck was broken and dragging her 10 metres along the road, jurors were told at his murder trial at the Old Bailey this week. Horrified witnesses surrounded the driver and beat on the sides of the van in anger after the incident in Brixton. Bystander Susan Fraser, giving evidence on Tuesday, said: "She was in front of the prison van dancing, waving [her] arms around and shouting. There was a lot of action going on. "The prison van eventually moved forwards and Naomi moved backwards. The van moved forwards again and almost touched her. She was obstructing the vehicle, she was shouting but I couldn't understand any words." She then jumped up and pulled the passenger windscreen wiper down before tumbling to the floor. Ms Fraser added: "That was when the prison van escalated. She fell under the wheel and the van continued moving up the hill and she was underneath it. I was in shock. "I remained there until she was run over and I made my way towards the van. "There was an immediate rush of people towards the van, screaming and shouting at the van to stop. "It was very nasty. Things got a bit nasty." Curtis, who had worked for Serco for six years, was transporting prisoners from a court in Westminster to Brixton prison during rush hour. He had stopped at the traffic lights outside the KFC in the middle of the three-lane carriageway heading southbound on Brixton Road. Prosecutor Simon Denison said: "She was killed suddenly and utterly needlessly by this defendant in a moment of complete madness. "She slipped and fell in front of the centre of the van. You may think he must have realised what had happened but quite incredibly he continued to drive the van forward and he went over her." The victim was still alive when the first paramedic arrived but by the time she could be moved from under the vehicle she was dead. Describing Ms Benjamin, Mr Denison said: "She was well known in the community, a local character. She was often dressed in brightly coloured clothes. She was outgoing and a loud person. Unfortunately she was often drunk." The trial continues.

March 30, 2009 The Sun
AN arsonist was on the run last night after escaping from jail by clinging to the underside of a prison van. Frenchman Julien Chautard, 39, was among ten lags who had just arrived at Pentonville jail. Chautard, who was starting a seven-year stretch at the North London prison after being convicted on Friday, crept under the van belonging to security firm Serco while the others filed into a reception area. A source said: “The van went into the prison’s secure area, then they unloaded the prisoners. “Normally as prisoners come off the vehicle and into the building there is somebody who searches and escorts them — but there wasn’t this time.. “Chautard didn’t go into the building and the van left. “When the van was checked afterwards they found foot prints and finger hold marks on the underside.”

January 16, 2009 BBC
A man facing assault and burglary charges who went on the run after a prison van was stopped by an armed man has been recaptured. Wayne Joseph Connor, 20, fled when the van was stopped a short distance from Feltham Young Offenders' Institution in west London on Monday. A Serco van was forced to pull over by two men, one of them with a shotgun. Police said Connor was arrested at the Clumber Park Hotel in Worksop, Nottinghamshire. Shortly after midnight detectives from the Specialist Crime Directorate of the Metropolitan Police along with officers from Nottinghamshire Police entered the hotel room and arrested Connor. He had been missing since Monday when the Serco van was stopped near the Clockhouse Roundabout in Feltham at about 0730 GMT. Two men, one of them armed with a shotgun, threatened the security staff before driving off with Connor. He had been due to appear at Woolwich Crown Court accused of three charges of assault and three of burglary.

January 12, 2009 BBC
A suspected burglar escaped when an armed man held up a prison van carrying him to court. The Serco van was forced to pull over and two men wearing balaclavas smashed the driver's window and threatened him with shotgun. Prisoner Wayne Connor, 20, was driven away after the raid, a short distance from Feltham Young Offenders' Institution in west London. No shots were fired and the driver has been treated for cuts and bruises. Mr Connor has been charged with racially aggravated burglary and two counts of actual bodily harm. An unknown number of other offenders were also being transported, but were secured at the scene, police said. Prisoner transfer -- Police investigating the raid on Monday morning have cordoned off several streets near Bedfont Road. A Metropolitan Police spokesman said: "Local officers and London Ambulance Service attended. "The driver of the van is believed to have been assaulted. "He was taken by London Ambulance Service to hospital and is in a stable condition." The van was driving suspects from Feltham Young Offenders' Institution to Woolwich Crown Court, said a spokesman for Serco, the private firm contracted to provide prisoner transfers. Another member of staff was unhurt during the incident.

December 23, 2008 New Ham Recorder
A "DANGEROUS" sex offender has escaped from court, prompting a warning from police not to approach him. Paul Reid, 32, formerly of Haldane Road, East Ham, is a convicted rapist and burglar. He was sentenced to two years in jail for indecent assault at Inner London Crown Court last week. He was at the same court on Monday for an appeal hearing when he escaped while in the custody of a private security firm which moves prisoners. It is at least the third time Reid has managed to flee from custody. In September 2001 he vaulted the dock at Snaresbrook crown Court and made good his escape through the judge's chambers. He was arrested next day in East Ham. Two months earlier he was handed a six month sentence for an earlier escape from Redbridge Court. In July 1997 Reid was caged for six years after a jury found him guilty of beating and raping a 16-year-old girl in Ilford Police said Reid is known to frequent the Plaistow neighbourhoods. He is black, 5ft 10in tall and muscular. He was last seen wearing a black fleece jacket and blue jeans. A spokesman for private security company Serco, responsible fro transferring prisoners, said: "This incident is regrettable and we will conduct a full investigation into how it occurred. "We are working closely with the Metropolitan Police and the court authorities to ensure that this individual is returned to custody as quickly as possible.

December 16, 2008 Guardian
A Kurdish asylum seeker who sewed up his mouth in an attempt to avoid being returned to Iraq last week had the stitches forcibly removed and was still put on the plane the next day, it emerged yesterday. He was among 49 rejected asylum seekers who were put on a special charter flight to northern Iraq last Wednesday, which took off six hours late from Stansted and was forced to return to Britain after being refused permission to land in Iraq. The flight's take-off was delayed because two asylum seekers had to be removed from the cabin. One had smuggled a blade on board and slashed his stomach, while a second concussed himself by banging his head against the window. A witness on the plane said many of the 76 Group 4 Securicor guards who accompanied the deportees were shocked by what happened. Some deportees were in handcuffs and others in leg irons.

October 17, 2008 BBC
A prison van driver has denied murdering a woman who was killed when she was knocked down by the vehicle in south-west London. Andrew Curtis, 48, from Orpington, south-east London, is charged with the murder of Nyaraui Benjamin, 34. Ms Benjamin was knocked down and trapped under the van carrying 11 prisoners in Brixton Road on 22 April. Mr Curtis, who worked for Serco Court Escort Services, was granted bail by the Old Bailey to face trial in April.

July 12, 2008 BBC
A prison van driver accused of murdering a woman by hitting her with his vehicle has appeared in court. Andrew Curtis, 48, of Serco Court Escort Services, is charged with the murder of Nyaraui Benjamin, 34, in Brixton, south-west London. Ms Benjamin was trapped under the van carrying 11 prisoners in Brixton Road, south-west London, on 22 April. Mr Curtis was remanded in custody at Camberwell Green Magistrates' Court, to appear at the Old Bailey on 17 October.

July 1, 2008 The Independent
The government is investigating claims that a 26-year-old asylum-seeker from Cameroon was so badly assaulted during her forced removal on a British Airways flight that she has to use a wheelchair. Stephanie Toumi claims that British security guards kicked her in the back of the leg and held her head down for two hours on a flight from Heathrow to Brussels earlier this month. Her injuries were so serious that Belgian immigration officials refused to allow the escort team to fly her on to Cameroon, claims Toumi, who fled her home in March after being tortured and abused by a village chief. In April, the Home Office rejected Toumi's asylum claim and fast-tracked her case to Yarl's Wood detention centre in Bedfordshire for an early removal flight from the UK on June 5. Toumi alleges she was assaulted by four Group 4 Securicor (G4S) guards when she approached BA staff on the plane to inquire about her luggage. She alleges: "The escorts threw themselves on me. One scraped me and I fell on my stomach, the other trapped my arms, twisting them behind and the other two put on handcuffs. I felt a very severe pain in my body and I wanted to twist my right foot to get up, but one of them totally paralysed this foot by giving me a sharp blow with his knee. "When they finished handcuffing me one of them caught hold of my hair to lift me up. I felt ill as I have never felt ill all my life." She alleges that when she started crying, the guards said: "Shut up." At Brussels airport, where the escort and the asylum-seeker were due to catch a flight to Cameroon, Belgian immigration officers noticed Toumi was now unable to walk unaided and informed the escorts they would have to take her back to the UK. An independent doctor's report found her injuries were due to the alleged assault. Toumi has lost the use of the wheelchair, so cannot make her way to the Yarl's Wood dining hall. Yesterday a report by the Independent Asylum Commission (IAC) called on the Home Office to only employ forced removals as a last resort and authorise "dawn raids" by immigration officers only in extreme circumstances. Eight months ago another woman was so badly injured during her removal that the Cameroon government refused her entry and sent her back to Britain. Beatrice Guessie, 29, returned to the UK in a wheelchair but the Home Office dismissed her allegations of abuse. Both women are bringing legal actions against the Home Office. Emma Ginn, of the National Coalition of Anti-Deportation Campaigns, said that these kind of cases are "depressingly familiar". She added: "This story of a torture victim coming back injured and then denied appropriate care in detention is a shocking disgrace. It is one of hundreds we have documented. This is state-sanctioned abuse." A UK Border Agency (UKBA) spokesman said that the government treated all allegations of assault extremely seriously. "The UKBA expects the highest levels of integrity from those carrying out duties on our behalf. The majority of staff carry out their roles with professionalism and integrity. It is standard procedure where physical or racial abuse is alleged to refer the case to the police and UKBA for investigation." The spokesman added: "The UKBA is committed to ensuring removals are always carried out in the most sensitive way possible, treating those being removed with courtesy and dignity." In a separate statement, G4S Justice Services (UK) said: "Escorting detainees is a very sensitive task. G4S will not tolerate inappropriate behaviour. Any staff member found to have acted improperly would be dealt with under robust disciplinary procedures."

June 6, 2008 BBC
A police force has been accused of "pantomime" by an MP after a security van travelled 57 miles to transport a prisoner just 200 yards. The prisoner was not allowed to walk across the road from Northampton Crown Court to the magistrates' court as it infringed his human rights. Northamptonshire Police said it was inappropriate for prisoners to be escorted in view of the public. Brian Binley, MP for Northampton South, likened the move to a Carry On film. The defendant was charged with stealing cable from a railway. He was taken to Northampton Crown Court after he was wrongly listed to appear before a judge on Tuesday morning. When it was decided the matter should be dealt with by magistrates, a security van was diverted from Cambridge to drive him there. Mr Binley said: "The situation is total nonsense, but most importantly it is about people in the public sector not caring about how they spend the public's money. "The police could simply have put the guy in the back of a police car and driven to the magistrates' court. "Public money should be treated with more care than any other money but it isn't, it is the opposite." Calling for a "common sense approach", he added: "It is pantomime, isn't it? If you saw this in a Carry On film you'd be amazed. "We should have a new film called Carry On Carrying those Detained by the Police." Matthew Elliott, chief executive of the TaxPayers' Alliance, said: "No wonder our prisons are in such a state of chaos, if they can't even manage to escort a prisoner 200 yards between buildings. 'Possibility of escape' A Northamptonshire Police spokesman said the force was not responsible for the van and could not comment on how far it had travelled, but backed the decision not to allow the prisoner to walk. The spokesman said that until someone had been convicted it was inappropriate for them to be "escorted across a very busy main road in handcuffs in full view of the public". He said it would also be inappropriate for prisoners to walk in a public area while in custody because of public safety issues as well as the possibility of escape and injury. A spokeswoman for Global Solutions Limited said the company do not discuss individual cases.

May 18, 2008 Sunday Mirror
A sex attacker escaped his guards - by jumping out of a lift as the doors closed. Hardeep Singh, 25, due to be deported to India after finishing a sentence at Chelmsford Prison, Essex, for indecent assault, was appearing before an immigration tribunal in North London when he fled. He was being escorted by Group 4 Securicor guards. A spokesman for G4S said: "We are conducting a thorough investigation."

April 22, 2008 BBC
A woman has died after being trapped under a prison van in south London, the Metropolitan police have said. The victim, aged about 30, was hit as the van turned from Acre Lane into Brixton Hill at 1735 BST on Tuesday. She was pronounced dead at the scene. The driver of the van has been arrested in connection with the incident. The vehicle involved was a Serco van transporting 11 prisoners. All of its passengers were accounted for and no-one was injured. 'Heartfelt sympathies' The driver is being held in custody at a south London police station. A Serco spokesman said: "I can confirm that one of our prison escort vans was involved in a fatal incident earlier today outside Brixton Town Hall. "We would like to extend our heartfelt sympathies to the family of the woman who has lost her life in this tragic accident." The incident is being investigated by the Met's collision investigation unit.

October 5, 2007 The Independent
Hundreds of failed asylum-seekers deported from the United Kingdom have been beaten and racially abused by British escort teams who are paid to take them back to their home countries. The scale of the alleged abuse has been uncovered in a joint investigation by The Independent and a group co-coordinating the representation and medical care of failed asylum-seekers. A dossier of 200 cases, collated by doctors, lawyers, immigration centre visitors and campaign groups over the past two years, has unearthed shocking claims of physical and mental mistreatment of some of the most vulnerable people in our asylum system. Many of the claims include allegations of physical and sexual assault and racist abuse which took place during the long journey from Britain to their home countries. One of the cases of alleged abuse is that of Armand Tchuibeu, a Cameroon national who claimed asylum in the United Kingdom in February 2000. His application was refused last year. He was then arrested and prepared for removal. On 29 January 2007 he was collected from Tinsley House removal centre in East Sussex by four escort officers who drove him to Heathrow to catch a 9pm flight to Cameroon, as pictured on the front page from CCTV footage inside the van. He claims handcuffs were applied to his right arm. Mr Tchuibeu says he told the guards that there was no need to handcuff him as he had no intention of obstructing his removal. But he alleges that officers started to manhandle him and, while his arms were held, one of the officers punched him in his ribs and on his neck and told him words to the effect "You will go to your fucking country today, we will fucking show you what illegal people deserve in our country". Another officer is alleged to have held his head down so they could apply a leg strap. Eventually, Mr Tchuibeu convinced the escort officers he had been injured and the deportation was aborted. Mr Tchuibeu was taken to the Hillingdon Hospital where he was examined and treated. His knee was placed in a cylinder cast which he wore for four weeks. Mr Tchuibeu, who is being represented by the London solicitors Birnberg Peirce, is now bringing a civil claim for assault against the security company. The authors of the 200-case dossier accuse the Government of turning a blind eye to the abuse in order to meet arbitrary targets for the forced repatriation of asylum-seekers. They say some of the cases they are investigating are worse than the torture and abuse the refugee suffered before making their asylum claim in this country. In nearly every case, the allegation of mistreatment is made against private security contractors employed by the Government to carry out enforced removals of asylum-seekers. Mr Tchuibeu appears to be far from an isolated case. Milton Apollo Okello, 25, who was tortured by the Ugandan security services, claims that, after his asylum claim was rejected, he was frogmarched on to a plane and tied to his seat by British guards. But when word came through that he had won an eleventh-hour reprieve, Mr Okello claims he was taken to a van and beaten and racially abused. Mr Okello said: "The driver opened the sliding door and I was pushed into the middle of the seat. Two of the officers got on one side of me and the others came in on the other side. Officer A then punched me hard in the face and he said "These black monkeys don't want to go back to their country ..." A 24-year-old man who escaped to Britain after being imprisoned and tortured in the Republic of Congo claims that when he refused to sign a document presented to him by his escorts, three of them forced both hands backwards. One of the escorts is said to have told him: "This is the key to going home." A doctor who later conducted an examination of Mr A, wrote: "The fourth metacarpal of the left hand has undoubtedly suffered a fracture. This is highly consistent with excessive use of force during or after a failed attempt to remove him from the UK." Dr Frank Arnold, a volunteer doctor with the Medical Justice Network, who has examined more than 100 detained asylum-seekers, says many of the injuries suffered during removal are not taken seriously enough by the British immigration authorities. He said: "Some of these injuries have been so bad that police officers who saw them appear to have been genuinely shocked. But it is my experience that medical staff who examine asylum-seekers when they are taken back into detention have greatly underestimated the severity of the injuries, including fractures and nerve damage from forcible traction on handcuffs." In the past two years government figures show that 1,173 attempts to remove failed asylum-seekers, such as Mr Tchuibeu have failed. The majority of those are due to the disruptive behaviour of the detainee on board the aircraft or because of an eleventh-hour judicial intervention. But others fail because of injuries suffered or the deterioration in the physical or mental health of the asylum-seeker during the removal process. Last month Mr Tchuibeu was returned to the Cameroon. After a police investigation, no one has been charged with an offence. The company denies the allegations of brutality made against its staff. A spokesman for the Border and Immigration Agency which contracts the security companies to help carry out the removals said: "Any allegations of misconduct are thoroughly investigated and all allegations of physical and racial abuse are referred to the police." Three security firms are on the Government's approved list for the forced removal of failed asylum-seekers. They are Group4Securicor, International Training Academy and GEO, an American company. A spokesman said Group4- Securicor was aware of complaints made but said they had never been proven – adding the company would condemn any such action. GEO and International Training Academy both declined to comment.

December 14, 2006 Daily Mail
A failed asylum seeker is on the run after escaping deportation when he was allowed off a coach heading for the airport to have a cigarette. The man was part of a group of a dozen men and women due to be thrown out of Britain on a specially chartered flight to Baku in Azerbaijan. Yet incredibly when they approached Stansted airport in Essex where the plane was waiting, some of the men were allowed off to have a cigarette --- there was no smoking on the coach. In what appeared to have been a pre-planned break, seven of the men are said to have tried to run off but all bar one were recaptured. An Essex police helicopter and sniffer dogs joined the search but last night he had still not been recaptured. A spokesman for Group 4 security, who were escorting the unidentified man to the airport, said yesterday an investigation was underway but refused to comment further. He did not say why the men had been allowed off the coach to have a cigarette. The escape and its circumstances are hugely embarrasing for the immigration authorities. All the men had been refused political asylum and their appeals against the decision had been turned down. To prevent them escaping, they had been held in detention centres at Colnbrook, near Heathrow, Campsfield in Oxfordshire, and Dover, Kent, --- some for several weeks. An immigration officer specialising in rounding-up failed asylum seekers yesterday said : "We have issues with the way these men are escorted. It takes considerable time and trouble to track down and 'house' them and to allow one to disappear in such circumstances is really sickening." He added ironically : "I suppose it is Christmas time and the word 'Pantomine' comes to mind...quite appropriate when someone disappeared after a puff of smoke." The case comes five months after Group 4 security was forced to launch an investigation into how a Somali asylum seeker convicted of sex attacks was able to slip his guards and escape from a van while being transported to a deportation hearing.

July 26, 2006 BBC
Police say a sex attacker who escaped from a security van in Manchester may still be in the city. Greater Manchester Police are investigating sightings of Mustafa Ismail, 35, in the Fallowfield area and the city centre. Ismail, a Somali asylum seeker, was being transported from prison in Preston, Lancashire, to a deportation hearing in Manchester when he escaped. He was at the end of a five-year sentence for attempted rape. His female victim described him as "very, very dangerous" and had appealed for anyone sheltering him to contact police. Ismail was travelling in an escort van run by Group 4 Securicor when he escaped near the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal Court in Manchester's Piccadilly on 13 July.

July 21, 2006 BBC
The victim of a sex offender who escaped from a security vehicle in Manchester has appealed for the public's help to catch him. Mustafa Ismail, a Somali asylum seeker, was being transported to a deportation hearing when he escaped last week. He had come to the end of his five-year prison sentence for attempting to rape a woman in Longsight in 2001. His victim described him as "very, very dangerous" and appealed for anyone sheltering him to contact police. Officers from Greater Manchester Police are working with the Somali community to try to trace the 35-year-old. They have been circulating leaflets and posters in south Manchester but are also investigating the possibility he may have travelled to Bristol or Hull. Members of the public are being warned not to approach him but to contact police on 999. He was travelling in an escort van run by Group 4 Securicor when he escaped near the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal Court in Manchester's Piccadilly. It is believed he was being handcuffed when he pushed over one of the guards and fled on foot.

July 17, 2006 Preston Today
Police are still hunting a sex attacker from Preston Prison who escaped on his way to court. Mustafa Ismail, 35, was being taken from Preston Prison to the Manchester Asylum and Immigration Tribunal Court when he escaped from the Group 4 Securicor vehicle. It is understood he was being handcuffed when he pushed over a guard and fled the scene, near to Manchester's Piccadilly, on Thursday morning. Security staff gave chase couldn't catch him. The Somalian had just completed a five-year sentence for attempted rape and was on remand in Preston.

July 15, 2006 Preston Today
Police have launched a manhunt after a rapist from Preston prison escaped on his way to court. Mustafa Ismail, 35, was being taken from HMP Preston to the Manchester Asylum and Immigration Tribunal Court when he escaped from the Group 4 Securicor vehicle. Detectives are appealing to the public for information about Ismail but warning not to approach him. The Somalian was at the end of a five year sentence for rape. He was on remand at HMP Preston pending a decision over his deportation. The hearing he was due to attend was to hear his application for asylum in the UK. Police have described him as a black man with black hair and brown eyes, about 6ft (1.8m) tall and of slim build. He was travelling in an escort van when he escaped near the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal Court in Manchester's Piccadilly, at about 11.30am on Thursday. It is believed he was being handcuffed when he pushed over one of the guards and fled on foot. A Home Office spokeswoman said: "We can confirm that on 13 July, at approximately 11.15am, an immigration detainee escaped from our care at Manchester Asylum and Tribunal Court. "Greater Manchester Police were informed and we are working closely with them to ensure the apprehension of the detainee. "The incident will be fully investigated and any necessary action will be taken in conjunction with the Home Office." Group 4 guards were trying to handcuff Ismail when he fled. They took chase but were unable to catch him. Nobody was injured. CCTV footage from the van is now being examined, as well as cameras from the local vicinity.

February 1, 2006 The Guardian
Heavily pregnant prisoners are being forced to travel hundreds of miles in claustrophobic prison vans known to inmates as "sweatboxes", the Guardian has learned. The women are being transported in conditions which campaigners have criticised as "unethical and barbaric", often spending many hours in cramped cells measuring 860mm by 620mm (34in by 24in), with hard seats and no seatbelts. Beverley Beech, chairwoman of the Association for Improvements in the Maternity Services, called for the Prison Service to stop using cellular vehicles to transport pregnant prisoners. "It is time this unethical and barbaric practice was stopped," she said. "Women in advanced pregnancy are in no position to run away and they should be treated with humanity and awareness of their condition." A source within Styal prison in Cheshire said a 27-year-old inmate had spent four hours in a van the day before her baby was due. She expected to be taken to court in Liverpool by taxi and complained when told she would travel in a prison van. She was then offered a thin cushion. The trip from Styal to Liverpool should have taken less than an hour but lasted two and half hours because the vehicle had to drop off other prisoners. The prisoner was allowed one toilet break. After an hour-long court hearing, she made a 90-minute journey back to Styal. Global Solutions, which operates a fleet of 400 prison vehicles, said specifications were agreed with the Home Office. A spokesman said there was provision for people with special needs, including pregnant women, and the company was not aware of any complaints regarding the transport of pregnant women.

Probation Trusts
Group 4, Serco
March 27, 2012 The Guardian
After all the furore over the proposed radical extension of the role of the private sector in policing, what should we make of G4S and Serco advertising to recruit probation officers? The role of private security companies in the prisons has been well-established for nearly 20 years but the core work of probation services has been sacrosanct. Indeed, the 2007 Offender Management Act, which was designed to open up probation services to potential voluntary and private sector providers, specifically reserved the provision of advice and assistance to the courts for the public sector. So it is something of a surprise to see that G4S is looking to recruit probation officers to work with "public sector clients". The security company says the typical work undertaken by its probation officers will involve providing pre-sentence court and bail information reports, assessing offenders' risk and threat to the public, and overseeing unpaid work programmes for offenders. The justice minister, Crispin Blunt, sent a shiver through the world of probation earlier this month when he told the Probation Chiefs' Association that he was considering repealing section 15 of the 2007 act, which reserves the production of 175,000 probation reports for the courts to the probation services. Blunt was warned by John Fassenfelt, the chairman of the Magistrates' Association, that the courts would not be impressed by such a development. Fassenfelt says he worries that a privately employed probation officer might be tempted to give advice that favoured their company's local tagging and curfew programme. He says such a loss of confidence because of a feared conflict of interest could result in more courts playing it safe and jailing more offenders.

March 2, 2012 Yorkshire Post
Probation workers may take industrial action after they were ordered out of three Yorkshire prisons in a row over jail privatisation. Sixteen South Yorkshire probation officers have been expelled from Lindholme, Moorland and Hatfield prisons after a governor learned their trust had formed an alliance with private firm G4S to take over the running of the jails. Lindholme prison governor Bob Mullen is understood to have taken the decision to protect the “commercial confidentiality” of a rival public-sector bid to run the jails, which have effectively been put out for tender by Justice Secretary Ken Clarke. MPs have tabled parliamentary questions on the issue and the Justice Unions Parliamentary Group is to convene an urgent meeting of South Yorkshire MPs. According to an internal email seen by the Yorkshire Post, probation staff “were effectively marched of (sic) prison premises and had their identity badges and keys taken away and were effectively locked out of their place of work.” The assistant general secretary of the probation officers’ union Napo, Harry Fletcher, said South Yorkshire members would meet to discuss whether to declare a dispute with the trust on the grounds they were not informed of its agreement with G4S. Such a declaration would put the branch on the road towards industrial action, he added. Mr Fletcher said Mr Mullen’s decision was “extraordinary and unparalleled”, adding there was a “clear conflict of interest for South Yorkshire Probation Trust”. “The decision has had the effect of alienating staff in both prisons and probation and puts all employees in an impossible position,” he said. Napo is appalled that the publicly run trust is entering into an agreement with a privately run company to make profits from publicly owned jails.” Mr Fletcher said he understood a public-sector bid to run the jails involves Humberside Probation Trust, effectively putting two neighbouring trusts in direct competition with each other. In an internal memo to staff, the South Yorkshire trust’s lead officer for prisons, Jan Hannant, wrote: “It is not known at this stage how the prisons intend to deliver the services currently performed by our staff and we are trying to maintain a professional working relationship with our key contacts in each of the three locations whilst a resolution is being sought. “This decision has come as a complete surprise to the trust and we are working hard to try and resolve this situation at the earliest opportunity.” Probation staff normally based in the prisons have instead been allocated work for the trust’s four local delivery units, located in Barnsley, Doncaster, Rotherham and Sheffield. The trust has offered to pay staff their extra mileage. In an official statement, it said it had an agreement with each of the three prisons to deliver offender management services. “Our staff in these prisons perform essential tasks that, we believe, require their skills and expertise, supervising high risk offenders and reducing their risk of reoffending once released from custody. “We recognise that we are working in a competitive market and we are committed to play our part, as appropriate, in the competitions run by the National Offender Management Service. “We believe we offer the public purse the best possible value as an Offender Management Organisation, reducing reoffending by 12.4 per cent against the national average of 0.70 per cent.” A Ministry of Justice spokesman said: “Arrangements are in place to ensure that probation staff are able to undertake their duties and we are confident that the situation will be resolved swiftly.”

Rainsbrook Secure Training Centre
Group 4 (Rebound)
July 18, 2010 AP
Brutal techniques to restrain children held in private prisons have been made public after mounting pressure from children's rights groups. The Observer disclosed details of the techniques used to train staff in restraining young offenders in the country's four privately-run secure training centres. The secret manual, Physical Control in Care, was created by the HM Prison Service and approved by the Department of Justice in 2005. The government's Youth Justice Board (YJB) had initially fought the Information Commissioner's order to hand over the documents. When the Children's Rights Alliance (CRAE) called on the Justice Secretary to hold an independent judicial inquiry, YJB finally relented. The Observer revealed that control measures authorised for staff to use include "an inverted knuckle into the trainee's sternum and drive inward and upward," "alternate elbow strikes to the young person's ribs until a release is achieved," and "drive straight fingers into the young person's face, and then quickly drive the straightened fingers of the same hand downwards into the young person's groin area." The manual went so far as to warn staff that some techniques risk a "fracture to the skull" and "temporary or permanent blindness caused by rupture to eyeball or detached retina." One passage states in regard to administering a head-hold that "if breathing is compromised the situation ceases to be a restraint and becomes a medical emergency." Carolyne Willow, CRAE's national co-ordinator stated, "Until now, we've seen a compulsive reliance on secrecy and an absolute failure to face up publicly to the disgraceful and unlawful treatment of children the State officially describes as vulnerable." The campaign to make the information public came after the deaths of two children, Gareth Myatt, 15, and Adam Rickwood, 14, who died in the custody of Rainsbrook and Hassockfield secure training centres in 2004.

May 11, 2010 Children & Young People Now
A private company running a secure training centre (STC) has defended its practices following a stinging attack from a prison reform campaigner. Frances Crook, director of the Howard League for Penal Reform, criticised private prisons in a blog post after former team leader at Rainsbrook STC near Daventry, Neil Hanna, was given a 40-week suspended prison sentence last month after dragging a teenage boy across the floor. "This story did not reach the national headlines, partly because of the general election and partly because nobody much cares if children in custody are mistreated; that is the scandal," she said. "Rainsbrook is a jail for young children that is run for profit by a private security company. These children's jails for profit are a stain on our justice system and should be closed down." Crook added that the story was all the more distressing given that the assault, committed in September 2008, happened at the same jail where 15-year-old Gareth Myatt died while being physically restrained by staff in April 2004. Crook's comments come despite glowing praise for the regime at Rainsbrook following an Ofsted inspection last June in which the STC was rated "outstanding". The report said Rainsbrook holds some "very challenging yet needy young people", but praised "clear and detailed" behaviour management policies and "good" staff training. "This reflects the robust and reflective arrangements in place to support young people placed at the centre, which have led to a continuous reduction in the use of physical restraint every year since 2002," it said. A spokesman for Rebound, the company running the STC, said: "The welfare and safety of the children who are in our care is of paramount importance to us and Hanna's actions were not in line with our laid down policies and procedures. "He was therefore dismissed from our employment. We are constantly reviewing and updating our policies and procedures." Rebound also runs Oakhill STC in Milton Keynes and Medway STC in Kent.

July 19, 2007 The Guardian
The coroner who presided over the inquest into the death of a 15-year-old who died after being restrained in a child jail has warned the justice secretary, Jack Straw, that it would be "wholly unforgivable" if the lessons were delayed by a general review of the use of restraint announced yesterday. The retired judge, Richard Pollard, who presided over the inquest into the death of Gareth Myatt, the youngest person to die in custody, sent a 17-page letter to Mr Straw yesterday detailing 34 recommendations needed to prevent similar deaths happening in the network of privately-run secure training centres that hold the most persistent teenage offenders in the country. He believes the changes should be made immediately, but in the face of a potential Lords defeat over new regulations widening the circumstances in which restraint can be used by staff in child jails ministers last night announced a joint review of the issue, not only in STCs but also in young offender institutions and local authority secure units. The review will have an independent chair and will look at the medical safety and "operational efficacy" of the restraint techniques as well as ways of better managing the behaviour of children locked in secure units. It is expected to report within six months. Judge Pollard told Mr Straw the inquest jury had made clear that one of the factors that contributed to Gareth's death in Rainsbrook STC, Northamptonshire, was the failure by the Youth Justice Board and the Home Office to undertake such a review of the medical safety of the "physical control in care", or PCC, restraint techniques that were used in the private jail.

July 13, 2007 The Guardian
A quarter of young offenders at a troubled privately run child jail have been moved out and a new director appointed after official concern over the rising use of restraint by staff to control violent teenagers. The Youth Justice Board said last night it had acted after two unpublished inspection reports confirmed concerns about control at the Oakhill secure training centre, near Milton Keynes. The latest figures show it recorded the highest use of distraction restraint techniques, which involve inflicting pain on a youngster's nose or thumb, in the child jail network. They were used on 110 occasions in 2006 in a centre which holds only 80 trainees. Non-painful restraint was used 921 times. The centre is run by G4S, formerly Group 4. The announcement was made as MPs debated the outcome of the inquest into the death of Gareth Myatt, 15, who died in nearby Rainsbrook secure training centre after being restrained. The outcome is uncertain of a Lords vote next week on regulations expanding the circumstances in which restraint can be used in child jails. The YJB admitted that recruiting staff to Oakhill had been a problem. It said it had cut the number of children there from 80 to 60 because "without the required staff on duty there will always be a risk". A YJB statement said: "There has been a rise in the number of incidents of violence by young people on other young people and against staff, as a result of which the use of restraint has increased. This happens from time to time." The YJB said it would continue to monitor the situation at Oakhill to ensure that restraint was used as a last resort: "With the new director in post we will expect to see rapid improvements in the centre." The centre, one of five in the national network of child jails for the most persistent teenage offenders, has had a troubled history. A 2005 inspection report said it had been struggling to care for trainees with limited staff, and a "difficult and challenging period" at the end of 2004 led to its first management shake-up. The second director, Lee Barnes, left two months ago. The new director, Malcolm Stephens, who joined on Monday, said he was committed to working with the YJB to provide the highest standards of specialist care. The director of the Howard League for Penal Reform, Frances Crook, described the change of director at Oakhill as significant, particularly bearing in mind the recent change to the rules on the use of physical restraint at secure training centres. "If staff at Oakhill have experienced difficulties with order and control, then replacing rules that explicitly spelt out appropriate circumstances for restraint with catch-all terminology and ultra-vague references to 'good order and discipline' will only make things worse."

February 11, 2007 The Observer
Damaging questions about the treatment of teenagers in jail will be revealed this week during the inquest into how a 15-year-old boy died in custody after being restrained by three adult members of staff. Gareth Myatt lost consciousness after being held in a Home Office-approved armlock that has since been banned. He is the youngest person in living memory to die in such a way in a British prison. The inquest into the death of Gareth, who weighed less than seven stone and was 4ft 10in tall, will raise questions over the standard of care and discipline in what critics call 'child jails'. His mother, who will give evidence at the inquest, told The Observer that she has still not been told all the facts about her son's death in April 2004 at the privately run jail in Northamptonshire. Pam Wilton, of Stoke-on-Trent, said: 'I'm very angry at the government and the firm that ran the prison. I cannot believe the restraint could even have passed safety tests.' Among the witnesses scheduled to give evidence is Dr Nat Carey, one of Britain's most eminent forensic pathologists, who is expected to give testimony on the restraint technique used in Gareth's death. Fundamentally the hearing is likely to explore why such an allegedly dangerous method of restraint was given ministerial and governmental approval to be used on teenagers. 'I have no medical experience and would say that type of restraint was in no way safe. You wouldn't need two brain cells to know that,' said Wilton. Following a police investigation into Gareth's death, officers recommended that use of the restraint be suspended and the Home Office later banned its use. Months before the teenager's death, the parliamentary joint committee on human rights had warned about the risks of restraining children. Gareth was just four days into a 12-month sentence at the Rainsbrook training centre, which is operated by a subsidiary of Group 4, for theft and assault when he was sent to his room after a disturbance. He was visited by officers in a bid to calm him down. There it is understood that Gareth, who allegedly attacked one officer, was restrained by three members of staff using a technique known as the 'seated double embrace', which involves grabbing children in an interlocking hold while they are seated. The details of a Northamptonshire police investigation and two government inquiries have yet to be fully published. The police inquiry led to a file being sent to the Crown Prosecution Service, which decided that no one should be charged over the teenager's death. 'What could be more shocking and in need of proper scrutiny than the death of a child in a state institution?' said Deborah Coles of Inquest, a charity that examines deaths in custody. Campaigners hope that the inquest will disclose which individuals approved the restraint system and why. They also hope that it will prove whether the use of force in Gareth's death was unlawful and whether the type of restraint used was in accordance with agreed training. The hearing will intensify scrutiny over the continued use of high levels of restraint in secure training centres and young offender institutions. Ministers and the government-appointed Youth Justice Board, which oversees the treatment of young people in custody, say the painful restraint is used sparingly, when teenagers are being extremely violent. During 2004-05, restraint was used 768 times, resulting in 51 injuries. An independent inquiry instigated following Gareth's death found that young prisoners were being subjected to treatment that would prompt abuse investigations elsewhere. Teenagers told investigators of broken and bloodied noses and of breathlessness during restraint. Lord Carlile of Berriew, who headed the inquiries, admitted being 'shocked' by what he found. Six months after the death of Gareth, the United Nations demanded urgent action to reduce the numbers of vulnerable teenagers behind bars in Britain. Numbers, however, remain the same as then, with about 2,700 people aged from 10 to 17 held in British jails. A spokesman for the Youth Justice Board said that restraint was used only when the safety of youngsters and staff was an issue.

September 26, 2005 Guardian
Staff in privately run child jails have been told they can use a painful "karate chop to the nose" technique to control troublesome teenagers as a result of an internal review of restraint methods after the death of a 15-year-old last year, the Guardian has learned. The government's Youth Justice Board has permanently suspended the use of a technique known as the "seated double embrace" on the recommendation of Northamptonshire police, who investigated the death of Gareth Myatt at Rainsbrook secure training centre, near Daventry, which is run by Rebound, a subsidiary of Group 4. But ministers have now quietly approved a new control and restraint system to deal with offenders, aged 12 to 17, held in the network of four secure training centres in England and Wales. MPs have voiced strong concerns over the system used to control the 200 persistent young offenders held at any one time in STCs. Children in STCs have been restrained in more than 11,500 incidents in the last five years. The system, known as "physical control in care", is a children's version of restraint techniques used in adult prisons, and is supposed not to rely on inflicting pain. It involves a series of holds suitable for up to three staff. Although the system is not meant to inflict pain, three "distraction" techniques intended to deliver a short, sharp pain aimed at the nose, ribs or thumb are allowed if, for example, there is a need to get a teenager to release his or her grip on another person. A former Labour minister, Sally Keeble, MP for Northampton North, who has been pressing ministers over the death of Gareth Myatt, said it should not have taken the death of a boy to get a dangerous restraint technique banned. "The risk should have been spotted well before such a tragedy. It is also clear that staff in STCs will still be allowed to inflict severe pain on children in such risky situations that close medical supervision is needed and that the staff involved need training in resuscitation," she said. Ms Keeble said that "nose distraction" meant "punching kids on the nose" and that clear records should be published of the injuries from these techniques. "On the face of it there are some vicious techniques for hurting children, without any explanation or justification of who developed them and why. This paints a very grim picture of what happens inside secure training centres. It seems we abolished the birch only to let people punch children on the nose instead." Frances Crook, of the Howard League for Penal Reform, said the use of "nose distraction" techniques had increased. "It is a bit like a karate chop to the nose. It can break your nose. We have had heard allegations of children who have been badly injured."

September 7, 2004 BBC
An independent inquiry will examine the way detainees are restrained and strip searched in 'child jails'. Lord Carlile of Berriew QC will chair the investigation, which was set-up by the Howard League for Penal Reform. The study was announced on Tuesday, just months after 15-year-old Gareth Myatt died in a secure training centre while being restrained by three staff. Gareth, from Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, lost consciousness while being restrained at Rainsbrook Secure Training Centre (STC), in Northamptonshire, on 19 April. The three STCs, which are operated by private companies, hold children aged 12 to 17. A subsidiary of Group 4, Rebound ECD, runs Rainsbrook, as well as Medway in Kent. Premier Training Services Ltd runs Hassockfield, in County Durham, where 14-year-old remand prisoner Adam Rickwood was found hanged last month.

April 25, 2004
Last Monday a short, skinny 15-year-old called Gareth Myatt died three days into his detention at Rainsbrook Secure Training Centre.  Sentinel exclusive: see Monday's Sentinel for an interview with Gareth's mother The Stoke-on-Trent teenager, just five foot tall, lost consciousness while being restrained by three prison officers and died an hour later in hospital.  Rainsbrook, which had previously been praised by inspectors for providing a "positive and rehabilitative experience" for the 70 or so young offenders housed there, is one of just three Secure Training Centres in the UK and one of two run by Rebound, a subsidiary of global security giant Group 4.  Gareth Myatt's death will do little to improve public perception of Group 4 which, since it won the contract to run the UK's first privatised prison in Humberside in 1991, has become the butt of jokes about escaped prisoners and bungled security operations.  But beyond the headline-grabbing mistakes in the UK, it is the world's second largest private security services group - responsible for managing prisons and shepherding offenders in 84 countries.  (The Sentinel)

Reliance
January 4, 2010 BBC
A prisoner has admitted escaping from the crown court in Swansea after using a shoe lace to tamper with a lock. James Stevenson, who is 30, also admitted separate charges of stealing 28 gold rings and assault with intent to resist arrest. Stevenson, who fled the Guildhall court in October after being given a five-year term for firearm offences appeared via video link at Swansea Crown Court. He also asked Judge John Diehl to be sentenced via video link. The judge said he would be sentenced as soon as possible and that sentencing could be as early as Tuesday as no pre-sentence report was required. The court heard Stevenson had used a shoe lace to tamper with a latch on his cell door during the escape. He remained at large for 17 days before being arrested. Following his arrest questions were raised about security at the court building. Judge Diehl heard private security firm Reliance had completed its own internal investigation into the escape, and he would be provided with a copy at the sentencing hearing.

October 5, 2009 BBC
A "dangerous" prisoner who escaped from a Swansea court just after being sentenced had previously broken out of prison, it has been reported. James Stevenson, 29, who has a previous conviction for manslaughter, fled court on Friday after being given a five-year jail term for a firearms offence. The South Wales Evening Post has reported he had briefly escaped from a prison in Dorset in 2005. Questions are now being asked about the security at the Guildhall building. Rene Kinzett, leader of the Conservative group on Swansea council, said the escape was worrying for residents of the city. South Wales Police have warned the public not to approach him. In 2002, Stevenson killed his mother's boyfriend by stuffing newspaper in his mouth and gagging him. He then dumped his body in a river. At his trial later that year, Stevenson denied murder but pleaded guilty to manslaughter and was sentenced to five years. He escaped from a Dorset prison in 2005 but was caught after half an hour, the Evening Post said. It is thought Stevenson managed to leave a basement custody suite at the Guildhall building before fleeing on Friday afternoon after being jailed for breaching the terms of his licence and possessing a .410 shotgun. He should have been taken from Swansea to Cardiff prison to begin his sentence, with the private security firm Reliance making the transfer, before he absconded at about 1300 BST. According to an eyewitness, he made his way across the flat roof of the court building before clambering down a drainpipe and escaping into the city. Reliance has launched an investigation into how Stevenson was able to escape and is working with police to return him to custody. The firm said incidents like this were "extremely rare". The National Offender Management Service is also carrying out its own investigation. The court building he absconded from is often used as an overspill for the nearby main court. Sanctions -- Mr Kinzett said that Stevenson's escape raised a number of questions, including whether the Guildhall was secure enough for high-profile cases. He also wanted to know what role Reliance played in what happened and what sanctions it could face if it is at fault. "I am very worried that people of Swansea have been put at risk," he said. "They have been exposed to a huge risk through the escape of this dangerous man and obviously people need to co-operate with the police."

September 15, 2006 BBC
Prison escort agency Reliance assured a sheriff in Shetland it would improve procedures after being called to court for failing to deliver a prisoner. Sheriff Graeme Napier ordered the firm to Lerwick Sheriff Court on a possible contempt of court charge after flight problems left a prisoner in Aberdeen. Reliance pledged to use the ferry to transfer prisoners to the islands when the weather was bad. Sheriff Napier accepted the assurances and did not pursue any contempt charge. Reliance area director Mike Pirie appeared in court on Friday in connection with the problems earlier this week. The sheriff was given assurances Reliance would review and improve its procedures for transferring prisoners to court in Shetland. The company also apologised to the sheriff for the inconvenience it had caused. Sheriff Napier said he accepted the company's assurances and decided there was no merit in a contempt of court charge.

September 14, 2006 BCC
A chief officer from prison escort agency Reliance has not made it to Shetland to answer questions about failing to deliver a prisoner on time. A man had been due at Lerwick Sheriff Court on Wednesday to face a variety of charges but did not appear. Sheriff Graeme Napier ordered the Reliance's director of operations to appear in court - with the possibility of a contempt charge. However, no officer appeared and the case was continued to Friday. The prisoner had originally been left stranded in Aberdeen due to fog and flight problems. Sheriff Napier was expecting to address the possible contempt issue after Wednesday's problems. The Reliance area manager is now expected to appear before the sheriff, along with a company lawyer, on Friday.

July 25, 2006 BBC
An investigation is under way after a woman working for a prisoner escort firm took her dog to work. The Reliance worker arrived at Paisley Sheriff Court with the dog two weeks ago and let a female prisoner walk the pet around the cells. A supervisor at the court has been suspended for letting the woman bring the animal into the building, a spokesman for the firm said. He said: "A member of staff has been suspended pending an investigation."

April 12, 2006 Evening Times
A PRIVATE prison security firm came under fire today after it took prisoners to the wrong courts and held up proceedings twice in one day. A Reliance driver took a rapist to a court 50 miles from where he should have appeared and delayed his sentencing by 24 hours. Staff from Reliance Custodial Services picked up Felice Cariello from Saughton Prison in Edinburgh and were supposed to take him to the High Court in Glasgow. But they took him to the High Court in Edinburgh, where he had been convicted, instead. The bungle happened the same day two money launderers were taken to Edinburgh's Sheriff Court instead of the High Court, delaying their appearance by hours.

October 26, 2004 Scotsman
MSPs today called into question official claims that handing prison escort duties to private security company Reliance will save taxpayers £20 million a year. Scottish Nationalist Andrew Welsh claimed the estimate was "poorly based" and "largely speculative". And Labour backbencher Margaret Jamieson suggested it "may not be very robust". The comments came as the parliament’s audit committee quizzed Auditor General Robert Black on his report into the contracting-out of the escort role from the Scottish Prison Service to Reliance.
Mr Black told the committee the SPS had not kept information on the cost of escort duties.

October 19, 2004 Scotsman
THE hi-tech arm of the controversial prisoner security firm Reliance - widely criticised for its performance in Scotland - has lost one of its key government contracts south of the border. Reliance Monitoring Services, whose sister company Reliance Custodial Services has come under intense criticism in Scotland for accidently releasing a string of prisoners, has lost an £18 million-a-year Home Office deal to supply electronic tagging equipment to prison authorities in southern England. Details of the latest blow to the company come as Reliance’s custodial-services arm - which recently took on a £120 million seven-year contract to escort prisoners across Scotland - continues to come under increasing scrutiny after admitting the accidental release of 12 prisoners, including a convicted murderer, leading to regular calls for Cathy Jamieson, Scotland’s Justice Minister, to resign. The loss of the lucrative contract south of the Border will present serious concerns to Reliance Monitoring Services in Scotland, whose own multi-million-pound deal with the Scottish Executive is up for renewal early next year and is expected to be put out to tender sometime in March. The firm lost the contract in England in the wake of a number of allegations surrounding malfunctioning equipment. In one case, in Gloucester, an electronically-tagged defendant awaiting trial on kidnap and assault charges was caught on CCTV breaking the terms of his tagging order without Reliance Monitoring Service picking up his absence. At the time Reliance press spokeswoman Yoma Anighoro, revealed that they had encountered problems with around 20 per cent of their assigned cases. With the Government under increasing criticism for turning crime and punishment into a profit-making opportunity for the private sector, electronic tagging has become the latest money-spinner for firms like Reliance, which created its monitoring-services arm in a bid to corner the market.

Rye Hill Prison
Rugby, England
Group 4 (formerly Global Solutions bought by Group 4)

May 12, 2011 Oxford Mail
A WOMAN who hid drugs up her sleeve to smuggle them into a prison has been jailed. Patricia Taylor of Paradise Street, Oxford, was jailed for three and a half years on Tuesday after earlier admitting possessing Class A, B and C drugs with intent to supply. Prosecutor Michael Waterfield told Northampton Crown Court staff at Rye Hill prison near Daventry became suspicious when the drug addict started shaking as they went to search the 40-year-old after she arrived for a visit at the Category B jail last September 10. They found a package containing 12 grams of heroin in seven packages, along with two grams of cocaine, cannabis and 100 steroid tablets. The court was told the street value of the drugs was £1,000, but they would have been worth more in jail. Taylor told police she had built up a significant drug debt and agreed to smuggle the drugs after threats were made against her mother.

November 22, 2010 Daily Mail Reporter
A woman prison teacher was suspended for filming a pornography DVD of her having sex in jail with a murderer. Beverley Van-de-Velde, 59, and Richard Francis, 29, shot the scenes in the staffroom of HMP Rye Hill, Warwickshire. Bosses discovered the 17-minute video among hundreds of love letters she wrote to the gang leader in his cell. Van-de-Velde denied the relationship but was frog-marched out of the G4S-run private prison, on November 3. Her employer, Manchester College, which is contracted by the jail to run its education service, has suspended her pending an investigation. The DVD, which was seen by The Sun newspaper, shows her having unprotected sex with Francis, who was jailed for 13 years for murder in 2002 after he stabbed a reveller in the chest in a New Year's Day brawl in Croydon, South London. The film even features a credits page and slide-show of still pictures of the pair in action.

December 17, 2009 Liverpool Daily Post
A LIVERPOOL prison is among five in the country allowing its inmates to watch satellite television. More than 4,000 prisoners enjoy the privilege in private jails nationwide. Altcourse Prison, in Fazakerley, is among the contractor-run prisons allowing access to a “limited number” of satellite channels. The number of prisoners allowed to watch satellite varies according to behaviour. But Justice minister and city MP Maria Eagle revealed the number was currently around 4,070. The Garston MP was responding to a written question from Tory MP Philip Davies. She said no inmates in public sector jails have access to satellite in their quarters. But they do at Altcourse and other GS4-run prisons in South Wales and Warwickshire. The other private prisons offering satellite television are run by Serco in Staffordshire and Nottingham. Ms Eagle said: “In these establishments, satellite television in cells is generally only available to prisoners on the enhanced or standard level of the incentives and earned privileges scheme.” There are 84,500 prisoners in England and Wales, meaning around one in 20 has access to satellite TV.

September 23, 2009 BBC
The treatment of a Ukrainian man who died while on suicide watch in jail was "appalling and at times unacceptable", a coroner has said. Aleksey Baranovsky, 33, died while on suicide watch at HMP Rye Hill, Warwickshire, in June 2006. He had been eligible for parole but was due to be deported upon his release and had been self-harming in protest. A jury found there were serious failures and inadequacies that contributed to the death. Assistant deputy coroner for Northamptonshire Tom Osbourne made his comments as the jury returned its verdict. The inquest, held at Rushden and Diamonds Football Club in Irthlingborough, had heard Mr Baranovsky, who was serving a seven-year sentence, had repeatedly self-harmed while in prison. He had feared deportation, saying he would be killed. Mr Baranovsky was transferred to Rye Hill in February 2006 after serving the early part of his sentence in other prisons. He was found in his cell during the early hours of 10 June. The inquest heard he had been placed on constant supervision, but was found unconscious, kneeling on the ground with his head and arms on his bed. Ambulance crews were unable to resuscitate him. He "lost so much blood that was not replaced, he died", the jury heard. 'Inadequate systems' -- The jury returned a narrative verdict, saying he died following a prolonged period of deliberate self-harm by way of cutting himself and regularly refusing food. They also said there was a failure to assess healthcare needs and to draw up a detailed care plan, as well as inadequate systems and processes regarding communication between healthcare staff, prison security and prison management. The jury also ruled there was insufficient training and knowledge of some prison policies, a failure to carry out and follow agreed actions and "inadequate interventions". They gave the cause of death as anaemia due to chronic blood loss and under nutrition. Mr Osbourne said: "The treatment that Aleksey received during the period he was at Rye Hill was both appalling and at times unacceptable. "I have no hesitation in adopting the words of Stephen Shaw from the Prison and Probation Ombudsman when he said it was "shameful." He added he did not feel the need to make any recommendations as changes had already been made at the prison. The inquest heard a psychiatric assessment recommended after a meeting at the jail was not carried out as staff did not feel it was necessary. Several staff members said Mr Baranovsky refused food and treatment, despite their efforts. Security manager Liz Clay told how, on one occasion, blood was left in the cell for more than 12 hours before it was cleaned. A chaplain also said he thought there had been a "lack of care and compassion" towards the inmate. Speaking after the verdict, Jerry Petherick, managing director of offender management at GSL, which runs Rye Hill, said there had been huge changes. "I think we have learned from this enormously and from the ombudsman's report."

June 29, 2009 Independent
Figures obtained by More4 show four of Britain's 10 private prisons received the second-lowest rating in Government tests. Britain's private prisons are performing worse than those run by the state, according to data obtained under the Freedom of Information Act. The findings, based on the overall performances of 132 prisons in England and Wales, appear to undermine claims by ministers that the greater use of private jails is raising standards for the accommodation of more than 83,000 prisoners held across both sectors. Separate figures, also released under the right-to-know law, show that nearly twice as many prisoner complaints are upheld in private prisons as they are in state-run institutions. The Government is committed to building five more private prisons to accommodate the growing prison population, which is predicted to rise to 96,000 by 2014. But the poor performance ratings among 40 per cent of private prisons in England and Wales throw into question the cost savings and other benefits of using outside businesses to tackle the prison crisis. The data obtained by More4 News shows that four of the 10 private prisons scored the second lowest rating of 2, "requiring development", and only one above an assessment of "serious concern." The Ministry of Justice introduced the Prison Performance Assessment Tool (PPAT) last year, providing the first direct comparison between public and private prisons. It ranks the prisons out of four gradings using a wide range of measurements, including escapes, assaults and rehabilitation. In the second quarter of last year, the average overall score for prisons in the private sector was 2.7. For the 123 public sector prisons the average was 2.83. In the following quarter this gap had widened to 2.6 and 2.85. This is a difference of almost 10 per cent. No private prison attained the top mark of 4, defined as "exceptional performance." There were also disparities in the number of complaints upheld in private and state-run prisons. Rye Hill Prison, a private prison run by G4S, which has been a focus of particular criticism since it opened in 2001, saw a total of 22 complaints, well above the average in both the public and private sectors.

February 10, 2009 The Times
Staff at a privately run jail failed to do all they could to ensure the safety of an inmate who killed himself while suffering a mental illness, a coroner’s jury ruled yesterday. In a highly critical verdict, the jury said the inmate’s death could have been avoided if staff at Rye Hill prison had carried out proper observations of him. They said a lack of trained and experienced staff in the segregation unit at the jail, then run by GSL private seucurity firm, made it an unsafe place to hold Michael Bailey. Tom Osborne, assistant deputy coroner for Northamptonshire said the death of Bailey, 23, from Birmingham was avoidable. He added that it was shameful that the prisoner had not been transferrred to hospital because of his mental health problems. Bailey, serving a four year sentence for drug offences, was found dead in his cell in the segregation unit at the prison in March 2005. He had suddenly changed from being a fit, confident young man to being quiet and subdued in the days before his death. His mother Caroline Bailey told the inquest she tried to express concerns after noticing marks on her son’s neck during a visit on March 22. But nothing was done and he was found dead in his cell on March 24. The jury was highly critical of staff at the prison when they answered a number of questions surrounding his death as part of their verdict. They said there had been a failure of communication between the segregation unit and health care staff. There had also been a failure to carry out a full or adequate mental health assessment during the time Bailey was in the unit and prison officers, healthcare staff, and doctors knew or should have known he was under a “real and immediate risk of self-harm or suicide”. The jury said Bailey’s death could have been avoided if observations had been properly carried out, if he had been given appropriate medication, and if he had been placed on constant observations. The verdict also said a lack of trained and experienced staff and effective management on the segregation unit created an unsafe environment to hold him. “There was a failure on the part of all staff to take responsibility for ensuring Michael Bailey’s safety. The prison staff, healthcare staff and doctors did not do all that could be expected of them to prevent Michael Bailey hanging himself”, the jury said. Mr Osborne, the assistant coroner, said he would to write to both the Ministry of Justice and the Department of Health about the lack of availability of secure beds in the prison and the health service. He said: “I believe that in this day and age it is shameful that there is not the ability to transfer somebody who is in urgent need of medical attention to an appropriate hospital. The inquest, which started last month, heard the Category B prison run by private company GSL experienced problems with “illicit items” being brought in, including drugs and mobile phones. In the month following the death, the chief inspector of prisons found the jail was “an unsafe and unstable environment, both for prisoners and staff”. Jeremy Petherick, managing director of offender management and immigration services for Group Four Securicor, which took over running Rye Hill from GSL, said the prison is a very different place now. He said: “My reaction is one of sorrow about the incident happening at all and I would like to express my condolences to the family.”

July 16, 2008 BBC
The stab death of a prisoner at a jail seen as unsafe was "possibly avoidable", ministers have admitted. Wayne Reid, 44, of Birmingham, was stabbed in the chest by another inmate at HMP Rye Hill, on the Warwickshire and Northamptonshire border. Three men were sentenced in April 2006 over his murder, which happened days before he was due to be released. Prisons Minister David Hanson told Parliament the running of the jail was currently under examination. Mr Hanson said they were hoping to find out "what lessons could be learned". An inquest jury ruled last month that the prison was "unsafe and unstable". A statement issued by the jail said that since Reid's death in 2005 changes had been made. 'Tragic death' -- Leicestershire North West MP David Taylor asked the minister in the House of Commons what was being done to improve safety at that jail and others across the UK. Mr Hanson said the government had received a letter from the coroner who carried out the inquest, outlining some of the issues that had been raised in the hearing. He said: "We are working to see whether lessons can be learnt from the coroner's verdict into Wayne Reid's tragic and possibly avoidable death." Rye Hill is a category-B prison run by private security company GSL. Bisharat Chaudry, of Slough, Berkshire, and Ibrahim Musone, of Cricklewood, London, were convicted of Reid's murder. Deedar Syed, 26, of Peterborough, Cambridgeshire, was also jailed for disposing of a blood-stained jacket.

July 7, 2008 The Guardian
At the end of last month, a Northampton inquest jury delivered their verdict on the death of a prisoner, Wayne Reid, at Rye Hill prison, a privately run jail, near Rugby. Reid, 44, from Birmingham, was stabbed to death in April 2005. Two prisoners were later jailed for life for the killing. The inquest jury concluded that "knives were brought into the prison undetected because the security searches carried out were inadequate, especially those on members of staff". It found that the prison authorities did not do all that reasonably could be expected of them to prevent the risk of harm to Reid and other prisoners and concluded that bad management, inexperienced staff and lack of security contributed to the death. It is not the first time that the category B jail, holding 600 serious offenders and operated by Global Solutions Ltd (GSL), has come under fire. Reid's murder took place while a prisons inspectorate team was in the jail. In the scathing report that followed, the chief inspector, Anne Owers, said the prison had deteriorated - since the last inspection - to the extent that it was an "unsafe and unstable environment, both for prisoners and staff". Owers took the highly unusual step of informing government ministers of her fears. She questioned whether inexperienced and poorly supported staff were fully in control of undermanned wings. During their visit, inspectors were shown illicit mobile phones in the possession of prisoners who also reported the presence drugs, alcohol and knives. The jury was told that a "criminal subculture" existed at Rye Hill at the time of the murder and that a security report posted two days before Reid died warned that a knife, believed to have been smuggled in by a member of staff, was hidden on the wing where Reid was housed. It also found that management at the jail ought to have been aware that a "contract" had been taken out on Reid. A seasoned prison governor told the jury that searches for illicit items were not carried out properly, with jail records showing two cells being searched by the same officer at exactly the same time. One witness told the coroner the prison was approaching a state where "you can do what you like and get away with it". The solicitor who represented the Reid family at the inquest says that evidence emerged showing the contract between the private prison and the Home Office provided a financial incentive not to carry out proper cell searches, which meant that knives were available on the wing. She said that a dispute that could have resulted in a black eye ended up as a fatal stabbing. Two weeks before Reid was murdered, another prisoner at Rye Hill, Michael Bailey, apparently took his own life in the jail's segregation unit. Bailey had made serious allegations of corruption against an officer at Rye Hill. Three members of staff were later charged with the manslaughter, by gross negligence, of the 23-year- old. They were cleared on the direction of the judge at Northampton crown court. After the verdict, one of the defendants, Paul Smith, who managed the segregation unit at the time of Bailey's death, said that GSL "failed me and failed Michael Bailey. In my role as manager I did not have the opportunity to do the job properly. I expressed concern about the level of support and training to senior management and they didn't do anything." In June, 2006, another prisoner at Rye Hill, Oleksiy Baronovsky died, apparently from self-inflicted injuries. The prison ombudsman's report on Baronovsky's death is complete, but its contents will not be revealed until the inquest, but impeccable sources have described it as a "shocking document" castigating the lack of medical treatment for a man who was clearly seriously ill. Every private jail has in place a controller, appointed by the Ministry of Justice, to monitor the regime. During a Panorama/ Guardian undercover inquiry into Rye Hill in 2006, it emerged that few, if any, staff knew of the controller's existence. A spokesman for the MOJ said that the Offender Management Bill enabled some duties, previously undertaken by the controller, to be transferred to the contractor. The first private prison in this country opened in 1994 and there are nine now operating in England and Wales. Critics of non-state jails say that the legislation came in by stealth and the morality of profiting from punishment was never debated in parliament. Deborah Coles, co-director of Inquest, said that where prisons are run for profit, the health, safety and welfare of prisoners will always run second to financial interests. She says that these three deaths and the two critical reports into Rye Hill show the role of controllers are subsumed within the culture of the private sector and she accuses the Ministry of Justice of "washing its hands" of the failings of private jails. An MoJ spokesman said the ministry remain concerned about Rye Hill and the prison is still subject to a rectification notice (requiring GSL to rectify failures in performance covered by the contract). He said that the contract is being robustly managed and progress is being made to take forward the chief inspector's recommendations. Three avoidable deaths and two damning chief inspector's reports on, Rye Hill continues to operate as a jail for serious offenders, despite clear evidence that it is an unsafe place for both prisoners and staff. The catalogue of continuing failings begs the question: how many more mistakes, or fatalities, will it take before the Ministry of Justice decides that GSL is not fit to run this dangerous prison?

June 26, 2008 BBC
A prison where an inmate was stabbed to death was "unsafe and unstable" for both prisoners and staff, an inquest jury has ruled. Wayne Reid, 44, of Birmingham, was stabbed in the chest by another inmate at HMP Rye Hill, on the Warwickshire and Northamptonshire border. Three men were sentenced in April 2006 over his murder. A statement issued by the prison after the inquest said since Reid's death in 2005 system changes had been made. The jury gave its verdict in a series of nine individual statements at the end of a two-week inquest held at Rushden and Diamonds Football Club in Irthlingborough, Northamptonshire. These included findings that staff were inadequately supported by management, the prison's cell-searching system had failed and lax security meant knives could be taken in. The final three statements said: "The prison authorities ought to have known that Mr Reid was under a real and immediate risk of harm from other prisoners. "The prison authorities did not do all that reasonably could be expected of them to prevent the risk of harm to Mr Reid or any other prisoner. "We conclude that our above findings in relation to Rye Hill prison created an environment that contributed to the death of Wayne Reid." Rye Hill prison is a category-B prison run by private security company GSL. 'Run ragged' -- A solicitor for Mr Reid's family said they were pleased with the verdict but added a penalty point system for finding banned items in the prison was a disincentive for management to search properly. "That's the most disturbing thing that's emerged," she said. The inquest heard there was only two custody officers overseeing Reid's wing of 70 prisoners when he died. Inspectors also said there was a "criminal subculture" at Rye Hill, searches were not taking place properly and inexperienced officers were being "run ragged by experienced prisoners". A spokesman for GSL said: "Managing a prison is an extremely complex task and since 2005 a number of changes have taken place, including the appointment of several experienced managers and staff, to move the prison forward." Bisharat Chaudry, of Slough, Berkshire, and Ibrahim Musone, of Cricklewood, London, have been convicted of Reid's murder. Deedar Syed, 26, of Peterborough, Cambridgeshire, was also jailed for disposing of a blood-stained jacket.

June 26, 2008 Channel 14 News
The jury at an inquest holds a private prison company partly to blame for the death of an inmate. Simon Israel reports. Wayne Reid was stabbed by another prisoner at Rye Hill jail in Warwickshire, run by the private security group GSL. The jury found that knives were allowed in because of inadequate searches of staff. Channel 4 News has learned that under a penalty point system imposed by the government, the discovery of weapons was not thought as important an offence as an assault.

June 16, 2008 BBC
Inspectors had described a jail where a prisoner was stabbed to death by fellow inmates as "unsafe", an inquest heard. Wayne Reid, 44, from Birmingham, was killed at HMP Rye Hill, in Willoughby, on the borders of Warwickshire and Northamptonshire, in April 2005. Bisharat Chaudry, of Slough, Berkshire, and Ibrahim Musone, of Cricklewood, London, were convicted of his murder. Reid's inquest at Rushden and Diamonds Football Club, Northamptonshire, is expected to last two weeks. Deedar Syed, 26, of Peterborough, Cambridgeshire, was also jailed alongside Reid's killers in April 2006 for disposing of a blood-stained jacket. The hearing, in Irthlingborough, was told inspectors visited the prison around the time of the prisoner's death on 13 April 2005, which happened only days before he was due to be released. 'Unsafe and unstable' -- Tom Osbourne, assistant deputy coroner for Northamptonshire, said the report said: "The prison had deteriorated to the extent that we considered that it was at that time an unsafe and unstable environment both for prisoners and staff." Prison custody officer Ronald Lewis, who still works at Rye Hill, was asked by Mr Osbourne if he had ever felt unsafe there. He said that it could be "interpreted in that way" because on Reid's wing there were only two officers for 70 prisoners. Rye Hill is a category B prison run by private security company GSL. Mr Osborne told the jury Reid, who came from the Handsworth area of Birmingham, had been seen arguing with fellow inmate Musone several times previously. 'Stay with us' -- Prison officer Mr Lewis told the inquest that on the day of the stabbing he had come out of the office to see Reid clutching his chest. He said he could not explain why he had called a 'Code 2' instead of a 'Code 1', which was normally used when someone is injured seriously, to inform his fellow officers of the incident. He said it was the "shock of what happened" which meant he also momentarily left Reid to let another inmate onto the wing. However, Mr Lewis said he then returned and held Reid's hand and told him to "stay with us". Mr Reid's mother Joan Winstanley and sister Correna Platt were both at the inquest. The inquest continues.

March 7, 2008 Northampton Chronicle
Managers of a privately-run prison in Northamptonshire have refuted a judge's claim it is "not fit for purpose". Judge Richard Bray branded HMP Rye Hill, near Daventry, as a failing prison "with a "culture of drugs and violence" after a member of staff was acquitted of drugs smuggling. A jury accepted Lenworth Beecher, 44, had acted out of duress due to threats from inmates after he was caught with £12,000 of heroin, cannabis and steroids. Mr Beecher called on the Government to investigate the private prison, which opened in 2001, while Judge Bray said the case revealed "a shocking state of affairs" within the prison. Anne Owers, HM Inspector of Prisons, concluded after a surprise visit last year that it was difficult to determine whether the guards or inmates were running the wings. But a spokesman for GSL said progress had been made since a spate of drugs arrests last year and with the appointment of a new director. GSL says mandatory drug testing of five per cent of the prison population had resulted in a seven-fold fall in positive tests since the series of arrests during the second half of 2007. He said: "Rye Hill Prison works in close partnership with Northamptonshire Police to develop intelligence to combat the problems faced by all prisons including people smuggling in drugs. "We're concerned and disappointed about the judge's comments and feel he may not be aware of the significant progress that has been made at Rye Hill over many months which includes mandatory drug testing." "We acknowledge Rye Hill has gone through some considerable difficulties but the one thing that is true of all prisons, is that the most experienced people are the inmates."

December 11, 2007 BBC
Gordon Hacker, of Corbett Street, Rugby, admitted conspiring to smuggle cannabis into HMP Rye Hill between November 2004 and April 2005. The 44-year-old was jailed for four years at Northampton Crown Court. Convicted armed robbers Steven McCluskey and Thomas Zealand, both from Coventry, were jailed for five years and four-and-a-half years respectively. McCluskey, 25, admitted conspiracy to supply cannabis while Zealand, 27, also admitted supplying heroin and ecstasy. The court heard Hacker had advised the inmates when the best times were for drugs to be thrown over the prison wall. He claimed he had not been rewarded for his actions and had helped the inmates because he felt under pressure. "He was surrounded by prisoners who knew the prison inside out. What he did was try to create a favour to get an easy shift," Peter Hunter, defending, said. Sentencing Hacker, Judge Richard Bray said: "A depressing picture has been painted of Rye Hill Prison, of the availability of drugs within the prison and of low morale among inmates and prison officers. 'Breach of trust' "You knew what was going on and facilitated the process by giving notice to those involved of the best times to throw drugs over the prison wall. "I appreciate what was said about the regime at Rye Hill Prison but that cannot excuse what you did, it was a grave breach of trust." The court heard Zealand's girlfriend Sheree Williams, 23, of Charity Road, Coventry, controlled bank accounts used by prisoners to pay for the drugs and stored 9kg of cannabis in her son's wardrobe. She was jailed for two-and-a-half years. Zealand's 26-year-old sister Stephanie, of Thompsons Road, Coventry, who was McCluskey's girlfriend, admitted possession of class A drugs with intent to supply and money laundering. She was jailed for two-and-a-half years.

November 19, 2007 BBC News
A former prison officer has pleaded guilty to helping inmates smuggle drugs into a private prison in Warwickshire. Gordon Hacker, from Rugby, conspired with inmates serving at HMP Rye Hill between November 2004 and April 2005, Northampton Crown Court heard. Hacker, 44, tipped off inmates about the best times for accomplices to throw drugs into the prison over the prison wall, the court was told. He was remanded on conditional bail and is due to be sentenced in December. Hacker, 44, was charged along with four co-defendants, all of whom had already pleaded guilty to conspiracy to supply controlled drugs at Rye Hill. Elaborate conspiracy -- They are Stephen McClusky and Thomas Zealand, who were inmates at Rye Hill at the time of the conspiracy, and Sheree Williams and Stephanie Zealand, the two men's girlfriends. They are all also due to be sentenced in December. Judge Richard Bray, presiding, described the elaborate drug-trafficking conspiracy at Rye Hill. He told the court: "It consisted of using moneys that had been earned in prison through prison work, or moneys used by relatives of inmates in prison to fund a bank account used by one of the girlfriends of the prisoners." Drugs were then bought with the money on the outside and thrown over the prison walls at night to inmates who were waiting on the inside, the court heard. Judge Bray told the court Hacker's involvement was "by telling them when was a good time to throw stuff over the wall, and doubtless turning a blind eye to what was going on". Telephone records revealed that Hacker had received frequent and regular telephone calls over the four-month period from 2004 to 2005 from Stephen McClusky and Thomas Zealand. Rachel Brand QC, prosecuting, told the court: "Sometimes he was being called by these men several times, many times, in the course of one day." Ms Brand told the court that although the calls often lasted no more than a few seconds, it was "enough, I suppose, for someone to say I need to speak to you, come and see me". Ecstasy, diamorphine, heroin -- There was insufficient evidence to prove whether Hacker had actually brought drugs into the prison himself, or whether he realised the scale of the trafficking, the court was told. But payments ranging from £20 to more than £800 were made into the bank account being used for the conspiracy. The payments to the account held by Sheree Williams amounted to £6,390; and large quantities of drugs were found at the homes of Sheree Williams and Stephanie Zealand, the court was told. The drugs included cannabis resin, ecstasy pills, diamorphine and heroin. Speaking outside the court, Det Sgt Andy Blaize of Northamptonshire Police, said postal orders were sent from "numerous" prisoners to addresses across Coventry. He said: "When you look at these addresses, there is some link with an inmate, and Stephanie Zealand has gone to collect the majority of these postal orders." Judge Bray said: "As to the scale of all this, we're not talking about the odd throw over the prison walls here. This is serious stuff." In 2005, a report by the chief inspector of prisons found HMP Rye Hill to be "unsafe for staff and inmates alike". The report of the inspection was described by the Prison Reform Trust as "one of the most damning we have ever seen".

October 9, 2007 The Guardian
One of the most troubled privately-run jails in Britain urgently needs a team of public sector managers to come in and bail it out, according to a report by the chief inspector of prisons published today. Prisoners, rather than the often young and inexperienced staff, are in control in parts of Rye Hill prison near Rugby, Warwickshire, which is run by the private security firm GSL, Anne Owers warns. At least 100 inmates should be moved out to other jails, she says. In her third inspection since the prison opened in 2001, the chief inspector says that safety remains "fundamentally fragile" with 52% of the 660 inmates, including 150 lifers, saying they felt unsafe. When prison inspectors visited Rye Hill in June they were told of 617 reportable incidents so far this year, including two rooftop protests, drug finds and assaults. Ten weapons had been found in the previous four weeks and glass bottles available from the canteen had been used as weapons in violent assaults. The inspectors say prisoners were not only verbally aggressive towards staff but had also managed to subvert the incentives scheme to such a point that many of the most badly behaved were actually on the "enhanced" or "super-enhanced" levels of the scheme, which include extra visits and even meals with families. The Prison Service said last night that a decision had been taken in August to reduce Rye Hill's population from 664 to 600. But it rejected the chief inspector's demand for a team of experienced public sector managers to be sent in to stabilise the prison. Instead a "rectification notice" has been issued against GSL, which has appointed a new director. The chief inspector's report follows disclosures by an undercover reporter working for Guardian Films who earlier this year uncovered routine bullying of staff by prisoners who had easy access to drugs and mobile phones. Ms Owers says many prisoners and staff told inspectors that prisoners were inadequately supervised on the wings, often by only one member of staff: "There was some evidence that violent incidents were not consistently followed up or investigated, which led to prisoners stating that they, rather than the staff, were in control of the units."

August 11, 2007 Northampton Chronicle
An organised gang who smuggled drugs into a privately-run prison in Northamptonshire have been warned to expect long prison sentences. Two inmates at HMP Rye Hill, near Daventry, arranged for their girlfriends to be paid by either inmates sending out postal orders as payment or for friends and family to deposit money in a bank account before they would supply prisoners with cannabis, ecstasy or heroin. Prisoner Thomas Zealand, 24, who is currently serving six-and-a-half years at neighbouring HMP Onley, his girlfriend Sheree Williams, 22, fellow inmate Steven McCluskey, 26, and his girlfriend Stephanie Zealand, 26, Thomas's sister, have all admitted their roles involved in supplying drugs. They were charged after the police investigation into the death of Michael Bailey, who was found hanged in his cell at the jail sited on the Warwickshire-Northamptonshire border in March 2006. At Northampton Crown Court Thomas Zealand pleaded guilty to conspiracy to supply cannabis between August 2004 and July 2005. Due for release next month, he reacted with anger and abuse after Judge Richard Bray refused an application for him to be released on bail pending sentence. Stephanie Zealand admitted possessing cannabis, ecstasy and heroin with intent to supply as well being concerned in retaining criminal property by having postal orders sent to her Coventry home as payment for prison drugs supplied. Once payment was made, word was sent into the prison for the drugs to be supplied. Williams admitted possessing nine kilos of cannabis found at her home in July 2005 and a similar money laundering charge in using her bank account to deposit payments for drugs. Rachel Brand QC said prisoners' friends and family would pay money in for drugs to be supplied to their loved ones inside HMP Rye Hill. Judge Richard Bray, who has previously criticised both Rye Hill and Wellingborough Prisons for their record on drugs, said the gang should expect to receive lengthy prison sentences. Releasing the two women on conditional bail, he said: "These are serious charges they have pleaded to. Let me say this, they would be very, very foolish if they do not turn up on the day they are required to do so because there will be consecutive sentences for breach of bail." Heroin addict McCluskey, who is serving nine years for armed robbery, has already pleaded guilty to the cannabis conspiracy charge and three offences of being concerned in the supply of cannabis, ecstasy and heroin. He will be sentenced later this year. Gordon Hacker, aged 44, of Corbett Street, Rugby, who worked as a prison guard, denies conspiracy to supply class C cannabis. He was released on bail pending his trial in November.

June 25, 2007 BBC
A group of prisoners has caused a disturbance at a privately run jail in Warwickshire. The inmates took control of one wing at Rye Hill prison during the incident on Monday afternoon. A team of specially trained and equipped staff regained control of the wing after two hours. A spokesman for GSL, which runs Rye Hill, said that despite some damage at the prison, there were no injuries to either staff or inmates.

April 16, 2007 Guardian Unlimited
The Home Office has pledged to review the management of a privately run prison where an investigation by Guardian Films and the BBC uncovered routine bullying of staff by prisoners at the jail. A reporter working undercover as a prison officer at the troubled Rye Hill jail found widespread intimidation of staff and incidents where diligent custody officers were urged to "back off" by senior colleagues for fear of upsetting inmates. It also found that prisoners had easy access to drugs and mobile phones. The investigation, which will be shown tonight, comes after the jail had already been heavily criticised by inspectors over the murder of an inmate and the "avoidable" suicides of prisoners. The Home Office insisted that Global Solutions Limited (GSL), the private firm that runs Rye Hill, has already been penalised for failings at the jail. But it added that the management would be reviewed again after tonight's broadcast. In a statement a spokeswoman said: "The regional offender manager will continue to work closely with the Commercial and Competitions Unit of Noms [the National Offender Manager Service] and the Home Office controller in considering whether further remedial action is required to ensure compliance by GSL against the contract. A review will be held following the showing of the Panorama programme and the response received from the contractor, as to whether additional action is required." The statement also admitted there had been failings at the jail. It said: "There have been undoubted failures in the past performance of GSL against their contract to deliver the required service in a number of areas. Both the current contract holder, the regional offender manager for the East Midlands, and the previous holder, the head of the office for contracted prisons, have sought to remedy these failings through robust contract management. "Contract management of Rye Hill has involved financial penalties related to specific incidents (escapes), the withholding of invoices and penalty points to reflect poor performance, which translate into further financial penalties."

April 16, 2007 BBC
An undercover reporter has unearthed evidence of intimidation and corruption at a privately-run prison, a Panorama investigation will say. The reporter, who worked at Rye Hill, a category B prison in Warwickshire, for five months, says prisoners openly threatened a newly qualified officer. He also says he was asked by inmates to smuggle in mobile phones and drugs. GSL, which runs the jail, said inmates' behaviour was unacceptable but accused the reporter of ignoring his training. Murder in cell: HMP Rye Hill is one of a growing number of private prisons in the country intended to help deal with a rising prison population. It houses 600 prisoners nearing the end of sentences of at least four years, including criminals from the Iranian embassy siege and Strangeways prison riots. However in the last two years, there have been one murder and two suicides, and government inspectors have given it two damning reports. During one inspection, prisoner Wayne Reid was stabbed through the heart in his cell by two other prisoners, both with criminal records for violence and knife crime. Chief Inspector of Prisons Anne Owers said even before the murder, her team had "established to their own satisfaction that they felt it was unsafe and unstable for both prisoners and staff". She shouldn't be frightened - she's fully supported. As part of the investigation by Guardian Films on behalf of the BBC, the reporter, a former SAS ex-British Army soldier, undertook a 13-week training period to become a newly qualified prison officer. He was earning £250 a week - a third less than officers in the state sector. During his time on the wings, he said a new recruit was threatened for enforcing prison rules too keenly. At one point, she was threatened with a pool cue by one prisoner, the programme says. The officer said: "I'm not feeling safe because of the staff. "And I don't know if I can be bothered with it for the money. They're going to kill me I do believe." Smuggling cannabis: GSL's director of communications, John Bates, said: "People shouldn't be surprised by the fact that prisoners in a prison seek to coerce staff into making their lives easier and we don't hide from that fact, and that's why during the training, we return to that theme regularly." And of the officer, he said: "She shouldn't be frightened. She's fully supported." In another incident, the undercover reporter says he was openly approached by inmates seeking to "groom" him into a smuggler. He reports being offered £200 for a standard mobile phone and up to £750 for a camera phone, to be paid to him by telephone banking. Another prisoner offered him up to £1,500 - more than he earns in a month from GSL - for one delivery of cannabis. Mr Bates said the prisoners' behaviour was "completely unacceptable" and the reporter knew what they were doing was illegal. "If that officer had done what he had been trained to do - that matter would have been dealt with. He failed his colleagues and he put himself at risk," he added. Panorama: Life Behind Bars can be seen on BBC1 at 2030 BST on Monday 16 April.

June 8, 2006 BBC News
Four prison officers have appeared in court over charges relating to the death of a prisoner in March last year. Michael Bailey, 23, was found dead in his cell at HMP Rye Hill, on the Northants and Warwickshire border. Daniel Daymond, Paul Smith, Samantha Prime and Ben King appeared at Daventry Magistrates' Court to face charges over his death. The four were granted unconditional bail and will reappear at Northampton Crown Court on 23 June. Mr Daymond, 23, of Rugby, is accused of manslaughter by gross negligence and conspiring to pervert the course of justice. Mr Smith, 39, of Birchwood, Warrington, and Ms Prime, 28, of Rugby, both face a single charge of causing manslaughter by gross negligence. Mr King, 21, of Southbrook, Daventry, is charged with conspiring to pervert the course of justice.

April 23, 2006 24 DASH
Prison officers are calling for all jail wardens to be better armed claiming they should be given metal batons in order to defend themselves from assault. The Prison Officers Association (POA) conference next month will vote on whether the extendable baton should be allowed in many more prisons. The union's national general secretary Brian Caton said he supported the proposals and predicted the motions would be passed. Currently, staff at private prisons such as Doncaster do not carry batons. "We would say that's wrong," Mr Caton said. "Prisoners in private prisons are no less violent, they're no less difficult. "You are twice as likely to be attacked in a private prison as in a public prison." Last July the Chief Inspector of Prisons warned that staff at a privately-run prison were being bullied by inmates. Anne Owers demanded urgent action after discovering unsafe conditions at Rye Hill jail, near Rugby in Warwickshire, which is run by GSL UK Ltd. Inexperienced officers were ignoring misbehaviour and evidence of contraband in order to "survive" on the wings, the report said.

April 6, 2006 BBC
Two prisoners who murdered a fellow inmate in his cell five days before his release have been jailed for life. Wayne Reid, 44, of Birmingham, was stabbed at Rye Hill Prison, near Rugby, Northampton Crown Court heard. Inmates Ibrahim Musone, of Cricklewood, north London, and Bisharat Chaudry, of Slough, Berks, will serve at least 15 years and 14 years respectively. Deedar Syed, 26, of Peterborough, Cambs, was jailed for 30 months for disposing of a blood-stained jacket.

December 21, 2005 The Times
A PRIVATELY run jail is out of control, with high levels of assaults and a culture on the wings of drug abuse, according to a highly critical report published today. Prison officers were covered with a bucket of excrement by inmates at Forest Bank jail as inspectors toured the building. The incident known in prison slang as "potting" was the latest in a number of similar attacks on prison staff. Anne Owers, the Chief Inspector of Prisons, criticised the culture at the jail which was "steeped in serious drug abuse". In one month alone, more than 2kg of cannabis, 60g of heroin and 4.6g of cocaine were found at the jail, run by United Kingdom Detention Services. Ms Owers was so alarmed by the prison in Salford, Greater Manchester, that she immediately alerted senior Prison Service officials to the extent of the failings. "There had been a significant deterioration in safety so that urgent management attention and remedial action was required to rebuild staff confidence and properly regain control of the prison," the inspection report said. A surprise inspection in July at the jail, run by UKDS, a subsidiary of Sodexho Alliance which runs three prisons, found routine intimidation of staff, prisoner assaults on other prisoners running at 25 a month and staff turnover of 25 per cent a year. There had been 2,500 prisoner discipline hearings in six months and 40 per cent of compulsory drug tests were positive. Ms Owers said: "There were a series of assaults against staff, including one unsavoury incident when a bucket of excrement was thrown into an office and over two staff who were there, while we were at the prison. This was by no means the first such 'potting' incident in the prison's recent history. We were told there were two or three others in the previous couple of months." The report depicts a prison where drugs are rife and that a high level of staff turnover meant custody officers were unable to tackle problems. It is the second report in less than six months in which Ms Owers has found serious problems of control at a privately run jail. In July she found that staff at Rye Hill jail near Rugby had little confidence in controlling prisoners and the premises were "almost out of control". Staff turnover at the prison, operated by GSL, formerly part of the Group 4, was running at 40 per cent a year. Private sector involvement in the prison system has helped to spur the public sector to improve its performance and introduced innovation into the jail system. But staff turnover at private jails is higher than State-run jails - reflecting lower pay for officers compared with those in State prisons. It is also difficult to get information about what goes on in private jails with "commercial confidentiality" used as a reason not to disclose details. One prison watchdog said: "The private sector do not like anyone knowing too much about what goes on in their prisons. If they could get away with giving out no information at all, they would."

August 5, 2005 The Guardian
Police investigating the death of a prisoner in the segregation unit of a privately run jail have referred the case to the Crown Prosecution Service. Michael Bailey, 24, was found hanging in his cell at Rye Hill prison, near Rugby, in March. Prisoners at the jail told the Guardian at the time that he had been segregated after giving staff the name of an officer who had been supplying drugs. Following the death, six staff were suspended from the prison and two custody officers remain on police bail. Officers from the homicide and major crime unit of Northamptonshire police are investigating allegations of supplying controlled drugs to the prison. Rye Hill, operated by Global Solutions Ltd, holds 600 serious offenders. After an inspection in April, the chief inspector of prisons said the jail was "unsafe for staff and inmates alike". The report of the inspection, published last month, was described by the Prison Reform Trust as "one of the most damning we have ever seen". In April, another prisoner, 44-year-old Wayne Reid, died from stab wounds. Reid had been due to be released a few days after he died. Three men have been charged with his murder. Detective Chief Inspector Pete Windridge, of Northamptonshire police, said the force had investigated the death of Michael Bailey and had sent its preliminary findings to the CPS. He added that "an investigation into the supply of controlled drugs into the prison is ongoing. Two prison custody officers, a 21-year-old man from Bedworth [near Coventry] and a 42-year-old man from Warwickshire, remain on police bail pending further inquiries.
"A further two men who are prison inmates and three women not connected with the prison have also been arrested and bailed in relation to this investigation."

July 29, 2005 Morning Star
The Prison Officers Association called for the return of Rye Hill jail to public control yesterday, after the Chief Inspector of Prisons Anne Owers found that staff at the private prison are being bullied by inmates. In a damning new report, Ms Owers found that inexperienced prison officers are ignoring inmates' misbehaviour and working in pairs, just in order to "survive" on the wings of the Warwickshire jail, which is run by privateers GSL UK Ltd. "We saw evidence of staff being bullied by prisoners and withdrawing from, rather than confronting, intimidatory and aggressive behaviour," Ms Owers said. A POA spokesman explained that, while the union is "extremely concerned" at the findings, it is not altogether suprised. "We have been receiving information from our members about the lack of control, as well as lack of management supervision," he said.

July 28, 2005 Politics
Anne Owers said the situation at Rye Hill prison near Rugby had reached a point that staff, many of whom were "inexperienced and poorly supported", were being bullied by inmates.  During her unannounced inspection, a death occurred that resulted in a murder investigation, while before the team arrived at Rye Hill the prison had seen a hostage situation. Inspectors reported an increasing number of inmates testing positive for drugs and found knives, drugs and alcohol were all available on the wings at the prison, some of which were only staffed by two officers.  Inmates at the prison, which is owned and operated by private company GSL UK, reported that they sorted out fights and bullying themselves.  "So great were the concerns that I immediately informed ministers and urged the chief executive of the National Offender Management Service to take immediate and decisive action," Ms Owers said.  Rye Hill is a category B jail and has a capacity of about 600 inmates. GSL has been fined £95,000 as a result of its poor performance.  The Prison Reform Trust said today's report was "one of the most damning reports of a prison we have seen", which painted a picture of an institution run not by private company but by the prisoners themselves.  Ms Owers' report comments on the "keenness and enthusiasm" of residential staff but criticises their lack of training and adequate management support, and highlights the estimated 40 per cent staff turnover rate.
The director of the Prison Reform Trust, Juliet Lyon, said this turnover figure would "disgrace many burger bars", saying it was "hazardous to safety and undermines the work of a prison in guiding prisoners towards a responsible life on release".

July 28, 2005 The Guardian
A private prison was yesterday described as "unsafe", with prisoners bullying staff, and drugs, knives and alcohol freely available.  The inspection report into Rye Hill prison, near Rugby, was described by the Prison Reform Trust as "one of the most damning reports of a prison we have seen".  The trust's director, Juliet Lyon, said: "This prison appears to be run not by a private company, but by the prisoners themselves."  The chief inspector of prisons, Anne Owers, said Rye Hill had deteriorated to the extent that, at the time of inspection, it was "an unsafe and unstable environment".  Inspectors found inexperienced staff on a wing of 70 unlocked prisoners, "surviving by ignoring misbehaviour or evidence of illicit possessions". They also witnessed evidence of staff being bullied by prisoners.  In the period immediately before the inspection, in April, the jail, holding 600 serious offenders, had experienced an apparently self-inflicted death in the segregation unit. A hostage was taken and there had been a 100% rise in the number of assaults against staff, at a time when assault figures are down across the service.  Staff and prisoners told inspectors that managers at the jail gave no support to custody staff and were rarely seen on the wings when prisoners were unlocked. The report also highlighted failings in the race relations programme at the jail. An analysis of use of force data shown to inspectors revealed that 57% of all recorded use of force involved black or ethnic minority prisoners, yet that group accounted for only 37% of the jail's population.

May 20, 2005 BBC
A prison officer arrested on suspicion of supplying drugs after the death of an inmate has been released on bail. Michael Bailey, 23, who was serving a four-year term for supplying drugs, was found hanged in the segregation unit of Rye Hill prison, Warks, on 24 March. He had been separated from others amid concerns about his behaviour. Northamptonshire Police, who are investigating the death, said the 42-year-old Warwickshire man had been released pending further inquiries. He was detained on Thursday on suspicion of being concerned in the supply of controlled drugs. Detectives also searched a house in Rugby as part of the investigation. A 21-year-old officer from Coventry was arrested on 19 April on the same charge and has since been released on police bail pending further inquiries. Two staff at the privately-run prison were suspended in March for alleged irregularities with documentation pending an internal inquiry but not as a direct result of Mr Bailey's death.
Rye Hill is run by GSL and houses 660 male prisoners, including 150 vulnerable inmates at a purpose-built unit.

April 22, 2005 BBC
Ibrahim Musone, Bisharat Chaudry and Deedar Syed are charged with murdering Wayne Martin Reid at Rye Hill Prison in Willoughby, near Rugby, Warwickshire.  The men, aged 40, 30 and 25, are accused of stabbing 44-year-old Reid, from Birmingham, on 13 April. A post-mortem examination revealed that Reid, from Balsall Heath, died of stab wounds.
He was serving a seven-year sentence for robbery at the 660-inmate jail, which is run by the private security company GSL.

April 21, 2004
AN ESCAPED Scots murderer was caught in London yesterday after 11 days on the run.  Gordon Topen, 33, gave his private security guards the slip at a hospital on April 9.  But he was held in West Kensington at 5pm yesterday by the Metropolitan Police Tactical Support Group. They specialise in dealing with violent thugs.  Dundee-born Topen stabbed a millionaire businessman 19 times in 1992 because he believed the man was having an affair with his girlfriend.  He was taken to Walsgrave Hospital in Coventry from Rye Hill jail in Warwickshire for a blood transfusion. He told his Group 4 guards he needed to go to the toilet, then walked out to freedom as they sat by his bed.  Police described 6ft 6in Topen as extremely aggressive and urged people not to approach him.  (Daily Record)

April 19, 2005 BBC
A prison officer has been arrested on suspicion of supplying drugs by police investigating the death of an inmate at Rye Hill prison in Warwickshire. Michael Bailey, from Birmingham, was found hanged in his cell in the segregation unit on 24 March. The 23-year-old had been serving a four-year sentence for supplying drugs. Northamptonshire Police said they arrested a 21-year-old prison custody officer, from the Coventry area, on Tuesday morning.

April 14, 2005 BBC
Three prisoners have been arrested on suspicion of murdering a fellow inmate at a privately-run jail. Wayne Martin Reid, 44, from Balsall Heath, Birmingham, was stabbed at Rye Hill Prison, near Rugby, Warwickshire. He was given first aid by officers and medical staff but pronounced dead on Wednesday afternoon. John Bates, a spokesman for prison operator GSL, which runs Rye Hill jail, said Reid was stabbed in the chest. "Our condolences have been passed to the family and friends of Mr Reid," he added.

November 1, 2004 BBC
An investigation is being carried out at a Warwickshire prison after two inmates finished a rooftop protest. The men came down from the roof of a shed at Rye Hill prison near Rugby at just after 9.30pm on Saturday evening.
  It is not clear what the demonstration at the jail, which is run by Global Solutions Ltd, was about.

Serco
Companies Use Immigration Crackdown to Turn a Profit: Expose on immigration by Nina Bernstein at the New York Times, September 28, 2011

May 14, 2013 huffingtonpost.co.uk
Prison reform campaigners have called for urgent action at Britain's news private jail, which has been put into "lock-down" in response to the violent gang warfare behind its bars. In an inspection report, Serco-run Thameside prison in London was found to keep some prisoners in their cells 23 hours a day, with 60% locked up all day, in order for staff to cope with the violent offenders. The Howard League for Penal Reform called the report "truly alarming" and said it was an embarrassment to the government. The previous system, where prisoners were allowed out of their cells for most of the day, had seen an "unacceptable" level of delinquency, the prison said. The report by HM Inspectorate of Prisons found that the prison, which opened in March last year holding 900 male prisoners, had far too high a frequency of assault, and that staff could not protect prisoners from the violence. "The prison had taken the unusual step of effectively locking down the prison, severely curtailing the regime and in particular prisoner access to time unlocked. "The prison had done little to evaluate the success of this quite extreme strategy and at the time of our visit there seemed only vague plans to restore the prison to normality. "The data on assaults, security report reports and use of force that we examined did not show any improvement from previous months and we were told that some prisoners got around restrictions by planning to attend activities so that they could become involved in fights." Andrew Neilson, Director of Campaigns at the Howard League for Penal Reform, said in a statement: “Conditions at Thameside are truly alarming. Violence was so common that the Serco management put the prison in a state of lockdown, and yet this extreme measure has done little to bring down the number of attacks. “Staff are inexperienced and often resort to physical force. The prisoners have no confidence in them. Despite enforcing one of the most restricted regimes ever seen by inspectors, this is a large private prison out of control. “Today’s report should embarrass the government. Less than a week after Justice Secretary Chris Grayling demanded that prisoners work harder to earn privileges, this flagship private prison is revealed to be locking up inmates for 23 hours a day because they don’t have anything constructive to do. “With a pathetic lack of activities and barely any vocational training available, Thameside is doing nothing to help prisoners turn their lives around. It is merely making matters worse. “This is what happens when you hand the justice system over to vast multinational corporations, who put cost-cutting and the interests of their shareholders ahead of concern for public safety.” The National Offender Management Service said action had been taken to address the concerns.

15 February 2013 pulsetoday.co.uk

The private out-of-hours provider Serco has received another warning from the Care Quality Commission about staffing problems with its service for NHS Cornwall and Isles of Scilly. The CQC conducted a surprise inspection in December to check on whether previous staffing problems had been addressed at the Truro-based out of hours service. The commission found that there was a shortage of healthcare assistants on duty and Serco did not have enough staff to answer phone calls. Last year the service was told by the CQC that it had to improve the standard of its services and have a minimum of three GPs per shift. In May 2012 it was found that the OOH service had only one GP on call to cover more than 500,000 people after the other GP was taken ill. The company made an undertaking to increase the pool of GPs and said it was confident it would be able to meet the needs of the service. When CQC inspectors made an unannounced visit in December to check on whether action had been taken, they found the service was now compliant with four of the five essential standards for which they had previously been found deficient. However, the inspection revealed that there were still ongoing staffing problems, with not enough health care advisors (HCAs) employed to handle calls to the service. One in four calls were not being answered within the minimum time of 60 seconds and 12% of ‘urgent’ patients were not having a clinical assessment started within the benchmark time of 20 minutes. The HCAs said staff shortages meant they had to work under stress and for up to seven hours without a break. The number of GPs employed by the service had increased since the last inspection but a shift manager said that there were still shortages. Inspectors found that one car was not covered and a number of clinics in the county had doctors working their shift partly in cars and partly based at a clinic. There was no GP on duty at the call centre, but Serco said a GP did not necessarily need to be based at the call centre and could be on call. The service said it was now using a ‘wider skill mix’ including nurse advisers and nurse practitioners to provide after hours care, and GPs’ time was used more effectively by having them take telephone calls at their clinics, when call numbers were high. The CQC says it has told Serco to report by 27 February on what action they will take to meet the standards and the commission will check to make sure that action is taken. A spokesman for Serco said it welcomed CQC inspection report, which it said showed the improvement made over the past months. ‘The CQC … recognised that the number of clinical staff, particularly GPs, employed by the service in Cornwall has increased. They have also said that we need to further increase the number of HCAs in order to meet people’s needs and to meet the specific National Quality Requirement for call handling times and we fully accept this. We have a recruitment campaign under way and will have more advisors on the team by the end of February. ‘All our team in Truro have worked extremely hard to achieve this progress and I have complete confidence that we have everything needed to provide a high quality service for patients in Cornwall in 2013,’ said Dr Louis Warren, who manages the service. This article has been altered to reflect that the CQC found a shortage of healthcare assistants, and not GPs, in their December inspection as previously stated.

September 9, 2012 The Guardian
Home Office ministers have ordered weekly reports on the progress of two new contracts with the private security companies G4S and Serco to house and provide support services for thousands of asylum seekers and their families. The chief executive of the UK Border Agency (UKBA), Rob Whiteman, has confirmed that serious concerns about the ability of the two companies to find housing for thousands of asylum seekers across the north of England by November has led to closer monitoring at the most senior levels of the Home Office. The £883m a year Compass contract to provide support services for dispersed asylum seekers is the largest project run by the Home Office. The two private security companies took over the five-year asylum housing contracts in four of the six UKBA regions across Britain from social landlords, including councils, in March. The companies were expected to start moving people in June. But after a contractual dispute G4S dropped its housing subcontractor for the Yorkshire and Humberside region, United Property Management, in June and its new subcontractors have yet to find enough homes. Two councils, Sheffield and Kirklees, have raised concerns about their ability to deliver the housing contract within the expected timetable. Kirklees council said that a fortnight ago, only one family out of 240 asylum seekers had been moved as part of the transition from the council to the new providers. "There are 240 asylum seekers being assisted. We understand the subcontractors are finding it difficult to procure accommodation and the council has been asked to continue to provide assistance until the end of October. There is no suggestion however that the council's contract will be renewed after this time," Whiteman has told the Commons public accounts committee there were also concerns about the two Serco contracts, one covering north-west England and the other Scotland and Northern Ireland, including the "speed at which properties are being acquired". He said the issue had been "escalated" to directly involve himself and Jeremy Oppenheim, the UKBA director of immigration and settlement. Weekly reports are also being sent to ministers. "It is not at this stage anywhere near penalties because they are acting within the contract in terms of how the work is handed over to them," Whiteman told MPs. "We do have concerns about mobilisation. We are escalating this and I have been involved in meetings on that but it is at a relatively early stage." He added there were other remedies available under the contracts but he hoped the difficulties would be resolved.

August 17, 2012 Radio New Zealand
New Zealand's only private prison operator, Serco, has been hit with another $150,000 fine for letting a second inmate escape. Graham Hay, an inmate at Auckland's Mt Eden Prison, spent 30 minutes on the run after undergoing an eye procedure at the Greenlane Clinical Centre in early June. An official report has found a non-standard pair of handcuffs was used to lock Hay to one of two guards escorting him to the appointment. The larger-than-usual cuffs slipped off Hay's wrist, allowing him to escape before he was caught by a police dog. The report says the incorrect handcuffs were used because prison officers had not properly checked the equipment beforehand. None of Serco's staff have been sacked as a result, although managing director Paul Mahoney says it has issued written warnings to some staff. The company has been ordered to make operational changes. Last year, Serco was fined $150,000 following the escape of inmate Aaron Forden. The Corrections Department is in charge of overseeing Serco's $300 million contract with the New Zealand Government. Deputy chief executive Christine Stevenson says Hay's escape was avoidable and the fine is warranted.

July 17, 2012 GP
Private provider Serco Ltd has been ordered to improve out-of-hours services it runs in Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly after a report by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) found they failed to meet quality and safety standards. CQC inspectors visited the head office of Serco Ltd in April after patients raised concerns about the service. Following its investigation, the CQC issued a report stating that the provider was failing to meet four essential quality and safety standards. The report said Serco had failed to employ enough skilled staff to meet the needs of patients and that staff often worked long hours. A CQC inspection revealed that seven GPs were working for up to 13 hours a day, some from 8am until 7pm and others from 7pm until 8am. The CQC found that the shortage of doctors had resulted in an increased number of complaints to the PCT regarding the service. The report also found that Serco had failed to protect patients by not training all staff in safeguarding protocols and not making locum GPs aware of local protocols. When the CQC asked staff members about statutory staff training, they were told it was a bit ‘hit and miss’. In addition to these concerns, Serco also failed to put an effective system in place to monitor the quality of service that patients received, the CQC said. Responding to the CQC report, managing director of Serco’s clinical services Paul Forden said: ‘We can confirm that we have already implemented actions to ensure that three of the four areas have made progress and we consider that we have achieved the required standards. ‘On the fourth recommendation on training we are 92% compliant today and will fully meet the requirement within the next month. ‘We are confident that we will be able to fully satisfy the CQC that we are meeting all of the standards required when they next visit the service.’

July 5, 2012 Stuff
Private prison operator Serco has failed to meet half of its performance targets since taking over Auckland's Mt Eden Prison. A report card on Serco's performance released today reveals three inmates were wrongly released, one escaped and there were three wrongful detentions. The percentage of sentenced prisoners with an appropriate plan in place within required timeframes was only 28 per cent - two thirds lower than the 90 per cent target. Of 37 targets Serco was to meet in the nine months to April half weren't met. Corrections said Serco had accepted responsibility for one wrongful release. To date the final decision on whether they'd be fined on a second wrongful release had not been made, and discussions between both parties about whether they'd followed correct operational processes were ongoing. Corrections are to issue a performance notice for a third wrongful release that occurred in March. During its first quarter running the prison Serco was fined $150,000 after prisoner Aaron Forden escaped in February. Forden, dubbed "Houdini" escaped along with another inmate who was caught almost immediately. The firm was also fined $25,000 for releasing one inmate early and $50,000 for failing to file progress reports. Escapes and wrongful releases are listed as zero targets.

June 6, 2012 Auckland Now
Private prison operator Serco could be slapped with its second $150,000 fine this year after a prisoner escaped after getting his eyes checked on Sunday. A Mt Eden prisoner spent 30 minutes on the run after escaping while being escorted from the Greenlane Clinical Centre. The police dog unit and prison duty staff found him hiding in a garden shed at a property in Claude Rd, about 600 metres from the clinic. Auckland District Health Board spokesman Mark Fenwick said the prisoner escaped while being escorted back to the vehicle after receiving his treatment. The man is back in prison and faces charges of escaping custody. Serco, who are contracted by Corrections to manage the prison, would not comment on how the prisoner escaped. An internal inquiry is underway. Under Serco's contract with Corrections they can be fined $150,000 every time a prisoner escapes. They were fined in February after serial escaper Aaron Forden fled the prison after breaking into a service way in October, 2011.

April 27, 2012 New Zealand Herald
Private prison operators Serco have failed to meet several key performance measures since taking over running the Mt Eden Corrections Facility, a Corrections Department report shows. The report, released under the Official Information Act, shows two wrongful releases and one wrongful imprisonment in the eight months since the Mt Eden facility was handed to the British-based company. It was fined $150,000 when Aaron Stephen Forden, a prisoner dubbed "Houdini", escaped earlier this year. All of the incidents are listed as zero tolerance areas under Corrections Departments standards. Corrections chief executive Ray Smith told Radio New Zealand Serco's failure to meet several performance measures was "less than we expect". "We have been actively working with Serco to ensure that improvements are achieved." Other results showed an 82 per cent completion rate on random drug tests at the facility - 17 per cent short of the standard required. Targets for prisoner management plans and telephone call monitoring were not reached. However, random drug testing showed only a three per cent return of positive samples. The Public Service Association said the results showed the failure of privatising prisons. National Secretary Richard Wagstaff said Serco had jeopardised public safety by allowing wrongful releases and escapes. "The department may be trying to write these off as 'teething problems' but they are no such thing - these are core procedures that should be right from the start. "This report shows Serco is failing in its number one priority - to keep the public safe." Mr Wagstaff said the report showed the "folly" of opening another private prison at Wiri.

April 27, 2012 Scoop
National’s prison privatisation plan needs serious rethinking after failing to meet basic performance requirements at Mt Eden prison, Labour says. Labour’s Justice Sector Spokesperson Charles Chauvel says that the Government’s plans to privatise up to a quarter of New Zealand’s prison capacity will worsen the already dangerous failure to meet requirements. “Figures out today reveal worrying trends in Serco’s management of the Mt Eden Corrections Facility over the last eight months “Of particular concern are failures to meet drug testing and offender management plan targets, wrongful releases, and an escape from custody. “Coincidentally I visited Mt Eden yesterday, as well as the state-run Paremoremo and Auckland Women’s prisons. “While there is much positive work being done by the staff at each of them, one of the obvious realities is that a level playing field does not operate between the public and private sectors. Many of the state-run institutions have to cope with legacy facilities and procedures, which Serco is unburdened by. “In light of that – and especially since, under National Serco’s slice of the corrections pie will double once the new Wiri Prison is built next year, and up to a quarter of all inmates in the system will be under their control – the public has a right to expect Serco’s performance targets to be met.

March 1, 2012 STV
Scotland's first private prison has been criticised by inspectors for the "limited" activities provided for inmates. HM Chief Inspector of Prisons Brigadier Hugh Monro has now called for improvements in the work and education programmes at HMP Kilmarnock. He also called for the overall standard of healthcare at the facility to be reviewed. The latest inspection report claimed out-of-cell activities at the jail were "limited and lack stimulation". It said "too few prisoners" attended the workshops, and that "too few prisoners also attend education and the educational facility is under-utilised". The report complained that "large numbers of prisoners are not engaged in purposeful activity". It also stated that access to activities was not good enough, with only 40% of prisoners out of the house blocks during the day. Just 200 prisoners were taking part in work during the latest inspection, and Brig Monro said: "I was not satisfied that the quality of work was sufficiently good. In some workshops some prisoners have no work to do and spend much of the time drinking tea or watching other prisoners who do have work allocated to them." Brig Monro recommended that access to work, vocational training and education at the jail is improved, and the quality of education and work should also be better. The report described the education programme as "limited and under-developed". It added: "Low numbers of prisoners access education programmes. A total of 139 prisoners out of a prison population of approximately 640 regularly attend education classes. This represents only 22% of the prison population." Brig Monro accepted there were "good points in the prison's healthcare provision, not least the mental health area, smoking cessation, dental treatment and alcohol programme".

November 23, 2011 The Age
THE multinational company that runs Australia's immigration detention network has been fined $15 million for failing in its duty of care to asylum seekers and underperformance . The immigration department has told a federal parliamentary inquiry it had docked $14.8 million from monthly payments to SERCO between March 2010 and June 2011 because of poor management of the detention centres, and docked another $215,000 from SERCO's contract to run immigration housing centres. SERCO was paid $375 million to run immigration centres last year, and $101 million in the three months to October 2011. The secretive contract the federal government signed with SERCO withholds payment for audited ''abatements'' each month. Escapes, failure to secure perimeter fences, not providing activities or reporting major incidents, not giving access to visitors, interpreters or legal representatives, poor building conditions and food safety can trigger fee reductions. The penalty is limited by the contract to 5 per cent of SERCO's monthly fee. The $15 million fine, revealed in written submissions to the inquiry, is therefore near the upper limit of what the Immigration Department would have been contractually able to penalise SERCO in a period plagued by riots, fires, suicides and escalating detainee self harm.

November 18, 2011 AAP
SECURITY company Serco has been asked to explain why a refugee was locked in isolation after he suffered an electric shock while scaling a fence at a Darwin detention centre. The Joint Select Committee on Australia's Immigration Detention Network is conducting an extensive inquiry into the effect of detention on detainees, in the wake of a series of detention centre riots. Serco, which has a contract with the federal government to run the centres, was questioned today over a refugee being locked in a room by guards for more than an hour, after he suffered an electric shock while climbing a fence at Darwin's Northern Immigration Detention Centre on November 15. The man, who was declared a refugee a year ago and was awaiting security clearance, was reportedly attempting to see friends in another compound, Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young told the inquiry in Melbourne. Ms Hanson-Young said he was only taken to hospital after he collapsed, then was again locked up in isolation after he returned. "In this scenario, which is a real scenario, who made the decision that this man was to be locked up on his own?" Senator Hanson-Young asked Serco managing director Chris Manning. Mr Manning told her he would look into the incident and report back to the committee on his findings. Senator Hanson-Young also asked him about concerns raised in a recent report by health and safety authority Comcare over underqualified staff working at immigration detention centres. "You don't have a client to staff ratio," she said of the contract the security firm has with the government. Mr Manning told her staffing levels were reviewed regularly. "They are based on a number of factors ... if there are safety issues then we would take a view on whether more staff were required," he said.

October 16, 2011 BBC
More than 25,000 cab journeys have taken place since August, Serco said. The Ministry of Justice has admitted a private security firm is using black cabs to take prison inmates to court. The firm, Serco, has a seven-year deal - with a further three-year option - worth up to £420m. But the company has been forced to transport inmates in London and east England in cabs after their computerised booking system failed. Conservative MP Patrick Mercer said he would raise the issue with Home Secretary Theresa May. 'Extraordinarily expensive' -- Mr Mercer said he was worried about the cost of hiring cabs, and the perception defendants were being driven around in luxury. "I just think it is ridiculous that a security company such as Serco misjudges things so badly that prisoners are moved to and fro in black taxis," he said.

October 10, 2011 3 News
Private prison operator SERCO faces a $150,000 fine after the man nicknamed “Houdini” escaped from its custody. Aaron Forden scaled the perimeter fence of Mt Eden Corrections Facility early this morning. He was pursued by a police dog, but got away in a waiting car. Forden used knotted bed sheets to escape from Mt Eden Prison in 2008. “I would consider him to be unpredictable and therefore dangerous and that members of the public should not approach him,” says Detective Sergeant Iain Chapman. “But it’s only with assistance from the public and his associates that we will catch him.” Forden is known to change his appearance to avoid capture.

August 25, 2011 The West Australian
A former Serco employee at Curtin Detention Centre says treatment of detainees by some staff members was "outrageously brutal" and they were bullied constantly. Seven asylum seekers were flown from Curtin and put in isolation on Christmas Island on Tuesday night because of increased tensions at the remote centre, 40km from Derby. The Immigration Department confirmed two men tried to escape on Friday. They climbed an internal fence but did not get past the electric perimeter fence. A spokeswoman denied the men were injured in the incident and said they were not among three detainees denied treatment at Broome Hospital on Tuesday for speaking to a member of the public in a waiting room. The former employee, who recently resigned and asked not to be named, spoke of growing tensions at Curtin where there were three staff who had "no training, no idea and no perceived intention to provide any welfare" to detainees. "The fact two Serco guards have committed suicided since April is evidence that not everyone can live with this on their conscience," they said. An elderly Afghan man who had asked in July to be moved to a single room because he believed he "smelled" - a problem attributed to mental health issues - was manhandled by staff. They claimed a department case manager and Serco welfare officer called the man a liar after a short interview and, as he tried to leave the room, two "burly" Serco guards shoved him to the ground. He spent four days in hospital with back injuries, the former employee said. Employees were scared to talk to anyone outside the centre about such incidents, particularly the media, for fear of being identified or sacked. "The expulsion of the Serco man at Christmas Island recently and the sacking of the mental health nurse from Darwin last week is evidence that it is a real threat," they said. Habib, 28, an Afghan asylum seeker released in July after 15 months in detention, fears for friends inside. He said some staff were uncaring and detainees were scared to speak out in case it affected their status. Many were depressed after waiting many months for interviews. The immigration spokeswoman rejected claims detainees were treated badly. "We require that our staff and Serco staff treat detainees with dignity and respect," she said. There were complaint processes and allegations were always investigated. She said there were no recent complaints of mistreatment.

August 19, 2011 The Age
A MENTAL health nurse has been sacked from a Darwin detention centre for saying she believes mandatory detention contributes to mental illness in asylum seekers. A letter sent by her employer, International Health and Medical Services (IHMS), and obtained by The Age, says her job was terminated last Friday after Serco detention centre managers and Immigration Department staff complained that she was ''expressing negative political opinions'' about detention. The federal government's Detention Health Advisory Group, the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses and the Australian Psychological Society yesterday called for mandatory detention to be abandoned. Their call came after documents submitted to a parliamentary inquiry showed high levels of self-harm, with 213 detainees treated for self-inflicted injuries and 700 for ''voluntary starvation'' in the first six months of this year. The chairwoman of the advisory group, Professor Louise Newman, said she was concerned that a political view could be held against a health worker. IHMS spokeswoman Melissa Lysaght said last night that staff were entitled to political opinions but needed to work in a team environment. ''In fact, that is not a reason for terminating someone, because everyone is entitled to a political opinion,'' Ms Lysaght said. ''In hindsight, the phrasing of the letter was incorrect.'' She said the woman had been sacked for professional standards reasons, after working there for two weeks. Amanda Gordon, of the Australian Psychological Society, said yesterday there was clear scientific evidence of the harm caused by indefinite detention, which ''exacerbates trauma, and creates mental illness, in contravention of the government's own commitment to reduce it''. Australian Medical Association president Steve Hambleton said yesterday his attack on the mandatory detention policy at the AMA's parliamentary dinner this week had been prompted by ''terrible stories'' being reported by paediatricians and psychiatrists who went inside detention centres. Dr Paul Bauert, director of paediatrics at the Royal Darwin Hospital, said children as young as four and five had been caught up in hunger strikes that their parents were involved in, and were treated at his hospital. ''They weren't eating and required intravenous and gastric drips,'' he said.

August 17, 2011 IT News
Australia's Department of Immigration has blamed IT systems for delays in turning over detailed information on serious incidents recorded at detention centres to a parliamentary inquiry. The Joint Select Committee on Australia's Immigration Detention Network, established 16 June and convened for the first time last night, received 597 pages of data [pdf] from the department on incidents recorded at detention facilities since January 2008. It had sought from the department copies of all incident reports filed by immigration facility managers Serco and health services provider International Health and Medical Services (IHMS). The department said it had received 9157 incident reports from Serco between 1 October 2009 and the 30 June 2011. These were recorded in a Compliance, Case Management, Detention and Settlement (CCMDS) portal. The department also received 1869 reports from G4S, a firm that managed detention centres before Serco was contracted. G4S incidents were recorded in a "legacy system" called the Immigration Services Information System (ISIS). The department claimed there was no quick way of accessing incident reports, such as use of a batch process for extraction. "It would take a departmental officer approximately 919 hours of work (this is equivalent to around 25 weeks of work for a full time officer) to extract all reports from the system as each report needs to be extracted individually," the department said. Instead, the department produced a spreadsheet that aggregated every incident recorded according to tags such as "escape", "voluntary starvation" and "self-harm". The department said that getting to IHMS incident reports prior to January 2010 was difficult because they were not electronically recorded at this time. Alleged abuse against staff -- The committee had also sought detailed data on actions taken by Serco for incidents where the contractor's or department's staff had been allegedly abused or threatened "by detainees or other persons within the Detention Network". Department figures showed Serco recorded 871 instances of "alleged or observed inappropriate behaviour... towards Serco staff" until 30 June this year. "Action taken by Serco in relation to these incidents are recorded in multiple systems depending upon the nature of the incident," the department noted. "The very detailed information sought in the [committee's] question is not readily available in consolidated form and it would be a major task to collect and assemble it. "In order to report on the outcome for each incident, the department would need to manually interrogate these systems. "The department estimates that this would take a departmental officer an average of 30 minutes for each incident. This equates to approximately 58 working days." Figures that were released by the department showed the number of detainees hospitalised, treated for starvation and injuries from self-harm.

August 17, 2011 The Age
THE full extent of despair and unrest in Australia's immigration detention centres has been exposed, with documents showing 1507 detainees were hospitalised in the first six months of this year, including 72 psychiatric hospital admissions, and 213 treated for self-inflicted injuries. The documents, released to a parliamentary committee by the Department of Immigration, also show more than 700 detainees were treated for ''voluntary starvation''. And it emerged that police had been notified 264 times of possible criminal behaviour in detention centres. The figures were released as Australia's top immigration bureaucrat last night urged MPs to rethink mandatory detention of asylum seekers and asked whether the hardline policy actually deterred boat arrivals. In an extraordinary opening address to the inquiry last night, Andrew Metcalfe, secretary of the Department of Immigration and Citizenship, urged a more flexible approach. The inquiry was instigated by the opposition and Greens, and has begun to lift the veil on the secretive private contractor, Serco, that runs Australia's detention centres. Hundreds of pages of data supplied to the inquiry by the department include the time and nature of every recorded incident inside the nation's 19 detention centres. However, Serco is refusing to state how many staff it employs at each centre, claiming this is sensitive. The department told last night's hearing that Serco was not required under its contract to meet any staff-to-detainee ratios. Mr Metcalfe said Serco was refusing to disclose its staffing ratios because it was concerned detainees would find out. Last night's hearing was also told that Serco had been fined every month in 2010-11 for failing to meet contract goals. Serco has reported 871 instances of inappropriate behaviour towards its staff, and 700 instances of inappropriate behaviour between detainees. There have been five substantiated complaints against staff - but no resulting dismissals. In June alone, there were 135 critical incidents across the network, covering multiple serious injuries, assaults, two escapes and self-harm. Christmas Island is particularly plagued by suicide attempts. There were 620 self-harm incidents there in the year to June, including 193 actual acts, 31 serious attempts and 476 threatened acts. The island's four detention centres were over capacity on 27 occasions. Hunger strikes were reported at most centres, and at least 17 cases of children starving themselves were noted in the past year. The surge in incidents began in mid-2010, coinciding with a rise in boat arrivals. Opposition immigration spokesman Scott Morrison said the data revealed the detention system had collapsed, with the government sitting ''in policy denial'' while centres filled. Greens senator Sarah Hanson Young said she wanted more details, including the daily cost of operating the network. Mr Metcalfe said rising unrest, self-harm and suicide were unfortunate and sad, but ''defy simple solutions''.

August 11, 2011 ABC
The report details a system unable to respond to serious threats like April's riots in Sydney's Villawood detention centre. ABC1's Lateline has been given exclusive access to a wide-ranging report delivered by Comcare, the Federal Government's workplace safety agency. It paints a picture of systemic under-training of staff and a lack of preparation to deal with the constant threat of violence, protests and self-harm. The revelations come as yet another boat carrying 100 asylum seekers arrives on Christmas Island, adding to overcrowding at the detention centre there. The Comcare report is scathing about overcrowding issues set to worsen with the new arrivals. Once inside the detention centre the latest arrivals face a system that places them and their guards in danger, according to the Comcare report. The report identifies five major failures by the Department of Immigration across the detention centre network: •There is no risk management process, despite the highly volatile environment. •There is no plan to alter staffing levels to deal with dramatic fluctuations in detainee numbers. •Staff are not trained to the point where they are confident and competent in their jobs. •There is no effective written plan to deal with critical incidents like riots and suicide attempts. •And no steps are taken to manage detainees' religious and cultural needs, detainees are roomed together even when there's a history of extreme violence between their ethnic groups in their homes countries. The Federal Opposition obtained the report under freedom of information. "There are system-wide failures in the detention network and I think that's what this report bares out, and I think it totally justifies the Coalition's call for a parliamentary inquiry into the detention network," Opposition immigration spokesman Scott Morrison said. The report details a system unable to respond to serious threats to life and limb like April's riots in Sydney's Villawood detention centre. "There were clear indicators (that Villawood staff advise were present at the time) that the riots were reasonably foreseeable. Despite the apparent clear indications, no critical incident plans were in place for staff to follow, should such a situation occur," the report said. The report backs up claims made by guards at detention centres that proper training is not provided. "Basically, from what I've seen, the new recruits were just basically put on the floor, no training whatsoever, they were being told that they would be trained as they were," a Serco guard said. Serco is the company which runs the detention network on behalf of the Immigration Department. The lack of training has led to serious ramifications identified in the Comcare report, which details how Serco staff are thrown into situations of extreme risk with little idea of how to respond. "Serco staff provided information about the level of serious assaults on staff, witnessing the deaths of detainees and the distress of having to deal with it. Staff also advised of feeling inadequately trained and the lack of instruction and supervision/support during times of critical incidents," the report said. 'Damning report' Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young says the report is damning. "They don't have access it seems in this report [to] a clear plan for dealing with self-harm and suicide, the report is very damning of a lack of management and management plans for incidents, and so they are left to their own devices," she said. "This report is quite damning [in] that there is a culture of non-disclosure, a culture of secrecy, total lack of transparency and what we see is we don't know how many cases of self-harm there are, how many incidents that have had to be escalated to different levels." But Immigration Department spokesman Sandi Logan says Comcare has "ignored and made errors" in terms of the training the department is doing "around cultural awareness, training around detention operations and training of case managers". Lateline recently obtained a log of incidents in the Christmas Island detention centre detailing up to 12 incidents of self-harm or attempted suicide per day. The Comcare report suggests the number could be higher, as could other dangerous events: "... there is (a) level of under-reporting of notifiable incidents in accordance with s68 of the OHS Act." Mr Logan rejects the suggestion that there is under-reporting of incidents in the immigration detention network. "What in fact there have been at times is where there have been serious incidents that have occurred is we have had to wait for the full medical report, the legal report, any police investigation into that incident before it's been brought to Comcare's attention," Mr Logan said. Comcare told Lateline it has identified a number of potential breaches by the Immigration Department of the Occupational Health and Safety Act. It says the department has got until Monday week to respond, or face the possibility of a $250,000 fine. The report also details attempts by the Immigration Department to hamper investigations into its safety performance. Mr Logan rejects any suggestion there was a lack of cooperation by the department. "We would reject any suggestion that we did not cooperate with Comcare. I think there may have been some miscommunication on a couple of occasions," Mr Logan said. A parliamentary inquiry will look into the immigration detention centre network next Tuesday.

July 13, 2011 The Australian
THE company running Australia's immigration detention centres is incurring unsustainable fines from the Department of Immigration for breaches of its $712 million contract, according to a leaked email from Serco's senior operations manager at the Christmas Island detention centre. An escape on July 1 -- about three months after Australian Federal Police were sent to bolster the security at the centre and insist that electric perimeter fences be switched on -- is the latest in a string of breaches that will cost Serco dearly. The company last week appointed a full-time security manager to prevent further escapes. Guards are now stationed on the perimeter of the centre under beach umbrellas on 12-hour shifts, complaining it is too hot and that shade falls on the other side of the fence for several hours each day. Serco's senior operations manager for the detention centre, Steve Southgate, addressed colleagues about continued breaches in an email last Monday. "We can no longer remain where we are," he said. "We are getting fined for things that should have been completed. We are getting fined for not paying attention to the detail. We are getting fined for not doing what we have said we will do. We need to change our culture to a proactive culture and get ourselves out of this reactive blame culture." Mr Southgate arrived on the island after mass breakouts, unrest and rioting in March that led to the AFP taking over the centre temporarily. Those incidents are likely to have resulted in substantial fines -- called abatements -- for Serco, though the firm's contract stipulates that fines are capped at 5 per cent of whatever the company gets paid that month for running the centre where the breaches occurred. The 5 per cent cap does not apply if the breaches are deemed "significant or continuous".

May 25, 2011 ABC
The Immigration Department says riots at the Christmas Island and Villawood detention centres are estimated to have caused about $9 million in damage. A number of buildings were destroyed during violent protests at both centres earlier this year. Department spokeswoman Fiona Lynch-Magor told a Senate hearing the company that runs the centres, Serco, will make an insurance claim for the damage. "We've made some early assessments of what we think those costs will be with our insurer," she said. "But Serco will be pursuing the insurance with their own insurer." The Immigration Department also says there were not enough federal police on Christmas Island to arrest asylum seekers who escaped from the detention centre during protests earlier this year. A large group of asylum seekers broke through the detention centre fence during the riots and the Senate hearing heard they were offered a lift back to the detention centre. Department spokeswoman Jackie Wilson says it was not possible to arrest the group. "The numbers of police on the island and the need to secure the airport as a priority did not enable us to have sufficient AFP on the island to do that," she said. "We were trying to do it in a peaceful way which required working with the clients rather than using AFP, which were being used for another purpose at the time." The Opposition says the lack of federal police left the island in a vulnerable position. Opposition immigration spokesman Scott Morrison says it backs his argument for a parliamentary inquiry into the detention network. "[It's] very concerning that there were not sufficient police on the island when things broke out," he said. "What makes [this] worse is the department confirmed that the number and type of incidents were escalating and getting more serious, which was a clear indication that things were ... [the] temperature was rising and things were getting out of hand." The Government has already established a number of inquiries into the detention network.

May 25, 2011 The Daily Telegraph
THE contrast in lifestyle could not be more stark. The man in charge of Australia's detention centres lives in this Sydney Harbour waterfront apartment - a world away from detainees living in overcrowded conditions just 30km away at the Villawood detention centre. David Campbell, the boss of Serco, lives in the $2.5 million three-bedroom apartment at McMahons Point. With estimates the highly-secretive Serco will make $1 billion from running detention centres until 2014, it is expected, with bonuses, that Mr Campbell's salary will only rise. Locals said apartments in the block featured only the best finishes: Spanish stone on the kitchen floors, eucalyptus granite on benchtops, stone-finished bathrooms and myrtle-veneer finishes for kitchens. Mr Campbell does not own the property, but local sources said a typical rent for the apartment would be $2000 a week. The apartment block is heavily secured - at the same time our detention centres have suffered some well-publicised breaches in recent months. A report this month by Amnesty International suggested that overcrowding at the Serco-run detention centres was a problem. Even Serco admitted that with boat people arriving in record numbers, there were "significant pressures on the operation of detention facilities". But the only boat people Mr Campbell is likely to see at his McMahons Point pad are the yachtie and motor cruiser set, with eight marina berths exclusively used by residents. And there is no sign he will have to vacate his luxury quarters in the near future.

May 6, 2011 Big Pond
A Christmas Island detention centre guard has accused management of a series of cover-ups. The guard said Serco, a private company that runs Australia's detention centres, was keeping the immigration department in the dark about the problems it faces at its facilities. Choosing to remain anonymous, he told ABC television on Thursday a management officer shredded a report detailing an incident in which he was attacked. 'You might get an unruly detainee, and Immigration will say Oh no, you can't do anything, you can't touch him' even if he pushes you, shoves ya, you just look at him,' the guard said. 'If you write him up, sometimes it goes into Bin 13 - and that's it.' He said Bin 13 was code among staff for the shredder. Asked if such cover-ups were a regular occurrence, he replied: 'I'd say so.' The man also accused Serco of inflating staff numbers and having guards on the rosters that didn't exist. 'Yep, they're not on the island, but they're on the roster.' The guard said he and his colleagues sometimes would go to work drunk, but were never punished because of the worker shortage. The ABC broadcast statements from two other Serco guards who agreed staff numbers were low. One said that during a riot in February, there had been 15 guards watching over 2500 detainees. Serco has been contacted for comment. The cover-up claims come as Immigration Minister Chris Bowen was forced to rebuke his department for not alerting him to the discovery of a homemade bomb at Sydney's Villawood Detention Centre. He conceded he should have been alerted when the primitive device was found in March, just a month before a riot and major fire broke out, damaging nine buildings.

March 2, 2011 ABC
The company in charge of Australia's detention facilities has been fined for a series of escapes by detainees. The Immigration Department claims Serco has breached the contract conditions to run the detention centres, with almost 50 detainees escaping since June 2009 and 35 still on the run. The fines are reported to exceed $4 million, but the Government has refused to comment. Yesterday Opposition spokesman Scott Morrison said an escape from Sydney's Villawood detention centre was a sign of a system in crisis. On Tuesday morning a Fijian national being held at the facility after his visa had been cancelled managed to escape. Six other men also attempted to flee the centre but were stopped by staff. The department ordered an investigation into the escape.

February 19, 2011 ABC
The Immigration Department says there are 16 people still missing from the country's detention centres after they escaped during the past year. The Department says there has been 41 escapes from detention centres across the country between July 2010 and January this year. Twenty-five people have been found but officials have no idea where the remaining 16 are. A spokeswoman for the Minister for Immigration says the Government considers any escapes from detention to be unacceptable. She says the company contracted to run the centres, Serco, has been fined for several escapes, saying the breakouts have been a breach of the contract conditions. The Government says if further action is required against Serco, it will not hesitate to act. It says the number of escapes has decreased significantly compared to 10 years ago.

January 13, 2011 Streatham Guardian
The escape of a dangerous prisoner from a Wimbledon court has sparked an investigation – as magistrates voiced concerns about security at the building. Private security firm Serco, which is contracted to escort prisoners appearing at Wimbledon Magistrates’ Court, has said it will examine how he was able to climb out of the dock to go on the run for 11 days before handing himself in to the police in Battersea on Friday. The man, who was not handcuffed when he appeared in the locked dock last Monday after his arrest in Wandsworth, climbed on to a bench before hauling himself over a plastic wall that supposedly sealed the dock from the rest of court number one. The escape of the 21-year-old from West Norwood prompted police appeals, in which the public were told he was dangerous and should not be approached. He had just been told he was to be kept in custody for two months before facing three charges of robbery, allegedly stealing cash and electrical equipment in Merton and Wandsworth last year, and one of carrying a bladed weapon. One magistrate at the Alexandra Road court said they heard there was not enough security in the court building on the day of the escape. They said: “If he was on the loose I would have to dive under the table.”

November 1, 2010 BBC
Outsourcing group Serco has abandoned plans to pass on the impact of government spending cuts to suppliers. Serco, which carries out a host of government contracts, had asked its largest suppliers to pay a 2.5% rebate. The company said it now wished to "apologise unreservedly" to its suppliers, and had retracted letters asking for the rebate. The government is reported to have been angered by Serco seeking rebates from its suppliers, but has yet to comment. Serco upbeat despite cuts drive Serco operates a number of public sector contracts on behalf of the government and local authorities. These include running four prisons including Doncaster, the maintenance of a number of RAF bases including Brize Norton, and the operation of London's Docklands Light Railway. Shares in the firm were down 6% in morning trading on the London Stock Exchange, making it the biggest faller on the FTSE 100 index.

October 20, 2010 International Business Times
Federal authorities confirmed on Thursday that an investigation is underway on alleged security loopholes in Darwin's immigration facilities following the lapses that occurred last month, which was punctuated by a peaceful protest of detained immigrants who sprung out from the centre. An Immigration Department spokesman admitted that the Northern Territory Licensing Commission is conducting an inquiry on Serco, which was tasked by the department to provide for security on the detention facilities. The same official told AAP that Serco is delegating some of its responsibilities to MSS Security though he stressed that the Immigration Department has ensured that the security firm was duly reminded to only employ trained and licensed personnel and comply with all relevant laws. The spokesman also revealed that some former MSS Security employees were facing compliance actions and Serco has been cooperative so far with the ongoing investigation, which came following series of incidents in the past few months where asylum seekers rioted in the facilities, vandalised the centre and staged a protest action after breaking out of detention. Meanwhile, federal opposition immigration spokesman Scott Morrison warned that the government would be made responsible if allegations of unlicensed workers were made to man the immigration centre were proven true. Mr Morrison told ABC that the government cannot put the entire blame on security contractors since it has the ultimate responsibility as he stressed that "the government must ensure that that licensed operators are only ever used in the care and supervision of people who are being detained by the state."

May 23, 2010  The Daily Telegraph
Under the scheme, the publicly-funded broadcaster handed over footage to inmates who earn just £30 a week rather than members of its own 23,000 staff. Convicts at a privately run Category B jail, the second-highest security level, transferred tapes of old television shows to computer to save them for posterity. Senior staff in the BBC’s archives department visited the jail to watch the work in progress while meetings were held to discuss a landmark deal for the prisoners to digitise all 1million hours of programmes in its vaults. Fearful about the controversy the scheme could cause, the BBC never discussed it publicly and even the broadcasting union, Bectu, was unaware of it. Details were obtained by this newspaper through a Freedom of Information request that took more than four months rather than the usual 20 working days. The BBC insists that it has not given any money to Serco, the private jail operator, for the secret scheme nor signed any contracts, following the pilot project last year. However emails disclosed by the corporation show that it had shown considerable interest in the innovative project proposed by Serco, which runs four prisons in England. The BBC owns more than 1m hours of historic content, some of it decades old and at risk of being lost. It employs 66 people to look after it, at a cost of £5m a year, in its Information and Archives department. The corporation estimates it would take 10 years to safely copy all 100m items in its collection into longer-lasting digital formats. In December 2008 it was approached by Serco to become involved in Artemis – Achieving Rehabilitation Through Establishing a Media Ingest Service – a new project for prisoners to transfer archive documents to computers. Serco said it would provide “high-quality employment” and the chance of an NVQ qualification for inmates and HMP Lowdham Grange, a 628-capacity jail near Nottingham all of whose inmates are serving at least four years. The firm said this would mean it could provide a “stable work force”. The BBC was told it would prove a “very cost-effective” way of digitising its archive, and several meetings were organised to discuss plans. Managers agreed to hand over 20 hours of old videos, including episodes of Horizon and Earth Story, so prisoners could transfer them to computer and also add “meta-data” – typed detailed descriptions of the footage to help producers search through it more easily. The British Library and National Archives also provided material for the pilot project. In September last year, five members of BBC staff visited the jail, where a production workshop had been built, and were reported to be “pleased” with what they saw of the prisoners’ work and enthusiasm. However David Crocker, the driving force behind the scheme at Serco, admitted: “The major concern was around the potential negative newspaper headlines that the BBC may attract.” The company did discuss the scheme with one newspaper and one trade magazine but made no reference to the BBC’s involvement. In November, Mr Crocker told the BBC: “I can’t thank you enough for finding a project